Yes even though I doubt it

@@youtubepro2323 I think apple are listening that we dont see the point in a powerful iPad if a cheaper far less powerful one that they sell can do the same job

Of course I’d love to see it🤩😍

I would like to run the full versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Teams on my iPad. Then it’ll be my primary device. But, that will NEVER happen so I’ll go back to drinking bourbon.

@@ChristianZafra-xj2jq Me too! It would be great!

It sure would!

@@MattTalkTech I just want to play bg3 on my iPad and some render software

Crazy how there's absolutely nothing stopping you from running Mac OS software on an iPad (same ISA, same chipset, practically same OS), but apple doesn't let you because it wants you to buy another device.

wait until 2077

Thank you for watching

bash is old coding. New architecture runs zsh

@@beniofisial6316 No, the default is now zsh but I still use bash because I have used it for decades.

I’d also prefer zsh but given so many servers run terminals only with bash, I wouldn’t mind stretching my bash muscles.

THIS is Pod Racing

So do I!

Awesome!

Thanks for watching

Why?

Phone is more useful than this toy

I'd 100% recommend the new 13" iPad Air for pretty much all kinds of students (except software engineering). Unless daddy is paying, in which obviously go for the Pro.

Just started back at College and went with the iPad Pro 13”. Reading textbooks is much more enjoyable on a iPad than a MacBook. Taking notes (Nebo) with the new pencil is also better on the iPad. The new keyboard is awesome, but does make it quite heavy.

Just get the m1 MacBook Air for writing assignments and a basic iPad for reading textbooks and annotating articles…

I didn’t see it either

Sorry, it is there now but its here too; amzn.to/3U2Pp8I

@@MattTalkTech No issues my friendly. Glad you were able to add it. 266.04 Canadian is pretty good for 2T drive.

The problem is that say an iPad Pro M4 with 256GB, Both OS would take 100GB of that together

@@MattTalkTech Apple could always limit the feature to devices with enough storage or (although very unlikely) make the OS downloadable so that you could install the MacOS on an external drive.

@@MattTalkTech Make a rule to install MacOS on an external drive from apple themself with a special chip so you cant use any external drive. Its a win-win for apple selling external drives like apples.

Why do you have the pro version for these basis tasks?🙄

@@lacafaca100 Why not? I can afford it and using an iPad is more convenient than a laptop to use in flight. Also, due to the potential to disclose confidential information I can't perform meaningful work in public settings.

@@gaiustacitus4242 i asked why pro version and not basic ipad or air (was not mentioning laptop…)

@@lacafaca100 As I said, I can afford it. I typically don't buy low end hardware. If I encounter a task I need a more powerful device to run, then I already have it. Why buy something you may outgrow? BTW, due to an abundance of caution when it comes to cybersecurity, I never sell off old equipment. This decision is based on having run a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) for more than a decade. I'm aware that vulnerabilities in an OS are often detected after security updates have ceased and someone could access confidential data stored on the device. I find such risk unacceptable.

@@lacafaca100 The MacBook Air is a laptop.

same

Same. Apple doesn't want to because they would lose billions. Now you need two devices, why would they only want you tobuy one?

I would hope they would put the software on all M-series iPads

It would be really good if it comes

i know i need blender too for a personal project and my mac its at my friend he is repairing it

Wait for the new os to release and see some reviews. Then purchase.

Yeah wait for the new os event in mid July. But wouldn't have high hopes, every year I remain disappointed and would say you can do everything on the air you would on the pro ie watch netflix and browse the internet.

Ask yourself how will I use it? Build your systems around how you use it rather than what they sell .

That would be problem, the most popular iPad Pro/Airs Apple sell is the lowest Storage Options, so sadly not much space for both

@@MattTalkTech they could still make it available for the larger storage options. I would never buy a mac or ipad unless it was an ipad that allowed me to use true, full macOS.

@@connorelliott7881 Now you are talking Apple's language: Let's upgrade all the way up to the bigger versions with their super expensive RAMS and storage prices. Granted the double LED looks good, but it is ridiculously expensive. Might as well buy a Macbook by then, which is also what Apple want you to do.. it all runs in a circle.

@@MattTalkTech True Matt but I mean for the one terabyte M4s and up. Apple would sell many thousands and fewer MacBooks

Why even use Mac OS on iPad Pro? It's a Mac with just one dongle port. Let iPad be iPad, but let iPad have apps that can view and edit documents and collab with projects for that Mac connection. If you want Mac OS you got MacBooks and some desktop models. Mac OS is a mouse/trackpad based OS. Maybe you can use voice control also. I don't know if Mac OS will be a great experience on iPads with touch even if Apple will add that support...

Haha, totally agree

There's a lot more to it. Designing an interface suitable for both touch and mouse+trackpad+keyboard is very difficult to do correctly. Apple does have insanely good designers but the design by definition will be a compromise. That is important because ever since Windows designed it for both tablets and desktops, windows has been terrible at both. It still lags in opening the start menu, notifications tray, windows overview... Opening file explorer, everything. This isn't completely the 2-in-1 design's fault and can be ironed out. But it does feed to the compromise and this will exist since both interfaces will need to be catered to. Additionally, the surface line is not a success or a compelling product to this day. Its nice and great for many users. I really wanted a windows tablet when the ones with windows 7 came out. But using windows 7 on a tablet didn't work because its not designed for touch. Windows 10/11 also don't work well with touch because again, not designed for touch. They are usable, but not as good as they used to be. Finally, what's the point? Using a touch screen makes sense for a tablet, but as soon as we take the touchpad and trackpad away from the ipad and surface laptop, using the surface laptop instantly becomes a chore. It turns out that users mostly use it as a laptop replacement which they can draw on (the drawing isn't that good on surface, definitely when compared to the iPad). If we're going to use the tablet as a laptop, use a laptop. Touching the screen of a laptop is only useful or fun when you've got the laptop on your belly while laying on the floor, or have the screen in your lap (keyboard on your belly) while sitting upright. I have had a few touch screen laptops including 3 surface devices. Surface laptop 2, 3 and surface book 2 15inch. The surface line to this day has not been worth the investment and the majority of them are really underpowered. I wanted to buy the surface studio (desktop) and came really close to spending a lot of money on it. It was really underpowred and users would say well its a small form factor in the base. How? The base was 3x thicker than any laptop (minus the lid) which would help with heat management significantly. You can easily fit a much larger heat sink in there and let it handle the extra heat. It was cost saving decision on the part of microsoft and fair enough. I love the 3:2 aspect ratio to this day. Fast forward to today, microsoft has replaced the surface studio (after a huge amount of r&d plus marketing), with a laptop called the surface studio. brilliant. and that laptop sucks too. They killed the surface book, killed the surface studio and windows has been dead since they stopped charging huge licensing fees for it. Having said all of this, iPad OS and iOS need a huge overhaul. They're too cluttered and not useful at this point (the software). It does need an experience which can parallel the laptop experience (as close as they can get with touch input). Finally, macos, ios an ipad os need their bugs fixed. It's long overdue. I find it hard to convince myself that I'm using an official release these days on ios and mac os in particular. My iPhone goes from insanely fast flying through everything to pentium then threadripper then celeron then i9 with every official update. Macos is not as bad but the hardware allows the os to be unoptimised and go unnoticed for a while. No heat, amazing battery, no noise, easy to forget those 0.2s extra delays on simple tasks. harder to ignore the visual bugs which are now plaguing ios and mac os. edit: I 100% support allowing mac os apps to run on the iPad. The experience will require a trackpad and mouse for it to be good, but would make a lot of iPad users really happy and be able to switch over to iPad os. This is made possible by the apple silicon as they're now all running the same architecture.

@@ZeerakImran I would be far more interested in your arguments as a person with Blindness if Apple hadn’t broken all third-party accessibility software in 2017, but being as how they’re still making all of the MacBook Pro and Air and iPad Air as well as the iPad Pro, I care about as much about all your personal experiences as I’m sure you care about those of the Disabled community.

I think Dex has an almost perfect idea of how this should work.

@@jamesmarkham9740I agree; it is an imperfect bridge solution, particularly the 1.0 or 2.0 that we’re in now. I also think Dex is right. I also know that using an iPP as a laptop now, in this early stage of the product lifecycle, will be a compromise. But, as it appears the vast majority of these tech social media influencers are deeply ignorant of the issues of the Disabled community (which as of 2019 - pre-pandemic - were estimated as high as 1/5th the entire US population; so figure that the same estimate now if the data existed would potentially be 1/4 to perhaps 1/3), I am going to say that despite whatever small issues exist the huge game changer (which I suspect a few Apple Bros are actually pushing against if they were really honest, and if so for them they can collectively suck my …) is having ostensibly an Apple personal computer running iOS accessibility software.

The tickle monster?