It's fiend dinos. All the 3s are the baby, but once per turn. The s/t are also the baby and sarama is oviraptor. The deck has no misc.

@@semisolaire5866 if babies locked you in dinos as well. Also a Miscellaneoarchfiend would make people outrage for emergency ban, same with a Warrior, Cyberse and god forbid Dragon equivalent.

It's cheap but contains many breaks , if you want more consistency you gotta go for a high priced one

@@ThanosSonOfElarswdym?

@@ThanosSonOfElarsI have the deck fully completed and it wasn’t really expensive at all outside of like 6 extra deck URs and a few staple handtraps but most URs in the deck are crafted anyways from use in other decks

What? They talk like this is the first appearance of unchained in Master Duel

I mean it was my first deck period and MD is my first way of playing yugioh yes it’s been in the game but the new support makes it relevant and more playable is what I meant

@@jakejones8159 Deck was pretty much unplayable prior to these supports.

Thank you for the clarification @TheBlueShell @Duck 👍

Woops, you are right! It's something that didn't tend to come up because you don't tend to have the bodies for it, but my mind assumed it's possible.

Also Underworld Goddess is light attribute.

- I don't think caesar should be banned right now. I just feel Caesar would've been a far better hit than Sharvara... Sharvara at 1 is what nuked this deck into a very fragile bricky deck... Meanwhile caesar is the somewhat toxic floodgate that pushed unchained over the edge... Had they banned caesar, unchained would've still been a real deck but with cool interactive back 'n forth with sharvara constantly letting you dodge and lots of pushes... (and let's be clear here... IP and SP are not more powerful than caesar) - I agree 3 Rakea might be better for the maxx c type of metagame. But with 3 rakea, tour guide becomes too many normal summons, so probably the DDD package then (especially since it also is the followup from caesar). My main reason for going for 3 tour guide here is that with prosperity at 1, I felt the deck lacked solid starters and tour guide being the only 1-card combo ensured we still maximized the ability to play. - While I love breakers in this deck, we are not reliably breaking the pure snake eye board with them... if we just let them play, they WILL have full board backed up by non engine and we simply aren't breaking it... We'd need an opponent that's ass or we'd need to get very lucky. I'm not a fan of that. Rollback being yet another brick until we're able to play is also not something I'm a fan of. - Yes, obviously lvl8 abo is crazy good when you're already playing, but if a card is not starting or single-handedly generating a push as an extender, I consider it a brick. The worst unchained hands are the ones filled with requiem, shyama, abom, fiendish rhino (and disaster). Obviously if you got a hand full of pushes, abom makes that hand even crazier, but the reality of this deck is that abom makes the good hands great but the bad hands awful. - I can see how apo could be seen as win-more. As I mentioned in the vid, it's definitely the most cut-able slot.

@@solemnyugioh - I dare say Sharvara wasn't hit for the power of the deck but just like SHS because the core as 5$ before support came and everyone already had them ready thus not getting sales for new product. - Caesar can't deal with Fenrir/Kash in general, backfires hard against Talent take, loses to books, requires non-generic materials. While I get the point, IP/SP is incredibly more versatile and resistant to removal while offering grind game as well as abusing floating effects making it a no-contest in the end. That's why 1 costed 100$ while the other 5$ because even with a more limited deck pool Caesar had only 1 print and would easily skyrocket if it were that broken. - I'm currently testing without Tour Guide (or Tell) and I don't have that brick issue. - In master 1 now after 7 games I didn't have an issue breaking the snake board and OTKing, although m1 is a bit for the memes and master 2 is the really competitive rank. I get the point and I agree, it must be variance favoring me a bit. - About 2 Rollback, with 3 Rakea/Aruha I didn't find it a brick, even got to Zeus it once then revive an Unchained to make MP2 plays. - Bystials were very useful. Thinking of bumping them from 3. I currently play 1 each TTT + Daruma as an alternative target. - Maxx C is horrible, I can't believe how bad it is now that I played with this. I typically choose a deck that either plays well into it (Lab/Tear) or ignores it (Mannadium/Infernoble) and if you lose the minigame chances are you lose. - Abo is hurt quite a bit by OCG rulings but still with the maxed out trap lineup you can get some value since Knightmare Phoenix and Accesscode are the prime removal options and SP is missing.

@@babrad - Obviously IP is more versatile. No one is going to dispute that. It's why it's been great in so many decks throughout the ages, BUT if ANY top deck could choose between putting an IP or a caesar on their board without any other changes in context, they would choose caesar every single time. Its effect is simply that much better. I think this will become very obvious when the fiendsmith cards drop lol... - I'm glad the deck is doing well for you!

@@solemnyugioh after the hype dies down people will realize fiendsmith requires 7 main deck slots and at least 4 extra deck slots (or 3 bodies for moon goddess + 1 fiendsmith). Personally I doubt Caesar is worth that much space and unless a deck wants this engine for other purpose as well, they won't run it.

Except for tour guide, it’s all 2 card combos so pot is quite important yes

same, but that'll be a long time sadly hha

That was back when kash was making shangri-ira so you could make a free arise on top of your fenrir. Not relevant now.