it sounds phenomenal

model d sound is amazing dude !

I agree the 101 is great but I have no idea why people still want the same tired 808/909 sounds. Especially when drum machines like the DrumBrute and Uno Drum exist. They’re still cheap and offer a fresh take and set of sounds while still being reminiscent of the classics. We’ve only heard the 808/909 for the past 35+ years 🙄

@@HotStrange *1.* Nostalgia. *2.* Gear Lust. *3.* Why abandon a winning formula? #ChicksLove808s 😁

@@HotStrange True, true. But for many of us, we wanted these devices for decades to make tracks, and they've always been out of our reach. Now that Behringer is selling at reasonable prices, we're gonna buy these synths and drum machines and make the tracks we've been wanting to make for so many years! I'll grant the sounds are dated, but who really cares? We've already passed the musical singularity, there is no progression now, no cutting edge. It's all just sound now, and we're all free to select the sound pallets we enjoy. Nobody has to like our pallets, we do what we do because we want to. But the thing is, many people DO enjoy a pallet that includes 101 and 808. AND... Arturia's analog synths/drum machines have never clicked with me. I was one of the first in the States to own the MInibrute, I ordered right when announced at Namm. It was great to be able to afford a new analog synth. But that synth did not have the mojo, or I couldn't find it. I found I'd rather use vst's for their convenience rather than deal with hardware sequencing and recording for the sounds I got out of the MiniBrute. I don't know what it is, but Arturia's analog is just dead to my ears. It doesn't have that breathing, living sound that Analog can bring. Long answer, I guess, but we've had the guitar for 500 years... still makes a sound people want to hear.

Thanks a lot autoy! Yeah you gotta treat those gems responsibly :)

Thanks Anton!

@@holygeneration7 Normal? No such thing as “normal” sized keys

Hold on, play? As in touching the keys?

@@holygeneration7 Normal is an obsolete word. Micro, slim, mini, touch , ribbon, buttons would be “normal for their respective synth. Since you want to be insulting, I'll just say it’s obviously complicated for you and narrow minded. Upgrading your vocabulary will upgrade your mind. Behringer is on the mark but Minilogue, Microfreak, Roli to Stylophones have “alternative keys” on some of their boards and groove boxes. How are you going to fit “normal" keys on a mini synth or mini controller? Or try this, mini keys are normal for a mini synth and please don’t say one can’t play well on a mini synth lol and if you can’t then you probably suck at keys anyway. We’re done jack ass.

@@holygeneration7 Guess what Mr. Normal read what you typed ...He never touched the Normal keys so your statement was wrong on all angles lol. You’re a fraud.

Recycology Tender feelings

You should probably get a keyboard controller too. Just grab a used M-Audio controller to start.

yes of course ahah its the particularity of this synth

The glide is digitally controlled so not like a sh 101 or 303

@@nanowave Printed photos in a flip book works for me 😁

agreed the resonance isn't exactly the same (too whistley) plus a slight crackling in the high pitch which maybe they can take a look at but very glad this exists!

Yeah it's got a much brighter, harsher sound. The high end has a kind of distorted edge to it. Main deviations from the SH-101 are: much brighter noise osc (white vs the 101's pink), filter resonance is different, envelope slope is linear vs the 101's exponential curve, and no auto-legato. Pretty big differences in my book. Having said that, for a little over $300 bucks (the cost of a single oscillator module), the MS-1/01 is a cool little synth capable of 101-ish sounds and unique, harsh tones thanks to the addition of FM. I see it as it's own thing rather than a clone of the 101. They sound totally different to me, but my ears are super sensitive to the subtle qualities of synthesizer tones, and I've been listening to music made with the 101 literally since the 1980's - it's a sound that's ingrained into my consciousness.

Working with iOS apps and VSTs never inspire me the same way hardware synths do. Nothing like it :)

dont the ipad softsynths sound like comb and paper thin compared to the real stuff though?!

yes! this guy makes by far the best synth demos...his Behringer Odyssey demo from couple weeks ago is also a must watch.

Thanks a lot! :)

The reason is pretty obvious. It’s not the Jupiter 8. The 8 is niche enough but not enough people even know about the 4-6 to warrant producing it. These companies are out to make money after all.

@@HotStrange I'd have to politely disagree. The Jupiter's are 3 of Roland greatest synths, the 4 being a Roland vintage classic, if there was no call for them, then the originals wouldn't be selling for thousands

Matthew Jessup That’s not true at all. The originals are expensive because collectors and rich hobbyists will pay that. That does not mean you’re average musician wants one or would pay that. Synthesizers on the whole don’t sell by the millions and something like a Jupiter 4 would sell even less. Sure, hardcore enthusiasts would be happy. I’d be all over it. But I don’t see them remaking anything besides the 8. The others just aren’t popular enough.

It can do accents and rests, I really like the accents. Can't do glides or legato steps tho :( Also u cant step it through with another device like the trigger info of a drummachine.... thats the only thing i didnt like!

@@Vincentrohr Thanks for reply!

​@@stefanoskollias According to andertons music UK who have it for sale on preorders say the Sequencer has adjustable accent, gate time, ratcheting and glide time per step. I believe the prototypes that were given out for demos on Behringer new products do not have all the full features on the sequencer enabled yet.

@@paulmski9564 Glad to hear that!

The 1/4" output or headphones jack on the back.... Just like you would on every other synth.....

Literally the best, you should know this

A WASP would be so cool, you're right!

Yes! This and the OSCar are my dream clones for Behringer. And the Octave Cat.

Welp, Wasp is out now. did you get it? :)

Yeah, the 101 always sounds better to me when used in a way that lets the sound develop.

Yup, definitely in this case. ;)

Jing Garcia That can only be a possibility with the boutique version. A poly version of this analog version means more circuitry + more $$$$.

James fuck off! All your comments about the boutiques and now your bringing your bullshit opinion into the behringer forum.

@@SPAZZOID100 Yeah. it's not just copy and pasting the code like in a digital copy. They'd literally have to have a full synth inside for each voice.

@@oracle-0018 James reeno gives the right answer to jing garcia.... It looks like you don't understand the subject.... and answer like a ****** troll. He brings good knowledge, you bring bad opinion. Roland boutique = just program in a chip , you can put all the polyphony that you want ( while the power of the chip allows it ). MS101 = real analog synthesizer! every feature in the synth need specific electronics components, if you want to have two features of the same type ( like envelope, LFO, filter, oscillator, etc.... ) you need to put twice of the specific electronic components. Very low price analog synth or polyphony, you must made a choice, you can't have both. MS/SH 101 are monophonic and have minimal architecture for being cheap and available for everyone. Moog One is polyphonic and have a more rich architecture (several VCO, envelopes, etc... per voice ) and is very expansive, not for everyone.

Odel 1980 cmon bro.

Bass station may be for you

No and there’s nothing wrong with that.

@@holygeneration7 it was a struggle to get a replacement, 2 months later I received refund

The difference is probably due to the fact that the electronics in yours are nearly 40 years old, and this one is brand new. It's possible that the one in the demo sounds like a *new* SH-101 sounded in the early '80s. Obviously, we'll never know.

lol u just don't wanna admit it's an sh 101 & more..the roland SH 01A, that one is a totally different synth...but this one? the resemblance is uncanny..check out craigslist, people are selling their old ass sh 101.. glad i got rid of mine last year as i got sick of the maintenance cost. But LOOKS wise i prefer the original..& ofcourse is behringer is behringer. people who jump in the bandwagon of Juno 106 & SH 101 who paid over a thousand are just so 2000 & late hahaha but ye it's a museum item ;]

@@SethJohn I have a old SH-101 and have had 3 of them since 1996. You need to get your ears cleaned. This replica sound 99% like a SH-101. Strop trolling!

it's ok Seth..i hope the tuning of your SH 101 is tight so you can justify what you've spent ya late bloomer lololol i just don't like pretentious comments when it comes to sounds/music

@@richiedon9133 "Seems like its own thing" = pretentious? I hope your folks installed outlet protectors in the basement, Richie. We can't afford to lose you.

Absolutely spot on assessment here

ms 1 and ms 101 is the same thing with another name on it

That would be a SH101 with a 1oh1 upgrade ;)

The camera was on the table and vibrating from the synth action but was it more than that? Did he need a banana?

gilt auch für den SH101

Nah just dumb.