I still think they thought it was Breakthrough for a moment.

@@Ravic hahahaha that would make so much sense :D

@@Ravic They were just practicing for when BF 1852 releases.

True, but it's not like the Rorsch is that great of a gun. Basically the only people who can really make use of it given the charge-up time are players like Rav or Mus1CK.

@@Slenderneer its acctually easy :D

@@philharmonie7499 People say that, but then I realised why it's not a good sniper for low-skill players: a) it requires you to maintain tracking of a target while they are moving, b) maintain tracking while the scope is swaying, and c) maintain tracking while you are potentially making evasive maneuveurs.

@@philharmonie7499 zoomers can't handle such weapon that require patience and skill nah

Rorsch Mk4, it’s under the tactical/utility weapons like the crossbow and shotguns.

On console, it's not like it was made easy. I remember people saying back in the BF3/4/H days that there was a big discrepancy between the PS and Xbox fidelity and at times people would say the game looked like shit. I honestly didn't blame them for thinking that they were blind because of how suppression worked in those games. I'm pretty sure that's not a problem anymore given the recent titles, so I think it is time to get rid of spotting. Now, if only the fidelity was consistent on all platforms.

Bf5 hasn't a real 3d spotting, it's the best from all Bf titles...

here is your medal 🏅

Who’s we?

@@carlsmith4568 South Africa

Just a heads up most of the "skilled" devs left before even BF4 was released. Game development has a high turnover rate unless you are in a team lead or manager position and those people don't do most of the important actual work in creating the game. Although the argument could be made that because those team leads and managers signed off on going back to WW1 and WW2 for two consecutive games that might have driven some of their more experienced programmers and designers, because I recall a few not really wanting to go that direction.