Amazing attention to detail in Post Scriptum: every 5th round in the Mg 34 and 42 is a tracer round. This is something that practically no one gets right.

BFV is WW2 movie (directed by Michael Bay ) PS is colorized WW2 video ( by war reporter )

The guns in post scriptum sound far more threatening then that of BF5

PostScriptum soldier knows about "M1 thumb", amazing

Guys this is something you might want to know: This guy used the "War Tapes" in-game audio config for BFV which makes all the sounds have more echo(specially on explosions and tank shots) but makes all the weapons sound worse imo. The "3D headset" audio config makes all sounds more clear and satisfying(more like PS) but lacks of echo at farther distances which makes the game quieter in certain moments

12:15 Multi Million $ Company Virgin Explosions vs Small Indie Dev Studio Chad Explosion

BFV's sound design is too muted which the echoes overlap it, I prefer the more "meaty" sound design they had for BF1 e.g. the Chauchat is a very loud gun designed to sound more like artillery than anything else, but in BF its _way_ too muted PS's sounds have a touch metallic nature to them which I like as well as the reloads

12:15 BF5 Panzerfaust hitting ground: *Poooof 12:21 Post Scriptum Panzerfaust hitting ground: *KAAAAAAABOOOOOOOOM!

Post Scriptum only suffers from 2 problems: -Rifles having +1 rounds -Only having 1 standard tactical-reload for the Rifles (for example: Only 1 animation of adding 3 rounds into the K98 although you shot 1 round, and then the ammo counter goes up to 6-rounds)

Battlefields ironsights look so enlarged I like Post Scriptums alot more

The big difference is that Post Scriptum's weapons feel real with a hard hit when playing it while Battlefield 5 feels like nerfguns

6:35 love that sound

i hate the M1911 in BFV, it sounds like something is hitting on your glass window. In BF1, they make the pistol gunshot much more hard-hitting with great sound effects.

12:29 that's the saddest explosion I've ever seen.

Bfv models are pretty good, the only thing that bugs me sometimes is that you could stick your face in some of the front sights

gun: shots KZfaq captions: applause

I just love the animations and sounds from Post Scriptum.

It's cool how in post scriptum you can hear the guy taking the new mag out of his vest or whatever

Post Scriptum definitely sounds better than BF5 The guns in BF5 all have a weird echo after the shots as well as sounding less powerful then PS. I would say that the guns also look better than BF5 as well. I also think that PS has a more realistic depiction of recoil then BF

Seriously who on the sound team at EA thought that using what sounds like someone hitting a truck tire with a sledge hammer for the chauchat firing instead of the almost deafening bark it had back in BF1 was a good idea?

I've always felt like Battlefield 5's animation really looked off. Like the animations themselves are good, sure, but it feels incredibly unrealistic, like the weight of the movements almost feels cartoony at times.

PS animations look soooo much better after the update

Post scriptums weapons have a more rugged and useful look to them. Also they sound much more powerful

BFV had so much potential that they chose to get beat by an indie game.

12:22 Now thats what we call real explosion!

Okay Post Scriptum just goes to show animation, sound, and graphics are higher than I’ve ever witnessed. I loved the sound. Actually sounded like WWII weapons you hear in documentaries. And the animation of the guns to the smallest details and when the weapon actually recoils with your hand.. than it just jolting back and forth the same type animation frames like in BF5.

I’m surprised how good the sounds are in PS. BF usually has the best sound design, but with BFV everything sounds muted.

What happened to Dice? I remember how awesome BFBC2 sounded. When BF3 came out, I was actually disappointed, because I expected it to be even better but it was worse. BFBC2 was the pinnacle of BF sound design.

Even tho Battlefield 5 released, the M1 Garand's ejection of bullet shells are too fast, but in Post Scriptum, i like the detail of the bullet shell's ejection.

Pretty fast reloads in both games. I would have expected post scriptum to take a bit longer to simulate you actually taking ammo from your Ammo pouches rather than always having ammunition at hand.

8:40 honestly I expected battlefield V to make this mistake. The enfield is build so that you can work the bolt without needing unshoulder the gun(unlike the K98). In battlefield he can not look threw his iron sights while working the bolt. In post scriptum he can.

GOOD LORD THOSE EXPLOSIONS! I gotta play post scriptum just for them!

Post scriptums MP40 reload bugs me, how can you slap the charging handle on an open bolt gun when it is in its bolt lock safety?

The recoil in PS feels so damn cool While in BF5 laserbeams

Literally everyone in the comment: *"Battlefield guns are shooting bullets, thats why i prefer Post scriptum."*

4:13 I really love the attention to detail when he kinda fails a bit when reloading.🙂

Post Scriptum win.

Compare Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway to Post Scriptum.

8:48 The Lee Enfield gunshot sounds like a weak Day of Infamy Kar98k shot

Battlefield: good Post Scriptum: best

The look and sound in PS looks and sound much more dangerous, impressive and powerfull.

Back in the day when BF1 was being compared with cod wwII the cod gun sounds were criticized for sounding weak. Now it seems like BFV has done the same thing as cod’s recent wwII game

It is hard to compare the audio as battlefields sound engine changes how weapons sound in different places. I believe PS has weightier firing animations but you can tell for the reloads that battlefields animators are more skilled. For both games the attention to detail is impressive and you can tell the devs put a lot of work in to creating authentic and satisfying games weapons.

Sounds in battlefield feel totally different in buildings halls etc. I have this weird feel like it's completely different gunshot sound but it's just top level reverb.

rear sight on Battlefield is always ridiculous , seems like watch through a window, and gunfire sound is a shit gg AAA game

6:10 You're welcome

The big difference is that PS sounds loud and meaty, where BFV sounds quiet as if some executive walked in and asked the devs to turn the sound down.

Just FYI for yall to remember, that ps is made by 8 people

did I just see the bolt release on BF V's K98K move when he cycles the bolt...

I love how Post Scriptum has the M1A1 Thompson the iconic smg.

Bf5 guy handling the weapon like it weighs 1 kg when reloading.

On the sten gun, why oh why would you hold it by the heat shield!?

And the most realistic thing ! In Post Scriptum, there aren't any black feminist strong female characters ! :)

The animation, recoil and sound feel more realistic on post scriptum.

Both games look very realistic and BFV takes the cake with the overall visuals and sound engine. Some of these people don't realize that these are to seperate kinds of games, one being a triple A and the other being a mil sim. The mil sim will of course have louder sounding guns and bigger explosions. BFV is a version of these iterations but more smoother and readjusted for gameplay purposes. BFV is made to be played with UI and or Audio. People will yell out orders and objectives will be ordered through morsecode, guns will of course be alot less loud so sounds balance out in the gameplay experience, especially in a chaotic combat environment such as Battlefield. In Post Scriptum, you aren't always in a fight and maps are alot more natural and wide, so audio balancing isn't quite an issue for the game.

The magazine on the BFV chauchat is the wrong way around. its supposed to face the opposite direction. This would allow an assistant gunner to see inside the magazine and know when to reload the gun

I love BF5 so much, and PS too. Both for me. BF5 cool PS realistic

In case of texture and enviroment BFV but in case of game design and explosions PS is far superior than BFV and I also played both so its not biased

comparing these two games is like comparing frozen pizza to restaurant pizza

hk slapping MP40 dear god

This is like comparing a hot dog to 5 star restaurant food

BF5: M1 Garand. “Ok I see” PS M1 Garand. “WOAHHH”

The Post scriptum Thompson is a m1a1 and the battlefield v Thompson is a m1928

One thing that BfV actually gets right over PS is the fact that the Gewehr 43 in reality didn't get reloaded using a box magazine (like PS shows it), but by using loading clips instead (like BfV shows it). Still, PS' sound design is superior by light years.

Now do Minecraft vs Battlefield 5

What gives with BF5 having tracers on all weapons

2018: BFV and PS were released. 2020: BFV is near dead while PS released new French and Normandy campaigns.

Luger P-08: Post Scriptum 1911: Post Scriptum Walther P-38: Post Scriptum M-3 "Grease gun": Post Scriptum Sten gun: Post Scriptum Thompson: Post Scriptum MP-34: Post Scriptum MP-40: Post Scriptum M1 "Garand": Post Scriptum Gewher 43: Battlefield V M-1/M1A1 Carbine: Post Scriptum STG 44: Post Scriptum Karibiner 98 K: Post Scriptum Lee Enfield No.4: Tie MG-34: Post Scriptum MG-42: Post Scriptum Chauchat: Post Scriptum Bren gun: Post Scriptum BAR: Post Scriptum Boys Anti-Tank rifle: Post Scriptum Panzerbuchse Anti-tank rifle: Post Scriptum Panzerfaust: Post Scriptum

I wonder French Army still use The Chauchat in WW2

This is very clearly a biased comparison. The BFV clips were recorded using the "War Tapes" sound setting which heavily compresses the loudness of the sound, making fire sounds quieter and reverb/reflection sounds louder (not to mention the inconsistent sound levels between the recordings of the two games), drastically decreasing the impact of the sounds. While PS is indeed impressive, BFV has not been given a fair chance. Also, to those annoyed at the way the BFV soldiers hold the weapons, the idle positions change depending on how far up (or down) the player looks.

Dude you could do the Mad Minute in Post Scriptum! Easily the winner haha.

Definitely Post Scriptum Natural Accurate and for MATURES

Bf5 lacks in gun noise and explosions, the guns have alot of echo and are muffled, as for the explosions, they don't feel like battlefield. The panzerfaust and PIAT's explosions are a fraction of what they actually are. I miss bf1, where the guns sounded more powerful and had that clunky metal noise as a cherry on the top. And those colossal explosion with ash and dirt after effects.

8:26 how does the rifle fire when the right hand's on the bolt instead of the handle/trigger?

*Hears the German MGs in BFV opening up at me* Me:I sleep *hears the German MGs in PS opening up at me* Me: *incoherent panicking noises and hits the prone button*

I find it kinda funny that people still seem to think that bfv is a war simulator game. I'm pretty sure battlefield has always been and will always be a casual shooter with gameplay over realism. There's this one word I usually use with gaming which is called FUN, it means that the game is more enjoyable to play than to think about. I think just like always people just want to hate on bfv, has been the same shit over and over again ever since the first trailer dropped, people are hard set on hating on it. I doubt it has much to do with competence about how loud the guns are or anything in bfv, pretty sure they could've made them obnoxiously loud and realistic but that would make some areas of the map really obnoxious to be in with the fast pace and 30 people cramping into a big room. So yes, i think both games succeed with what they were going for, they're not even close to being the same game to begin with. This is like comparing squad and call of duty, the comparison can be made but the games never had the same goal in mind.. well except for making money, but that goes for any game.

Post scriptum.....

Even the explosions in post scriptum is far more realistic than bf

That HK Slap on the PS MP40 is several different kinds of stupid but fuck its satisfying.

People I rather have fun over realism. BFV maybe historically inaccurate in someways but the gunplay is so damn fun. I love history I really do but I also realize it’s a video game. The whole historical accuracy was thrown out the window when it became such. I will acknowledge the developers of Post Scriptum but too much realism is boring.

These needs to come to console

Both great games for different audiences.

I like how BF reload non empty mag bolt action rifles, the left hand is stopping the current bullet for ejecting before reloading individual bullets.

Yep. Post is better than BFV. BFV's guns are muted as hell. Post's are very accurate for sure. Not to mention that Post is used by reenactors. BFV is far from realistic at best.

Post Scriptum is way better! It has good sounds, animations, details, and is more realistic! In Battlefield V the weapons feels like reload an toy guns!

BFV sounds too clicky and mechanical And holy shit the way they reload and hold the guns annoys me so much

The only reason I tolerate bf5 is the empty mp40 reload. That shit smooth as hell

Key point: Post scriptum have real FOV slider (model/weapon)

Chalk and Cheese. BF is consumer crap, PS is indie art.

BFV: Textures and animations Post Scriptum: sounds

The only reason I play battlefield is because I’m a console peasant with no access to things like post scriptum and arma

PS designers don't know how an open bolt is operating (mp40) and have no idea where a magazine catch lever on thompson is

Every weapon in BFV sounds the same to me, like a heavy LMG, sometimes faster, sometimes slower.

This is BS I can't believe people like the look of the guns in BFV more than Post Scriptum.. Show PS some love! BFV is arcady but PS is all about historical accuracy.. But it's freedom of speech bro it's you guys' opinions say what you want.. XD

BF5's gunshots sound like you are standing half a mile away from the shooter.

I notice on neither BFV or Post Scriptorum on the Sten the animation doesn’t lock the bolt back when loading a fresh mag from empty. That’s the point of the little notch above the bolt about 3/4 of the way to the rear, it’s kinda like a safety catch and primer.

Just a reminder that both games has it's own ups and downs

Post Scriptum soldier prevents M1 thumb, BFV soldier gets M1 thumb. Be like Post Scriptum soldier

Animations are more realistic in post scriptum. But much smoother in battlefield. The sounds are a toss up, one game is better on some than the other and vice versa. Although I do have to give a hand to battlefield that when you reload a bolt gun with a partial magazine the character catches the ejected live round with his thumb and puts it back in. And the stripper clip reload on the G43 vs changing the magazine is much more correct

Post Scriptum was spot on with the Chauchat. BFV's fires too quickly and like most of the guns in game sounded weak and unreal. Don't tell me firearms sound weak in real life for I've shot a good bit of them. Enough to tell you they certainly do not. However, both games have a piss poor, lazy, and pathetic pistol sound design. Every pistol in BFV sounded the same, and Post Scriptum's pistols sounded like the P08. It's so bad, I instantly thought of MW3. After BF1's sound design, I'm disappointed in BFV. Glad I deleted that shitty game. And also, why does every Battlefield game aside from 1 make my hands look like they're pasted onto a green screen or something? It feels like they have an outline. I know BF3 and sorta BF4 DID have an outline. Laying down in Battlefield V takes me outta the game. My hands look like paper, and the crawling animations are the shittiest I've ever seen.