Amazing sir

CONTRADICTION!!! lol sn

Thank you Very much!

"Face-to-face" literally means in person!

Thank you. God bless you 🙏🏻

Praise the lord...

Also see jay smith. Dr al garza

I’m here 6/22/21 and also right on time💕

The Bible or you read it all or you don't read it and the Bible is the word of God and the Bible must be read with the help of Jesus and the Holy Spirit

@@user-xu7mn5ks8s _"The Bible or you read it all or you don't read it"_ : on which basis dare you make such a claim? What about those who can't read? The uneducated peasant in Afghanistan or the slave-like worker in N. Korea shouldn't be saved?

I just finished it too! I feel that it has strengthened my faith a whole lot. I'll probably rewatch the first two videos on Daniel because I didn't quite catch all of it the first time through.

I just now finished it. I'd play the videos back to back while playing games. Amazing stuff.

Just finished too! I'm new to faith (~2 months), previously an atheist dabbling in spirituality. I had my born again experience but struggled in my primarily secular environment with all of the accusations against the Bible. This series was a HUGE help in strengthening my faith! Thank you Mike for your meticulous and well presented delivery of all the information!

Thinking that IGNORING the glaring realities that Bart Ehrman spent decades acquiring the knowledge to make astute observations about, including learning ancient languages and having access to the earliest available copies (and that's all there is) of manuscripts, is wisdom... isn't. That might unclear to you. Bart Ehrman is imminently qualified for textual criticism of the bible, and no not everyone who does "textual criticism" is anti-religious. And neither is Dr. Ehrman. So trying to sound the least bit sharp by that statement is a face-plant into a "wish I was smarter" pie.

@Young Yoda English please!

@@justaguy6100 it doesnt take a a genius to read bart ehrman and realize that he gets a lot of things wrong or just blantantly ignores thing. He also writes with an extreme bias against Christianity so you have to take everything with a grain of salt

@@danielparham5232 Ok Mr Scholar let’s hear exactly what Ehrmann gets wrong. His scholarship is respected internationally, and even top apologists don’t dispute the scope of his knowledge. They will argue about the details, that’s what they do, but prove he’s wrong about any of his positions before you try and claim he gets a lot wrong. You obviously don’t like his conclusions but they’re grounded in sound scholarship.

@@justaguy6100 you clearly didnt watch the video when mike points out in clear terms why bart ehrmann makes false claims or even just avoids things because they don't fit his arguments

Faith is trust so if an atheist is destroying someone trust they probably didn't have much trust to start with

Is it destroying faith that results from biblical psychosis or liberating souls from spiritual enslavement????

Do you also wonder about a couple of 'christians' who I met and conversed with at a church Alpha course but have since pretended not to see me when I say hello to them passing in the street? Do you wonder about the christian who has informed me that the Devil is in my house because I do yoga to keep fit? (I could give a few dozen similar examples of christian activities in my neighbourhood.)

I thought maybe Saul looked dead to his armour bearer but wasn't quite dead. 🤔 either way though, no issue here.

Same. The guy lied and paid for it with it his life because murdering Saul is not something David would've rewarded (unknown to the man)

Man, I found a contradiction in the Bible! Here it says you should awnser a fool according to his folly: ‭Proverbs 26:5 NKJV‬ [5] Answer a fool according to his folly, Lest he be wise in his own eyes.

I would see to the opportunity to learn more! If it was a university-level class with objections to the Bible, I’d assume you were being educated on the best the skeptics have to offer against the Bible. Don’t shy away from challenges but embrace them. We’re all on a search for truth aren’t we?

awwwwwwwwwww

@@kennylee6499 Jesus loves you! Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be SAVED! Get a king james bible an believe. Read Matthew. Read 1 John 4. There are NO mistakes.

Lol.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iKhjmpmevbKpe58.html

I see it too 😅

I did too at first lol

I did too'. Then smoke started coming out of it.🔥🔥🤔🤔😂

True

Hey this is fun! I have been thankful for both of y’all’s videos. They have been very helpful to me!

Good point, HolyLandSite. Is it possible that the "the wind was against them" references a struggle with the wind, not an exact headwind? In that case, the apostles are thinking "Well duh, He wants us to go to home base in Capernaum; He could have said it plainly, but, whatever..." So they set out, past Bethsaida, toward Capernaum, but God's destination for them is Gennesaret, and despite their best efforts, the wind from the north drives them south to Gennesaret.

You not helping anyone with this to God because they are

​@@Wendy-xk5uhwhat?

@@somethingrandomyt8367 there are contradictions in the bible so you cant help people because your not fair

@@Wendy-xk5uh you didn't watch the video did you😑

@@somethingrandomyt8367 in the first place i wasent responding to you

So basically, just interpret it however you want.

@@BlGGESTBROTHER lol

Pray and seek for answers? Lmao

I'm pretty sure Erhman is a Jew, his name, his looks, his despising the gospels.......screams Jew to me.

Jews and what the bible says about them.@@tribequest9

@@tribequest9 Most of your Bible was written by jews. Jesus himself was a Jew. Christianity screams JEW to me.

The New Testament is basically a commentary on what Jesus said/did and the Old Testament teachings. The Jews are not to be despised.

Given it's not a complete book to begin with, though....?

pretty sure that was just a joke

God bless. God looks at the proud from far away.

+Wendy James these are three videos about Bible contradictions which are only part of a much larger series called "Evidence for the Bible". The series is meant to show why we can and should believe the Bible is God's word. Here is the link to the full playlist. kzfaq.info/sun/PLZ3iRMLYFlHuhA0RPKZFHVcjIMN_-F596

So near warrensburg 🤷‍♂️

Or Lee's summit

Yep, I always claim to hale from the nearest city. I don’t see the point to say some town that only local people will know of.

SwolllenGoat yeah it is rather impressive that god did something like that, that’s why it’s in the Bible lol

SwolllenGoat rather slow child? Yikes man I can see the bitterness in your words, and I don’t know exactly when it happened and I don’t have to lol you can search your whole life for when it happened and never find it. Your asking the wrong questions man. If we confess with our mouth Jesus is lord and believe god raised him from the dead we’ll be saved. Not by finding evidence for Noah’s flood, proof is overrated. You might be watching too much Aron Ra

SwolllenGoat yes they are child like, Jesus said to enter the kingdom of heaven I we have to have child like faith, and those are really good questions that we may not answer in our lifetime but that doesn’t make it untrue, love ya!

SwolllenGoat without any evidence? The resurrection is the central point of Christianity and there’s plenty of evidence for that, and I wasn’t taught to believe it I went through a whole phase of questioning what I believe and still ended up a Christian you clearly have something against religion or you’ve just been watching to many of your favorite atheists videos. However, I’m happy god brought you to mike wingers channel and I hope you continue to watch his videos with an open heart

The bible is about as real and accurate as the book of mormon my friend lol

Hey everyone! I just wanted to share some good news with you all. Let's just put it this way, the Ten Commandments are called the Moral Law. Ask yourself this. How many lies have you told? Have you ever stolen anything? Have you ever used God's name in vein? Have you ever hated someone or ever looked with lust? This is for you to judge yourself, but chances are that you are a lying, thieving, blasphemous, fornicating, adulterer at heart and you HAVE to face God on judgement day. Now ask yourself this. If God judges you on judgement day by these Commandments, will you be innocent or guilty? Of course you'll be guilty because we've all done these things. The truth is that none of us are good people and we NESD God's grace to make it to heaven. We judt simply cannot do it on our own. These Commandments arecalled the Moral Law. You and I broke the law, Jesus payed the fine. So now what we must do to be saved is to repent of our sins and trust alone in Jesus Christ! To repent doesn't mean to just say I'm sorry, but to turn from our sins and let Him truly be our Lord continually. He said that many will say to Him, Lord, Lord I have done all of these things for you. And He will say I never knew you. Depart from Me, ye who work iniquity! And those will be cast into outer darkness and raging hellfire and loneliness for all of eternity!!! Because we broke His law, He is very, very just to send us to hell. If someone had murdered 4 people and said to the judge, I've done nice things too and have tried to treat people nice but it was just one time, the judge would then say, okay but you're going to jail. And the judge is very just to do that. One last thing, if you were 10,000 feet in the air and you had to jump, you wouldn't jump out and flap your arms and try to save yourself. That's ridiculous! You would put on the parachute. It is the same with Jesus. You must trust Him as you trust the parachute. We are not good and we cannot save ourselves with our own goodness. We must trust alone in Him to save us. In just a moment of time you can pass from death to life. Jesus said, "Verily, verily I say unto you, you must be born again." That is how we enter heaven. Through the blood and grace of Jesus Christ!!!!✝️If you ask someone how to enter Heaven, they will most likely say, "Be a good person." Well the Bible says that none is good, no not one. We like to compare ourselves to guys like Hitler and say, "Hey, I'm a pretty good guy compared to him." But when we compare ourselves to God's standard, we realize that the Bible speaks truth when it says that we all sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God!!! When we see this ( our sin in its TRUE light), we see how much trouble we are in and we say, "Well then there's nothing I can do. I'm going to hell for sure then." It's true that there is nothing that WE can do, but there is something that has already been done for you! God sent His One and Only Son to die on a cross as a sacrifice for our sins! So to recieve that eternal sweet sweet forgiveness, all we must do is repent of our sins (meaning to continually turn from them and confess them) and trust alone in Christ as you trust a parachute. If I was to push you out of an airplane, you'd want the parachute for sure! Don't try to flap your arms and save yourself, trust in the parachute! His finished work on the Cross IS ENOUGH!! He is the only way to Heaven, He said it Himself!! These other religions teach that we must he good and do good things and then maybe if we've been good enough, we will enter Heaven. But if that is true then we are all doomed to eternal hell because none of us are good. That's why this makes sense. Look at the Ten Commandments, they are written on your heart right now!! I promise that you have violated them. And you might still be doing that today. Therefore God is just to poor out His wrath on us because we deserve it!!! But Christ died for us so that we can spend eternity in Heaven with Him! Turn to Him today, and He and only He will save your soul "Verily, verily I say unto you, you must be born again ( to go to Heaven)."✝️

How do u mean

Could be better. And why did Satan keep any powers...

Wait... so Winger is disputing Ehrman - who studies the source material and all of their variants- by reading from the Bible as printed? O_o Or am I missing something..

I'm pretty sure the only time he referenced original text was in regard to copyist error. Failing to realize that there were many humans and many degradable materials who copied the Bible many times will lead you to come to the conclusion that the Bible is contradictory, at least/especially pertaining to numbers. Failing to understand the languages the Bible was originally written in and the contexts of scripture will cause you to be so confused. But at one point there was an original document for every book, an original understanding of the text, an original language, etc, and that technically will outweigh all other copies and understandings. If there is error in the original, there is error in the Bible; if there is reason to believe a copy/translation is in error but the original wasn't, there isn't error in the Bible. Yes this need for original text opens discussion, but just like you said, there's no way to prove it, so we can either choose the most ignorant explanation or the most logical explanation.

I think you missed him proving the right usage by looking at the context of the preceding or following verse/s which a logical reader always does so it is not strange to do the same with the Bible to defend it. Also he admitted that he only answered this topic but does not mean it covered the whole defense of the Bible because there are a lot of questions that is irrelevant to his objectives. Regarding the issue that the original text is free from error and not the copies, it is logical to doubt, even Christians should entertain that as well. After all, people before have no access to printing technology that time. But recent archaeological findings, which are inconsiderate to the Bible in the first place, has been proving little by little and consistently that the inerrancy of the original texts is highly possible. Masoretic system of scribal reproduction, the Dead Sea Scrolls and other artifacts are the solid existing evidences regarding the millennial preservation of the texts of the Bible, not to mention the thousand manuscripts of the New Testament surpassing the few to hundred copies of other famous manuscripts of Homer, Sophocles, Aristotle and other brilliant "reliable" philosophers with their writings. We cannot let the latter pass with fewer copies and reject the first considering the mountain of evidences that is hundred times more available than the latter. That is the double standard mentioned that we must avoid in logical interpretation

@Larry Cavalli "are really just pieces of documents" there you finally laid your answer why any evidence pointing to the veracity of the Scripture are unreliable and unimportant according to you. And your interpretation about its connection with the founding of Roman Catholicism is irrelevant. Just because it is connected to a religious organization does not mean the accuracy and preservation of the texts are affected by it

@@coliostro1006 Yes, I believe you're "missing something". Ehrman has stated over and over how we cannot be sure of what the originals would have said. He has debated Daniel Wallace of Dallas Theological Seminary about this. Wallace erroneously claims that we can be quite confident of what the originals said. We have no originals of any book or epistle of the bibles and therefore cannot be certain of their content.

I think that each of those quotes needs to be looked at individually but a couple principles can help. 1- It is abundantly clear that a quote doesn't equate to elevating the quoted material to being Scripture. 2- Not only are those quoted works not Scripture but they are not elevated by the quote in the sense that it's reasonable to quote something without making that thing an overall reliable source.

Mike Winger Good points. Kind of like extra books to read for a class, but all you need is the core book. Like how there are documents of early church fathers & documents from disciples of the apsotles? God could have gave inspiration to write what they wrote, but that inspiritation doesn't trump/shouldn't go against the bible.

Sometimes the Apostles had to quote stuff from Greek mythology because otherwise people could not easily understand certain things. For example , Peter says "he cast them down into Tartarus" . Tartarus was in the greek mythology as a place "as far below Hades, as Earth was below Heaven , in other words very deep. Peter could not say Hades or Hell because what he meant was the Abyss or a place reserved especially for very dangerous evil spirits. People would have not understood the difference between the Abyss and the Sheol or Hades.

Beets By Schrute guy you're easily impressed.

@@grosbeak6130 being easily impressed is great actually lol it’s a way happier life than being a snob

Shred Hed fool ! Grow up .... shred head , what a cute name.

You should open up your spiritual eyes and look deep into your own soul !

Then ask GOD to open your eyes that you ma see.

@@wesleygordon1645 And why was any angel in heaven ignorant of God, precisely?

In the very last part of this video he said the last one was the one that was the one he struggled with the most but its not like there isn't an answer and just cuz it may not he good enough for some its nothing for a Christian to lose faith over cuz there's a possible answer. But he also said that it would be impossible to go over them all but these were the "skeptics BEST ones" that he found. He searched for their "best" examples and asked those. And so there were none he couldn't answer. I may not uave answered that in the best words but listen to the last part of this video and he explained how he chose these and not others (supposedly there are thousands) but cuz these were the "bsst" ones the skeptics had to offer. And he answered them all. Hope that helps

@@TinkerBell-bt6vu Did he ever answer how two ignorant people can legally give Satan a world? Take your time. And no angel ever had the ability to render their own offspring spiritually dead, either, yes?

@@chrissonofpear1384 I just saw your question here, and I’ll take a crack at answering the first half of it. “Legally” is a strange choice of words here, but ok. Adam and Eve were not ignorant on this point; they had been warned explicitly regarding this. Their choice was not simply eating a piece of fruit, it was a declaration that they didn’t believe God’s warning, didn’t trust that God had their interest in mind, and that they no longer accepted His rule over them. They were siding with His enemy. Having been given dominion over the earth, this put the earth itself into bondage of sin. As to the second half of your question, I don’t even know what you’re talking about. What angel? What offspring?

@@thefamilydad8635 Err, prove it? Prove they REMOTELY understood any of those concepts, or the deterrent of death, or the very IDEA of death, in the ONE day of life they had actually experienced. And the fact, cold, hard fact, remains, that WE, 99.99999999999999999999 percent of us, humanity, had NO CHOICE granted to us about this issue, whatsoever. Compare that to angels, loyal or disloyal - including many of the ones who KEPT their powers, post exile. As they could not even reproduce, then no, they could NOT pass onto their descendants any spiritual impairment, because THEY ALL got to 'chose' a side from the beginning, without this ridiculous hereditary impairment or obstacle course, that involves God not only sowing His own rivals onto this world, but now, increasingly, competing with definitions of HIMSELF, across assorted churches and creeds.

@@thefamilydad8635 And we have NO PROOF they even knew God HAD an enemy, or that any dangerous entity would ever be allowed into the garden, neither.

He does have videos now that call out Bill Johnson and others

Same here bro so many lies. I thought I had the truth and had it all figured out. Until a actually started reading the bible. Then I realised, nope I actually know nothing at all 😂

@@osascamp1002 well maybe you should put that book down; if any of them are real it'll be one that can stay consistent with its characters and lore.

@@DisasterEnby put it down months ago lol im done studying that crap way too many contradictions it's crazy

Truth Seeker I pity you you must not have watched the video I learned I can’t trust any Atheist or anyone who tries to discredit or debunk it

@@305thief8 then go, suffer in your meaningless paranoia.

Interesting questions, I’m not a scholar but I’ll share a few thoughts. 1. As soon as you make a choice you deserve the consequence. We all deserve immediate judgment and any time given to repent is mercy on Gods part. 2. Aaron’s sons were priests and leaders of the community. They set an example for millions of people and generations to come. In gods knowledge of all things and all time he may have known that this was the time he had to make a swift action to set the standard for behavior by people in that position or for those types of duties. One of the letters in the New Testament even warns that teachers and preachers will be held to a stricter standard for the effect they can have with their influence and authority. We see Moses was forbade from entering the promised land because he struck the rock for water when god told him to speak to it. This is because god had a plan to use the rock as a picture for Christ and the salvation that came from him. Moses had already struck the rock once representing Christs death. By Moses striking the rock again he messed up the picture and faced the consequence. Only god know why one was death and the other was prohibited from the promised land. 3. I believe your New Testament example may be something similar. God knew that he needed to make an example there of how serious it was to defraud the church or use the church for social status. Clearly god has shown great mercy with some modern day “church leaders”. I do not claim to know gods intent but just sharing some of my thoughts on the matter.

Ohh you said it already lol

People, my self included, have very short attention span and tend to wonder down to the comment section and stop paying attention to what is said in the video. That's why I think keeping the comment section closed is a good thing. Anyways... back to the video 😂

Yeah they need to be more brave . But atheist are very mean for some reason that's probably why

Congrats on making it all the way through!

Face the truth: Acts 9 says Paul's companions heard a voice, Acts 22 recounting the same event says they did not. Most arguments about errors in The Bible Christians have are non-biblical, desperate, Ad Hoc rationalizations they'd never apply to the Koran or to any other book.

@@michaelflores9220 Why are the troll accounts the ONLY ones being responded to by Mike Winger?

@@michaelflores9220 he literally addressed this “contradiction”!

+TheLukeskywalker2 I would like to do quite a few but I don't have a timeline on it. I hope to do archaeology, science, a response to claims that the Bible is immoral or evil, response to claims that New Testament documents are forged and more. But it's entirely possible that it will take years given my current schedule and responsibilities.

Years for another single message or years to complete the series?

Please see 34:52 for an explanation of how this doesn't challenge inerrancy but actually supports it. I do believe in inerrancy. I should also mention that this is not my own private definition of inerrancy, it is the general view. Inerrancy only extends as far as the copies represent the original, and this seems quite rational. To imagine that inerrancy means every copy must be inerrant no matter how badly done seems quite silly.

+Mike Winger Thank you for the time-stamp, and for responding. I swear I watched this entire 3 video series start-to-finish and can't believe I missed this part. "Inerrancy only extends as far as the copies represent the original, and this seems quite rational." While I agree, do you only teach from the original manuscripts that we have no complete copies for? Or do you teach from errant copies? If you teach from errant copies, is this not a willing distortion of your text? "To imagine that inerrancy means every copy must be inerrant no matter how badly done seems quite silly." I imagine that a God as powerful as you claim yours to be would be able to keep all copies inerrant. It is the inspired word of God, no? Lastly, did you get a chance to review my other comment with a Bible Contradiction?

+Mike Winger Hey Mike, I never received a response on my comment. I understand you are likely very busy, so I just wanted to poke you here once more to see if I could get a response to my questions and the contradiction I pointed to within the bible. Hope to comment with you further. Thanks.

Hi Benjamin, I enjoy having this sort of conversation, I see it as truly valuable and will try and reply to you as time allows. The great and sad thing is that I am no longer able to keep up with all the comments on my videos, but this isn't because they aren't worth responding to. Do I teach from errant copies? Not exactly. I teach from a translation which is made after available copies are analyzed and strong attempts are made to determine the original reading of each passage. When the original reading is in question there is usually a footnote indicating that issue. This means that the original text is represented in either the text or the footnote and I am able to examine reasons for any textual variation using great resources like netbible.org and the like. It is simplistic to say that their are no issues regarding the text, and some believers have made the mistake of saying this to their own detriment. It is also a mistake to say that any issue equates to a substantial challenge to inspiration or inerrancy, and that is the mistake that I see some skeptics make. I am trying to deal with the facts as they are and not overstate their implications in this series. It is true that God has the power to keep every copy inerrant. He also has the power to simply hardwire the entire contents of the Bible perfectly into the brains of every human being. But simply acknowledging that God could do something doesn't necessitate that He must in order for us to have a reliable Bible. The fact that He could keep all copies inerrant doesn't mean that He must in order for us to have an inerrant source text. Is it possible that God would give us so many copies that the discipline of textual criticism would be able to say with great confidence "this is the original text"? I think so, and I think this is the case. I will go look for your other comment and the example of a contradiction which you mentioned before.

Benjamin Tuchek Biblical Inspiration does not mean every single copy of the "Bible" is innerant. It means the original books made by the authors were inspired by God.

Did you pay any attention to the first 20 minutes?😂

God may give U a chance to repent or pray to him, so that he shall change his mind. God gives his ppl a way to save themselves. He is Most Merciful, Most generous, and Most Wise

@J J in the words of Rafiki from the Lion King. "Look harder"...answers to everyone's doubts and skepticism and straw arguments, are out there. It's like this, if you accept the Bible as truth, it's fairly simple to understand. If you want to doubt it and be skeptical, the answers are stil there. They just become much deeper and more complicated. I've studied probably 100 hours of in depth credible fact checked video research surrounding the Bible, ancient texts, the science/history/archeology of the Bible, the occult, secret societies, and government. And that's just the stuff outside the scripture itself. The Bible is tested and proven over and over again in a world that "the great deciever" has manipulated. I wanted to know if I was foolishly following a fake god. Now I see I was foolish only in my lack of knowledge and information.

@J J your reply is appreciated also. It is refreshing to hear sincere curiousity and desire for truth, rather than scoffing and mocking. I am native american, raised on a reservation. So since birth, I've been raised to doubt books and their authors, as well as those in power. So I've grown up skeptical and doubting all that is called fact or truth. And that's a great thing. Because I've also doubted what is considered common knowledge or belief. If you'll send me your email address, I'll send you a couple playlists of the most legit information I've come across. I have watched every single intently, and rewind any time I fall asleep(the info can be dry). As for slavery in biblical terms, it's important to look at the times, the verbage, what slavery looked like, what the term slavery meant...shoot me your email.

@@crazyrezreppa as an honest person with questions. You arnt presenting a very convencing point. Basically what you are saying. Keep reading till you see it as good thing. That would require a initial bias from the get go. If you put on rosy sunglasses as soon as you open your eyes in the morning. Of course everything will look pink. That doesn't make it true though... Especially when one is trying to find out the true colors to the world.

Religion is a man-made fantasy. We have different fantasies and that's why we have over 3000 religions in the world today. If God was real, his WORD would be clear and his EXISTENCE would be as undeniable as the Sun. There would be no argument about his EXISTENCE.

Because the all knowing God is not the God of all nation's. He's the GOD of Israel. The book is designed to be confusing to a carnal mind. The spirit of truth must enter for it's mysteries unlocked.

I'm going to go a head a through out there that most people who believe the bible contradicts itself usually hasn't and wont read the whole book.

Joseph Bishara thank you for clearing that up with your briliance😯

Right. stop listening to man. God said. bible could have been. for if man takes or adds is a sin. MAN SINS SO THERE.

bla what what

Do you have historical material to support the idea they changed chariot horses during battle, or did you just come up with that? ;)

First off, part of going to church isn't just to learn, but to have a family to lean on in tough/doubtful times. Have you gone to your pastor with your questions? You should talk to them if you haven't already. Second, what are you having trouble with in the accounts of Jesus's birth? Third, I think Mike has done a very good job of showing that the outside influences (i.e. not internal doubt) that get in the way of God's word are human attempts to twist it. People have free will, and they use it to do bad things. This whole 20 part series should have proven to you that the Bible is the divinely inspired word that holds true (so long as you don't have a very bad translation). Despite very small minor inconsistencies (like 4,000 stables vs 40,000), the actual theological beliefs it espouses hold true.

I believe one is the genealogy of Mary and the other is Joseph if I remember correctly. (Even though Joseph wasn’t the birth father it was common to show the “fathers” lineage.) I’ve often wondered why things weren’t clearer and it has indeed frustrated me. The only answer I have is that God wants us to be faithful and these verses serve as an easy test to see if we will remain faithful. Secondly the scripture tells us to study. Maybe it’s a little difficult to understand because he knows that things you work for are more valuable than freebies.?

I believe one is the genealogy of Mary and the other is Joseph if I remember correctly. (Even though Joseph wasn’t the birth father it was common to show the “fathers” lineage.) I’ve often wondered why things weren’t clearer and it has indeed frustrated me. The only answer I have is that God wants us to be faithful and these verses serve as an easy test to see if we will remain faithful. Secondly the scripture tells us to study. Maybe it’s a little difficult to understand because he knows that things you work for are more valuable than freebies.?

Beliefs*

These are light weight contradictions in Comparison to many of the others🤦🏽‍♂️

Their are no contridictions.

Straw men are easy to know like down

@@VitoHoffa There is no spoon...

Napoleon Jones There are some but not as many as critics claim. And most of those contradictions are in the KJV translation due to either old language or poor translation of verses

I think it's just a parable. So it's not a literal event transpiring, and it's also not a teaching on the physical set up of heaven and hell at that current moment. It's just an illustration to get a point across to his audience

No need, the Bible is totally inerrant on science as it gets everything right, in regards to the physical world, with unparalleled accuracy

@justaguylearningmusic No, it does not. This is totally absurd to claim, actually. The Bible is a collection of books written by people who did not have a clue about science. Sure, if you apply a far-fetched interpretation on specific passages, you can find whatever you want to find, but that's not proof the Bible gets it right, it's just dishonest cherry picking.

@@johnpetkos5686 Idk, Isaiah 40:22 seems pretty rock solid.

There is no science in the Bible. Science is the study of process. The Bible tells us how to go to Heaven, not how the heavens go. There's no explanation of process in the Bible.

YA JESUS FAITH BELIEVE TRY TO WALK. NOT TO DIFF

Yea, so always stick to the King James Version. The one people were killed over as it was written and as it was propogated to other nations. Other translations were made for money loving men and for Catholic Church agendas.

Nah he got some good points. And I don't think he has reasons to lie. Unless u a Jesus freak nd u think he working for the devil

@@nampresto143 He makes millions off of selling books attacking Christianity, and he has idological reasons too. He has been caught lying before.

@@inukithesavage828 Bart can be wrong on some topics but what makes u think he is doing it on purpose? To Sell books? Money? Because the bible is the most Sold book in the history of humanity, the Vatican, evangelicals etc make billions out of it.

Bart Erhman changes his narrative about the new testament a lot !!

@@nampresto143 You sound like a complete moron. Unless it's purposeful, in which case you're lying. I figure it's the former.

"I've not seen you in forever" said one finite being to another.

The earth abideth forever in fervent heat. How is that hard to understand?

Winter White yes, it’s like saying “the sun will rise again” or “the seasons will change”, yet the Bible is clear this current system will inevitably end and a new heaven and earth be brought about, one with no sun and no seasons.

In the Hebrew, sometimes forever doesn’t always mean “infinity and beyond”, but it sometimes mean “continuously” or “long period of time”.

Thats because solomon had no knowledge of Jesus and the end times. This was the OT

If you're talking about the passage saying that the Father, there Word and the Holy Spirit being one, Yes in KJV, NKJV, GNV, AMPC, KJ21, DRA, YLT, JUB, BRG, WYC and as a footnote in other translations. Bible translations in other languages also have it.

Hi KJ reader :) yes in the footnotes

You're taking the series out of context. They are not all about contradictions.

With such a confusing background it must be hard.All l can say is get on your knees & ask the Almighty to reveal to you himself(& mean it with all your heart). lt might take some time, but he is faithful.& will answer you !

Louis Sousa Mike has other videos addressing the variants and different translations. Furthermore, we have thousands of manuscripts from hundreds of years before the 14th century, so we know exactly what differences are present from what we have today. What we have found is that other than a few minor differences that don’t affect the message or theology, The Bible is pretty much unchanged from the earliest manuscripts that we have. I would be curious to know exactly what contradictions you were referring to that the Catholic Church supposedly removed. Can you give any examples?

The kjv (King james version) is the correct original version. Esv and NIV were changed to take important messages of jesus and God's everlasting'ness and water down powerful scriptures to deceive Christians and searchers of truth. The Catholic Church are pagan and only want money and do not want us to know our Bible nor the true God and jesus and it doesn't suit their agenda

Where did you find the idea that all bibles are translated from the bible the catholics tampered with? Modern bibles are typically translated from the thousands upon thousands of manuscripts and fragments that have been collected and verified. Not a single Bible. Check it out.

What flagrant translation discrepancies have you found? Where has the bible failed to be historically accurate?