Until a cold gets him...

​@@sgasdvsdvdfvs a cold was nothing to them the real threat in that time was leprosy.

Until the French killed literally all of them with no issue 💀

​@@sgasdvsdvdfvslike another person here said a cold, isn't really a big of a deal, the more pressing problem at the time was leprosy, tho it didn't stop some knights since the order of St Lazarus is literally an order of leper knights

They worshiped bahomet tho

Impressive

Didn't you make a mistake and reverse 5 and 6 ? I've been looking at them and don't understand your description unless I reverse them

@@BlackCrafte Yeah, I did, already edited out.

Regarding point 11 im pretty sure that its still debated among historians whether they used wings in the battle or not.

@@bleflar9183 They may have used wings in battle, it often depended on each banner's regulations. But even if, those XVI and XVII century wings would be much, much smaller, not attached to the back of the rider but to his saddle, and they were straight, and not curved as shown in the photo.

Imagine getting your head blown off by some modern day soldier with a 🙂 ballistic mask.

Coming down the mountain side!

Coming down they turned the tide!

reddit

(and then got shaken up by Prussia, Russia and Habsburgs)

“I'm a Hussar, I'm a Hun, I'm a wretched Englishman Routing Bonaparte at Waterloo I'm a dragoon on a dun, I'm a Cossack on the run I'm a horse soldier, timeless, through and through”- Corb Lund

"Death from above make their enemy kneel"

storm clouds, armour and wings; death from above, its an army of kings!

Its cool but that goofy ahh crest

​@@NikoCigojthat crest is what the last thing you'll see before your guts get vibrated to dust after he demolished you off your horse

@@AffranchiXIV il die laughing then

​​@@NikoCigojhe who last laughs, laughs longest

Agree! Im all about the fancy crests and heraldry on armor.

It was also made to stop guns. One account had it shot twice in the face with a pistol and he kept on advancing like nothing happened. They then engaged in a sword duel where of course the man in full armor took no damage.

@@Phantom-bh5rulmao horror movie ahh knight

Every mfer from burgundy was dripped head to toe.

Isn't Charles the Bold that king who basically extinguished his own kingdom overnight by dying in battle without an heir during a cavalry charge? And then they ask me why I think political leaders going into battle is a terrible idea despite all the talk about "honor and bravery".

@@mekingtiger9095 he did have a daughter, but no male heirs, which lead to his realm being divided up between Habsburgs and France, as Burgundy held lands that were de jure part of Holy Roman Empire (Netherlands and County of Burgundy) and some that were de jure under French sovereignty (Duchy of Burgundy and Picardy).

Swiss peasant with pointy hook:

It’s just armor with some extra colorful bits added for the tournament to make it easier for the spectators to tell who’s who, and make it more of a spectacle.

Ayy nice Warden dude, also It also looks like the Fluted set from Demons SoulsPS5 remake, that iconic knight set, so cool looking

0:27 the Close Helmet was developed in Late-Middle Ages but it evolved incredibly after XV and XVI centuries.(Just for the people arguing if Close Helmet is whether medieval or not)

@@LittleSilva422 thanks, I haven’t played For Honor in a while, back when I did play, I only played Warden just because of how much I loved him, eventually got good enough to beat rep 70 Warmongers despite only being rep 24

You would be referring to the storm veil knight set, correct?

I think he’s talking about the set you buy from the twin husks in the round table hold

COMING DOWN THE MOUNTAIN SIDE

0:19 yup. If you’re facing someone with a polearm you’re going to have a bad time in that

@@buttered__toast_2899 That is what the knights of the 12th-13th century would wear. Plate armor wasn't really that common in that time.

@@atom8248in the 13th century, they’d usually have a coat of plate over top the maille and under their surcoat, but yeah, that’s just completely typical armor in the 12th-13th century

Most of these armors are some of the best protection you could get for the time periods they were made.

@@Specter_1125 And Many of the "uncanny" Images get effective protection aswell, but Since it looks funky it's Not good

Fr

glad someone noticed

Found ya

Red Baron! Many sing your legend!

Higher the king of the sky He's flying too faster and he's flying too high.

@@Lord_Ascwin hey

@@warchiefballer8809 hi

Gallóglaigh armour as well

the title said suits of armor

@@twiddlerat9920 They had their own armour set up

make your own version.

@@ronjahartonen7134 I don’t know how to

Here you go: For those wondering what are those sets of armor: 1. Early XVII century Savoyard-style three-quarters cuirassier's munition armour (a type of a mass-produced armor). 2. Early XVII century Arquebusier armor, consisting of elbow gauntlet, a cuirass and a lobster-tailed pot helmet (Pappenheimer). 3. Early XVII century English pikeman cuirass with morion-type helmet. 4. End of XIV century Churburg-style armor, one of the early types of plate armor, with a bascinet helmet and Hundsgugel (Dog's face) visor. 5. That's a terrible reconstruction of XV century Milanese armor I guess, due to assymetrical spaulders and a hook on the right side of the breastplate, but the assymetry should be focused on making the left side more armoured, and not the right, that bascinet helmet is of late XIV and early XV century, while white armor, which is an armor uncovered by cloth, started appearing in the third decade of XV century, and the brestplate shape is hideous, the armor is ugly and historically inaccurate. 6. Early XIII century chainmail (based on how short the mail hauberk is compared to earlier chainmails) and an enclosed helmet, known also as early great helm. 7. That's some strange set of armor consisting of plate armor of late XIV to early XV century, a cuir boulli breastplate (perhaps?) with a chain suggesting rather first half of XIV century, and a great helm from second half of XIV century with a crest and a torse (that fabric at the back of the head), suggesting purely representational and tournamental use, it wasn't used in combat. 8. Late XVI century corselet armor. Both armet-type helmet, assymetrical spaulders with left side of the body better protected, and a hook on the right side of the breastplate suggest Italian origin or at least style inspiration. 9. Late XVI century parade armor "alla Romana", basically a XVI century imagination of an ancient Roman armor. 10. That's some kind of ceremonial armor but couldn't find any info about it. 11. XVII century Winged Hussar's armor with szyszak-type helmet, a type known elsewhere as zischagge or aformentioned lobster-tailed pot helmet. Worth to mention that these huge wings were only part of ceremonial equipment and in such a form only in XVIII century, when Winged Hussars served only as representational unit and served no combat role. 12. Late XVI century parade armor of Erik XIV of Sweden. 13. Early XVII century heavy cavalry three-quarters armor 14. Second half of XVI century, a truly magnificent full plate armor of the King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania Sigismund II August.

@@jak00bspyr72 thank you very much

I would like Gallóglaigh

That's wild. I never really thought about it before. Only, like, rich *rich* people can afford to pay for a proper suit of armor

Hey I would take even the ugliest pieces, as I love history, especially the medieval period.

​@@PresidentFunnyValentinenaw, most people who wore armor where murcinares who bought it when they could

Winged hussars absolutely overrated

​@@racist4595 nah

@@racist4595 I'd say samurais are

I think you made a typo, the time stamp is 0:19

i was just wondering and waiting till THE WINGED HUSSARS ARIVE

I'm going to Alice

Most of the highest rated ones are the most practical for their given time periods provided you could afford them (which more people then you’d think could).

​​@@Specter_1125always nice to see some body humble enough to know there shit

Somewhere in Poland I bet, since it's the armor of the last Jagiellon King of Poland

Femboy knights LMAO.

​@@lightahead1278YES

Yes 😈

yh I find myself disagreeing with half of his shit

Gallóglaigh armour would be better

@@oscarosullivan4513 I dont even understand how he is rating them its not by looks really cuz some of them look terrible and hollywood type stuff but he rates them ok or high and its definetly not from protection

@@partnermammoth2562 Agreed one of the lower ones the mail and plate combination is better than most of the upper ones

0:11 should be higher

LOL

Armor so good that it makes you vanish

It’s Polish

Its Polish suit of armor not Portuguese

Dont know but im like 99% positive it was used in the mid-late 1600s

It’s called a cuirass. The way you see it being used (as the only armor on the soldiers torso and arms) I believe it was used in the 1200’s and was even used in small numbers in the First World War. But keep in mind the way it appears is the later use of it. Being only meant to protect the torso and no armor on the arms.