They did that for me just now as well. Excellent customer service and company!

Happy to help 😀

The German way of celebrating :P

Thanks for the feedback Jonny, we will try to optimize it next time

@@RaiseYourEdge You're the best Ben keep up the great content dude

Omg this guy rise his edge on everything

Y wanted to say the same thing

Great video anyways

hahaha :D

Agree 100%

Thanks for pointing it out Bizz, we will try to do better next time

Raise Your Edge Joking around but not hating! Love the content! 👊🏼❤️

Ben must be so sorry.....

Sorry Mahdi, we will try to optimize next time

Thanks for the feedback Laz, we will take that with us

Thanks for the feedback Chad, these live play vids are recorded with the intention of showing all action, but we understand it is not optimal for mobile

1. as I said, of course Jx is too strong to fold in theory but in practice it is a different thing. Based on my experience I see people way too often waking up with trips. 2. Yes in theory, uut he was folding a lot vs 3bets and then T4s is also profitable to 3bet. 3. Of course you can also check/call. Evs should be similar. Based on my experience people are way too sticky and lose and non believer in HU and I prefer going straight for value. A lot of my plays differe a lot from Theory optimum and I do adjustments based on my experience what is max ev against certain players or against the pool.

@@RaiseYourEdge Thank you Ben. I'll save this comment in my notes - and re-read it whenever i make a bullshit GTO play. :)

You're welcome King, enjoy them!

Я тоже не понял этот фолд, то ли потому что адамс открылся половиной стека и поэтому у него в рендже доминирующие руки д10о, то ли стратежный пас, давить на фиша типа, хз если честно.

thank you!

GTO+

Good choice!

Slightly +EV. you gonna have other clear spots with higher EV etc...

Please join us on Discord, our coaches and community are looking forward to give you feedback! Be sure to also give your own thoughts so they can help you with that too: discord.gg/ry2Gkc5

against my overall calling hands that contain pairs and better flushdraws it is a bluff

@@RaiseYourEdge right, but why is it better to bluff vs the range that contain more J8, T8? More FE for the 2nd barrel?

because they have equity to make a straight and folde equity against a Q and a 9.

Sorry to hear Leo, out of curiosity do you watch on Mobile or Desktop? We will try to do better next time

​@@RaiseYourEdge no problem just thought i would let you know. i figured its important to you to know what the viewers want. obviously you do care cause you resonded and made the proper correction.good job

Ben here. 55 is a pretty standard rejam, just unlucky outcome. If you dont play those pocketpairs under 30bb aggressive, the BU can just run over you and it will hurt your winrate. The rest I agree from a theoretical standpoint, however, if you play exploitative, you will always be vulnerable for a counter strategy. Thanks for your input!

@@benjaminrolle7004 Hi Ben, Appreciate You responding man. I used to do SNGs, HU hypers, Spins and now do NLHE 6 max. I have done a lot of work in HRC (holdem resources calculator) for getting bubble ICM type of ranges. From SNGs I know when in bubble (which is similar to Your MTT spot when each pay jump affects equity of ranges), stack size matters a lot. If I recall correctly, with 55 You had a short stack somewhat solid player who knows how to slow play post flop open that BTN. If he is short stack, he is already aware that he should be much tighter in RFI as both CL and 2nd stack will attack him with 3b due to ICM factor. Even if he was 2nd stack in this spot, or You were 2nd he was 3rd stack for example, he will still not go monkey crazy with BTN RFI because as both 2nd and 3rd stack in those spots, he will face aggression from blinds via 3 bet jams due to ICM. As 3rd stack he will be scared of both stacks while as 2nd stack CL (chip leader) can own him pre flop and apply pressure. So with all that in mind, I mean well when I say 55 is too wide in such setup - as general expectations in these spot are that opponent will have very little to none FE (fold equity from BTN). All the best and look forward to Your content. That video with Steffan was gold (HH review and also interview - despite audio cutting).

@@benjaminrolle7004 Forgot to add about 86s 3b a bit more info. When shallow stacked, best 3b hands will be hands that have SDV (showdown value). Scs (suited connectors) are best used as 3b when deeper as they can realize their equity and get paid off. When shallow stacked or even with mid stacks, these hands end up being weak pairs with kickers or hands without SDV. So in those spots with lets say 30bb effective , if You prefer to 3b, better option is to go for linear 3b range which will consist of PPs , Axs , stronger AXo (AJo+) and then KTs+ QJs JTs type of hands. This range will be much better off vs shallower stack OOP where post flop often hands are played maximum 2 streets. All the best man, Charlie S

@@charlies3795 I disagree, I prefer to polarize my 3bets with 25-40bb eff with the focus on ax kx blockers. So the 54s and 55 3bets didn't make a lot of sense to me. K2o and T4s were good although the K2o shouldve been a little bigger

@@Johnny-cz2wv Villain was weakly folding to a lot of 3bets and not 4betting, so I understand why Ben was upping his 3bet frequency and choosing a more efficient smaller sizing vs this player type.

then work on your concentration

Damn why am I the only one that got a cheeky comment 😂😂. But to be fair you might have a point. Try make the screen bigger can't see much of the hands..

Ben is all about the sexiness!

Sorry to hear Norm, we'll try to do better next time