battlefield is lightyears ahead of battlebit

@@stride3842 Light-years ahead but with a lot less passengers on the ship.

@@GordonBowater Battlefield has more active players than battlebit atm

@@stride3842You couldn't be more wrong. Just look at the steam Charts - Battlefield 2042 Average Player count last 30 days: 8,149 Battlefield 5 Average Player count last 30 days: 17,470 Battlefield 1 Average Player count last 30 days: 13,512 Battlefield 4 Average Player count last 30 days: 2,002 Battlebit Average player count last 30 days: 47,063 Even combining all recent Battlefield titles gets you to 41,133 players. Nearly 6k shy of Battlebit.

@@sellsjeeps wait until you realize that battlefield isnt only on steam... Battlefield is on multiple game launchers on pc and on all of your modern consoles. Adding all of those equates to more players than battlebit. Also keep in mind battlefield had way more players than battlebit on steam alone right after launch. Battlebit will drop in numbers in the coming weeks and will be a dead game by the end of the year.

Overstate. You can understate and that would be terrible since the game is so amazing. God bless.

Inviting your friends and joining them is SO EASY it made my brain hurt. Crazy that BF couldn't even get that right.

You actually can because there are never any open servers. It usually takes me 15-20 minutes to find a game

@@noahcarr9977try a different game size

Not to mention the ability to run it on a potato. Shit, no dedicated graphics? You can maybe still play it. Other games are demanding an insane amount of VRAM, and here's Battlebit kicking their asses showing that you don't need it.

remember saying this a while ago to some OWI devs for squad and they all got super defensive, like, squad is a good game, but the absolute lack of all progression and a poor new player experience combined with untill recently their random hatred of modded servers made so little sense. Like i understand they want to keep all guns and classes accessable from the start for all players but they 100% need some rising strom vietnam esque appearance progression in the least, i understand its a milsim but that doesnt mean every player needs to look like Random soldier no 63.

genuinely think squad could have filled this battle bit niche if they only realised that having ; smaller fast paced map rotation for some servers / hardcore and casual servers with and without friendly fire and weapon damage changes to help newer players. And a progression system. Those two things would have massively helped them onboard and keep more players.

The games industry hasn't forgotten. It doesn't care. Because the AAA space is now run by money-men and their vampire overlords.

> not "reinventing the wheel" Reviews people, they are reinventing the wheel. Because over time the wheel has had all this unneccessary stuff put on it so that it doesn't spin very well any more. Battlebit has looked at the last 20 years of wheel developments, kept the 5% that have improved the function of the wheel, and discarded 95% of the developments that haven't.

They didn't reinvent the wheel,they just made a damn good one when there weren't many on the market

I just hate how they threaten me with a ban every time i load the game if i talk about any of the topics they banned. Kinda fascist imo, but the game itself is good and i hope it gets better. I get 60fps on a super old laptop. Better fps than minecraft

@@censored4christ162 almost like being toxic and using slurs should be punished?

​@@user-bx9ri2qv3ybro really compared enforcing basic decency to actual fascism 💀

@@LiliumOrientalis ikr lmao

It's a known battlebit fact that you don't get revived if you don't have a wounded voice

same, seems like they have that attitude exactly lol

Reminds me of Thanos. Now if only we can get the finger snap for half the developers to disappear. Lmao

Yeah we are all fed up with those unfinished games. Those predatory action from AAA studios. Only game that I still play and feels still awesome is csgo. I am not excited about new cod or battlefield anymore, haven't been for 5+ years. And 3 people make game, that capture all the fun I had in the past, no bs.

imo what is dragging battlefield (and the majority of AAA titles) is threefold: design by committee, overly large budgets, and public investors expecting massive return on investment on everything their developers push out. design by committee irons out developers' vision to an extent, overly large budgets make publishers wary about investing in new IPs, and investors push for nonsense like microtransactions, season passes, games as a service, etc. the modern environment leaves little room for an agile smallish development studio to put out the game they want. I think the huge scale of the gaming industry has been its downfall

That's the indie game scene for ya!

I've used the VoIP to start spontaneous sing along sessions with enemy players after I've died 😂 I've been taken "prisoner" so many times just because I'm singing and "can keep troops morale up"

This comment has me dying 😂

Soundboard time, I have a bunch of songs

Loaded into my first match and a tank zoomed by blaring the freebird solo. Immediately, I knew this game was gonna be a blast.

@@grimm_8819 shame thats literally bannable. really hope they will add self hosted servers where you cant have your 15$ taken away for messing around on the mic.

@@nonope7592 My youngest brother (17) did the same only he's more into the older sports games. All he plays is 2KFootball and the older NCAA football games. Can't blame him tho really, Madden 23 is complete horse 💩 💩

That's the problem with modern AAA studios. They doing business, not games. But they dont realize, that core of business success is a making a good passionate product. They wasting a tons of money on wrong things instead of wasting just fraction of that on right stuff, because, again, they think as a game entrepreneur, not as a game artists.

⁠c😮 2:27 k 2:27 r😢

Very true. Sucks that we have to endure the lackluster efforts of corporations that do only the bare minimum in order to make a profit. Oh well, gotta love capitalism

Stardew Valley was it for me

Minecraft?

@@SirGrassy that's its own design though. I mostly mean a game in a style that is already established. If you don't make it thag specific, then most good indie games would apply

Factorio, cosmoteer, prison architect

my goto bad graphics fun game is OSRS

@@SirGrassy boring

Part of the problem with Medics in V as well was how they gave them the CQB weapons with the idea that "oh well they're gonna be in the fustercluck Frontlines reviving everyone when they die, should give them a cqb weapon to defend themselves" when in practice it just means all the close quarters sweats will just pick up the class

Laughs in Hell Let Loose

​@@ChungusTheLargeLaughs in unnecessarily complex game mechanics

I loved being a medic in BF4 because it was rewarding. Seeing me with 1.0 or less k/d didn’t matter since I was top of the scoreboard due to revives and heals.

and then when they die to that line of fire some random support player who just finished throwing 17 granades bandages them up and they continue to heal everyone haha

too bad the sweats will be the only people playing the game in like 3 months. but that all FPS games these days

Sounds like a terrible child game

@@RealEvilLordExdeath "To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence. "

​@@RealEvilLordExdeathHave you ever played HLL?

@@reckergamer1879 what is HLL? I played squad wich is 1000 Times better

I love the community. I think the graphics give everyone a license to just chill out and have fun and I'm 100% behind that.

and also its a rock solid game, by gamers, for gamers. no bullshit. so no distractions either, everyone can have fun without feeling like they are selling their souls to the microtransaction gods.

@@OilHutJoneshe graphics also just make the game way more accessible to people with low-end systems which opens the game up to a much wider audience than Battlefield on PC

Playing music is a bannable offense, these devs are wound up tight.

If you can waste money on companies that don't care about you, then you can for sure support devs that do care I havn't bought a battlefield game since bf1 because any game after that is trash

I get you like this game but please play more single player games if you think this is the "best"

@@InternalxHDsame, I wanted to try 2042 but glad I waited for the free play weekends to ultimately not spend $50. Battlebit however has been a great purchase for me. I suck at mouse and keyboard but I’m still having a blast just reviving people and playing my class which is what I missed from battlefield

Try hollow knight if you think battlebit is good value

The first money I've ever spent on a live service game that will eventually d ie never to be played after the servers shut down.

DICE has really made the standards extremely low 🤣

Considering that all their previous games had all this stuff! Lazy devs.

Yeah but the recording us and getting triggered if we talk about anything they dont agree with warning us of perma bans has me suspicious

Why does everything have to be toxic God dang

@@censored4christ162what did you talk about specially that they had a problem with?

i have yet to see any toxic shit. the death mics have been the most hilarious part of the game for me

I wish it were on console too, I have kids and don't want to hole up in my office to play.

bro every person that dies has a sound and its great lol

@@first_ones_free6556 The "What the fucks" are the best

It feels like LAN parties with your friends, its great fun.

there kinda has been, try looking up the long list of boomer shooters that had released within the past 5 to 6 years

Well I think it depends on what you view as FPS. You’re discounting Valorant that was released 3 years ago and has a crazy successful pro league and player base.

@@SlickyWickyy am refering to the indie fps scenes with games such as dusk, amid evil, nightmare reaper, ultrakill to name a few

could say games like doom 2016/eternal has kickstarted more indie devs to go back to the basics to just make an enjoyable fps game than try to make a esports scene

@@TheRyupichu fan of new blood games huh?

It really depends on how much they expand on the player experience and potentially add more sandbox elements for long-term user generated content. Because in many other regards it can be compared to a timeless game like Minecraft: Also has a visual style that is entirely standalone and not reliant on contemporary visual fidelity standards. Its gameplay is also very accessible for multiple playstyles and easy to get into. There is true potential for longevity for Battlebits, their main obstacle initially will be to ensure the game doesn't grow stale after the initial popularity and intrigue dies off. How well does it retain its players when the next genuinely good AAA game in the genre comes out- because it will happen eventually. Long-term player retention is one of the hardest things to master in any game, especially in shooters that aren't highly competitive (like counter strike for example).

@@Real_MisterSir the long but constant drip of progression will really help it out, im 200 hours into it and I think I have another 200 to go before I can prestige, and there is no way in hell ill have all the attachments for all the guns by then either. It is literally the same progression formula that won call of duty its fans and support when MW1 came out all those years ago. It was a hit then, and it still works just as well now. slow continuous drip is how you keep people around, and its how battlebit does it, you will get at least something every 5-20 kills, be it an attachment or a new gun with lvl up and with the sheer number of unlockables, that can continue for 100's if not 1000's of hours.

@@EthanolTailor I think the main important part is that they manage to stay relevant. It got a lot of hype and traction, mostly as a breath of fresh air, but one thing going against it is that it's not free to play, and it doesn't have the outreach of an AAA title either. Player number will always decline after the initial spike, even now 1 month later it's 30% down in player count from 90k to 60k - which of course is normal for any game, but the key part is if they can keep attracting new players or if they primarily rely on the existing player base. Drip-feeding is good when you have a solid core community, but the game is still too young to have an established base and foundation to rely on. Keeping people around doesn't earn them any money, selling more copies or having a form of in-game monetization does. They earned great on the opening month, but if everything from now on is just an expense to maintain players, rather than bring in new / or monetize existing players further, then drip feeding content will not be the game's savior. This is of course not to argue against your main point, for that I fully agree that drip feeding will be great for the core player base to stay invested. Absolutely. But what is the dev team's benefits from this? How much are they actually getting in return for the hours of work that drip feed content gives them? It got mass market exposure quickly, but staying power and further marketing is questionable. There is also the issue of cheating, which demands exponentially more dev work and practically gives zero money in return, but is still something that must be tackled if the game is going to survive and grow long term. I hope the game sticks around and becomes a mainstay classic. Time will tell.

Wouldn't say it's "optimized" but it doesn't run bad by any means. Should be running way better, sorry.

I like how i can chat with the enemy team about how we need a version of operation metro

Who is operator drewski? Sounds like a porn star but surely it isn’t 🤣

Just hop out when you are low enough and for the love of God get away from the crash site ASAP.

@@Faus4us it's fun to stay in the crashing helicopter

​@@youngrich10THIS. Lol

cause everyone doesn't have a wingsuit or parachute so we're all in it together lol.

everyone roll plays when their downed or pinned or in a crashing helicopter

too bad the maps are all crap and the gameplay is worse than the roblox version that this game copied

FOR ROCK AND STONE

@@Sheepheadzit copied nothing it’s inspired by squad and battlefield nothing like roblox at all

@@Sheepheadz found battlefield’s burner

@@Sheepheadz found the battlefield fanboy...

Yep so when you get in the small spaces in 127 vs 127 the grenade grenade bullet spam doesn’t rank your game plus the game with shaders is even better

exactly, I think one aspect levelcap missed is how accessible the game is, its potato pc-proof which isn't said about a lot of games coming out now, all the milsim games as well as new battlefield titles would need relatively up-to date rigs and so there is a swathe of people just coming in droves to battlebit for the gameplay that they can't run, and the game has been on a weekly stress test for so long and every time there was never a shortage of full servers.

I agree, i can play this game on my laptop and not cook my hands at the same time while still getting decent consistent frames.

Yep, if I get a smooth framerate, I don't give two turds what the graphics look like. So many games come out now with choppy frames it hurts my eyes to play.

Performance in this game is a huge plus. I wanted to try BF1/V/2048 but none of them even have a chance of running on my GTX 660, leaving me on what was left of bf3/bad company 2 servers. This is the first new battlefield style game I've been able to actually play in years.

The gameplay experience is so solid that it lets your brain fill in the gaps for the graphics.

On the other hand, a super graphically intense 4k triple A game completely loses its magic when you realize the fundamentally broken game underneath.

Have never cared for graphics in all my gaming history, so I find it baffling that there's people who will prefer it OVER gameplay, like wtf go watch a movie instead LMFAO

I actually like battlebits graphics over the so called triple A games. Its easier to spot players and focus on what is happening.

It’s kinda like how I thought OOT LOZ had really good Pixar graphics only to see footage a year later and be like damn it’s aged, but then play it again see it the same way

BF needs to bring back spawn camping main bases, vehicles spawning on map instead of a menu. Be more a sandbox like all BF games prior to BF4.

​@@v4skunk739no they need a Bad Company 2 Reboot and I'm not talking 2042

@@HumbertoHacked Bad Company 2 sucks compared to the full fat BF3+4.

@@v4skunk739disagree heavily. BFBC2 was a great game with fantastic gunplay that paved the way for 3 and 4. BFBC2 is still the best experience I’ve had in an online shooter to date, and the Vietnam DLC was one of the best value DLCs I’ve ever purchased

The best moment I’ve had so far is that my squad was shown mercy by one random person on the enemy team who dragged my body over to them to be revived. Fast forward 10 minutes later and I was baiting enemies over to my body because I died as I was putting down a mine. Lone behold it was the guy who was nice to us earlier and I blew both him and his squad mate up. I have it clipped as well and it was hilarious.

Ther banter is #1, especially when down waiting for a medic XD. Calling for help or talking mess to the enemy , i love it.

So Toxic. Not allowed in current year.

Serously tho, does anyone remember BFV Beta and Launch they banned the words "White man" but kept "Black man" ? Shit was Insane.

​@@refugeehugsforfree4151 And the word "nuts", that's nuts...

Same for me. I thought I grew out of it. I've bought every BF since BF4 and I couldn't reach that same high again after BF4. Battlebit proves that it was Dice that drifted away from what truly made their games special.

bf1 just wasn't a good battlefield game, even though it was a great ww1 game.

@@T33K4Y what a good battlefield game is for you? Bf mfs just seem to never enjoy a battlefield game

@@T33K4YW trolling

@@T33K4Y Wasn't a great WW1 game either with all the experimental semi and full auto guns everywhere and the bolt action rifles that 99% used in WW1 almost nowhere to be found.

I remember playing Battlefield 1943 on Wake Island and I'd go to the enemy peninsula solely to use the enemy AA to shoot down enemy planes as they leave their aircraft carrier and once the enemy wised up, hide after leaving TNT on the AA and wait for the enemy to use the AA then blow it up.

​@PlebNC don't forget sneaking onto enemy carriers with dynamite and picking off the pilots before they launch

@@BubblesTheAmoeba I did 1 better than using dynamite on the carrier. I'd take control of the AA on their carrier and just wait for the plane's propeller to start up and blast the plane. If any infantry got any wise ideas they'd have no cover so I'd shoot them with the AA too. It was the dominant way to win Air Supremacy matches until they patched it so carriers were out of bounds for enemies.

@@BubblesTheAmoeba Everyone was a navy seal in that game attacking the ships lol

There used to be a clan in BF1942, something in the lines of Nordic Ice, that made crazy stunt videos. I can to comment on this video, on how BF1942 was like BattleBit for me. In 1942 as an engineer, you could keep a mine in your hand and with the correct timing, blew up a jeep trying to run you over without dying or the mine leaving your hand. Or when you flew with a bf109 and then try to land on the enemy bombers roof while it was full of players.

And the right camp works wonders, camo actually helps instead of just beeing a cosmetic

Theres a suprising amount of detail my old crummy latop stil runs on potato at 60fps so i get to crank it up

I wish the teams were a bit better differentiated, but its a small quibble

This. I remember loading up BF1 for the first time, it was that forest map with a train line down the middle. And all I could think was "Where the bloody hell is the enemy?" Even with a 4K monitor i struggled to see through the intricate bushes grasses and trees, with shadows covering the landscape. Its great to see everything so clearly in Battlebit.

This is why games like halo where so popular for so long. Along with being traditional arena shooters, there was pretty much constant action because everything was right in front of you.

Skill issue.

This is why I love games with this simple style. I don't care about realism -- I want to have fun and I feel like most AAA games have left this audience behind for years now.

This indeed. Its why this 30yo boomer has been stuck on UT99 until now. This is the first fps since that actually looks appealing to me. Focussed on movement and skill; not eyestrain and gimmicks.

"Voice Chat? Oh, you must want to call people the N word! Can't allow that! Sorry just stare at the score board and pretend you're bantering with enemies" -DICE

@@refugeehugsforfree4151 don't destroy the game reputation just because you think saying the N word is funny. Racism is not cool bro.

@@dadqqader ? My point is some people say the N word so DICE removed the ability to talk to enemies. That is my point. Not that I "want to say the N word" Although let's be real words are words and banning them doesn't make them not exist, those people just find ways of saying the same thing in "Coded" language anyways.

@@dadqqader It is funny because of people like you saying it isn't funny. If you just ignored it then people would just shut up or would find another thing to get you mad, and racism is an easy bait for most people to go insane.

​@@dadqqaderreading comprehension is hard

@@Unknown_Genius people have complained in one way or another about the state of AAA gaming for a good 10-15 years.. when DLC was making it's ever-so-important entry into the market in the mid to late 200x's alot of people were criticizing even call of duty's 4 map DLC model for modern warfare 1.. >:X trends pick up, it's just in the last 10 that the problem has become vastly more inflated with microtransactions replacing DLC as a defacto money source for games and inflating profits.

​@@ThatWhichObservesThis game has been in development longer than most triple A complainers have been alive kek

@@Unknown_Genius yet triple A games are still garbage

You just described the target market known as whales

AAA games spend most their budget on marketing, graphics, and MTX department

As a peak 2k pc owner, I'd trade all the pretty graphics for solid Gameplay.

I get very irritated any time I hear someone mention low-poly graphics as if it is holding Battlebit back. The hardware requirements being equivalent to a basic work laptop from 2010 means that anyone can play Battlebit. Even that cheap desktop your family bought grandma so she could have something to browse Facebook on can run Battlebit.

​@@carboncopy4183 cod doesnt even run that well on a 2k pc.

I'm making it a goal for the rest of 2023 to play at least an hour a day. The game NEEDS community support, maybe that will wake AAA teams up.

​@@drewber2006Wow! What a amazing goal. You are truely a hero. I REALLY REALLY hope you can achieve your pathetic goal.

Makes me wonder if they should do a Free Weekend to ride this hype even further. Get tons of additional people into the game who have no doubt heard about it from one of their friends. I'd imagine retention would be decent seeing as it's only a $15 purchase.

@@tiestofalljays this is genius and would honestly blow its playercount sky high

​​@@AceMyHighok but... Why the hate??

I really love this game. It is just so hard to play by yourself.

@@yotus3491 I find the 64v64 matches are better for rocking it solo.

You're not really solo if you join a full squad and actually use VOIP. Lot of people actually playing together, it's quite wholesome actually. Don't like the squad's vibe? Leave and join a different one. Easy enough.

I don't want a BF4 remaster. This game is also NOT a BF4 remaster.

Yeah, Battlefield Vietnam truly was a masterpiece

One can only hope. But AAA gaming is just a huge cash grab at this point.

@@nextisomi it really is sadly, it’s just a infinite money glitch

People really have to commit to the smaller games to see a genuine change in the big ones, I fear. They made their money, they’re not in it for the love of video games

​@@nextisomi If Bud Light can be taken down, so can AAA game companies

I was messing around yesterday with c4 jeeps and everytime i tried it or suceeded i would banter with my enemies and its just so refreshing and fun

I like how you fail to mention that its moderated and recorded.

literally every other comment is about the VOIP :D

@@shawno8253 Yeah, you gotta walk on eggshells or else you'll get, not just VC banned,but banned from the actual gameplay.

​@tiandi5585 lmao what do u mean walk on eggshells? Just dont be a racist/bigot

And funny af, too

@@juggernautknight2749 From watching this video, I went to go play a game, and I literally JUST had an encounter with two enemies where we all had our mics on and were laughing at the goofiness of our situation New favorite memory of the game

​@@juggernautknight2749I love when people act like they are really dying on the mic, "where's my leg, where's my leg!", "mommy, mommyyy!"😂

Everyone's almost always chill in every game I've played so far, it's a nice change of pace to be honest.

It really helps that a single player can’t lead to a victory or sweat their way to a team W. So if you’re not playing in a perfectly min-maxed way, it’s not that big of a deal

Reminds me of how Deep Rock Galactic did the same

For sure, there has been a lot of funny banter between the teams at times, its quite wholesome. I haven't seen like any toxicity at all, it seems like everyone is having a fun time even if they are dying.

Because most games wouldn't be toxic if the devs and their moderators actually cared about people and getting them together for fun

I remember when I play CS source on servers owned by players. The mods keep the banter moderated and kick obnoxious kids/manchildren. Building a relationship in a private server was fun and rewarding. I think that was really important in making the community positive.

Majority of games are in early access. Devs just don't tell you that so you think you are getting a finished product.

@@mad_elfyeah early access doesn’t mean anything anymore, it’s just a bullshit marketing buzzword to lower your expectations

​@@Brent-jj6qi Agreed, but I do believe this team thinks there is a lot more to be added. Similar to squad who were early access for years until releasing there massive update and showing us what they really wanted the game to be front the start.

@@mad_elf sure but how hard is it to add more maps and guns? I mean the early access thing you’re describing is generally for big AAA studios to cover their asses for buggy and poor quality of life releases, but this game doesn’t really suffer from those kinds of issues. It’s a very quality experience already, so I think you’re being overly pessimistic. This game will definitely continue being developed and supported with more new content because the player base is determined to show Dice how dumb they are for abandoning support for their games, releasing content devoid and unfinished garbage, ignoring community feedback, and publicly shaming and admonishing the fans for having expectations

@@cdf360 you're diving homie. I was just saying that games are never going to be finished products at release. AAA or indie. I'm not saying that makes them a bad game.

Wait until 1 year passes, people will be tryhard and toxic

@@shredd5705 that certainly is one of the more negative outcomes.

@@maj_pr0blems It often happens as games age (if they become really popular). People stop tolerating new player mistakes and cheating and exploiting glitches etc. becomes more common. Maybe the light hearted Roblox look will negate some of that, but isn't Minecraft community also toxic. Sadly almost all games that become popular, become also toxic

Reminds me of counter strike. Everyone was fairly "normal" for being on the internet because everyone knew the whole purpose was to have fun, not be the best.

i can see them updating the character models and giving them more polygons, cause they are a little bit behind of the weapons on that sense, but it 100% agree with you, visual clarity is never an issue and i love how the game runs fine on my kind of old rig with 254 players

Yeah, I don’t really place a high degree of importance on photorealistic graphics. I prefer a low polygon art style. I don’t need super realistic water reflections or real time shadows if that processing power could be used to do something more interesting like adding destructible terrain.

Massive TF2 energy

My thoughts exactly, especially with the WARZONE 2

@@GusCraft460 same, better game mechanics over better graphics. Take project Zomboid for example it won’t win any graphically awards but it has insanely deep core mechanics

But the huge problem is at rank 70 and rank 105 the guns Vector, and AS Val seem to be extremely stronger than any other smg and rifle you get before it. I just unlocked Vector and it has a 1200 fire rate and makes close combat give me a extreme edge. Locking the best weapons behind extreme level walls is very annoying.

Games just chaotic and not competitive

same. back as a teen glad i checked unturned, w/ games like it, its content was literally imagination as its limits. edit: blocky graphics does compensate for being a comprehensive game of being an amalgamation of the biggest fps titles

@@R3TR0J4NI really don’t get why people say the obvious blocky style choice Is because the games early access like Unturned exists and so does a lot of other blocky games

@@seasons1745 Because other blocky games are consistent with their textures and shading. Compare battlebit's ground texture to any of the buildings and the difference in detail is way too drastic.

lol yea cause war is so crisp and clear...the reason why other milsims are so much further superior is cause of that. There is literally 0 realism in this and defeats the entire purpose of its goal people rant on about

It makes it feel so rewarding when you finally slap a tandem warhead through a Blackhawk or Littlebird windshield

learning how to read and use the scope of the RPG is a unique experience no other game has made me do and I love it lol

All weapons except the Vector*. That thing is easy mode. I racked up 500 kills with it in no time [60-round Drum Mag is nuts lol...can just lay into a group and drop 5-6 of them]. It's even decent at mid range. It's stupid, and makes a bunch of other weapons not worthwhile unless you want to "challenge yourself". When a weapon is so dominant that it makes you feel like you're nerfing yourself by using something else, there's a problem imo.

@@joetatos8687 It's definitely got some mil-sim aspects to it, which is cool. Like Squad~ Can't wait for the Battlebit Milsim mode :D

@@tiestofalljays I think that’s my next weapon unlock.

Was in one of the playtests over a year ago and the test i was in had 22k people. That would have been late 2021

its a sanctuary from recent fps genre

>festivals >travelling tiktok is that way, bye.

​@@VinceR3000I think he is talking about real life.

@@VinceR3000touch grass lol

Gameplay loop is king

Agreed. I hate when people say this has “bad graphics”. It’s an art style

Plus poly stylized look is really big right now. I LOVE it. Ultra realistic is kind of frustrating because it makes it hard to see what’s going on, stylized makes everything pop out much more and makes it easier for me to instantly understand things in the heat of the moment, which I prefer in competitive games over pretty graphics.

@@HemlockRC On the other hand, you can say that whenever something looks not as sharp as something else. I think it's fair to say it looks shit, but this seems to be done intentionally to save resources on the developers end, provide fluent gameplay even on weaker machines, allow for bigger game lobbies and enhance performance. Overall this sacrifice is well worth it since good games are not just about graphics.

@@ColdGhost01 If they were trying to make it look realistic, and it wasn’t high fidelity, then you could say the graphics suck. The developers made a decision to make it a low poly art style. Nobody complains about terraria and Minecraft, because that’s the intended art style. If call of duty 2024 has bad textures, then I would say that they failed to meet their own standards of “graphics”

I'd say the same thing about bbr when it comes to the political stuff. There's to many chat rules you can't say anything without getting banned.

snipers are pretty strong but only on the big open maps like the one wtih the ship in the middle but on smaller maps they are actually pretty weak because of the slow fire rate. most of the time the medics or assists have the most kills and deaths because they are always in the front fighting. i have seen match leaderboard winners with 100+ kills and 50+ deaths in one match.

true 100 %

@@The723343im sorry you can’t be an edgy teenager in chat, one day you’ll realize most people are normal and don’t think your jokes are that funny.

@@The723343 from what I remember you just can't really debate politics/religion or be racist and transphobic You can absolutely shit talk all you want

It also changed hw certain maps are played liked lancang damn or siege of Shanghai

Exactly. The problem with a game like 2042 was never that they had these big cinematic elements that provide great immersion. The problem is that they got fucking lost in the sauce and tried to add elements that nobody associate with the BF experience, such as big hero-shooter elements with specialists, sacrifice of old features that were loved, scaling back on actual environment destruction / interaction, and ofc the fact that the game was nowhere near finished when it launched and ran like a potato even on the best hardware. It was just insanely poorly managed with no vision behind whatsoever. That's why it failed.

@@waynesmith7746that was the point of the levolution events. It actually made Siege of Shanghai bearable when the middle tower was destroyed

Out of all the other things going on in this game, your screen turning black is what amazed you…?

@@NahBNah Think you missed the point here lol

At least when your visuals return, you're back in Battlebit. In many instances while playing 2042, I would honestly prefer the black screen.

@@NahBNah Simulated helo crashes where you're able to survive is a pretty neat feature man

@@NahBNah Uh yeah? This is the first game I played that simulates helicopter crashes and makes you black out until you regain consciousness. The whole point of this is that I did not expect that to happen at all it was just one random moment.

Reminds me of phantom forces from roblox, plays similar too

@@RhomasTotevenaarPhantom Forces is amazing