High Powered, this loadout is bad though. Video on it later.

He’s played them all… for years.

Pretty sure he's sponsored

@@Shkeli-Man nope

Low IQ

Aw yeah.

Bait used to be believable 😔

90 in-game which is ~106 horizontal.

I think it's less vertices to reduce graphical performance hit while still somewhat looking like a cylinder or pipe.

Good examples. Also reminded me while a lot of maps were similar to each other within games like BF3 or BF4 they played differently because of what was allowed or what was available on the map with regards to vehicles and aircraft.

I'd argue BF2042 was functional at launch ( no crashing, queueing with friends worked ) or more so than other previous Battlefield games but you might be referring to something specific to you so that might not be true in your case. Oddly enough I think over time with the changes DICE made crashing was added to the game in later patches, unintentionally of course, most were related to CPU overclocks being pushed hard while shaders were loading.

@@Ravic im on ps5. Never really had a problem like pc users had but it wasn’t as polished as it is today and all the features that were added help the experience today. My only complaint is that wasent enough urban style warfare alla Karkand, shanguai etc. Wish we had more maps, naval warfare and a little more lévolution and destruction. Besides that I have a blast on 2042 and love your gameplay. Hope the next title can please the majority and make BF great again!

It basically repeated the same mistakes that every recent Battlefield game made, and the games never really rose to their full potential. Remember the complete lack of base game weapons? Remember the terrible update schedule? Remember Hazard Zone? Remember how you were forced to play smaller modes in Portal (and good luck finding something that isn't an XP farm or "milsim" server), and the usual pitfalls of the maps we've come to expect? If BF1 was bad for further streamlining the gameplay and the ability to completely flatten maps, then why can't the same level of criticism be levied against this game for the unnecessary BS players had to deal with for a whole year and a half like missing party features and the specialist system? Yeah... I won't be buying this game, BFV, or BFH. Yeah, 4 had a shit launch, the infamous battlepacks, bad first half of DLCs drops, a catastrophic launch that is arguably worse, a big catalogue of just mid maps, and failed modes that were either throwaway or abandoned for never being tweaked, and another bad campaign... I didn't buy the game. I got it through different means. I did buy 1, but I've come to regret it. The bar is getting lower and lower. I full-well admit that I'm not exactly the best judge of these games, but why bother continuing to buy them if the bar is only getting lower?

People seem to forget those "best Battlefield games" according to the community like BF3 or BF4 had less "player choice" or vehicle balance was taken into consideration with map design. Not all vehicle combinations were available for every map, most couldn't have both the Attack Helicopter and Scout Helicopter, some no jets or no mobile AA. Sure there were lots of other things they could have changed or tweaked to address the issues people were having with the launch versions of the BF2042 maps but reworking the maps wasn't what the game needed.

It's that aspect I've brought up before where too much player choice creates unbalance. BF3 and BF4 maps or map design included what vehicles and vehicle combinations would be available. Go look up some of the maps for those games, very few had everything or every vehicle type available and that added to the replayability of the game in that every round didn't feel the same.

bcoz enemies don't shoot at him ?

This. It's also why the US attack helo changed from the Apache to to Cobra and the APC changed from the Bradley to the LAV.

4x scopes already give scope glint, except the ones which has 4x-1,5x etc. This scope he's using is 2x