Not all protocols were developed with the same capabilities. Audio Guru Brian Maddox shares his insight on the "big three": Dante, AVB and MADI. ____ For FULL free courses, visit: www.theproductionacademy.com/...
Пікірлер: 6
@felipousismix10 ай бұрын
I wonder why Ravenna wasn't listed here, being the only one with AES67 native support...
@JBF-GST-Tanda2 ай бұрын
Hope one day there'll be an international standard protocol for parameter control like analog gain or 48V or phasing over Dante, making a mixer made by a brand natively compatible with a Dante stagebox made by another brand. Also I'm looking forward to see in the future that some DAWs and virtual rack softwares will have the ability to process Dante streams directly from and to the computer's Ethernet adapter without all the hassle of DanteASIO conversion. If this can be achieved, there'll be a powerful rival against Waves Soundgrid.
@thesteel-hearted94728 ай бұрын
I WONDER my dante multitrac recording is giving a lot of latency issues. as clip duration increases clip appears to be stretced. i am using 64 track recording via cl5 rio in daisy chain
@christiaanbezuidenhout69848 ай бұрын
Is your DAW in which you are recording, set to sync to external clock?
@SaveTheHuman52 ай бұрын
AVB is really miles away more solid than Dante. I use Dante for some time then switched to AVB..........end of history.
@theproductionacademy2 ай бұрын
Yes, I'm with you here! But Dante is so ingrained in our audio workflow right now, don't think it's going. anywhere.