as yes, the name ending in -ian.

@@redeemedzoomer6053 As a man named Ian this is also hilarious

There was an ancient group called the “Arians” who’s heretical views were what caused the first council of Nicaea, I probably don’t need to spell out what other word they sound like.

@@fleebogazeezig6642 Their leader was the guy who killed the WW2 German moustache guy

When I first began going to a PCA church years ago, the pastor described himself as an Armenian pastor (his grandfather escaped the Armenian genocide), but I heard Arminian and thought to myself “What is an Arminian pastor doing in a Presbyterian church?”…one of many precious memories from Valley Springs Church!

true my brrother God bless

Good college you go to..

@Some Mohamed To be fair, the same conclusion could be drawn after 6 semesters lol

I know right. Redeemed Zoomer is incredible gifted.

@@WangLin-jt8pj 😅😅😆

This is unrelated but it is nice to see someone who enjoys fighting games in videos such as these!

@@Whatisthis2345 haha same here! Love to see Christians with similar interests.

I know some biblicists who say it's absurd and even blasphemous to use any thinking that's sourced from outside the Bible, what I like about scholasticism is that it can pave a more understandable, easier to digest path towards the Bible and towards Christ for non-Christians who would outright reject the assertion that you need to surrender yourself and your will to the ultimate authority of the Bible. Yes, we do ultimately need to do so, but you need to ease a secularist into it. I even know a couple biblicists who would say that if someone won't accept the premise immediately, they're not saved and not worth talking to, but I see that attitude as fundamentally un-Christian. We're supposed to be a guiding light and show forgiveness. And sanctification doesn't happen overnight, you know.

Hey, if you want to study and find the truth than open your heart and mind to Islam. If anyone rejects it without even trying to understand then they are scared or just ignorant. I’m sure that it will speak to any logical person that can clearly see the inaccuracies found in the Bible. Try and learn and I pray God will guide you to the right path :)

​@@majesticsoysauce8648 Islam is a 80iq religion sorry bro still prefer you over Judaism tho 😂

Haha I could make you a block of these 10 theology badges

So you're a Baptist then lol

@@redeemedzoomer6053 ooo well they’re probably not gonna stay that way for long lol

@@redeemedzoomer6053 that sounds fun, go for it!

Dude what the HECK do these words mean?!

just throwing this out there: vast majority of calvinists are infralapsarian. i don't know any theologians that are superlapsarian. i feel like that theology just exists for the sake of existing. For those who might want more on this: Romans 1 says that God gave them up to a debased mind. God "giving up" means that He's just letting them be. In other words, God's common grace is being lifted from them. God's common grace is the reason why humans aren't as evil as they can be. When God's common grace is lifted, then people become evil as they can be because it's where their sinful totally depraved minds are already at. So when God "hardened" pharaoh's heart, he wasn't necessarily making Pharaoh "more" evil than he already was. But simply that God's common grace was being lifted from Pharaoh so that Pharoah would act in the sinful-debased-depraved way that his sinful nature led him.

@@sdubs Basicly after Calvin death this hard line calvinism died out. I think only extremly consistent and strict theologians/phylosophers would belive in superlapsarian though.

@@ClayJarsProductions It just makes a God not worth worshipping.

@@sdubs thank you for this comment. Very helpful clarification

@@reactiondavant-garde3391I know this was awhile ago, but that’s what I was thinking. Cause doesn’t Calvinism automatically lead to those who are non elect being made for hell..

That definitely sounds like a cool idea.

Absolutely!

you could collect the data and show it as a survey, to show what percent of Christians who built their blocks believe in what

Exactly, while still maintaining the unity of the brethren

Seems to me like a build in a video game. Which I'm entirely good with.

It's all about your personal relationship with God -- Baptists

At my pentecostal church we also do non alcoholic beverages

@@hollyholly7542 same here. At my pentecostal church we do grape juice. And it's also about a personal relationship with God, regarding previous comments

we also dont drink wine. 95% of our church members came from the soviet union where alcohol addiction was rampant, so in order to not tempt anyone we drink grape juice.

I came from a Church of Christ and we also avoided alcohol.

I think so cause I can’t find them anywhere else

Glad to read that :) It's astounding that Pope Francis called having a relationship with Jesus "dangerous"!

@@wairimu-k when? Where? Why? I read what pope Francis says almost daily and I've never seen it...

@@gonzalonicolas1366 m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qa14ZZN5nae6Yok.html&pp=ygUXcG9wZSBmcmFuY2lzIGRhbmdlcm91cyA%3D

And this is why we love the Catholics ☺️ Thanks for this! It’s not just about doctrine, it’s about connection and transformation

​@@wairimu-kSource?

I could not agree more and I’m 13 so this is a really good starting point

Agreed! These fancy words are confusing but neat! :D

Yes, lol.

I’d probably rather be annihilated than go to hell ig

Hell is totally an eternal punishment. It's eternal separation from God, that's all what Hell is. This 'annhiliation' doctrine is making hell seem like not a bad punishment, but oh boy, it is an awful and horrible punishment. Revelation 14:9-11 KJV: "And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." Hell is also described as an eternal/everlasting fire, or an unquenable fire. It is described as ETERNAL punishment. Matthew 25:41 KJV: "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:" Matthew 3:12 KJV: "whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire." Mark 9:44 KJV: "where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." 2 Thessalonians 1:9 KJV: "who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;" Matthew 25:46 KJV: "And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal." Revelation 20:10 KJV: "And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever." Nowhere does the bible speak of annihilation in Hell, that's made up.

​@@crusherfire1I like your Roblox studio tutorials

To be fair most catholics and protestants don't follow the Nicene Creed. They follow the Gothic-Arianist Creed thanks to that handy dandy Filiouque that was never agreed upon at an Ecumenical Council.

​@@TW-fs3fjI canʼt talk for the protestants, but the Catholic Church uses the Creed. How dare you call us Arians? Itʼs the Greeks who refuse to update their outdated theology. Credo in Spiritum Sanctum Dominum et vivificantem Qui ex Patre Filioque procedit Qui cum Patre et Filio simul adoratur et conglorificatur qui locutus est per prophetas

@@deutschermichel5807 I said you follow the Gothic Arian Creed. Not that you're Arianists. The Goths took full control over the western Church by 500AD. The Filioque was added because pagan Spaniards couldn't comprehend why the Son and Holy Spirit came from God. It was not agreed upon at any council, and any documents defending papism at the time were forgeries. Plus Peter had two disciples, the original being from where our forefathers were first called Christians. Your historians acknowledge these facts, in fact iirc the Eastern Papists don't even follow that creed. Wake up

@@TW-fs3fj what are you talking? The Goths didnʼt take control over the Westeen Church in 500. And the filioque was officially added half a millenium afterwards, when the Goths have been long extinct. Also you donʼt even seem to understand the Holy Trinity: Pater, Filius et Spiritus Sanctus Deus sunt. Pater non est Filius, Filius non est Spiritus, Spiritus non est Pater. So when you say we wouldnʼt understand the procession of the Holy Spirit, YOU are the one not understanding. In the Nicaean Creed, it says: “ex Patre Filioque procedit”. The Holy Spirit IS God, jsut as the Father and the Son are. Spiritus in Latin doesnʼt only mean ghost, but also breath. So the Holy Spirit really is the Breath of God, his divine Sigh of joy which inspires his creation for the better. So when the Holy Trinity has been around for ever, as God is eternal, you see: The Son is eternally born of the Father and they “see” themselves and “look” at each other, recognizing themselves as one and figuratively Sigh of love. Imagine you would look into the mirror and see a person. Whom do you see? Yourself, or rather a perfect counterpart. Many people with healthy hearts and souls recognize themselves in the mirror and realize “Yes, this is me”. This joyful feeling, this relief can be compared to the Holy Spirit, when God “sees” himself.

Everyone has a creed (I believe) including non-credal baptists. The question is whether your “I believe” is written down and testable or ad hoc and untestable

ikr, he’s turning me into a Reformed Christian and I haven’t even watched far enough to know what Reformed Christians even believe

While I agree that it is very educational, I do think that there is a bit of barrier to entry in terms of those who can watch, understand, and enjoy the majority of the connent on this channel. The short video style mixed with briefing over a large range of detailed concepts likely makes it very difficult to follow for someone who doesn't have a solid base in at least some of the major Christian theological ideas.

Agreed!

Does is mean is?

@@theintelligentmilkjug944 Is does mean is! If it were a mere symbol, people wouldn't have become sick and die for taking it in an unworthy manner, eating and drinking judgment upon themselves. See 1 Corinthians 11:27-30.

Is it relevant if it's symbolic or not? I mean...if the presence of Christ is in the sacrament it's a miracle we cannot prove and take by faith. But we take communion in a manner worthy of Christ. And if it's symbolic we still take it in a manner worthy of Christ. In remembrance of His blood and body broken for us. Maybe I'm ignorant but I don't see the argument between the two positions.

@@zacharybaker695 If it is symbolic, then the meal is only in remembrance of Christ and the forgiveness of sins He won. If it is real, then the meal truly has Christ present and the meal itself truly offers the forgiveness of sins. Whether or not the Lord's Supper does anything alone is an important concept. To a Sacramentalist like myself, it would be argued not observing Christ's body and blood in the Supper is a form of sinning against the Lord; the other obvious way of sinning against it would be not recognizing your sin and need of a Savior when taking it. If understanding / taking the Supper incorrectly is a possible sin, then it very much is relevant. Luther and Zwingli basically agreed on everything except the Lord's Supper - and they saw that as crucial enough to not join fellowship.

Me, a former Baptist who's always believed that predestination is stupid even after leaving the faith. Accepting or rejecting anything at all is my decision to make and not ever God's. And I'm not saying God is incapable of predestination just that he never predestined it. He didn't predestine anything. He just knows who's saved or not because he's omniscient. Granted, I am in a bit of a predicament since the church I grew up in didn't believe salvation could be lost so I guess I'm now damned to eternal salvation. Ah well.

LOL that'd be great. For Catholic church, he should do "You could make a religious order out of this".

Great idea!

there's a whole channel for that called "Ready to Harvest" - he goes over denominations and what they believe and what their history of their existence is.

Glad you're here :)

Me too

I disagree with those points- hell is real, and it's permanent. But I'm only human, and humans get things wrong all the time; if I had to be wrong about one more thing, that sure would be a nice thing to be wrong about. But hey, that's why God makes the rules and not me

i used to be a universalist, and i had made my own assumption that hell was real and permanent, however very few get in

Hell is eternal, anyone saying the contrary is going against the Bible. Revelation 14:9-11 KJV: "And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." Matthew 25:41 KJV: "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:" Matthew 3:12 KJV: "whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire." Mark 9:44 KJV: "where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." 2 Thessalonians 1:9 KJV: "who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;" Matthew 25:46 KJV: "And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal." Revelation 20:10 KJV: "And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."

@@crusherfire1 I have not made my mind up on this issue. But many scholars have said that the word that is translated eternal can mean for an age or until an unknown end.

@@davidpaddon4529 "for ever and ever" is not a finite time period.

Sometimes, but it is often well-meaning but hard-headed stubbornness that leads to these problems. A frequent phrase I use in discussing these topics: “There are many godly people who love Jesus who disagree on this topic.” That way I leave open the discussion for clarification without demonizing those I disagree with

Wouldn't you like a more liberal form of christianity? Even more liberal than protestantism.

The latter part of your comment sounds like an enormous argument in circular logic - "the Bible is infallible because it's the word of God, and the Bible is the word of God because it says so and it's infallible..."

@@Skin_Man Yeah, I agree with you. The argument always seemed dumb to me due to how it presupposes the Bible as the true book, which any religion can do. There are much better apologetics.

As a Dutch Reformed person myself, I love my Baptist brothers and sisters. (Shhh, don't tell anyone, but I might be becoming a closet Baptist 😉)

As a 1689er Amil, I too enjoyed the video.

Same here!

the believe that Mary Poppins is the 2nd coming of Christ?

What a load of fake labels and theological Fables ? ? Keep it simple minded not philosophical blinded ? 😁 😄 😩😨

Interesting. There aren't too many Calvinistic continuationists around, most charismatics are Arminian (that or they've never even considered Soteriology) and most Calvinists are cessationists (I happen to fit into that category.) Having said that, I think I've got much more in common with you than with an Arminian cessationist in terms of theology.

@@HartyBikerI can’t be a Cessationist because I got healed when I was 10, I was born with flat feet and the Holy Spirit healed me.

@richbandicoot you know, cessationists don't claim that God doesn't work miracles, even miraculous healing today. We certainly do say that God is free to exercise His power over creation in any way He sees fit, and does sometimes, perhaps even often, choose to do so in ways that transcend the natural order with miracles. What we deny, however, is that in this post apostolic age, that God has given power to individuals to wield to do miracles in that way. Sure, a church or a fellow Christian may pray for healing, but he or she cannot exercise the divine right of healing as the apostles did in their day. It's not that healing miracles have ceased, it's the gift of healing that has ceased.

@@HartyBiker you know i looked into it and you’re right, I agree with cessationism and i also lean more heavily on amyraldism

@richbandicoot glad I could help. Someone I highly recommended when it comes to biblical teaching on gifts especially, but also just good biblical teaching is Justin Peters. God bless

So I'm not the only one? AW YEAH!

hmmmmmmm

Any God who is worthy of worship must also be worthy of more thought than is required for the act of accurately pushing a metal tube from point A to point B with explosives. Even though the second is also super cool. In fact, the second is super cool because the first is super cool and made the world that way.

The confusion is crazy, makes you wonder how far men stray from Truth while making up their own ideas, supposedly better then those next door or the generations before. As it is written "will the Son of man find faith when he returns".....more theological rhetoric for sure, but faith?

could you explain?

@@deutschermichel5807 A theology that was developed by Thomas Aquinas (Dominican) and Luis de Molina (Jesuit).

I’ve seen some Protestant Molinists

@@carlose4314 do you generally oppose some Catholic Orders or Fraternities? What do you think about the Jesuits

@@deutschermichel5807 I don't oppose any Catholic Orders or fraternities. I just mentioned their holy order since each has a different approach to theology.

19 minutes........ Argh!

Don’t you think that if you just “stop existing” that would be merciful? “Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.”” ‭‭Revelation‬ ‭14‬:‭9‬-‭11‬ ‭ This to me is so clear that your punishment is eternal. Really interested on your thoughts.