Thanks!

Depth is interesting, when we get there it’s shallow. Humility and longing, the food in Ratatouille was a blind test, or a double blind test of the critique. Knowing humility better perhaps is more like seeing the failed elder person, again having conversation alongside the younger hospital child, the bond begins, because the mind never gets old, this allowance is underused because of the stages in theory that have nothing to do with the age of the mind. Likely all we learned and stored in knowledge, is that to know where to find knowledge is more important than possessing it? The problem with watching a movie, is as infotainment, but to watch it as a critique, is the duration of seeing it as a director, an editor and the audience, to unravel the arc, the motives, the gesture towards humans, and the understanding of genius wrapped in an event of hundreds of people orchestrated, each adding an element of surprise. Really there are not too many movies to watch, there are things to watch of intrigue and study to notice change and how we change. To be obvious, ratatouille is not about a rat, and neither is it for children, it is child appropriate.