"I'm coming off so pretentious" hunny you worked for that film degree, you better use it unapologetically

Skin looks so glowy plz update on skin care also I love you

this movie is literally leo dicaprio and brad pitt just driving around hollywood vibing edit: oh my god it's just a joke. i love this movie and it deserves all the praise. stop being such pretentious babies. learn to joke about the things you like and stop holding things on such high pedestals

Quentin Tarantino on why Margot Robbie didn’t have many speaking lines in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood: “For most of us, if you brought up the name Sharon Tate a year and a half ago, what would you think? Most people would think about the murder. They would think about her as the victim of this horrible crime - one of the ghastliest crimes of the 20th century. So one of the things I’m just really proud of is the fact that I wanted to show her alive, I wanted to show her as a person. I didn’t want to get her involved in a bunch of movie plots or anything like that. I actually liked the idea of just following her during the day as she does her errands - the thing that was robbed from her was living her life.” “And now, because the movie has played all around the world, when you bring up Sharon Tate, the murder isn’t the first thing people think of. And I’m very, very proud about that. And her family is very, very happy about that too.” PS. Sharon Tate’s sister was impressed with Margot Robbie’s performance and she even teared up and thought that was exactly how Sharon Tate herself acted in person when she was still alive, she even loaned Sharon’s jewelry and clothing to Margot Robbie to wear while filming. To some people who didn’t really know much about Sharon Tate other than her murder, it would seem random that it’s just long shots of her doing mundane tasks, but if you’re into the 60’s style and style icons or if you respected Sharon Tate and her movies, you would love the scenes of her just being herself instead of most movies glorifying her death. Edit: to further explain, in my point of view, the movie was all about nostalgia and evoking a sense of “feeling” to the viewers. What was it like to follow around a regular human, not some murder victim or a rising star, but just to portray Sharon Tate as any regular person like you and I. It’s too cheesy to make too much sentimentality by giving her too much lines about how much she loved her life, but just show her enjoying life. Simple things like going to the movies, partying, going to the bookstore, driving with a hitchhiker. Especially now that we’re under quarantine with the coronavirus, these little things really just make you see how Sharon Tate was just like anybody else. Just to go out and have fun or “being normal” and day-to-day activities. That’s the feeling I got from watching Margot Robbie as Sharon Tate, someone just living her life as a regular person. Not how the media always portrayed her before (murder victim or rising star gone too soon) I think that was the point of the movie to have Sharon Tate not a main character, but to be there to serve a feeling of nostalgia.

"it's generally known that Tarantino has a foot fetish..." apparently it's not generally known enough !!! tf !!

I never said I wanted to see Bradd Pitt on acid defeating two armed members of the Manson family in hand to hand combat. But I sure wasn’t disappointed.

The foot thing: QT 's fetish aside, people did walk around with dirty bare feet back then.

This movie was really amazing in a lot of ways but one of it’s biggest flaws is that, like you said, you have to have knowledge on Hollywood history and that time period in order to understand everything and enjoy the movie to it’s fullest. I’ve never heard about Sharon Tate or Charles Manson so my mum had to explain it to me while watching the movie.

u should have a segment here or sumn, called “Movie review Monday with Ashley”!! i love you and the way u analyze films!!

directors wasting amazing actresses' talent because they don't know how to write women without sexualising them is my villain origin story

you shouldn’t have to do research to enjoy a movie, imagine being told to do that for every movie you watched. just bc your a famous director doesn’t mean you should alienate your audience

"Lonely... but beautiful" is what I hope people describe me as.

I watched this with my boyfriend and I told him before about the Tarantinos feet fetish and he was like Nah that can’t be true. Well after we walked out of the theater... he believed me

Ok I want more movie reviews from Ashley pls

You're actually wrong about the roof scene. Charles Manson makes his appearance and there was a flashback memory of Pitt's character and Bruce lee if I remember correctly.

didnt manson show up during the shirtless brad and dancing margot to see sharons house

Just googled Quentin Tarantino and like honestly he looks like a foot guy.

The movie did a beautiful way of representing cinema history in a way. I've seen the movie twice and at first I thought the same about Sharon's character. But the second time I saw it, I thought its not what she says, but more what she does. The scene where she goes to the cinema and is like insecure about what the public would think about her film says a lot more about the character than what she says. I enjoyed the movie a lot. The feet were uncomfortable. The ending is amazing! I definitely disagree with the ending not being satisfactory.

Margot Robbie was playing Sharon Tate as the way Sharon Tate was. Her basic role wasn’t meant to belittle women or the image of Sharon Tate.

I hear your points and see you're very passionate about them, so I respect that. However, the movie goes a lot deeper than the points you've made here. The movie, taking place in 1969, is essentially about the end of the 1960s which coincided with the tragic death of Sharon Tate and her friends. Leo's character is an actor who's career is in decline and is almost outdated by the social trends and the 'hippie' culture that arose in the late 60s. Brad's character is his counterpart who though is in a similar position doesn't allow the end of the 60s defy him and is content to where is life is going, keeping Rick's confidence afloat, encouraging him to start a career in spaghetti westerns and finally saving him from the Manson family's attack. Cliff is Rick's stuntman he does the heavy lifting in Rick's life (taking down the killers) and allows Rick to steal the show afterwards (the flamethrower), we see this consistency through the whole film and I think it is carried out with great pay off in the finale. As for Sharon Tate, her character is there as a parallel of Rick's. Tarantino perfectly and delicately depicts her as the joyful rising star that she was. The scene of Sharon in the theatre, listening to people laughing and praising her scene in 'The Wrecking Crew' plays next to Rick's agonising time on set, where he forgets his lines and dramatically comes to terms that he is a failure. I understand you may feel Margot Robbie deserved more stuff to do in the film but I believe Tarantino wrote her character as more of an homage to Sharon Tate in the movie and as an optimistic and inspiring symbol of happiness. Therefore your point on how you would've liked her to take on the Manson Family (not "random hippies") could move into a distressing and disrespectful territory for Tate's family and her legacy. Additionally, it would've been completely out of character for Sharon to begin fighting her killers, making sense that Cliff (a stuntman who proves his skills many time throughout the movie) would be the one to defeat them. Sharon also takes many qualities of the 'hippie' culture in Hollywood (putting her feet up in the theatre) because she was a modern woman who is trendy unlike Rick who feels uncomfortable wearing tassels on his jacket. Tarantino simply uses moments like character's having their feet out to depict the time and especially the Manson family's lifestyle. With that being said, I think it's unfair to throw out allegations the shots of women's feet were shot for Tarantino's sexual desires and for no real purpose merely because you find it offensive that women show their feet in this film, I mean it's just feet. Also, comparing Tarantino to men who have sexually abused women in Hollywood for including these shots of actor's feet is disrespectful and a cheap shot to strengthen your argument about the movie. I really enjoy the movie and think you get a lot more of Tarantino's genius out of it by looking further into it's context and after multiple viewings. I'd recommend watching it again as I certainly got a lot more out of it which now I think proves it as one of Tarantino's best!

Ashley is that kind of KZfaqr I can watch all day, and never get bored of

I’m a simple girl.... I see Ashley and I click

as someone who lives in LA (suburbs but same thing lol) when she said that driving at night is lonely but beautiful bruh u best beLIEVE I felt that

OUTIH is driving around doing nothing in Grand Theft Auto then in the last 20 minutes you decide to do a mission.

KSHSHJSAK u called the manson family guys “some hippies”

A man reviewing films would never apologise for "coming off so pretentious", let alone if they had an actual film degree!!! would love to see more reviews x

This doesn't happen often, but I'm always so glad when it does: I disagreed with a lot of your points, but I had a blast watching it! And even though I didn't agree with you on a number of things, your critique was intelligent, thoughtful, and witty, and offered a new insight on several aspects of the film. I will absolutely be subscribing and checking out some more of your content. Also, I loved seeing someone else who throws their hands around when they talk.

the way Ashley talks just makes me so happy, it's so soothing and mature sounding (in this type of video lol)

"I would kill to have tarantino's brain" **instant regret**

this video is the equivalent of swinging a bat at a hornets nest and i love it

Your not getting the whole point of the movie it’s literally about the Hollywood lifestyle and Manson murders. It’s referenced to all the Quentin Tarantino movies. At the final part the line “the moment you’ve been waiting for” meaning the moment we’ve been waiting for, the violent part of Quentin movies

I think this is a movie that one needs to see more than once. I too wasn't very fond of the lack of momentum during my first viewing, but when i watched it the second time i found myself having a deeper appreciation for every line of dialogue spoken, every piece of music played and just the overall laid-backness of the movie. Once you accept that it's just a "hang-out" movie about 2 dudes at at the end of a Hollywood era, you start to lay back and to enjoy the smooth ride towards that fairy tale ending.

girl you are GLOWING we need a skin routine asap

MORE MOVIE REVIEWS, I want to start writing movie reviews and this would be really great and helpful

i will agree, most of the audience when i went to see this movie where middle aged, and everyone was cracking up in the theatre. but i enjoyed this movie so much!! I didnt get most of the reverences, buy i went to see this with my then-boyfriend, and he knew literally every little detail about this movie, but hes also freaking insane, lol! and he does his research about everything he's interested in. but we absolutely adored this movie. I love this movie because its literally "once upon a time in hollywood." like, what if sharon tate had this crazy neighbor who owned flame thrower and saved her life, instead of her dying the way she did. how if the empty house next door to them was actually inhabited by leo's character, and because of that, leo was targetted instead of sharon, so she lived. how "hollywood" is that, to have someone save the day in such an over the top way, and no one die, and everyone live happily every after, you know? also loved how all the other charcters were real people except the main charcters. so like, this is literally placing two fictional people in a historical time and how things would change if there were two extra people there. idk, i have so much more to say about why i love this movie, but i love that odd take on a slice of life kind of thing. there's something so... you know "subverting expectations" about that. but another thing that i thought was cool was how he also subverted expectations by it not being a traditional Tarantino film. (shoutout to my ex, im stealing all his research lol) it wasnt overly violent or graphic at all, the only violent bit was the ending, so it made so much more of an impact in that way, where all of a sudden all that gore in one scene, out of no where, the build up and all the time leading up to the violence, made it really hit me, i think. I'm sensitive to violence on screen anyway, but i literally had to walk out of theatre when that scene happened because it was so violent, i felt sick. and i feel like thats a good tactic to use in general if you want to make something super memorable, you know? anyway, all of this to say that just , long story short, im surprised you found the movie boring! it was super entertaining to me, and i LOL'd various times throughout, lol. i did find myself thinking though, "what is the point of this movie? whats the storyline here?" and by the end realized, that it was just supposed to be a day in the life kind of thing, which, although simple, i was pleasantly surprised by and enjoyed. also absolutely LOVED the cowboy acting scenes with the little girl. anyway, i enjoyed your video! you should do a film review series!

I love your commentaries! you do it so naturally and its just hilarious : D

"he almost killed Uma thurman" BUT Y’*LL AINT READY FOR THAT CONVERSATION

oh my god yes i loved this please more. Also you should go back and do film theory on older movies that are deemed 'staples' and break them down.

okay this is an older video but... MORE FILM REVIEWS!! just watched this video while chillin drinking a coffee and I loved it!!

This is honestly one of the most interesting videos I’ve seen from you, I’m a media and entertainment major so I absolutely LOVED hearing your opinion on this movie because I agree with everything you said!! You’re doing great work :)

“Tarantino has overestimated the importance of Hollywood to the rest of the world” really ties up that movie.

Ashley’s coming for my wig with all this quality content

Tbh I feel like this movie was perfect for someone like me. I don't need a plot, I hate most forms of tension and I really don't want a movie to seem realistic, I want to KNOW that what I'm watching isn't supposed to be realistic. I completely agree that it is a non-enjoyable movie for most people, but if you're like me, consider giving it a watch

On some points I agree with you (like the feet thing) but for the most part I disagree. Especially the part where you wished Brad Pitts character would've died. That would've been melodramatic and cliche. It's called Once Upon a time.." precisely because it's playing the fairy tale ending, which was very refreshing, and made the movie feel sweet, something unexpected

the movie has its redundant parts, but I really enjoyed the cinematography. my favorite scene was when all the neon signs started lighting up in the dusk, I'd watch the movie again just for the production design.

Ashley: If you haven't seen the film yet stop watching this video now Me: *continues watching anyway*

Don't forget the like 5 scenes of people literally just driving.

She was too forgiving. This wasn't just Tarantinos worst movie, it was one of the worst movies of the decade. I was shocked not only of how God awful the movie was but that CRITICS LIKED IT. It was 100% made for Hollywood. The majority of the scenes went nowhere, a complete waste of time.

we must protect ashley from the filmbros that are going to find this video

Her sister said this in an interview about Sharon’s character: Debra added that she wished Tarantino had told the story of Tate herself, and not DiCaprio or Pitt’s fictional characters. “I would love to see Margot play [that],” Debra said. “But that was not the movie that Quentin had written, and I knew it and I understood it.”

The roof scene with Brad Pitt is actually very intersting and important. Its the only time you see Charles Manson, the man who basically horribly killed Sharon Tate and her friends. The scene goes on with Charles going to the house of Sharon and asking about the guy who charles actually aimed to kill.

Please continue doing movie reviews, I love to hear your opinion!!! Its nice to get to know this aspect of your life too, so please don't stop doing them

I thought the way he represented bruce lee was kind of odd

I think the extreme violence needed to be isolated though, and that's why I loved the ending. We all know she was brutally murdered along with her friends that night, seeing that potential threat and situation played out away from the focus of her stops people defining her as just a murdered woman. I think the lack of truth in the ending spoke volumes, we know the reality but seeing this universally loved woman given the ending she deserved was beautiful and it left me speechless afterwards. We are left with the image and memory of Robbie's Sharon as the warm life of the party, I felt the ending actually really did pay tribute to her.

You should watch mad men because you’re missing the essence of the 60s lifestyle and also it’s a great show

I would love to see Ashley give her "film school" review of tons more movies.

i would love love love to see your oscar picks when oscar season gets closer and just more film reviews in general 🥺

The Brad Pitt rooftop scene was a reference to a Robert Redford film

Make more of these, this was so insightful ❤️

An 8 and half months pregnant woman fight off the 4 most violent and vicious members of the Manson family? Sounds like a plausible ending

sis your hair looks so damn good here

I agree with a lot of the things you said, especially about male gaze and how the whole feet thing is kinda creepy and weird. But I have to disagree with you on the depcition of Margot Robbie's Sharon Tate. The whole point of Margot Robbie's character is to create a misdirect where the audience sympathises with her and fears for her, especially when we see how nice she is and how she treats other people (such as the hitchhiker). It creates tension and so when the final scene does happen, it's shocking and almost bittersweet. If you know what actually appened to Sharon Tate and if you understand the true horror behind it, then you feel this big emotional pay off at the end. (Which is kinda Tarentino's fault that you can't really underatand this movie without knowing the history behind it) And yes I agree that a feminist ending of Sharon killing those members of the Manson family would have been awesome but I also think it would have been a bigger insult to her legacy and would really undermine the true tragedy of her murder.

Many of the old westerns created in the 60’s paralleled this format, there was a lot of set up and I feel that there were tons of small details that tied into a very satisfying ending, I think that’s why Pitts character survived. In westerns the hero would also win. It definitely was made for people with a lot of nostalgia and knowledge of that time with the Mansons and old Hollywood. I really like it tho, thought it was a good movie and I don’t remember being bored but then again if you enjoy something you can forget the bad parts about it.

> Tarantino says it's a love letter to the golden era of Hollywood > casual movie enjoyers complain they don't understand anything the movie is the most detailed Tarantino's movie. Everything what you see was deeply planned, every song, the perfect editing, SCENOGRAPHY, characters, western movies and shows. There is so many references and easter eggs so casual movie enjoyers can't spot. There is a reason why Brad was driving for 5 minutes - this is how it was and it was perfect because of its chillin vibe. I feel it because it reminds me even early 2000s. The purpose is to be a postcard in form of a movie.

I agree that it was his worst film, but I gotta say, that last scene had me shook.

The point of the "boring scenes" including Margot Robbie was to show how Sharon Tate was just like everyone else. At the time, a lot of people didn't appear to be big fans of Sharon Tate because she did star in "dirty movies" so Tarantino was trying to give her justification in a way for the horrific murders that happened at her home. Idk, not trying to attack anyone, just wanted to open up a discussion of why maybe Tarantino would've included those scenes/shots. I personally loved the film.

this is so relaxing nil

Man I totally agree. I remember coming out the cinema and thinking "well at best it's decent art but it isn't a decent movie". It's pretty dang cool that tarantino has the sorta agency in the film industry to just write in a totally unconventional Manor, to make commentary on mundane boring life, but the trade off if done I suppose realistically is a mundane boring film. I also thought the hippy murders at the end were sort of a jab from tarantino at the accusations of "senseless violence" in movies. He spends majority of the movie depicting regular boring lives with disjointed plots just to suddenly slap you in the face with intense gore and violence, literally creating purposeless violence. I think maybe giving it to margots character would've given the violence purpose, but I would've loved that! It would've felt like all these scenes lead up to something, while not detracting the idea of "mundane life in Hollywood" from margots scenes prior! SO again, the trade off you get for wanting to really go out of your way and make some bold commentary on Hollywood's reality is a kinda messy plot and script, a.k.a. Bad movie but arguably not terrible art. And like you said, the choice to go down this route also made getting invested in the higher energy scenes quite difficult, because they seemed to have no rhyme or reason for occurring. The movies already totally inaccessible for someone like me, a YOUNG ADULT from MIDDLE ENGLAND, like I had to go home and do a research project just to get it. Then add all these choices to string scenes together that have no purpose other than their lack of, it meant that on my first first viewing I just ended up being confused at a hard to watch mess. However, once I got home, looked into it all, I can see the films somewhat value, not terrible you know? SO realistically, it kind of shows you what this movie is for s regular human, its just sorta messy but cool. Luckily now I just think its okay all round, but I definitely had higher expectations.

hey ashley! please review 'EUPHORIA: as that show is just phenomenal and its so intriguing and intrinsic YOU"LL LOVE IT! please like so ashley can see this!

I had exactly the same thoughts about Margot's character in that although Tarantino was trying to encapsulate the innocence of Tate's life, he ultimately reduced her to a ditzy pretty blonde girl who is eye candy for all the men in hollywood. As bell hooks would say, Margot's primary role in this film was her "too-be-looked-at-ness" I also had a problem with how Bruce Lee was played as a caricature of his film roles and not actually who he is in real life: a professional and humble guy. No way in hell could Brad Pitt beat Bruce Lee in a fight. *As a loyal viewer to your channel and a fellow film student, I loved this film review! Pls do more!

I come from South Africa and the moment those girls were walking down the road singing I knew what was going on. People that did not know what was going on did not enjoy the movie, you had to have known what was going on to really get you on the edge of your seat. Like they just going through their day to day lives and you like "I know what is going to happen." and then he just like changes it and you like WHHHAAAAAT.

the roof scene isnt a full scene though is its split up by the cliff's flashback

i feel like the tension was supposed to build up by you knowing how things are supposed to happen and everything leading up to that

watching the actress describe how she didn't wanted to show her feet on screen was soooo uncomfortable. Especially when they were talking about him seeing her reaktion as a challenge. You could feel how awkward it was for her just remembering the situation.

I really liked this movie, and i feel like the slow moving process and kind of random scenes is a part of the charm to a lot of Tarantinos films. Idk thats just how i feel. Maybe it was at some times a bit boring bur i didnt really think it mattered that much because of the whole setting idk. And yeah i do agree that before watching this movie you should propraly do a bit of research but yeah...

Yes! 100% Agree. It had no plot for me. I was so excited to see it then left feeling robbed. Especially with the caliber of actors/actresses.

Hey Ashley, I know movies are your thing but you should definitely watch Killing Eve

When you said “some hippies just decide to murder them” i was like noooo that’s the Manson family: a bunch of psycho hippies

she clearly wouldnt like the irishman

Thank you. I thought I was alone in not liking this movie.

I'm french so i'm used to the "Boring" kind of scene 😂

wow I did not pick up on the foot fetish power dynamic that could be going on between tarantino and the actresses before you said this. Thank you for highlighting that.

Love these!! I love hearing opinions of movies from film students (film graduates?) please do more!!!

tbh i think the ending does have that last puzzle piece moment you mightve been looking for it in the wrong place. the puzzle piece is both the fact that in this universe sharon tate is alive and doesn't get murdered by a cult as well as (most importantly) the washed up tv actor main character is gonna get his shot to be in a polanski movie bc of this new found connection w his neighbors. idk felt very heartwarming to me

SPOILERS 2:15 - that scene builds up to the first glimpse of Charles Manson who talks to Sharon Tates husband, Polanski, and is a foreshadowing of the Manson Family murders... The knowledge of which is a massive tension builder *throughout* the film.

to understand this movie you have to a great grasp on the manson family murders to understand the immense amount of foreshadowing and detail

I thought it lacked tension too... At least compared to every other Tarantino movie..

Me: *sees the Leonardo DiCaprio pointing meme* Me: *Points at the screen like Leonardo DiCaprio*

i thought it was boring for a big part :/ The bromance and the last scene were worth the watch but i expected more

my thoughts: this is tarantino’s most chill movie compared to pulp fiction, reservoir dogs, django unchained etc. because it was, what he called it, “his movie”. he wanted to capture the 60s which he remembers very well from his childhood and to him it was more about the mindset and the aesthetic rather than the whole plot, which i do understand. about the feet: tarantino said, it was his movie, and what can you do, the man loves them feet. was i uncomfortable? yes. did it ruin the whole movie? absolutely not. i personally give it a 7/10 because it was indeed an enjoyable movie for me, something i kind of needed after watching all the badass, intense tarantino movies, and i do appreciate the movie very very much for what it is and how it’s created. thank you for reading, goodbye

The thing is though that Sharons' sister may have had a say in this movie. I do think that Sharon Tates' character should have had a bigger role in this movie though, because I was under the impression that the whole movie was based around what happened to her....I was wrong! I really was completely taken off guard by the ending...wow!

This movie is a film made for people who love movies and films that captured the imagination and sparked creativity. Not to mention a throwback to the Hollywood of yesteryear which saw a major shift from the Old Guard/Conservative Hollywood, where rugged men on horses single-handedly shot down the bad guys and rode off into the sunset, were then replaced by a new subculture that swept over them overnight and threw them out of tinsel town without warning. Tarantino’s love of old movies is well illustrated with DiCaprio’s transition to ‘Eyetalian’ (Spaghetti) westerns that were so completely cheesy and absurdly simple, yet so gritty. It is a justice film too that proposes a what could-have-been if history had chosen a different path. One of the best scenes in the movie (and there are no bad scenes in it, honestly) IS the one where Sharon Tate is enjoying the audiences reaction to her performance. It’s true that she does not say anything but that’s the beauty of it: she does not have to. Her mere presence brings energy and joy to everything she touches accept for the likes of the dark forces that make their appearance on her doorstep on that fateful night. Tate is throughly humanized in that scene in so subtle a way it would be criminal to even give her any lines. Going back to the ‘what-could-have-been’ component in this film is that what happened at Cielo rd. changed the nation’s way of thinking about old traditions of trust and community and humanity in general. This was the hippie movement that had come to fruition at the very end of the 1960’s: free love and peace and relativism manifested itself into pure carnage. This movie is a film for people bored with the stifling of creativity by the over-the-top theatrics that leave nothing to the imagination which is the essence of digital age. Tarantino is a storyteller first and a filmmaker second. It was not made for the masses but rather for the laymen who miss what was good and no longer palatable to many. I’m sure the next superhero movie will do very well ;)

Ashley this video will upset so many black-haired skinny guys who smoke

Okayy so in defense of it (by a non-native speaker btw so this may SUCK) Honestly i think it was pretty well done!! The audience knew that the movie was going to come to the point of murder of Sharron Tate and i think that set tension all through the film. Margot was like the heartbeat of it, she didn’t have that much depht but that wasn’t the point of her character, her character was consistent and was always sweet almost reminding of “oh look how nice she is too bad we’ll see her die”keeping the audience reminded of what’s to come and like the countdown-ish element to the event, Cliff going into the Hippie camp were all filled with tension and it misguided the audience at the end which was very very cool and put the whole thing together And my answer to all the other points is that yes, it was very very personal to Tarantino and Tarantino only which may make the audience disconnect from the movie but it wasn’t to the point that we didn’t care about it

I have a degree in Production Design and we were trained to be really analytical about every single detail of every film we watch and I have nothing else to say but SAME THOUGHTS. While the movie was visually stimulating, I found it boring as well. I only really liked the ending and I couldn't even tell how that was relevant to what was happening the whole movie. Just my personal opinion but I respect his art. Funny how I also feel so pretentious whenever I talk about the movies I watch because I never just say "It's nice" or "I didn't like it" and could just talk endlessly about them. I just found your main channel the other day and immediately subscribed. I've been binge watching your videos today and found this other channel then found this video. Great timing because I just saw the movie a week ago and couldn't talk to anyone about it. Make more film reviews, please!

Too many dudes writing huge essays on why Ashley is wrong and not enough people discussing the weird dynamics between the director and the actress who didn’t want to put her feet up? Well, fellas, I’m sure your film degree is a lot more valid than hers now that you’ve ~explained~ it.

ASHLEY PLEASE START A PODCAST YOU'RE A NATURAL

I don’t have a foot fetish or anything but I actually think that Margot Robbie’s feet in the theatre scene is a really good note to her character like it shows how chill and and a lil childish she is and the entire scene were she hears everyone laughing is beautiful she is so proud of her and it’s just great idk

It’s just so funny to me that brad Pitt got his Oscar for exactly THIS movie hahaha Ashley’s college tuition fee so worth it 🤪

The COOLEST thing that I love about your review though is how you mention the other viewpoints that could affect how you see the movie differently than other people and how although this is your opinion, there’s def other opinions that exist that are also informed and cool. But undoubtably yes too many feet. However, you have forgotten to mention the BEST part of this movie... the plot line of the beautiful dog!!! I love you ❤️