Hi, is this channel for sale? I would like to buy it

Most underrated battle

To promote the German city of Ulm, also the site of one of Napoleon's famous victories. Gwen Stefani's 2004 hit What You Waiting For could be used, via a simple reworking of the chorus, removing the oh's and turning them into Ulm. Wunderbar.

Excellent.

background music sucks and too loud.

W

Muslim army led by Khalid ibn al walid was 40000 vs 240000 byzantines..Muslims were very small in number, slowly Islam was growing and people accepting Islam..They fought against the existing super powers of their time and crushed both Persian and Roman empire..

An EXTREMELY important thing to remember about this battle is battlefield knowledge. The environs around Leuthen happened to be a location where the Prussian army had previously trained extensively. It is almost certain that Frederick knew every village and every significant hill and ridge in the battlefield area. He KNEW that he could march his troops out of sight of the Austrians to the south and then put themselves on the flank without them being any the wiser. He KNEW where to put his big guns for maximum effect. He KNEW where to move his cannons when the Austrians packed themselves in the village (the Austrians packed themselves so deeply in the village that any cannon shot, solid ball or case shot, that hit anywhere near where they were aiming was going to do devastating physical and morale damage). It seems like something that really doesn't need to be explained nowadays, but battlefield knowledge just was not emphasized back in this era of war. It's largely what contributed to Napoleon's successes. Napoleon was a good tactician, yes, but his great strength was his pouring over maps and the ability to remember them in the heat of battle. When you know the battlefield, you know what paths are available to you and your opponent and, more importantly, which are not. Motion and maneuvers of forces become a lot easier to do and anticipate when you know the terrain. It's probably why Napoleon took such a liking to this battle: "This Battle is a masterpiece of movement, or maneuvers and of resolution; enough to immortalize Friedrich, and rank him among the greatest Generals. Manifests, in the highest degree, both his moral qualities and his military."

So many Georgians died in that battle 😢

Juepucta que btalla tan hijuepucta cuando las armas aun no se conocian mucho

Amazing!

Carthaginian infantry were class especially the Libyan infantry, and history sometimes makes out that Roman legionaries were miles superior and Carthage just had a rabble of barbarian mercenaries. They were actually loyal and very well trained Carthage's biggest downfall for me was they never had any competent leaders apart from Hannibal in their history.

Change the music, it really doesn't go well to talk over!

bro i live in kohima i go to forst every week and see ancient british hq and helemets and gun that are coverd with dirt

If you are going do a historical vlog about another country AT LEAST TAKE THE TIME TO LEARN HOW TO SPEAK THE LANGUAGE TO PRONOUNCE NAMES AND PLACES. THIS IS PAINFUL TO LISTEN TO & COMPLETELY INSULTING. GET IT RIGHT YANKS

He lost battle of muttah

250k+ Romans against 40k muslims

No wonder why they beat the crap out of us, you can only make so many mistakes prior to and during the first engagement. They could have learned a thing or two from Caesar.

Alexander the Ordinary lost to the Mighty Punjabi Khatri Porus and his warriors. All modern historians have concluded that. Old historians falsely claim that Alexander won. As shown in the Hollywood movie, Alexander's horse got hit by Porus's javelin and Alexander fell on the ground. There he got hit by an arrow. When Porus approached him and almost was about to crush him with the elephant's foot, his soldiers came running to his rescue to save him and raised a white flag to surrender. His horse died and he signed a truce to not return in future and requested Porus not to mention his defeat to anyone. Porus kept that promise. Prior to him Cyrus, Darius, Syrian Queen Semiramis all lost to the Mighty Punjabi Khatris and retreated back to their home. Semiramis came to conquer India with 400,000 soldiers and returned home with only 20,000 soldiers.

There was to be no Miracle of Dunkirk as the Soviet Red Army and Marines tried to retreat for Krasnodar and they were heavily attacked and sunk by German Infantry and Luftwaffe Stukas.

I'm far too late but: Its important to say, that the Grande Armée was never in a better shape than in 1805. The Regiments at full strenght, highly moralized, well trained, rested and with competent corps and division commanders.

The principles of this strategy are simple 1. Present a small decoy force in an obvious invasion route. The enemy thinks it is the main enemy effort (Army Group A and B in Belgium and Netherlands, battle of France) 2. A main army would manoeuvre through a difficult terrain in a swinging motion, to surround the enemy facing the decoy force (Army Group C in Ardennes)

Great video

any good book about the ULM ? can you advice anything considering tectics and economical view?

Please. I'm begging you to remove the Guitar music from the video.

The number of Byzentine soldiers in this battle was well over 120,000, if not 200,0000. Where did you reference this 40,000?

Not "Cal-vary", "Caval-ree"!!!

Bir ordu onbin kişi bile olsa , yandan on kişi kuvvetindedir.( Japon atasözü)

Fake. About 200,000 Roman's. Stop spreading fake European propaganda.

2.26 The gangster arrives

Please come back

Cut the inappropriate music. It's also too loud.

Worst music ever makes the videos unwatchable

Charles basically got his arse kicked by Frederick.....

The metal shreds too bad the link doesn't work anymore it is VERY 2000's!!

A good movie. More about fencing, training and weapons of the European cavalry in the 18th century in my book kzfaq.info/get/bejne/odSUeKlirqvDl30.html

Good description, thank you!

I'm fucking dying laughing at the beginning where she just starts presenting and then WHAM! [queue Insane guitar solo]

can you be any more boring or the animation any more delayed in describing the action? It seems like a decisive battle by a great general in Khalid but the description and animation are so lifeless. It looks like the women were the decisive force in both spurring on the men and in taking up arms and defending themselves against the Byzantine assault. Amazing.

actually this is not where leuthen is (map 0:49) its not even near silesia XD

Its false history.because Alexander had wanted conquer the world then how he returned.because he seriously injured by porus and defeated by porus.

Doesn't have the polish of BazBattles

Hi there, Jonathan, I'd be very interested in re hosting this content if you are not making any more vids. These have been most excellent. plz email me @ [email protected]

By winning the Battle of Quebec, the English won Canada but ultimately lost the 13 Colonies. I don't know if they won on the exchange. What is certain, that the British government lacked common sense and foresight, but they were blinded by an anti Catholicism and an exacerbated nationalism, they wanted at all costs to do battle with France. In the mid-eighteenth century from the English point of view, remaining at peace with France was out of the question, as English superiority was evident in America, whether in demographic, military or naval terms. Remained in peace, was equated with treason. The reality was that the French were not a serious threat to the English colonies because Canada, unlike the 13 colonies, was sparsely populated, and the royal navy, which dominated the sea, could at any time isolated Canada by blocking it. help that France could send. On the contrary, the French had their uses in America, they were like a scarecrow! In so much war, by isolated raids, (which had no influence on the course of the war) in the company of Indian auxiliaries, they put pressure on the colonists by spreading death and terror, constantly reminding the colonists that they needed the crown. This terror allowed the unity of the settlers behind the king. As long as the French were there, the settlers depended on the king for their protection, the fear they inspired and the military dependence of the settlers ensured the complete loyalty of the settlers. You make this fear disappear, you also make their dependence and their loyalty disappear. Because no longer having a French threat, the king and his soldiers were no longer useful to the colonists, on the contrary even by prohibiting the colonists from settling beyond the Appalachians (royal proclamation of 1763), by attributing the valley of the 'ohio to the French of Canada and by claiming taxes to cover the expenses of the war, the crown had become an obstacle and an unnecessary burden that they no longer needed to bear. If the British had not gone to war against France or if Wolf had lost the Battle of Quebec it is almost certain that there would not have been American independence and the thirteen colonies would have remained English colonies like Canada or Australia until the beginning of the 20th century.

That victory was incredible, but in my opinion Frederic's tactical genius was only a half of success. He wouldn't have done these astonishing manouvers without the outstanding discipline of prussian soldiers. Back then only prussian army was able to pull off moves which required so much speed of march and so much precision. The other thing was that austrians had screwed up really bad. No recon, quick assumptions and lack of knowledge about your enemy...

Clear and efficient presentation

thanks mate this is very good, reading a book about napoleon and its good to watch these kind of videos as i go along

Byzantine empire is a posthumous name for the eastern Roman Empire, they always called themselves the eastern Roman Empire and the western empire was always the western Roman Empire

Good

Battle of Yarmouk is true ...but I think Khalid Ibn Al Walid did not exist...he was just a made up symbol of the undefeated Muslim leader or he was a symbol of the Islamic sword