#17 This time the BMW wasn't at fault 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

At 13:30 license plate looks like CEF-3349

When are they going to figure out, Americans DONT do round-abouts?

Most of these are repeats WTH?

@@sammatsusaka823 Because it's a BEST OF

@@kullalishka RIGHT ?! In so many of these videos i just think "yeah, its the other persons fault, but maybe evade before honking next time and you could have avoided a crash?!"

Yep! New York taxi style of driving.

If y’all are talking about the crash with the lady and the kids that impact could’ve been drastically reduced or even not have happened if she didn’t lay on her horn for such a long time before using her feet to stop the car and protect the kids in the back

Perhaps the answer is for car maufacturers to build cars so that hitting the horn automatically applies the brakes, as it appears that there are a lot of drivers that can't do both at the same time.

Or brains.

They must get paid very well!

They are never hard up for work. Nice driving cheeseheads.

😂😂😂😂😂

@@Weshopwizard You just explained why the wrecks happened, they are all pissed off at Rodgers for messing up the team and the team losing including being knocked out of the Playoffs by The Lions.

Why did it happen so many times here ?

he kinda was blazing through there

He says as he's going 60 mph 🤣

@@randellmainer Speed limit is 70

@@randellmainer Which is likely less than the speed limit.

​@@MadProfessor153But still way too fast for traffic conditions.

I mean at least he was honest😂

If I were ever to be in an accident, I can confidently say, that would probably be my same reason 😂

Had someone say they were looking at the clouds XD

Illegals being imported into canada is what it is. This crap was never happening 20 years ago. They've let a whole bunch of Indians, middle eastern and asians into the country all notoriously bad drivers and guess what, accidents have skyrocketed. Source: I work for a major IT company that runs analytics software for insurance companies.

Laugh?? Pisses me off to no end these embeciles have drivers licenses..... They need a bus pass....

Exactly he’s an idiot, anyone with common sense knows to slow down even while driving in the HOV lane during traffic hours because some people like to cut over unexpectedly to bypass.

Agreed. Having said that, I really don't understand people fully stopped in a highway lane with no one in front of them. If they weren't going to go, why did they cut over? Making sure no one else went anywhere also?

Makes one wonder what he means by blazing through...

Yeah, maybe 100mph is his threshold for “blazing through “

cars in next lane barely moving, while he's doing 59mph as shown in the footage

I was looking for this comment 😂

RIGHT!?!?!? I was looking for this comment XD

bro that shit had me fucking dead on the ground laughing bro omfg

Hopefully that roundabout NEVER gets 'reworked'!

Comes in a close second to the 11'-8" bridge currently

@@billst1985 didn't they raise it 8"?

I kind of want to take a trip to Milwaukee to see this roundabout.

@@Xavier-be2mi Yeah, they did but I still doing it's job.

Last year in Downtown Seattle, I had some guy hit me due to the road veering off to the left some. Construction was happening on the road. He admitted fault at the scene. Then he goes and tells his insurance that I hit him, not to mention he tried claiming it was at a different intersection. I shared pictures of the area after accident that proved the area it happened in. It came down to neither party at fault due to the false story he was telling. I got a dashcam after that and wished I had one then for that very reason. If I had hit him like he claimed, we would have gone into oncoming traffic and got in worse shape.

Two years ago, had a POS sideswipe me and then flee the scene. Dumbass missed their turn, so they decided instead of simply turning around and going back, they'd make a 90 degree right turn from a straight only middle lane, directly into my lane. I was lucky enough to see it and make the turn with them to minimize the damage or I would have T boned them. I thought they were slowing down to turn into a car dealership so I turned in as well. As soon as I did, they took off. I checked with the dealership, but unfortunately, their cameras didn't quite catch the intersection. Luckily, I was able to avoid the worst of it and my truck is still drivable. They are just lucky they didn't hurt my dog.

MOST PEOPLE FLEE BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO INSURANCE BECAUSE INSURANCE RATES HAVE GONE THROUGH THE ROOF I MEANI HAVE A GOOD DRIVING RECORD AFTER COVID MY INSURANCE WENT UP 13 DOLLARS A MONTH THATS ALMOST150 A YEAR FOR JUST LIABILITY

News flash, people suck. lol

Speed limit is likely 60 -70 in that kind of multi-lane road. The suv was clearly in the the wrong as it appeared they were upset about being passed by vehicles in the HOV lane while they were stuck in traffic. They pulled out to try and block the cammer from passing them. They played the ol F around and find out game, and lost.

​@MadProfessor153 I made no comment regarding the speed limit.

except in this situation you're supposed to adjust your speed@@MadProfessor153

He's going 59mph in what's likely a 60 or 65mph highway, how is that blazing?

@@joec3090 he's speeding compared to the rest of the traffic. it's called defensive driving.

@@joec3090 If you've ever driven in an HOV lane you know someone is going to do something stupid and jump in, so you minimize the delta V.

@@jimchesnutt7879 what is a HOV lane never heard of it

@@ryanlindstadt9968 HOV stands for High-occupancy Vehicle lanes (AKA Car Pool lanes). because if you car pool with others you get to bypass normal traffic using the HOV lanes because it cuts down on the amount of cars on the road. So if you have a passenger or a large amount of people in your car, you get to use these lanes. California also used it as incentive for people who purchased electric vehcles a long time ago I dont know if the state of CA offers that incentive anymore since I dont live in CA.

is that common in Milwaukee i wonder especially at that one roundabout

me too lol

I wish there were some clips of that roundabout from the dash cam point of view!🤣

they really need speed cameras there

@@darkmeilan9814 no, I use that roundabout everyday. And it’s mostly idiots or car thieves that cause all the damage

That would be the "normal" response of a good driver. Idiots don't know where the brake pedal is.

"Honk"... what I could not hear you over my horn

Yuuup. 1 car length for every 10mph at the minimum

You see some of these creeps turn into the accidents to make them worse.

Most people just hit the horn 🤣

Thats how they roll. Don't blame the bad guy, blame the guy who is standing up for his rights.

Angry Karen need someone to be mad at, and it's not good enough if she can't get paid! It doesn't matter who they burn in the process, because obviously the universe revolves around them 🤡

SERIOUSLY

The owner's insurance should have taken care of the other car the other car whether it was stolen or not in in police chases the owners Insurance is still responsible for every car or incident that car has

I mean, just read how they form their sentences lol. You can definitely tell they’re not the most intelligent.

I used to live on a rather curvy road way out in the sticks. People would rip through those curves like Satan himself was nipping at their ankles. Had a couple cars end up in our ditch.

they need their own web cam like the 11 foot 8 bridge

Not that it absolves the speeders but an ascending bridge with a blind spot over the ridge when’re the road takes an immediate, hard downhill left is horrible design. If the posted speed limit for the bridge is anything over 30mph and the left turn speed max warning sign shows anything more than 20, then the city should be sued to fix that shit.

Right I was like how are there SOOOOO many crashes is there no warning or ppl just straight up think they’re in Tokyo drift

@@goobs3988 I found it on google map, the speed limit is 30 mph and there are signs that a roundabout is coming up. It's a long straight line befor that so I assume that most of it is people going WAY too fast. Even if the design is a bit weird, if they were going 30 even 35 they would have plenty of time to stop. these people must have been going at least 40-45.

Tbf though, the dude had zero reason to stop and cause the accident though.

@@solidmoon8266 did you not see the vehicle in front of the SUV? It’s kinda hard to notice but you can see the top peek over the SUV and then you can see it’s shadow to the right. Basically everyone here is an idiot lol. The first car for brake checking the SUV, the SUV for tail gating, and the cammer for tail gating and failing to slow down significantly the first few seconds he saw the brakes.

If he wasn't too close, he wouldn't have rear ended them.

This is a common way of running an insurance scam. The two cars work together with the second one full of passengers. They both brake suddenly and the rear one gets hit from behind. Those passengers and driver all claim for injuries whilst the first car drives away. Cops can't do anything because there's no information on the first car that "caused the collision by braking hard". It's why you always leave a gap and pay attention when driving.

@@solidmoon8266 Why would it matter if the guy in front had a reason to brake? Do you think that, if he braked with a reason, he wouldn't have hit him? He simply was too close. 100% his fault.

If she doesn't like paying $500, she should ask for a lower deductible. Don't blame the victim. STUPID!!!

Yea rediculous statement from the car owner, knowing full well they would likely do the same thing in the other guys shoes.

But his confrontation lead to the incident and even caused the theives to evade being called. If they called the cops, the cops would of arrested them or chased them. He is partially responsible for the damage to the ladies car. But because his actions let the theives escape, he bears full responsibility unless they were caught. In this case her bill was 500$. I would of offered to pay her.

What I saw was black vehicle slamming into the front of white car pushing white car into grey SUV. Black SUV is at fault. Video? What video.

@@michaelgarrison688 Please, get your eyes checked.

You beat me to it... Lol

And asks if everyone is ok instead of standing on the break pedal, hitting the other car a few more times.

Yup, guys a bit of a moron. GPS shows the speed but I could see with my own eyes how fast he was going next to cars not moving. Darwin Award.

He’s the one pulling out then stopping right?

I wonder why the silver vehicle pulled into the HOV lane, then stopped? Possibly to block that lane from what he perceived to be misuse of it?

It was infuriating to watch, like WHY AREN'T YOU LISTENING TO YOUR PASSENGER?!

For a contact high.

For a contact high.

My only thought was perhaps human curiosity? Wanting to know what was going on with the driver; were they asleep at the wheel, unconscious, drunk, or otherwise incapacitated in some way? Not saying I condone it of course, definitely should have stayed right the fuck back from it. Luckily it appears that despite his insistence to be so close, none of his passengers nor himself paid the price for it

It has a youtube channel

It has a whole KZfaq channel with nothing but the round about crashes. Blows my mind that people from Milwaukee can't navigate a round about

@@charlesmcclure8000 I'm sure you can't either

@@charlesmcclure8000 especially with as many roundabouts as Wisconsin DOT has installed. You'd think they'd be part of the landscape by now.

@@robertjoseph5206 Maryland has many roundabouts and I successfully navigate them daily. You seem to be projecting some feelings with your unsolicited feedback. So I can only assume that you lost a car to the Milwaukee roundabout

I was going to post the same thing

Lol 😅 thinking the same thing.

Anyone knoow what book that is? Sounds interesting.

I came to the comments for the audiobook as well

Lol 911

Exactly. Video starts and he's actually less than one second behind the white SUV with plenty of time to get more following distance before the impact. Sucks that he got himself caught up in this mess.

😎👍

Jon: I hate people that tailgate and make the roads dangerous for everyone else. Also Jon: Tailgates in a big truck and then is surprised when he rear ends the white SUV.

The guy in front of me was so rude for not leaving me enough room to stop!

Then they say to move on if someone is tailgating you. Tailgating is very dangerous especially in bad conditions, if I don't feel safe with you tailgating me I will slow down to send you a message

It only should be attempted by those good enough to finish driving and start New Driver+ with all the perks and power ups gained from before 🤓

I don't even see why. It looks quite open and spacy. Why the heck does it seem like noone can get through it?

I don't know why Europeans keep saying Yanks don't know how to use roundabouts... /s

@@rs232killer perhaps they didn't grow up with The Magic Roundabout

@@SlipShodBob Boing Time for bed said Zebedee.

Agreed. Although he might be using the normal speed limit at that moment, the fact that the whole highway is almost slowed to a stop, the cammer should be much more cautious

A slower speed would have helped reduce the risk but the other car quickly moved into the lane when the lane it was in was clear…sound like an insurance scam to me.

Blazing or not, the intruding SUV caused the collision, not the dashcammer. Why would you pull into the HOV lane like that and then STOP? Smells like attempted insurance fraud to me.

@@taijuan5087 There's no question that the person merging in is at fault, but it was so fucking avoidable by just driving defensively. Assume everyone else is trying to crash into you and you become a much smarter driver. This was so SO preventable.

@@astu4677 How about NOT ILLEGALLY crossing into the HOV lane and just stopping. Everyone knows that MOFO who did that was trying to commit insurance fraud ... even got a sleazy attorney to sue. Even if the cammer was going slower he would still crash as that moron illegally crossed and dead stopped, there was no car immediately in front of him for him to dead stop like that. Next time open your eyes and watch the video!

Agreed - and she could have carried uninsured driver coverage for exactly this type of situation, she took her chances to save a few bucks.

@@austex995 I thought uninsured coverage is more expensive lol

Or, he could have just called the cops instead of playing cop himself. Hopefully, she takes him to small claims court to recover her $500 deductible. Maybe after he pays up, he'll think twice about trying to take the law into his own hands.

@@TomCat13461 - He has no liability. He didn't steal the car, and he didn't hit her car, either. The liability is with the thieves, period.

@@TomCat13461 you're defo the woman's husband

People who can prevent accidents and don’t do it just because they are In their right are the biggest idiots 😂 like it doesn’t matter if you’re right, avoiding accident and going home is more important than being right , some bad people in this world man. Also the spying culture is so cancerous in US “My dad called the police to report someone hitting another car” like mind your business man

which is why i never ride someones ass always give a few feet

Plus you could see the guy in front braking for atleast 500feet and then has to brake because a car completely stopped in front of him the guy driving with dash is completely at fault regardless of his excuses

Seemed like his reaction time was lacking, the driver had already been slowing down. He was totally at fault.

It is a major problem in my state. People will follow a car and a helf length back while doing 70 on the highway

To be found not-at-fault for rear-ending someone is a hard case to make. The person in front has to be doing something really blatant - reversing on a freeway, stopped at night in the middle of the road with no lights, suddenly lunging into a lane etc...

it’s an express lane, it’s illegal to cross over

He was doing 48MPH when the other driver crossed over

HOV lanes you can go over 60 dude. Especially in LA, going 60 is slow

@@ACNEH98Thene California's "Basic Speed Law" states that drivers must not exceed a safe speed based off of road and weather conditions. Driving the speed "limit" may be too fast if certain conditions make it unsafe to do so. Some examples of "conditions that would make it unsafe to do so" include: the general flow of traffic moving significantly slower, a high density of traffic, etc. While the insurance company will not see him "at fault", that's only for monetary purposes in terms of who pays what. At the end of the day, the dude was going too fast and that totally could've been avoided.

@@ACNEH98Thene still doesn’t make it smart to do with your family in the car and your wife already warning you *ESPECIALLY* in LA the city with some of the absolute worst drivers. He only won the verdict because of what you said but it still doesn’t it make it a smart decision and if a judge rules he was driving recklessly (even if it was the speed limit) he can be found anywhere from 0% liable to 100% liable(doubt he’d be found over 50% though).

yea what an absolute fwit and he braked so late aswell, no situation awareness at all. Even after the contact he still didn’t brake fully his car was slowly pushing the car in front. Seems like a self righteous bellend

@@nickng5857 And he even noticed that one car had jumped out ahead of the silver suv. At that point, slowing down would have been prudent but even after the second car jumps out he still didn't slow down. Terrible driving all around.

@@nickng5857 yup and morons like that are always more worried about blaring their horn instead of reacting or braking

@Shadow Of Wiggin lol I’m all about going the speed limit but the dude was flying in that lane when I would have been going way slower especially after seeing cars pull out like that. You gotta drive like everyone else doesn’t know what they’re doing.

@@Bruce_99 Sure Karen

Dude is a straight degenerate troll, uploading that and saying "so what if someone tailgates you just move on" you getting in an accident and the guy driving off is "What" you maroon. Glad he had to pay outta pocket

Yeah, the cammer had a LOT of time to slow down. My foot is about on that brake pedal the moment I see brake lights in front of me, especially when I see the brake lights of 2 morons riding up on each other. Stay vigilant folks

I'm glad they got away scott free. Serves the tailgater right. Hope he learned his lesson.

Just to clarify, there were two white vehicles in front of the cammer. The one in front of him was tailing the lead. The lead brake checked which caused the one in front of him to panic brake. Still though, the fact the cammer couldn't stop in time just shows that he was following too closely himself. Which is no surprise he would defend the dangerous behavior by saying that the lead should've ignored it. As this video shows, it's putting people at risk. By tailing, you will not be able to stop in time in the event that the vehicle in front of you has an emergency situation. This not only puts your own life at risk, and not just the person you are tailing at risk, but those around you as well. It honestly carries more risk than a little bit of speeding does, yet police are far more likely to pull over a car from speeding than tailing.

I do not go faster than 30km/h of the traffic around me. This what happens when doing 60m/h (100km/h) when the rest of traffic is doing 25m/h (40km/h). But the grey vehicle is at fault unfortunately.

He’s on a highway so it was the speed limit the other driver suddenly turned into his lane he had no time to apply the brakes And the horn is a reaction we all have, it’s the first reaction then applying the brakes

@@bleachfan2.029 if the other cars are stopped around you the speed limit is out of the question you should be slowed down too prepared

He wasnt going that fast and had slowed frm 65 if you watch the whole thing

I had anxiety watching him blaze through like that. I spend a ton of time on LA freeways and have been in his position many times where my lane is flowing while traffic is stacked in all the others. I would never go that fast and I don’t get honked at because drivers out here know that open space is just tempting all the other drivers around you. He was talking game but he wasn’t actually being defensive.

So true! Still going over 50 mph passing traffic jam

it was a full 2 seconds. he did brake the moment he saw that.

@@ryuko6727 he was going 60 past barely moving cars way, way too fast. I am surprised he wasn't partly at fault, in fact mostly at fault.

Yup. Not sure what he considers blazing through, but he is wrong!

Assuming the speed limit is 70, he was going 10 under at 60mph. There was no traffic ahead of him in the carpool lane, any slower and he's just potentially holding up traffic behind him.

it looked like a highway which is usually around 70mph, even at -10 its still around 60mph. you cant really go super slow in a free lane or carpool lane even if the others a close to a stand still, that's empeeding which is also a ticket fine. legally your not allowed to go under max 15mph of the speed limit unless your emergency blinkers are on for either shoulder pull over /dangerous driving conditions / or your trying to get somewhere to repair your vehicle. its pretty normal for accidents like that to happen on the highway because people try to shoot out to avoid wrecks then end up in them because they full stop for whatever reason and the original car in the lane may not be able to slow fast enough.

@@roothlus speed limit has no bearing on that situation with the traffic stopped on the right hand lane you slow down in the HOV lane Otherwise you will get into an accident like he did. People do not follow Road Rules they’ll do the unexpected

@@roothlus Literally every other lane is at a standstill he should’ve known people would be trying to merge he’s definitely not holding up traffic in that situation LMAO I mean come on

Haha exactly what I thought.

Exactly! So if they legally with insurance and doing things legally and made the same mistake they would have gone after them. But they suddenly refuse because they were breaking a lot of laws you suddenly are sorry for them? I guess if they are a drunk driver who kills their family they will have to see if they had legal plates, legally required insurance and all the rest before deciding if they should call the cops?

@@Quentin0352 And they DO cost us more because someone has to foot the bill for their lawbreaking. That's why we pay such high insurance. Since the guy is SOOOO sorry for these CRIMINALS, he should help pay some of our insurance too.

Exactly they will continue to break the law with out repercussions if they can get away with it

this is what liberal propaganda does to people

You + are = you're.

@Golden And that is the point that is being made. No-one is questioning where the blame lies, they are simply saying the cammer could have avoided the heartache by driving at an appropriate speed in those circumstances.

@@PJBonoVox he also didn't hit the brakes until after he noticed the car came to a complete stop. I've noticed good truck drivers immediately let off accelerator when someone goes in front of them. People forget that trucks can be carrying an oversized load and that their car brakes work much better.

It don't matter, 53 mph is within the speed limit. How about NOT ILLEGALLY crossing into the HOV lane and just stopping. Everyone knows that MOFO who did that was trying to commit insurance fraud ... even got a sleazy attorney to sue. Even if he was going 40 mph he would still crash as that moron illegally crossed and dead stopped. Next time open your eyes and watch the video!

yeah and if not for the white suv he probably would’ve hit the black car in front with how fast he was going since the black car clearly just merged and was stopped as well.. did not seem like they were already slowing down, at least not enough

Exactly what I was thinking. That seemed like a pretty decent speed to me to not be considered “blazing through” traffic. Wouldn’t have called it out if it weren’t for his speed being up to 60mph while the rest of the regular lanes were practically at a stand still, yet says he’s not blazing through the HOV lane. 😅

​@@BestoftheBest-oz4eiexactly! It's just SCREAMING insurance fraud!

I can tell you from personal experience that its the shock and disbelief that grabs you and keeps you from instantly reacting. most people don't get into a crash and it unhinges them. they shortly after either go through fear or the go through intense anger. there is a reason its call the fight or flight reaction.

Russia is worse.

@@tealnoise no, they’re not.

America is a "Me first" culture. thats why so many of these guys hit and run.

Look at videos of Russian drivers. They're TEN times worse. It's just scary seeing how Russians stone cold refuse to learn how to merge slowly into traffic. They just swerve HARD to the left and don't care if they hit anyone! Oh, and when it snows in Russia, you always go faster! Do we need to brake? Nyet!

this happens all over the world, theres plenty of videos in Uk and europe of this happening. dumb dumb.

Insurance scam 100%

Aviate, navigate, communicate. The rule applies to more than just pilots.

I agree. Sick of people thinking they don't have to follow the laws in this country. You can bet your ass they were illegal aliens over here talking jobs from legal citizens.

@@JustAnotherConspiracyTheorist bro please, legal citizens dont even want to work in the firs place, much less do the jobs these people do. get your head out of your ass

yes 100% thieves fault. now if the owner had FORCED them to crash then yeah I could see some liability transfer. if the OP (owner of the innocent car) comes in she will NOT be happy with us having this conversation. WHILE I DO feel for her she had nothing to do with this she wants to make the owners pay knowing she can never make the thieves pay. right and wrong don't matter she just wants SOMEONE to pay and that's ALSO wrong.

you should mad that the insurance company is refusing to pay. otherwise, why bother with having insurance if the insurance company is going to look for every loophole technicality to not help policyholders?

@@blackflagnation no. insurance is (from what I gather) not doing anything wrong here. they offered UNI/UDI she elected NOT to take it. since your never going to find those thieves and I doubt they have insurance even if you do this IS a hit an run. it is covered under UDI/UNI it might also be covered under comp/collision NEITHER Of which she had from the sounds of it. Liability covers what YOU do to OTHERS Comp/Copllission covers YOU regardless UNI/UDI covers what happens to you not your fault when the OTHER party is uninsured or under-insured or simply absent (IE hit and run) For example you need ENOUGH UNI to cover your max potential losses and you need enough UDI to cover the likely "difference" in coverage that typically might exist. got a $80k tesla in a state where min liability is $15k? you better have at least $60k in UDI to cover that difference. because that's all your getting from the other persons insurance if they have the state min you then have to SUE THEM directly for the difference. UDI takes care of this. This is why a HOME OWNER with a brain usually carries 100/300 coverage minimum. you don't want them coming after your HOUSE if you smash up more than your insurance can pay for. SHE elected not to have that coverage. I have many issues with insurance and don't think it should even be private but IT IS what it is and she went in eyes open. she is going whacko because she WANTS someone else to pay (and I don't blame her I would too) but in this instance the party she is trying to force to pay IS NOT RESPONSIBLE.

@@nerys71 Insurance is a scam. Simple as that, they prob offered her $50.

@@HowManyHintsDoYouNeed that's the people running it. not the concept of insurance. for example AVOID geico !!! spent over 5 months just trying to get ahold of them when their "client" wrecked my car. Finally the only way I could get ahold of them was when MY insurance did me a favor (liability only) and CALLED their insurance using their internal numbers and 3 ways me in. at which point they told me Oh we declared you at fault. our client says they were in control of their lane and you drifted in front of them causing them to hit you...... yeah no joke. that's what they came up with. The guy was such a moron he did not grasp what I means when I said exactly this "they must be a special kind of stupid or they don't know what I meant when I said I have a dash cam" When he replied with what do you mean and I said I have a camera in the car I have a video recording of the accident. he replied with what am I driving around with a video camera. I LITERALLY HEARD my agent face palm through the phone and then I told him he was a special kind of stupid as well (I was really angry) When he asked for the video I said you slimey twats I have been trying to give you this god damned video for five months and you have been intentionally ignoring me. I said LET ME GUESS. 24 year old kids SECOND major accident under Daddy's policy. Daddy says no at fault then changes insurance companies on you to avoid the rate increase and now you are stuck with this claim that you are illegally and fraudulently trying to avoid by declaring me at fault and then ignoring me and what? hoping I will go away with a wrecked car? Does that about sum it up ? absolute silence on the other end and a chuckle from my insurance agent. a soft one but audible 🙂 Then I said. how about I also send you a video after the accident when the state police told us to just go home where the driver admits to falling asleep and waking up as they were slamming into my car and your "client" admitting that he let he unlicensed girlfriend drive the car home and that this is his second major accident under daddy's insurance and that he is not taking the blame for this. Would you like that video as well? yeah. I was in burn it all mode at this point. AND IT DOES NOT STOP THEIR. I actually had to make a CUSTOM video for them to download after getting him to explain to me what kind of fucking computer he has because they rigged their video upload system to simply not accept any video and claim they can not use youtube. finally figure out he was running windows xp (this was a while ago) so I knew his system could natively read mpeg1 video even with nothing else installed so I converted the video to mpeg1 and put it on my own server so he could get the fucking thing. AND ITS STILL NOT THE END I then spend the next 3 months fighting over the VALUE they kept trying to undercut the value by thousands but still wanted to "total" the title (salvage title the car) and I said fuck no. you are offering $2900 to total out a $5500 vehicle FMV. you have 2 choices. $2900 and NO salvage title or $5500 and you can have a salvage title AND you will pay for the repairs I have done to the vehicle in the last 7 months as well I said your alternative is court. I have 5 cars and already repaired this one its no skin off my back. they then also paid me $1500 for my trailer $400 for each phone (photographer time lapse camera's) $400 for my bike and $160 for my bike carrier. I got the max to the penny the law permitted. I had to sit down with my mechanic and do a custom order for a micro aluminimum trailer. he said sure we can make it for anything you want I said no it has to be legal and legit using standardized rates and materials. no cheating. Yeah. aluminum was skyrocking at that time. it was delicious to watch him TRY to figure (insurance guy) out a way to decline anything. I looked him in the face and said you go ahead and try. triple verified using industry standard rates and material costs from multiple sources precisely as the law prescribes to the letter. yeah I had to spend 2 months learning how insurance works and how the law figures into it. fucking scumbags. in the end THEY STILL screwed me as I did not notice they forgot to include SALES TAX when they paid me so they beat me for 6% hell THEY HAD me bring the trailer to them instead of picking it up. it had a flat tire. when I handed him the receipt for the tire he said "we are not paying for that" I said no problem I will just put the flat tire back on the trailer :-) I PROBABLY could have charged them standard tow rates for bringing the trailer to them but did not think of that at the time. Grrrr :-)

That happened to me. We were both backing out of our space and we hit dead center of each other. Luckily neither of us were going at any speed, the only damage was some dust was bumped off.

Sounds like a serious issue of a crook in a cop uniform, needs to be outed and fired

@@davidpowell3347 and have a sudden short drop

I am sure they will check their blind spots more carefully from now on. No need to get law enforcement involved when their cash could fix the damages that happened.

Turn signals on a BMW & VW must be a $30,000 option! Agree with you 100%!

Don't jump too fast. Get the police report of the incident first and see what their determination was. If they mentioned obtaining the video, who they believed to be at fault, and anything else worth noting. If they lie about the videos existence or try to pass speculation of her running a red as absolutes then you go nuclear

The police investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing.

Naw, better to just let people go without penalty. Laws are only for people who chose to follow them. lol

I know, what stupid idiotic reasoning, all of it

no license, no registration, no insurance... ya just let him go, that'll teach him!!