@SourPlanet Жыл бұрын
It's worth noting that fast lenses are also great in architecture photography because you can simply use focus stacking for critical scene depth. Then for spaces with intentional lowlight (entertainment spaces especially), it's easy to get great shots at 100 ISO without figuring out a long exposure on site.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
I don’t use focus stacking too much, but Luminar has a pretty sweet extension for that. Good tips! Thanks for watching
@SourPlanet Жыл бұрын
@@PaulFeinberg I sent this video to a buddy who is trying to figure out what lens to get. I agree this little F4 is the way to go. Punches way out of it's weight class. I'd be on one if I didn't do cityscape stuff and already love my little 16-35/4 ZA to death.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
@@SourPlanet thanks for the love! It’s for sure good bang for the buck!
@riparianlife97701 4 ай бұрын
I just ordered one for RE, yacht parties, and architecture. I'm so excited about taking it into some old cathederals.
@PaulFeinberg 4 ай бұрын
It’s a fun lens. I think you will enjoy it. I see people switching between 14mm GM and 16-35mm GM and I would rather have this one not have to switch lenses and it’s wider. So it’s been great!
@tomaszbejnarowicz 3 ай бұрын
9 bracket is just wild
@PaulFeinberg 3 ай бұрын
Wild is how I roll! Honestly could probably get away with 5 brackets but I like options
@emower2011 Жыл бұрын
Great Video, Paul! I've noticed maturing in video (for me) is realizing that not everything--especially real estate-- should be shot with a wide open aperture. Shooting f8+ for real estate is great advice.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Ya for real estate video a great lens is the new 16-35mm f4. Looks awesome, portable, works great on a gimbal and you want everything to be in focus so the f4 is fine. I am Learning as well that everything doesn’t need to be low low Aputure….I mean I love that background blur but there are times when you don’t need a ton of it.
@BrianTheCameraGuy Жыл бұрын
Well done Paul. I have not tried this lens. The photos look amazing.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
It’s a fun lens, right now I only use it for real estate, but maybe I should try it in other projects…..
@JaredSpink Жыл бұрын
Great job. For sure a good lens.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
Thanks man for your support.
@user-io8gx9fz1d 2 ай бұрын
Hey thanks for this! I'm pretty much sold. I already have the 16-35 2.8 tho. It tends to distort. Is there less distortion with a prime 12mm lens? It's a 1/3 of the price and I'm just getting started, but I'm thinking this one might be worth the investment. Would I be better off just getting the 12-24? It sounds like that's all I would need. I also have a 24-70 and 70-200. Thank you! Great vid.
@PaulFeinberg 2 ай бұрын
I have the 16-35 GM for my KZfaq channel and I still only use the 12-24mm f4 for all real estate photography. Hands down the best I have tried with no swapping lenses. If it died today I would be buying another one. Well worth the investment for my real estate photography. I only use this lens for real estate pretty much. Hope this helps! Best of luck!
@mattym2210 2 ай бұрын
I currently am doing RE photography and using a 16-35mm GM II with an A7IV. I purchased this 12-24 which helps A LOT in tight spaces. Deciding if it’s worth keeping the 16-35 or picking up a 14mm GM for video, and using the 12-24 f4 for all my RE photography. Any advice would be appreciated!
@PaulFeinberg 2 ай бұрын
Personally for video I find that 16-35mm works and I like having that option for tight shots at 35mm. Plus the 16-35mm is my daily driver for on the go KZfaq content.
@mattym2210 2 ай бұрын
@@PaulFeinberg Drives me crazy that there are so many options! lol Not sure it makes sense to keep the 12-24 and 16-35..
@PaulFeinberg 2 ай бұрын
@@mattym2210 so many options for sure….if you don’t think having both works for you then sure pick the best for you and sell the other
@Slipsch 11 ай бұрын
Why not 16-35 PZ?
@PaulFeinberg 11 ай бұрын
PZ is great for video. I personally like something wider for smaller bathrooms and such. You can get away with a 16-35mm but prefer at least 14mm for small spaces and 12mm for small bathrooms comes in handy.
@rich4738 10 ай бұрын
10 seconds in and I think you are talking directly to me.
@PaulFeinberg 10 ай бұрын
How did you know!? lol Destiny!
@byshotmedia Жыл бұрын
Great video. And for videography?
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
Spare no expense the 14mm f1.8 GM….Sony 16-35mm GM (I would hold off till the version 2 gets announced and you would need a gimbal strong enough) budget options Sigma 16-28mm f2.8. I personally use the Tamron 17-28mm right now (I would buy the sigma now that it is out) and I am looking to get the 16-35mm GM version 2 when it releases. For video the F-Stop does matter. The 14mm works great inside but you can’t put filters on it for outside.
@michaela.942 7 ай бұрын
Man i was gonna watch your video, BUT what did you shoot your video with? I tried even 1080 and picture is still not sharp, so how can you give me advice of lenses ?
@PaulFeinberg 7 ай бұрын
My lighting was clearly not set right in this video….sucked at setting the exposure on this one. I shot with Sony a7siii and 24mm GM first half then swapped to the 12-24mm F4. Probably would care more about the demonstration photos in the video…..but ya not sure why I would have been ok with the exposure in this video. Oh well
@BillAshtonNelo Ай бұрын
12mm and 14mm is a world of difference. 16mm is a galaxy difference.
@clydedigital Жыл бұрын
The sigma 14-24 blows it away in terms of quality.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
Haven’t had any issues with my 12-24…been amazing. Plus having that 12mm for tight bathrooms is so clutch.
@clydedigital 11 ай бұрын
Christopher Frost tested and said vignetting and barrel distortion were issues. He also said the sigma 14-24 was sharper and better.
@padiver 5 ай бұрын
Why not just get the Sony 16-35 f4 and save 700$ ?
@PaulFeinberg 5 ай бұрын
That 12mm is so clutch for really tight bathrooms and small spaces. Also when there is a huge tree in the center of the front of the house and you have the get closer to get the whole house.
@RubenDelight Ай бұрын
It's absolutely insane to me y'all shoot real estate below 16-18mm that looks absolutely ridiculous. Anything below 20mm is distorting reality. I basically never go below 22mm unless it's a bathroom or miniscule room.
@PaulFeinberg Ай бұрын
@@RubenDelight I try not to shoot below 18mm if I can but those agents love the wide perspective. They don’t see the distortion like us photographers do. Normal people don’t care
@RubenDelight Ай бұрын
@@PaulFeinberg I find it pretty interesting that it’s so prevalent in the US and Canada. Here in NL most of the real estate shots are at minimum 20. The home owners I visit very frequently talk about how they hate the ultra wide shots that distort the space though! A lot of the real estate agencies also tend to care a bit more here I feel like but it could be just anecdotal bias.
@PaulFeinberg Ай бұрын
@@RubenDelight every place is different for sure.
@mohammedmehta2542 Жыл бұрын
Instead of lenses, you might want to invest in some teeth
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
Lenses pay the bills, but my mom did invest in my teeth when I was younger. Foolish me stopped wearing my retainer. Maybe if I get a million subscribers like you one day I will get some new teeth, but thanks for watching!
@brandonsmith3552 Жыл бұрын
You should invest in some manners.
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
@@brandonsmith3552 just happens from time to time. Thanks for the love Brandon!
@brandonsmith3552 Жыл бұрын
@@PaulFeinberg For sure man! Some people are the worst. Great video, btw
@PaulFeinberg Жыл бұрын
@@brandonsmith3552 for sure! Thanks for the support!
@marienorris4878 Жыл бұрын
𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚖 🎉
Cool Items Official
Рет қаралды 35 МЛН
Alex Serrao
Рет қаралды 50 М.
AT Architectural Photography
Рет қаралды 145 М.