I totally agree with you.

They’re actually pretty easy to find nowadays on Amazon!

@@techseth Thank you 😊. Are you doing anymore videos?

All these except the Miele in the far right will with to the proteam vac. You just have to make sure it has 32 mm pipe diameter.

Powerhead will definitely out clean any turbohead.

+naturegirl2110 You are correct, the 2 and 4 did the best (4 slightly better). 2 is Electrolux turbo brush and very good considering it is only powered by suction. Turbo brushes are different and some tend to slow down too much when they are used on the shag. 4 is the Miele SEB-217 powerhead and it has separate motor to run it. Miele recommends it for low to medium pile rugs. It's good for shag because brushes in it aren't very aggressive. However on high pile shag it's hard to push and it sinks in to the carpet and causes extra wear to the rug. It cleans very well and also works great on all floors. It's also quite light (being powerhead) and easy to maneuver. There are different opinions what it comes to shag vacuuming. Some recommend just straight suction nozzle and some nozzle with rotating brush. My opinion is that powerhead do the best work on medium pile shag. Straight suction nozzle needs more manual effort and can get tiresome job in the long run.

+naturegirl2110 What it comes to vacuums I would highly recommend Miele or Sebo. Both are quality Made in Germany vacuums and last a long time, are quiet and have excellent filtration.

+naturegirl2110 Here is a great link to the expert testing Miele canister vacuum and SEB-217 powerhead. Go to the 27:30 in the video and watch demonstration of powerhead vs straight suction. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l8qmf7FouMnZkX0.html

ı00p0ķwmo

Then you should get a vorwerk demonstration, then you'll see what a shark misses. Well they all miss actually compared to a vorwerk.

Now I have Kirby G6🤩

The turbo nozzles work will just fine

Turbo nozzles work by turbines inside the head spinning with the air that passes through as you vacuum, which in turn drive belts to turn the brush rolls. So as long as your vacuum has enough working suction it should be able to drive a turbo nozzle. There are turbineless turbo nozzles but they're used for bare floor only.

I think it's one of the best turbo heads. Now they have improved head what spins better under load: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gs2Zo6Sdl92wgqc.html

Vacuumtests I found one that says stb 200-205 stb 201 vario looks like the stb205 I wonder if it’s the same thing?

I got it and seems to slow down when put on a medium pile rug. It’s easier to push than the suction only brush. Also, the sound it makes when pushing it is different than the sound it makes when pulling it back. I don’t get it.

Iris Maldonado creo que es una Miele.

Yes that it is how they work. Powerheads are better, because they don't slow down when they touch the carpet. Turboheads are good if you don't have powerhead connections in your vacuum. They are super light also.

My current AEG Vampyr 402.

What I have is Chinese copy of Wessel Werk TK280. Mine has universal fitting so it should fit to your Rowenta.

@@vacuumtests9225 from amazon? you have a link by chance?

@@arncj18 It's this and fits to all vacuums with 30-37 mm tube: www.amazon.co.uk/Universal-Rotating-Bristles-Siemens-Cleaners/dp/B0088WQCL8

@@vacuumtests9225 thanks

It would win easily.

@@vacuumtests9225 and the wessel werk 360?

@@santouchesantouche2873 I have the Wessel Werk 340 but it has the same performance than the 360. Great full size powerheads. Note that the Miele powerhead in this video is very small.

@@vacuumtests9225 how do you compare the 340 with the et1?

The Miele has exceptionally soft bristles. I even use it on silk rugs. So, I agree, the ET-1 should win hands down.

Yes they are.

I want to know the types and prices

Turbo nozzles work better than straight suction nozzles. However they often slow down quite a lot when using on carpet. Much better option is the powerhead. And yes some bagged vacuums lose airflow very quickly. Paper bags are know to lose airflow quickly. High quality hepa/fleece bags maintain airflow much longer. My old Philips has 93 cfm with empty bag and 78 cfm with full bag. However 78 cfm is more than my Dyson DC40 has (57 cfm). Bagged vacuums are usually more powerful than bagless vacuums. Typical bagless vacuum airflow is around 50-60 cfm and bagged 70-100 cfm.

@@vacuumtests9225 Id be questioning just how good that cloth bag is if it maintains air flow. Doesnt make sense unless its got a lot more fine holes to plug. Bag vacuums need to be more powerful, theyve gotta pull/push that air thru the bag. But you're also vacuuming blind so a lot of soil could be left behind. You just wouldnt know.

@@ronwerner Bags nowadays have much more layers and carefully selected materials. They don't leak dust and performance stays good a long time. Problem with bagless vacuums is the cyclone system. It lowers the airflow a lot because the air has to travel through several bends and small holes.. In the Europe bagged vacuums don't have any bigger motors than bagless vacuums. Bagged vacuums really should have stronger motors due to the huge resistance of the cyclone system.

@@vacuumtests9225 Do you realize how counter intuitive that is. The bags filter more, but they allow more airflow. In other words, they capture finer soil and thus will plug faster, so how can they allow more airflow? I think you meant to say in your last sentence that bagless vacuums need stronger motors. I would agree. I use one that has an 8amp motor. Personally, I'd like to rig up a 3 Stage vac motor with 2" piping to the canister vacuum I use. I would be able to move a little quicker if it had a stronger motor. But having the clear canister is a big advantage. You can see when soil is coming in and then know to slow down. My analogy is trying to push a skill saw faster through plywood. It just aint gonna happen. It will fight you! Vacuum won't fight you but if you're moving too fast you'll leave a lot behind. In some areas you have to slow down and simply let the vacuum do what it was designed to do.

@@ronwerner If you really want deep analysis of this subject you should ask VacLab channel. He is a maths teacher and really knows these things. I have also a lot of real measured data about this subject. Here is videos what you should watch: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qdl9a5eZ1rWupZc.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hsxkqtiQmZi1dWQ.html My videos: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p9lgntCSyMmYoYU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gdpkeKSc0JOUiZs.html

LOL

Vacuumtests XD lol the test was great... I wish there was a turbo nozzle for the Kirby :(

R Cole why you Leaving hate comments

Sorry I thought 💭 you were leaving hate comments 😮

Jason Shields It's not meant to be fair. Purpose of this video is to show how the different type nozzles will perform. It was meant to show how much better power and turbo nozzles are compared to the straight suction nozzles.

This is old video. Nowadays I measure with scale how much each vacuum picks up.

Vacuumtests if you sell vacuuming tools, I am looking for the largest and most effective power head, air or 240v driven.

@@Howie672 Unfortunately I don't sell power or turbo brushes. I have hard time buying them by myself. In my opinion Sebo makes the best powerheads and Wessel Werk best turbo heads.

Vacuumtests thanks mate, advice is much appreciated

Nozzles with the spinning brushes are not meant to be used on the flat surface. Watch my Twinner videos. I have quite many of those vacuuming flat surfaces 🙂👌

@@vacuumtests9225 So we can conclude with that the twinner wins since it is way more versatile and does a pretty good job compared to the others 😀

@@altide8784 Twinner is the best hard floor nozzle what I have used 🙂 For carpets brushroll is needed.

Phil Watson Well now I have Kirby. I think it would be the best. However I really like those Vorwerk vacuums and I probably buy one (Vorwerk Kobold 122)

nice suck dude! check out our slowmo sucks ! your welcome,