i think the reason they stop at the 3rd day bc they were scared by that cannonball lol

The subtitles are for people who don't understand the language. This is about expecting a better quality of sound. If people aren't told about this then they never know.

Charles Rablin i

Agreed. The music has to go. It's counterproductive. Anachronistic with many style breaks. Immature. Boring, so very boring to not have the possibility to think on history while the nerves are attacked by audio emissions polluting the environment.

Damn 10 yrs old comment

Probably better than both, especially compared with Cassar. Caesar fought barbarians who couldn't even form proper ranks. Alexander had advantage of superior tactics and troops, plus he relied on his bravery to route Darius III. Napoleon on the other hand fought on even technology and tactics.

Lin Tora Alexander inherited his father's accomplishments mainly uniting Greece. However, Napoleon started with nothing.

Lin Tora That's not fair. Although Caesar did fight barbarians, mainly Gauls. However, he did fight against other great generals (Pompeus Magnus) with similar technology while being outnumbered. (Battle of Pharsalus) He also defeated the Egyptians who weren't mere barbarians. Truth be told my favorite tactician was the Carthaginian Hannibal. His ability to envelop an army far bigger than his is amazing (Battle of Cannae), and his ability to use his diverse army of different styles of soldiers from among different nation peoples shows his leadership credentials.

Aaron Smith I see your point. However, I still think no tacticians can hold candles to Napoleon. He fought over 60 battles and that's unmatched by any tactician;. He said himself that his dominance in battlefield will be over in 6 years in 1806. If he had died in 1809 before Aspen-Esling battle, he would have had 100% winrate with over 30 battles at his hand. Khālid ibn al-Walīd also fought numerous battles undefeated, but many of his battle records are questionable.

TheLandOfTears s Caesar? Okay, although Caesar probably fought more pitched battles and battles with a slimmer margin for error. Alexander? Nope.

That comment made my afternoon.

Dynasty warriors music awesome what you talking bout Willis

if only davout was at the 1813 campaign

@@derpynerdy6294 that was a napoleon blunder, napoleon fall’s like a domino and it starts with the continental system, that brought him in spain and that in to austria 1809 when he lose lannes and saint hilaire. Beacause of the system he invade russia, all this disgrace because of a commercial system that not work and no one wanted except napoleon

@@andreiadornelles5021 true true

Fucking music .

How is possible for your grandfather to have been Austrian (since you said he fought at Aspern-Essling which was French vs Austrians), Russian (since the battles of Smolensk and Borodino occurred between Napoleon's French army and the Russian army under Barclay de Tolly and Kutuzov respectively) and lastly British (or maybe Dutch or Prussian since at Waterloo the French army under Napoleon clashed with the Anglo-Allied Army under Wellington and the Prussian army under Marshal Blücher). Your grandfather seemed to have been a great adventurer.

By that day, nationality meant nothing. You could enroll in any army. The main question is how to survive. :)

moderate terms was to leave lot of conquered place by France. Napoleon refuse, he couldnt accept that his soldier had died for nothing

Not at all. Napoleon and everyone then and now knows that the Prag peace would have never been respected for long. The Allied never respected their talk. Amiens treaty was fast surrounded by the English which have paid ALL the coalitions against France. France did mostly defensive wars in which when you won when you're attacked, forcely, you obtained alot from the attackers. Prag treaty was to earn time to allies to bring all their troops in Germany for the decisive battle of Leipzig which was a strategic win for allied but a very poor one. Outnumbering greaatly the French, especially when some french allies switch side in the night. Napoleon was encircled at Leipzig, he had an alone job, inflict a big number of casualties to the allies and eventually, escape from the trap with his army... The battle of leipzig is then a tactival victory for the french because they inflicted twice more casualties to an enemy 2,5 times then 3 times superior to him (after defections) and because most of the army was saved, permitting the masterpiece of the Campaign of France 1814. France was exhausted by 25 years of civil war inside, and 20 years of war outside mostly because of England. would have england not financed the coalitions, there wouldn't have been the wars after 1802 amiens treaty. The fun of the thing is that despite 200+ years of anlo-sphere misinformations about Napoleon, trying to make him the ogre and the villain, the wars of this period, the Revolution and napoleonic wars when it should be the Kings and english wars. The invasion of both Spain and Russia has done only because England is the one whicch bothered the continent... I would recal that originally, the English almost democracy (at least the one which were the nearest to be considered as a democracy, USA excluded) fought a people which had decided to govern by his own and decided to help all other despotes of those times : King of Prussia, Russian Tsar, Austrian Emperor and many other lower kingdoms. English even paid and made manouevres that Murat and Bernadotte had to make war against their own people... But finally, Napoleon is an icon all around the world. and the Battle of leipzig which was felt in those time the end of Napoleon aura in Europe was in fact the beginning of the legend, because the battle of the 20 nations has waken up the europeans nations. italians remember Napoleon as the guy which fired the local Kings and the austrian dominator, it was sure completed by the intervention of the french under Napoleon IIIrd... but the feeling of a complete italy was born under Napoleon, and the ideals of the french revolution speaded all around Europe and that for long after the fall of the French. The reunification of the wesr germany (confederation du Rhin) originally a french idea done by Napoleon conducted in german minds in the raise of german Nation. etc... who remember William Pitt ? only historians... who remember Napoleon ? most of european countries and northern america... and I am pretty sure many in latin america and some in africa have heard about him... most of the modern democracies have adopted more or less the Napoleon Code from Portugal to Poland. Even England adopted his code of the property... the legations he let are absolutely incredible : masses de granit, the meeritocraty, the civil code, the code of porperty, the judicial system, the univerisies system, the military warfare (still learn nowadays and some precepts he invented still in use practically speaking). He may jhave lost of the field, but surely not in the minds !

Alex De not here lol