....but you didn't create anything here. You just uploaded someone else's work.

@@adambane1719 indeed. Had he even bothered to create subtitles, THAT would have been something. I mean, what about the -- I don't know -- 8 or 9 of us who might have been lured to this video by the fact that the title is in English, discover that the clip is in Japanese and has no subtitles, and DON'T SPEAK THE LANGUAGE? Let him fix THAT litle oversight before asking for money.

@@adambane1719 Ññppppppñññrabo

4⁴​@@adambane1719

Americans never allowed Japanese to make such movies again . They had to contend with bringing movies like Ton Cruise in Last Samurai .

our men are running from the battlefield, shameful display!

LOL

Oh my god.. I can hear his voice inside my head..

my lord a victory will soon be ours

I’m playing this game😂

OUR MEN ARE RUNNING FROM THE BATTLEFIELD, MY LORD. A SHAMEFUL DISPLAY!

a *cutting* blow

We must defeat clan oda this port is ours !

@@BOCBUD and we shall be white castles in every town. We shall destroy the nasty McDonald's.

I WANT NO MAN RUNNING FROM THE BATTLEFIELD!

but they did not cry for the thousands of poor slobs that did the actual fighting and died in the process ! lol!

They both will cry if china army marching near them.

@@cohendarwin5365 lol what a stupid comment

@@cohendarwin5365 found the ccp shill

@@machopi ah i found bastard of products Japanese army raped women in ww2. Keep growing your weeaboo spirit.

Its Japan, all functions are as groups. No one gets singled out. Amazing - like their swords, women and art.

Did not know that many of them rode horses.

This was one of the most expensive movies ever produced in Japanese cinema

ニュージーランドで撮影しました。エキストラや馬はニュージーランドで調達しています。

But sadly you are an American colony now with no pride left.

stay away from my cat

😔true

勝頼が滅亡には、川中島一帯は上杉領になるんだよね。

Michael Navarro Way of honor. I thought they were just scared.

yeah, that final scene is beautiful

Shingen planned an envelopment and an ambush against Kenshin. The problem is that kenshin found out about the ambush and went straight to Shingen. This kawanakajima battle was extremely costly for both sides. Something like 30 percent casualties both sides. A literal bloodbath.

Takeda and Shingen were the same person, the other guy was named Kenshin/Kagetora.

Years of battle experience.

Fear the old guy in a profession where people die young

In reality he is, Kenshin is also famous for his brutality and extensive massacre, internal purge and slave trading, though it is a norm for Sengoku Daimyo to trade slaves, but Kenshin and Shigen came out on top as the biggest slavers, but it is true that Shigen is not fool, both are expedient ruler who does not hesitate to loot, pillage and sold captives from conquered territory, in Takeda clan's documents captives are referred as human goods, and they were part of the booty during the designated three day loot and pillage period after battle, in which soldiers can freely loot the surroundings of battlefield.

I agree, a really great Depiction of Shingen, his Tactics and his Army was the original Timeslip/GI Samurai that starred (Sonny) Chiba Shinichi.

@@adambednarek7146 Meaning neither side will win?

Japanese army would likely to lose due to inferior armour and weaponary (Japanese during the early Muromachi period were still not very accustomed to long polearms like pike, while the prominent naginata and nagamaki are not suited for formations, unlike halberd, which is a major weakness), and the lack of heavy cavalry would be devastating, in terms of firearms, european army would have better artillery but Japanese would likely to have more explosives, but even for late Sengoku army it would br difficult to face contemporary European army dur to the lack of cavalry and field artillery, while the Japanese yari tactics are basically useless against pike formations, the only aspect that Japanese army can compete with were muskets, but to be fair, musket by itself are not very effective, and one thing about Sengoku army is the low morale as most soldier were accustomed to fleeing even before battle, it was not uncommon at the time to see an army of 10000 men when call to arms reduced to few thousand because the enemy was said to be outnumbering.

@@fsdds1488 i agree on early muromachi period when army formations and tactics with great numbers not developed much. but in late sengoku period or 16th century,i think probably only major factor is terrain(in japan japanese would win,in europe european woud win). in close combat it would be pretty much even no european melee weapon can penetrate japanese armour and same with japanese.both armours have almost similar weak points and method of killing a knight and samurai are almost same(subdue your opponent with grappling,find weak spot,take him out with dagger?knife?) europe has artillery and advantage because of more experience and development but in mountanious japanese terrain transporting it and deploying it to effective position is very difficult thats why japan didnt use much artillery(and i admit they dont have raw material for that so they have it with trade) same with cavalry(japan s geography is not much suitable for it) sure,japanese had cavalry but not in great numbers(latest research says takeda cavalry is kinda myth they exists but not in great numbers)and development of gunpowder ended cavalry superiority in europe right? and actually japanese are more advantageous with arquebus(its controversial i guess,both sides claim they are the superior)most of the japan is rainy and japanese arquebus are usable in rainy weathers or atleast more durable to rain. by numbers japan slightly outnumbers european army even though europe has more population since japan would be in at least 200 years of civil war so almost every peasent has combat experience(not necessarily in battlefield,most of them independently fought against other villages for survival,if there is a war nearby peasants arm themselves and hunt the defeated warriors for loot) i know europe is also at war but time to time some parts are safe and peaceful what im trying to say is geography decides who wins in general.(sorry for bad english)

Mid to late 1400s? Not even a fair match. The Japanese would simply get stomped by heavy European cavalry while not having counter-meassures like the English longbow or pike formations.

My questions are these: "What era Samurai Army are you talking about?" When I imagine the Japanese art of war at its highest form, I picture the late Sengoku period. If you put a force from that era up against a European army from the mid to late 1400's, I think they might fair better than the other commenters give them credit for. It would not take them long to recognize that the Knights had superior armor, and while that might win the 1st battle for the Europeans, I doubt it could win them the war. There are a number of noted battles where the Japanese employed field-works to negate the advantages of cavalry, creating obstacles behind which arquebusiers and bowmen could cut them down. The other thing to consider is that while movies such as this focus on mounted samurai with yari, a Daimyo could undoubtedly field a sizable force of mounted archers instead. Mounted archers had long been the bane of European Knights, as they could easily evade their charges until the heavy warhorses were blown (out of breath and exhausted). I admit that 14th Century armor is superior at stopping arrows to what the knights of the Crusade-era had, but I would also submit that Japanese longbows had more penetrative power (though certainly not as much as an English longbow). Bullets, however, are another matter... "Where is the European army from?" Not all European armies are identical - an army from 14th Century France is different from 14th Century Sweden, etc, etc. Personally, I think that facing an English army, with its many units of longbows, would prove devastating for the Samurai. But the last thing that must be considered is the critical issue of morale. The Knights were brave (sometimes to the level of foolhardiness) but most of the infantry in the typical European army of the period were ill-trained and unreliable troops. I think the fact that the morale of the Samurai armies was higher over-all, is best illustrated by the very casualty counts reported from this battle (if they can be believed). The Takeda force is said to have suffered 72% killed or wounded, the Uesugi 62%. For a battle where the majority of the losses would have been inflicted in melee, that's appallingly high. To fight on that long without breaking would have been inconceivable for a European force of that period.

エキストラ６万人、馬二万頭を動員したとか

You’re not a historian and don’t ever consider yourself one again

i think it's called, "heaven and earth." i've watched the whole movie. it's spectacular

『天と地と』

Many clans were in feudal Japan. This is from Sengoku period.

Japan is bigger than Great Britain and Germany, and these countries also were divided in feuds/kingdoms.

Around 20 clans or more

Am I tripping or I see a choshu clan

Idk​@@Pillager_666

バブル期の角川映画ですね…当時の社長の角川春樹さんがめちゃくちゃお金をかけた「天と地と」です。

これはカナダで撮影されたんだよ。従って顔の見えない武者はカナダ人。体格も良くて馬乗りも優れた人々が向こうにはたくさんいるからね。 いずれにしても二度とこのような大作は日本では出来ないと思いますよ。

@@osarasan このスーパー資金力を駆使して黒澤明監督に監督してもらいたかったなあ。

i think it's called, "heaven and earth." i've watched the whole movie. it's highly regarded

Well, in that era horse archers were becoming obsolete, guns were taking over... But you would see a lot of foot longbowmen that unfortunately did not make an appearance in this

@@EduardoFerreira-gi7wo they were pushing the horse budget already (last I checked this film had the most horses on film in history) which is why probably why they couldn't afford bows

@@EduardoFerreira-gi7wo Oda Nobunaga would bury the famed Takeda Cavalry at Nagashino using his mastery of the rifle and thus, the Demon King continues his unstoppable rise to power

@@michaelbandada9887 that was after the death of Takeda Shingen . His son Katsuyori fought at Nagashino

@@michaelbandada9887 The incidents of the film 'Kagemusha'?