Birthrates Are Plummeting Worldwide. Why?

  Рет қаралды 20,497

New York Times Podcasts

New York Times Podcasts

Күн бұрын

For a long time, the story about the world’s population was that it was growing too quickly. There were going to be too many humans, not enough resources, and that spelled disaster. But now the script has flipped. Fertility rates have declined dramatically, from about five children per woman 60 years ago to just over two today. About two-thirds of us (www.unfpa.org/swp2023/too-few) now live in a country or area where fertility rates are below replacement level. And that has set off a new round of alarm, especially in certain quarters on the right and in Silicon Valley, that we’re headed toward demographic catastrophe.
But when I look at these numbers, I just find it strange. Why, as societies get richer, do their fertility rates plummet?
Money makes life easier. We can give our kids better lives than our ancestors could have imagined. We don’t expect to bear the grief of burying a child. For a long time, a big, boisterous family has been associated with a joyful, fulfilled life. So why are most of us now choosing to have small ones?
I invited Jennifer D. Sciubba on the show to help me puzzle this out. She’s a demographer, a political scientist and the author of “8 Billion and Counting: How Sex, Death and Migration Shape Our World (wwnorton.com/books/9781324002703) .” She walks me through the population trends we’re seeing around the world, the different forces that seem to be driving them and why government policy, despite all kinds of efforts, seems incapable of getting people to have more kids.
Mentioned:
“Would You Have Four Kids if It Meant Never Paying Taxes Again? (www.nytimes.com/2023/02/08/op...) ” by Jessica Grose
“Are Men the Overlooked Reason for the Fertility Decline? (www.nytimes.com/2023/02/15/op...) ” by Jessica Grose
“If We Want More Babies, Our ‘Profoundly Anti-Family’ System Needs an Overhaul (www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/op...) ” by Jessica Grose
Book Recommendations:
Extra Life (www.penguinrandomhouse.com/bo...) by Steven Johnson
The Bet (yalebooks.yale.edu/book/97803...) by Paul Sabin
Reproductive States (global.oup.com/academic/produ...) edited by Rickie Solinger and Mie Nakachi
Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.
You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast (www.nytimes.com/column/ezra-k...) . Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-... (www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-...) .
This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact checking by Michelle Harris, with Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Jessica Grose and Sonia Herrero.

Пікірлер: 447
@davidguerrero1636
@davidguerrero1636 Ай бұрын
This misses something obvious, in poor countries children are an economic asset. In rich countries they’re an economic liability.
@User53123
@User53123 Ай бұрын
Yes! Poor countries use their kids as slave labor. Send child protective services in there and the birthrate would drop to zero.
@oforde5072
@oforde5072 Ай бұрын
They mentioned this.
@julianskinner3697
@julianskinner3697 Ай бұрын
On farms children are an asset In urban areas they are a liability
@Bigfield47
@Bigfield47 15 күн бұрын
I could never afford them…🤷‍♂️
@T1tusCr0w
@T1tusCr0w 14 күн бұрын
No, they are still an economic asset. But to billionaires instead of you. They need a new set of everything. A new house eventually s bunch of new cars. Etc etc. child care, education, all the things children can’t do without went through the roof. Only way to win is not to play.
@wlf9108
@wlf9108 Ай бұрын
If you’re a single parent you’re pretty much on your own. There is no village to help. Better to stay childless.
@Edo9River
@Edo9River Ай бұрын
In the internet village, not the real one lol 😂 there’s others in the neighborhood who take off the condom and have daughters who go and get married to some lovable but pudgy guy and together so far produce 2 more kids, who seem spoiled but too soon to know
@reuvenpolonskiy2544
@reuvenpolonskiy2544 22 күн бұрын
And why the family became so unstable? Why there is no longer any viliage or community?
@everythingisfine9988
@everythingisfine9988 19 күн бұрын
​@@reuvenpolonskiy2544 are you involved in the personal lives of your neighbors? Because that's what it takes
@phillipm5148
@phillipm5148 15 күн бұрын
How about pick a good man, then don't divorce him?
@wlf9108
@wlf9108 15 күн бұрын
@@phillipm5148that’s like having another baby to take care of
@needmorecowbell6895
@needmorecowbell6895 Ай бұрын
Children are expensive and inconvenient for many people. As soon as women in developing countries get a cell phone they can see how everyone else lives. They can see the freedom enjoyed by single people in the West and they want that for themselves.
@warrenny
@warrenny Ай бұрын
What they need is more cowbell. Someone call Will Ferrell.
@bartsimpson8616
@bartsimpson8616 10 күн бұрын
you are dellusional , enjoy in your western ''freedom'' soon gonna be even more freedom.
@Wegivesp
@Wegivesp 7 күн бұрын
Except it is the developed countries births are down.
@bartsimpson8616
@bartsimpson8616 7 күн бұрын
@@Wegivesp you mean those countries which are not so ''progressive '' and ''free'' as yours .Dont worry , soon they gonna make you high birt rate , And what was most often baby name given on new born in your democratic paradise ? It was Rendal , or was Mouhamed ??
@needmorecowbell6895
@needmorecowbell6895 7 күн бұрын
@@Wegivesp Not really. Birth rates are below replacement in places like Brazil, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Burma, Indonesia, Iran, Mongolia, Nepal, N. Korea, Bhutan, Malaysia, Costa Rica, etc.
@suzannejamison5366
@suzannejamison5366 Ай бұрын
I have 3 girls and two boys. We were low income, often homeless, carless, and always struggling. Today, only two of my children want and have families; the other three - "no way!" I think this may be because they don't want to struggle so much and bring children into a world which does not support democracy, equal rights, families, education, decent housing, decent jobs, and so forth.
@Scl45689
@Scl45689 Ай бұрын
Yep, I think it's funny that social scientists and reporters think we don't know why birthrates are falling. We absolutely do. We are living it. Obviously, there are many reasons,but the big two are: Choice, we are no longer socially obliged to have children Economics: we no longer have an economic incentive to have children. In the past, children were a financial burden, but were also financial help when it came to things like family farms or even working jobs, or caring for elderly parents. Now, children aren't expected (rightfully so) to provide to the family. They are only financial burden, and society does nothing to ease the burden.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
"Often homeless" That's very rare for American families. It's also odd that you chose to have 5 children, given your exigent circumstances.
@bookplateorg-ry5fl
@bookplateorg-ry5fl Ай бұрын
I was surprised that this was not mentioned in the program. I did not have children because of that, and I am talking 50 years ago.
@thegardenoffragileegos1845
@thegardenoffragileegos1845 Ай бұрын
@@bookplateorg-ry5flIt's not mentioned in the program because that doesn't serve an agenda they're trying to push. Economic policy of the wealth in the US earnestly believes that the more you oppress people, the more they breed like rabbits. They don't think ahead enough to realize that going below subsistence means a person can't feed, clothe, and shelter themselves, let alone a child. This podcast is stuck in the 1990s idea of how Americans live. That's how insulated the upper class is, and that's why they're only going to make things worse as time goes on, particularly with the methods they (regardless of party affiliation) are using to try and force more births for child labor.
@chewyjello1
@chewyjello1 Ай бұрын
Yep! I'm a single mom of an only child and she watched me struggle to provide for her. She also said "no way!"...she does not want that responsibility. She said a cat is all the extra responsibility she wants....it's hard enough just to take care of yourself now days!
@mempto
@mempto Ай бұрын
Something often overlooked is that a lot of people grow up with parents who never should have been parents. This is not an uncommon thing. Back when everybody had kids because you basically had to (boomers and older) you have huge numbers of people becoming parents who were simply not cut out to do the job well. So I think part of the drop in people having children is the understanding by younger generations that they do not want to risk ruining someone's life in the way many of their lives were adversely affected by their parents.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Agree 100%
@23erisx
@23erisx Ай бұрын
Wow aint that the truth! Getting to a place where you can admit that your parents sucked and never should've gotten pregnant with you is a huge step in self healing. Many many people never get there and just repeat the family pattern.
@rrickarr
@rrickarr Ай бұрын
I am one of those people you describe and I am over 50!
@mereniecrosby7120
@mereniecrosby7120 13 күн бұрын
Yep definitely a pessimistic society won't have kids! I see it in my own family.
@KitaTaki-mk3gt
@KitaTaki-mk3gt 6 күн бұрын
Also, the older people get the more they are aware of the advantages of not having children … society brainwashes people in wanting to have kids … but when people get older they start thinking for themselves … Being a parent isn’t like a cornflakes advert … And one better realises that before becoming a parent
@pce12345
@pce12345 Ай бұрын
Why would people want to bring children into the world when it is in such a bad state and only getting worse? It's actually cruel.
@YadraVoat
@YadraVoat Ай бұрын
Compared to what?
@pce12345
@pce12345 Ай бұрын
@@YadraVoat that's it. No need to compare
@coreyander286
@coreyander286 Ай бұрын
When has the world been in a better state? The 20th century? Cold War, Vietnam, segregation in the US, apartheid in South Africa? WWII? WWI? The Spanish Flu? The 19th century? Slavery still legal? Charles Dickens level poverty? The 18th century? Medieval times? Roman Republic? Han Dynasty? Bronze Age Fertile Crescent? Human prehistory? The world has never been better than it is now. In terms of life expectancy, eradication of diseases, education levels, equality, human rights... This is the best time there's ever yet been to have kids. Oh, woe to our kids, they'll never know the bliss of being born on a medieval fiefdom.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
The Left is depressed and childless. The Right is angry and not childless. The future is therefore not hard to predict.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@anthonyburee650
@anthonyburee650 Ай бұрын
Rich country doesn't mean richer families...... Cost of living , both parents NEED to work. The middle class is now borderline poverty. And children are expensive
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Both parents to not need to work. Those who think they do are victims of marketers and other propagandists. They don't know what "need" means and don't compare their supposed needs with those of their parents or grandparents. But, this is all to the good. The propaganda system, in effect, is discouraging people who can't think for themselves from reproducing themselves.
@CJ-re7bx
@CJ-re7bx 18 күн бұрын
The question is, how can some people be literally dirt floor poor and stil have 10 kids, but someone who has access to decent housing and food feels like they can't?
@kreek22
@kreek22 17 күн бұрын
@@CJ-re7bx psychology, created by culture
@CJ-re7bx
@CJ-re7bx 15 күн бұрын
@@kreek22 wow, I wish I thought of that. You're a genius.
@kreek22
@kreek22 15 күн бұрын
@@CJ-re7bx I know.
@karim.mmmmmmm
@karim.mmmmmmm Ай бұрын
Easy answer is are we happy ? I mean most people? Do we even want to live or exist in this place ? Do we see a bright future ?… in the past life was by far more miserable but we didn’t have the means to compare our life with others … now the comparison is depressive … you compare yourself to the rich and you feel like you have no chance in life so you just let go
@andoarike2843
@andoarike2843 Ай бұрын
Why not a word on how inhospitable late capitalist neoliberal societies are to families and communities? How school systems are underfunded and falling apart while we spend $1 trillion per year on the military? How paying for health care is a constant worry? How employment is often precarious, and housing costs continue to skyrocket?
@vinista256
@vinista256 Ай бұрын
Good points, all!
@raraavis7782
@raraavis7782 Ай бұрын
Those are all good points (obviously), but it's still interesting, to look beyond that, imo. Because there are countries where these issues aren't nearly as severe and birthrates are just as abysmal. Or even more so. Germany has a worse birth rate than the USA. And while we're struggling atm, for obvious reasons...we had it pretty cushy here for many decades. Many people still decided to opt out of having a family. Or at least a large family. This already happened between 1965 and 1975 btw, when birthrates dropped from 2.5-1.5 in about a decade. Ever since, we've been pretty much stable at that number. There was even a slight uptick between 2010 and 2020. Just from 1.4-1.6, but still. So this clearly had nothing to do with economic factors or all the upheaval and change, we all have been going through these last 20 years or so. The only people here, that have 2+ kids are immigrants and they are usually not better off financially or in any other aspect (job search, housing etc). Except maybe family support. I've thought about this a lot and continue to be puzzled by it.
@victoriapearce6145
@victoriapearce6145 Ай бұрын
The drop in the sixties would be birth control I would think
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
@@raraavis7782 The lowest birthrate in US history was 1.64. Also, the US birthrate declined significantly from 2010 to 2020 (1.93 to 1.64). You're also wrong about who in America has large families. Have you ever met statistics?
@raraavis7782
@raraavis7782 Ай бұрын
@@kreek22 You missed a key word in what I wrote...which is 'Germany'. I know, I know... it's hard for Americans to comprehend, that there are other countries than theirs in the world *pats head*. No go work on your reading comprehension, before you try to correct others in such an unnecessarily condescending way again.
@GungaLaGunga
@GungaLaGunga Ай бұрын
i can't even afford to keep a dog anymore. kids? you are out of your mind.
@etherealradar
@etherealradar Ай бұрын
For real. If someone is actually writing, for a living in new york, they are out of fucking touch with this topic.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
So, you're homeless. But, have internet access. Sure.
@GungaLaGunga
@GungaLaGunga Ай бұрын
@@kreek22 So, you're thoughtless. I didn't say I was homeless, or lacked internet access. Nice gem of a non sequiter strawman combo comment though.
@reuvenpolonskiy2544
@reuvenpolonskiy2544 22 күн бұрын
People lived for thousands of years under much harsher conditions and yet brought much more kids.
@antinatalistwitch111
@antinatalistwitch111 15 күн бұрын
@@reuvenpolonskiy2544 Those people are not us, so what point are you trying to make?
@khidirkarawitah2539
@khidirkarawitah2539 Ай бұрын
I want kids, but i can barely afford to house myself 😞
@masonm600
@masonm600 Ай бұрын
Maybe we're doing parenting wrong? No kidding! What we think is normal has only existed for a couple generations! Moving somewhere with no support network and doing everything yourself in your little castle only works in an age of unprecedented prosperity.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Moving away from grandma, then putting the women to work is an excellent recipe for demographic decline.
@catsaresocute650
@catsaresocute650 Ай бұрын
The cost is simply atronmus. Just the thoght of paying in money for all the labour that wouldn't tradtionally be paied but done by the wife/support network. That's hours upon hours. In places where children can't safly play alone around the nighberhood even more money that you pay essentialy for lacking a safe community. And every of those is taxed as a buiness and as a person themselves (the wage needs to be enogh after taxes)- just as much as the parents will be taxed. So a lot of money plus a lot of taxes on top
@StopWhining491
@StopWhining491 Ай бұрын
And the last time we had that was when?
@CJ-re7bx
@CJ-re7bx 18 күн бұрын
@@StopWhining491 Probably the silent generation.
@T1tusCr0w
@T1tusCr0w 14 күн бұрын
@@kreek22they demeaned woman’s roles as homemaker & mother. Exhorted them to get a job, a career. Then used them to drive down men’s wages & Cleverly made it this feminist agenda. Whereas it was a capitalist agenda. People respond to stimulus & it worked. & they got the end result too. Now 1 man working 40 hours a week in a middle class job can’t dream of bringing up a 2-4 child family in a decent house, have a car & go 1-2 holidays a year. Woman are unhappy, men are lost. The rich get richer & they find more ways to nickel and dime us. But oh dear. We decided not to play anymore. 🤷🏻‍♂️
@jonlittle5032
@jonlittle5032 Ай бұрын
[6:25] "India is not a wealthy country so it's not the case that economic growth both preceded declines in fertility rates" Wrong. The hypothesis is not if a country is wealthy by global standards then fertility rate goes down. The hypothesis is that economic growth is a causal factor to declining fertility rates. An Indian couple does not make procreation decisions based on their relative wealth to a couple living in the English countryside halfway around the world, they base their decision on their own economic situation. India's declining fertility rate began to accelerate in 1963; India's per capita GDP (10 year moving average) started to increase in the mid 1950s in a sustained manner. I should write a book and make money doing podcasts.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
"An Indian couple does not make procreation decisions based on their relative wealth to a couple living in the English countryside halfway around the world" THANK YOU FOR CALLING OUT THIS VIDEO'S STUPIDITY!
@tomwirt319
@tomwirt319 Ай бұрын
Maybe people are finally hearing. Earth needs to decrease its human load and its up to us to replace our budgets to lower population. Return us to a balance of loving the earth , our only home.😊
@tomwirt319
@tomwirt319 Ай бұрын
Go look up t he 1970 book by James Lovelock "GAIA THEORY"
@T1tusCr0w
@T1tusCr0w 14 күн бұрын
@@tomwirt319 & Limits to growth. 1972 book. We should have listened. We should have instead tried to have more people live well. Instead of just having ridiculous amounts of more people.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
"loving the earth" is meaningless unfalsifiable garbage. The earth does not feel pain. Only individual sentient beings do.
@AlZ-oy4si
@AlZ-oy4si Ай бұрын
I'm 35, no kids. Before that, I'd need to actually have a partner. Before that, I'd actually need to date someone. Before that, I'd actually need to ask someone out. Before that, I'd need to move out of my parents house. Before that, I'd actually need to have an income. Before that, I'd actually need to have a job. Before that, I'd actually need to have work authorization. Before that I'd actually need my immigration status to change. 20 years and counting.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Or...you could return whence you came and embrace your heritage in the land of your ancestors. And have children.
@taylorc2542
@taylorc2542 Ай бұрын
That's waytoomany steps. I'd head home and marry a local girl; she'd probably be a better mother than anything you'll get here.
@tatan4ik
@tatan4ik Ай бұрын
Yeah you could do all that if you're not killed or thrown to jail right from the airport upon returning to your homecountry.
@bluemonty2184
@bluemonty2184 21 күн бұрын
Bothy husband and I were still living with our parents when we met. Go out there and start dating!
@everythingisfine9988
@everythingisfine9988 19 күн бұрын
​@@kreek22 The dude immigrated for a reason. I'm just going to guess, he didn't want to starve to death. Word on the street, it's an uncomfortable way to go
@klf9161
@klf9161 Ай бұрын
Can't we switch this around and ask why would anyone want to have kids? In high income society, having kids is a lot of unpaid work frankly. Kids do not materially contribute to the economic stability of a household. From a practical standpoint, kids are a burden. There are going to be people that enjoy that work so they're okay with that. A lot of people do not enjoy child care or the idea of child care. It's hard just to take care of yourself and deal with the economic uncertainty of yourself. Why would you take on even more uncertainty with a child unless you really wanted to? In the past people didn't think about it. By the time they looked up they already had three kids and a wife. I think now people have the opportunity to mature a little bit and when they actually think about having kids they make the choice that it doesn't make sense.
@michaelparker9083
@michaelparker9083 Ай бұрын
Business got too used to the idea that having children was immutable human nature, and that the labor force would naturally be replenished without them needing to do anything to incentivize it. They have always pursued profit by paying their employees as little as possible, and by paying as little in tax as possible. Eventually they will discover that this state of affairs is ending, and that parents require monetary compensation for the value they are creating for society.
@bluedreams517
@bluedreams517 Ай бұрын
I come from two lines of huge families. My grandmother on one side had 13-14 children, on the other she had 9, 7 surviving infanthood. My parents had a lot of kids. And then there's me, who's had 3 with one living. There's a couple things that fit what you mention (they married young, pressures kept them in said marriages, and they didn't have access or believe in most contraceptives). One big thing that's different is the cultural emphasis and beliefs around what children are. There is language around babies that emphasizes their positives more than their negatives. Children are seen as blessings and purpose. A fundamental aspect to growing and maturing. That's lost on later gens that may have already come from smaller families or having had that values transmitted to them (or did and rejected them). In my family lines, almost everyone assumes they'll have children and there's a disproportionate number who have larger than average families or are aiming for that. I believe that's strongly tied to a cultural heritage that values children and family.
@GUSCRAWF0RD
@GUSCRAWF0RD Ай бұрын
Not all people can, not all people should. You need a license to catch fish or drive. The idea it’s a right over sovereignty of another human for 18 years with no qualification seems insane in some way too, not that I would change that. You are somehow not doing your duty to your ilk on an organic level by not replicating if you can. Yet thoughtlessly copulating does nothing for humanity. I dunno. I would like to have one child but I just never grew up enough in the right way where I could see that. Maybe there’s other way to pass on what I’ve learned and benefit humanity.
@Edo9River
@Edo9River Ай бұрын
Interesting stuff. I’m in Japan with a family of 2 daughters and though born in the USA, They’ve been here since kindergarten. The distribution of people is a way to help solve this issue. The society that willingly encourages others who are flexible and willing to contribute will benefit greatly by the diversity. There’s a fear of “ losing cultural identity”. What does this REALLY mean, if the society faces economic collapse 😢
@catsaresocute650
@catsaresocute650 Ай бұрын
I agree, without the neccerity you probably should even only have a child if you love to be a parent, including all the work as the thing you would love to do most. I wounder if people have enogh exposure to healthy loveing families who share chores for example tho, because maybe not? A lot of ppl don't seem to belive that's possible for them
@tora0neko
@tora0neko Ай бұрын
easy answer that doesn't need an hour of filler: it's expensive and wages are meager. Housing, groceries, utilities, debt payments, car payments, gas, etc. are all through the roof. we can barely afford to be alive and feed our humanity on the side, nevermind create and cultivate an entire human being that'll be totally dependent on us. and our society in general has also become so rigid, vacant, and alienated that it's growing more and more difficult to meet new people and form attachments. We barely have any energy and time between work shifts to be fulfilled as humans, we're often too tired or busy with domestic obligations to go out and meet someone to have a child with. And where would we go, anyhow? the third spaces that would fill those needs are disappearing and so our only options are home, work, and trips to the store where we don't typically want to be social or bothered. Capitalism is killing us.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Move to N Korea and get some good old school communism. You might lose your Y-tube access, but that's a benefit to the rest of us.
@T1tusCr0w
@T1tusCr0w 14 күн бұрын
Left a comment like this on the 1st section of the page. It’s so obvious & these 2 have no idea 🤦🏻‍♂️
@ericarn
@ericarn 10 күн бұрын
I have only heard about 10 minutes of this podcast and don’t understand how these two think most working class people have so much financial freedom & ‘time to enjoy’? Rich countries or ‘some rich people in those countries’?
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
"easy answer that doesn't need an hour of filler: it's expensive and wages are meager" I know, right?
@jamesbunch8932
@jamesbunch8932 Ай бұрын
Ezra Klein keeps saying things that make me believe he thinks everyone in America is like him and his friends from graduate school. 13% of Americans have a master's degree. ~3% have a doctorate. Is it possible that not everyone is like him? Is it possible that economic numbers in the US don't accurately represent the level of distribution of income and wealth? Maybe the reason why *most* people are choosing to have fewer kids is that this amazing prosperity is actually *not* equally experienced. This is such a fundamental problem with NYT professional opinion-havers. They are a bit myopic. I, myself, have a doctorate in what has turned out to not be a very lucrative profession. I didn't go into it thinking it would make me rich, but I wasn't prepared for this level of precarity. The idea of buying a house, saving for retirement (or just retiring in general), let alone having a kid... These are all wildly unrealistic for me. So even some of us with graduate degrees aren't doing so well.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
The smart opinionators (eg, the execrable Ezra) at the Times are not myopic, they're strategic liars. But, there are some dumbos on the payroll.
@Ryanandboys
@Ryanandboys Ай бұрын
Still doesn't explain why the poorest Americans have the most kids on average. Or why when Americans where much poorer we had many more kids. I grew up very poor to a mom who had 5 kids, it was perfectly fine and we all did well. She definitely didn't put much time in with us and we didn't do any of expensive activities. My best friends growing up supports his 4 kids and stay at home wife in MA on $75k no problem working construction by my brother in a city working in the media making $125k with a partner making $120k says kids are way to expensive. It's obviously not the money it's that they would have to give up ALOT of spending on travel and career progress to have kids.
@kyber1fun164
@kyber1fun164 Ай бұрын
You know Ezra never went to grad school, right?
@jamesbunch8932
@jamesbunch8932 Ай бұрын
@@kyber1fun164 that's very interesting. I did not know that. That makes me curious about why he actively identifies himself (in this interview) as belonging to the group of people that go to grad school? He doesn't talk about himself as a person with "only" a bachelor's degree...
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
"I, myself, have a doctorate in what has turned out to not be a very lucrative profession. I didn't go into it thinking it would make me rich, but I wasn't prepared for this level of precarity. The idea of buying a house, saving for retirement (or just retiring in general), let alone having a kid... These are all wildly unrealistic for me. So even some of us with graduate degrees aren't doing so well." BINGO! SAME FOR ME! I always did "work hard, play hard", have had a singular goal, with several "backup goals" if the primary goal did not work out, that I "went for", and in some ways, still do. And going for all those goals - all those academic degrees -- was and still is THE BEST DECISION OF MY LIFE! Nevertheless, working hard and being focussed on a goal of life is ZERO guarantee of getting all you had hoped for in return. I've gotten a LOT of what I had hoped for in return (PhD in Mathematics, BChE in chemical engineering, 2 years as a chem eng, eight published papers, have given several talks and poster presentations) but not all I had hoped for.
@Wegivesp
@Wegivesp 7 күн бұрын
Becoming rich wasn't the cause. Not sharing and the concentration of wealth. Not spreading the wealth among the masses. Selfishness. Greed.
@roberttilimbici9139
@roberttilimbici9139 Ай бұрын
It is because in the rich societies people invest too much time in their kids. I was born during Ceausescu's regime in Romania, and then the parents would not spend that much time with their kids. We were going alone to school, come back from school alone and ate what was left for us in the fridge to eat. My both parents were working including on Saturdays. If we would some sport, or take music lessons, the same, we would go alone or with our friends. We spent most our time with our friends outside, not with our parents.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
What you describe was true for most American children until around 25 years ago. But, the American birthrate dropped below replacement 50 years ago. Romania, though not rich, has had a low birthrate for 30 years.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
Unions and Marxists are JUSTIFIED forms of collectivism: they fight to INCREASE equality of labor and wealth produced by that labor. Unlike nationalism or tradition or culture, which actively fight against equality of choice, freedom, when doing so goes against their nationalistic or monarchist or theocratic delusions and ideologies.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
Unions and Marxists are JUSTIFIED forms of collectivism: they fight to INCREASE equality of labor and wealth produced by that labor. Unlike nationalism or tradition or culture, which actively fight against equality of choice, freedom, when doing so goes against their nationalistic or monarchist or theocratic delusions and ideologies. FYI: far too many "Communists" turned out to be Communist in name only: fanatical fascist rightwing dictators.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Don't have kids and have a good life, have kids and suffer
@alejandroavendano7988
@alejandroavendano7988 Ай бұрын
I dont understand how 3,7 million births a year is a low fertility rate, if anything they should be trying to make it slower.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
You do not understand the meaning of the term "rate."
@alejandroavendano7988
@alejandroavendano7988 Ай бұрын
@@kreek22 no, what is it?
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
​@@alejandroavendano7988 In this case it refers to the number of children produced by an average woman currently in the fertile age range. The fertility rate was 1.6 last year. The number of births was 3.7 million. A fertility rate below 2.1 causes population decline.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@TikvahUganda
@TikvahUganda Ай бұрын
We live in Uganda. We love our kids and have extended family help as well as land for them to play around in. Not everyone has a big family but it's normal to have one and grandmothers expect to be very involved and live with or next to the grandchildren.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
The grandmother effect is important. Without grandmothers, childcare is more expensive and lower quality.
@arcticgoddess
@arcticgoddess Ай бұрын
That's one of the norms humans relied on for hundreds of thousands of years. The tribe concept is not moving away from our families of origin and getting support in child rearing. Now that so many people move far away from families, and culture is isolating more, parents don't get a break from kids and kids don't get a break from parents.
@Developer888
@Developer888 4 күн бұрын
thats not the reality in USA, grandparents aren't nearly as involved, also its way more expensive here to have a family than in Uganda
@F2t0ny
@F2t0ny Ай бұрын
I feel guilty for engaging in my hobbies and not spending time with my kids or leaving them to my wife.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
"rich country" means NOTHING. The ONLY QUANTIFIABLE meaning of "rich" is HOW MUCH QUALITY OF LIFE (which INCLUDES access to advanced technology) do you get in exchange for HOW MUCH HARD LABOR you do. Money is just an INTERMEDIARY between what goods and services you get versus how much goods and services you produce.
@Developer888
@Developer888 4 күн бұрын
rich for a few, poor for many
@aquababy2012
@aquababy2012 Ай бұрын
Not a bad thing. Capitalism is way depressing.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@bartsimpson8616
@bartsimpson8616 10 күн бұрын
soon they gonna change in techno feudalism with fashism.
@missshroom5512
@missshroom5512 Ай бұрын
Sometimes I feel all this talk is corporations and companies desperate to beat that bottom line every year. We did absolutely fine with 2 billion people on the planet …only 100 years ago. This is not a finite planet. We will be just fine. Don’t let anyone scare you that more is better. It is just NOT true🌎☀️💙
@andoarike2843
@andoarike2843 Ай бұрын
Why isn't a falling population considered a good thing, at this point -- if not a miraculous blessing? For two decades now, a commonly quoted statistic is that if all 8 billion humans enjoyed Americans' material consumption levels we'd need 4 or 5 more planets to supply the resources. Needless to say, this is not going to happen -- and Indeed, our planetary resource base is rapidly declining, both in quantity and quality, and we are likely polluting our oceans, aquifers, and atmosphere beyond repair. Why not celebrate the falling birthrate and reform our societies to support a smaller global population?
@Shapeguydude
@Shapeguydude Ай бұрын
Read your last sentence, that's why
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Conventional wisdom is usually dumb. There is no shortage of resources, with one possible exception--a mineral important in food production. You've probably never heard of it due to conventional wisdom entrapment. You've also failed to understand basic principles of economics, like catallaxy and automatic market-based information systems.
@platinumfalconm3891
@platinumfalconm3891 Ай бұрын
"Why isn't a falling population considered a good thing, at this point -- if not a miraculous blessing?" Answer: “The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.” ― Voltaire
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 күн бұрын
Because ALL these media are extremist conservative or centrist biased. OPPOSED to allowing OTHER VOICES OTHER OPINIONS be heard such as ANTINATALIST.
@heidijanuary3286
@heidijanuary3286 Күн бұрын
It is the economy. Simple as that. Low wages, High inflation , Housing too expensive... These 2 seems out of touch.
@brucethomas471
@brucethomas471 Ай бұрын
I find it curious that there is no mention of chemicals that are causing fertility problems. Perhaps these effects are more in the future? Has Shanna Swan's research been proven incorrect? I do agree with what is presented here but it seems incomplete.
@CJ-re7bx
@CJ-re7bx 18 күн бұрын
Good point. Why are sperm counts and testosterone levels dropping?
@sarakaplan3396
@sarakaplan3396 Ай бұрын
As a mother of 9, whose oldest child is 51, at first had children because it was expected of me, but now, I am so grateful for the privilege of having them. They taught me much! And provide so much joy in my life.
@qarljohnson4971
@qarljohnson4971 Ай бұрын
The actual problem is overconsumption by the top 10%. Top 10% being most of us here online. The OECD nations comprise most of this overconsumptive class, who consume >60% of the planet's annual resources, leaving only 40%, for the bottom 90% of humanity. If we top 10% reduce our consumption back to 1950s levels, every human being could thrive on Earth. That does mean ending Capitalism and in specific, ending ALL forms of rent extraction.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Your numbers are incorrect, probably due to ideology, possibly due to innumeracy.
@arcticgoddess
@arcticgoddess Ай бұрын
Another reason for the shift in rich countries is that in most rich countries, women have access to those same opportunities. In 3rd world and developing countries, the norms are for women to only stay home and raise children. When given the choice, women want options too.
@zebrafinch12
@zebrafinch12 Ай бұрын
Lots of people dont like or want kids
@CJ-re7bx
@CJ-re7bx 18 күн бұрын
No duh. The question is whether that feeling has always existed, and if it hasn't, why does it exist now? If it has, why has it changed how people are actually having kids?
@antinatalistwitch111
@antinatalistwitch111 15 күн бұрын
@@CJ-re7bx child abuse, child neglect, and child homicide as always existed. Of course everyone did not always like children. No duh!
@victoriapearce6145
@victoriapearce6145 Ай бұрын
An excellent conversation. As a Canadian certainly childcare and maternity leave being offered at a reasonable amount is so important to make having not only the first but additional children being possible. It's never easy but support is so important in an expensive world. Doing volunteer work like a Guide or Scout leader is important work for the community but tough when both parents are overworked and overwhelmed
@danmoreman954
@danmoreman954 Күн бұрын
The fertility rate of women who have children is about 2.6. It was roughly 2.6 in 1972. The difference is 5-6 times as many women are not having children now vs 1972. I wish the demographer could have discussed this point. Disappointing interview over all because she did not say anything that was particularly insightful.
@philipwilkie3239
@philipwilkie3239 3 сағат бұрын
For everyone claiming that it's too expensive or inconvenient to have children - ask yourself this - exactly where in the world do people still have many children and a positive birthrate? Is it somewhere wealthy and comfortable?
@mariamathews5312
@mariamathews5312 Ай бұрын
Because the loss exceeds the gains
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Natural selection never stops selecting, regardless of how the selection environment shifts.
@etherealradar
@etherealradar Ай бұрын
​@@kreek22 true, ive thought about this concept from time to time.
@squirrelabouttown6022
@squirrelabouttown6022 Ай бұрын
This seems very out of touch. Try to look beyond your own social circle. Not everybody has your paycheck. Not everybody has shared home/childcare duties. You can do a search on any social platform and people will tell you why they are putting off having kids.
@etherealradar
@etherealradar Ай бұрын
Straight up.
@etherealradar
@etherealradar Ай бұрын
Look at healthcare.
@ANANG408
@ANANG408 Ай бұрын
exactly, should include someone outside their circle, this seems too narrow for such a wide discussion
@dougmiller5849
@dougmiller5849 Ай бұрын
Job stability and immigration is the driver. Immigration is causing massive job instability. Companies can hire/layoff as immigration provides an endless supply of labor and supress wages.
@StopWhining491
@StopWhining491 Ай бұрын
Most women don't live on farms where they used to be equated with the livestock.
@andym4695
@andym4695 Ай бұрын
Real estate prices are part of the problem. It's too expensive to find a house someplace you can hope to find a job (a city or large town) I posit America simply doesn't have enough cash to have a bunch of kids. I also ask the question, what if successful women were willing to marry less successful men, who (are you sitting down?) are willing to stay home with the kids until they start high school, say? You know, that bank manager being willing to marry that handsome bartender? I'd posit these two factors have a lot to do with why people aren't having more kids.
@Kevin_40
@Kevin_40 Ай бұрын
a lot of people are satisfied with porn over finding a mate. a lot of people are having a hard time supporting themselves even basic needs such as paying bills and buying food. a lot of people are barely surviving alone, let alone find a mate and have a child. women want nothing to do with a man who is barely surviving.
@jessa5388
@jessa5388 Ай бұрын
46:05 I have memories of waiting outside of San Francisco restaurants that didn't take reservations when I was a kid. We were expected to wait. We brought a book. It was fine.
@garyjohnson8327
@garyjohnson8327 Ай бұрын
I have memories of growing up in Oklahoma when it was a natural paradise with a billion fewer fences
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
@@garyjohnson8327 OK hasn't been a natural paradise since the buffalo roamed.
@Developer888
@Developer888 4 күн бұрын
im missing the point, are we just sharing our memories here, I remember when Golden Eye came out on Nintendo 64 in 1999, best game especially for inviting friends over to play
@nonnoyobisnis8705
@nonnoyobisnis8705 11 сағат бұрын
Help me with the math! If the global fertility rate is 2.2, but half of all newborns are born in places where the replacement level is 2.5 or even 3 and higher (Chad, Sudan, Niger, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh etc.), then the fertility rate is already under replacement level worldwide, correct? Or are you telling me that the supposed global replacement level of 2.1 takes into account the situation in the above named nations?
@Bigfield47
@Bigfield47 15 күн бұрын
A person born today can probably live to the end of the century. By then the world will be very different from the world of 1960 or even 2000. Sea levels will have pushed populations near the seas to move inward. Money will have been funneled into the hands of the wealthiest 2-4%. Sea level raises will have also reduced arable land. The population will have grown to unsustainable levels. This is not a scenario for lots of good outcomes. My belief is that the peoples need for more resources to live will attempt to redistribute wealth and resources which will lead to a world wide collapse of society. Having children today might be the ultimate bad move. For them and the world.
@jamesmullins6681
@jamesmullins6681 Ай бұрын
An hour's worth of conversation and not a word on migration and the fulfillment of labor needs through more realistic immigration policies (throughout the world). Not a word on the forced birthing in the US by the removal of women's reproductive rights. Ezra. What does "highly successful" mean?
@jeremy____5747
@jeremy____5747 Ай бұрын
So that's you literally in favor of Replacement Theory.
@alvegutt42
@alvegutt42 13 сағат бұрын
the day food production gets extremely cheap due to automation, and the majority of jobs can be done remotely from rural areas, and housing cost gets more reasonable, people will be having few kids. and if the current situation is due to people actually not wanting kids, then how would it ever change
@dE3Lov
@dE3Lov Ай бұрын
We're eating plastic. Might have something to do with it.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Yet, the life expectancy in most countries continues to rise. Did you know the sun inflicts radiation upon the entire earth every day? I'm surprised anything can survive on this planet.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
The water's toxic the air is toxic the food is toxic, the government is toxic, yeah let me bring another human being into this world, lmao!!!!
@everythingisfine9988
@everythingisfine9988 19 күн бұрын
Certainly doesn't help
@bartsimpson8616
@bartsimpson8616 10 күн бұрын
but that is nt important what you eat , its important MOLSANTO to make couple billions more ,
@Developer888
@Developer888 4 күн бұрын
ding din ding! here i thought i was the only one who figured it out. its in organs and arteries. plastic massively reduces the ability to have kids and clogged arteries is the reason for nearly all deaths.
@zeenohaquo7970
@zeenohaquo7970 Ай бұрын
Hallelujah
@arktseytlin
@arktseytlin 22 күн бұрын
Make housing with several bedrooms in a townhouse affordable, and this will get fixed. Also, get the men to do more in terms of child care
@fredyyfredfreddy
@fredyyfredfreddy Күн бұрын
It is not just ''cultural'' The problems are that housing has become insanely expensive in most developed countries. Unnecessarily so and also jobs have become less secure. Rules on the Job market has changed, but even more so the job culture has changed. We now have what I would call a ''hire and fire'' culture where employers try to find '' the perfect'' employee and if it turns out they are somehow human and not perfect then they are fired, instead of investing in the employees and letting them grow.
@garyjohnson8327
@garyjohnson8327 Ай бұрын
Ill tell you how to feel about it. It took until 200 yrs ago to each 1 b humans. Then 200 hundred more years ti get to 8 billion. 8,000,000,000. Another 100,000,000 every year (but youre special). This is the stupidest concern i have ever . Most living in poverty, all wanting to live like Americans. We have one planet.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Get a grip, Gary. Take your anti-hyterica meds, then take some classes in stats, economics, science, etc.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
This world is insane and a complete suffering why would you want to bring anyone else into this madness, why.
@bartsimpson8616
@bartsimpson8616 10 күн бұрын
for satanic purposes , and for couple of billions more,
@kitwanaabraham560
@kitwanaabraham560 24 күн бұрын
In the animal kingdom, any species that has more food, greater security, and no natural predators will reproduce more; every succeeding generation is guaranteed to be far more numerous than the one before until the food source determines the equilibrium and natural carrying capacity of the land. In western capitalist liberal human societies especially, and those aspiring to become so over the last one hundred and fifty years, once people become richer and more secure, with fewer threats to their health, safety, and longevity, they tend to reproduce less. The all-important question is why. The answer, I believe, lies in the internal psychology of humans with this particular ideological bent. They become hyper materialistic hoarders. Greed, selfishness, individualism, me, me, me, more, and mine become their religion and god.
@chriswatson1698
@chriswatson1698 3 күн бұрын
No fault, on demand divorce makes having children highly dangerous for a woman. She can be forced into single parenthood and poverty at any time, against her will and on no grounds at all. Alimony and child support is half the living standard of a person with a productive, contributing partner. No one with whom to share the expenses and domestic labour.
@and2244rew
@and2244rew 10 күн бұрын
Orange pill moment: Building our lives around the car is very inconvenient for having children. If I'm not watching my kids for 30 seconds, they can be killed by a car. 30 seconds, its unacceptable. Yes, other things can happen, but that is the number 1 risk.
@tristan7216
@tristan7216 Ай бұрын
Peter Zeihan says it's urbanization:"on the farm, kids are free labor, in the city, they're expensive furniture, adults aren't stupid, so the have fewer". It's a little more complicated. On farms, particularly non mechanized subsistence farms, parents can combine child care with work, and kids really are free labor, and they're also your retirement plan. When people move to cities to take jobs, living space is at a premium, and they have to find child care because you can't take watch your kids while you work in the factory or the office (both because modern jobs require deep focus of attention, and because offices and factories don't typically welcome kids, and may not be safe for them). Plus urbanites have investment options for retirement. Incentives shift, because of the practical realities of economic developement.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Putting women to work caused more decline than urbanization. And that wasn't economic development, it was political planning.
@23erisx
@23erisx Ай бұрын
@@kreek22 Many people disregard or are even ignorant of how different life was for women in the USA in those times (during and after WWII). Remember, a woman couldn't open a bank account or get a credit card (once they were made available) without her husband's consent. There was no such thing as no-fault divorce. Birth control ("the Pill") was not as readily available as it is now, and women generally, with some exceptions, did not get higher education and if they did, they were somehow un-feminine. And that femininity was everything, absolutely everything, to a gal. Without it, we had no social lives, no husbands -- and if we liked girls we better hide it. Rape victims often weren't believed and nearly always bore the guilt of having 'caused' it somehow. I could go on and on (and often do) but you get the drift. Putting women to work -- women being encouraged to work -- was a blessing. The empowerment it gave us is undeniable. Our society is still changing in powerful and positive ways because of this fundamental shift. The diminished part that women played 'back then' is sad, and thank all the forgotten gods we WILL NOT GO BACK to that. We must create a new society, one that doesn't disenfranchise anyone. It may take time to work all the kinks out but there is no other path forward.
@SC-sh6ux
@SC-sh6ux Ай бұрын
This is a super great conversation but it is unfortunately way too late. What is done is done, we need to focus the conversations on how we are going to deal with demographic changes that humanity has never ever seen before.
@skidcaesar
@skidcaesar Ай бұрын
I listen every morning. Thanks!
@grahamashe9715
@grahamashe9715 2 күн бұрын
How do you slow population growth across any and all cultures without anyone even realising it? Empower women (even to the point of absurdity) but say it’s about equality. It’s certainly more subtle than a one-child policy.
@danmoreman954
@danmoreman954 Күн бұрын
The interviewer’s use of the term “individualism” could more accurately be described as narcism. When people reach a certain level of affluence and believe in nothing bigger than their own wants, this is what we get. Google the average fertility rates in practicing Christians and Jews vs the fertility rate in atheists and agnostics and you will prove my point.
@idoneitatemlususnaturae802
@idoneitatemlususnaturae802 23 күн бұрын
The notion that global population decline "will be good for the environment" seems somewhat absurd. Without a tax base, how does the government implement and enforce environmental policy? Countries that have trouble funding basic services don't have robust environmental programs.
@andresp.4583
@andresp.4583 Ай бұрын
Ezra I would love to hear an entire podcast just on your ‘individualism’ theory, I think you’re definitely touching something important
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
I agree it's part of the explanation. But, capitalism doesn't seem to work well without individualism. Not only was modern capitalism invented by the most individualist nations on earth (the WEIRD people), but these places continue to lead the race. The only places that challenge them, in NE Asia, have somewhat less individualism, but even lower birth rates. Also, NE Asia is much more individualist than it was a century ago.
@catholicconvert2119
@catholicconvert2119 Ай бұрын
Screw individualism
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
@@catholicconvert2119 Thanks for the internet graffiti.
@danmoreman954
@danmoreman954 Күн бұрын
Most demographers seem aware of the links between demographic trends and economics. Consumption trends, savings rates, productivity levels, etc. This demographer seems very focused on feelings, not economics.
@etherealradar
@etherealradar Ай бұрын
Im just judging this by the thumbnail, let me guess some over researched under thought about non-threatening NPR voice drivel that pretends to be contrarian or cynical but misses the point massively and sells ad-space well?
@etherealradar
@etherealradar Ай бұрын
Give me the podcast i want.. 'can you afford a fish?'
@NotANameist
@NotANameist Ай бұрын
Mostly accurate
@catsaresocute650
@catsaresocute650 Ай бұрын
You can't tho. Because welath in rich countries dosn't translate to the average person getting more money. Just like being rich in New York by the standarts of some small town that's in the heart of the countriside dosn't actually make you rich in New York. You may still struggle to fit grocheries, rent, other necceritys and a bit of small fun into the budget. Housing, grocheries etc how much of that you can afford defines how much money you actually have!
@catsaresocute650
@catsaresocute650 Ай бұрын
That lifestyle you want to have is what I mean. Ofc you could be poor and have children, but that's not wealth. If you need to choose poverty or at least a substantialy more poor lifestyle to have a child you are not in fact rich
@evelynramos445
@evelynramos445 Ай бұрын
Nice hear Ezra! So great to have you among us!
@Developer888
@Developer888 4 күн бұрын
that's an easy answer, micro plastics in your organs and arteries massively reduce the ability to conceive. I like to believe it was planning when we switched from glass products to plastic.
@User53123
@User53123 Ай бұрын
It's declining because we are overpopulated. We are fighting over real estate fighting over land. Israel/Palestine is a perfect example. Becoming richer is not worth this. We are fighting over everything and turning on each other. It is not smart to increase the population we need to be below replacement to reduce the total and start acting like people again.
@RaghuvirMohanta
@RaghuvirMohanta Ай бұрын
We should be careful on money usage,if you are not spending to earn back,then stop spending.
@katiekilbo
@katiekilbo Ай бұрын
People dont understand that the prices of things are never going back down. This inflation is deeper than we think. Those buying groceries are well aware that the real inflation is much over 10%. The increments dont match our income, yet certain investors still earn over $365,000 in stocks and assets. Wish I could accomplish that.
@MianHussnain-tu1wi
@MianHussnain-tu1wi Ай бұрын
Very possible! especially at this moment. Profits can be made in many different ways, but such intricate transactions should only be handled by seasoned market professionals.
@uacdcalvin
@uacdcalvin Ай бұрын
Some persons think inves'tin is all about buying stocks; I think going into the stock market without a good experience is a big risk, that's why I'm lucky to have seen someone like mr Brian.
@alasdekarton
@alasdekarton Ай бұрын
Brian demonstrates an excellent understanding of market trends, making well informed decisions that leads to consistent profit
@ysareyes
@ysareyes Ай бұрын
I'm surprised that you just mentioned and recommend Mr Brian Nelson. I met him at a conference in 2018 and we have been working together ever since.
@marycarter3972
@marycarter3972 Ай бұрын
Funny that Ezra does not understand why women do not want to have lots of children
@SkepticalZack
@SkepticalZack 9 күн бұрын
The future cultures that will exist will be the ones that have children. This is terrifying to me.
@denisefoot9823
@denisefoot9823 Ай бұрын
What is the most logical answer?
@twelvestitches984
@twelvestitches984 Күн бұрын
The birth rate in the hispanic countries south of the US is 1.5 times that of the US. The birth rate of African countries is 4-6 times that of the EU countries.
@sillyman382
@sillyman382 20 күн бұрын
Wasn't the population growth an anomaly in of itself? The economy will adjust either way, instead of this "boom" and "bust"?
@rogue-ish5713
@rogue-ish5713 16 күн бұрын
Because the planet is dying stupid.
@alfreddunn03
@alfreddunn03 11 күн бұрын
Yep, you keep telling young people the planet is dying...do you think they want children?
@stephenboyington630
@stephenboyington630 Ай бұрын
The frustration is that people cannot or will not recognize that things CHANGE. Populations go up, and they go down. The people of one generation are not pre-destined to do what earlier generations did.
@jeremy____5747
@jeremy____5747 Ай бұрын
Yes. Right now we have lots of immigration. In just a year from now we are going to have almost none at all.
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
@@jeremy____5747 You're saying that The Donald's second term will be even better than his first? Inshallah!
@heidijanuary3286
@heidijanuary3286 Күн бұрын
The comforts of the rich depends on an abundant supply of the poor, Voltaire.
@gregvanpaassen
@gregvanpaassen 8 күн бұрын
The proximate cause is very simple: people are marrying later. Fertility directly correlates with marrying young, especiallly for women. Why are people marrying later? They have been told a bunch of lies about what success is, what they need, and how to find fulfilment. Edit: Sorry, Jennifer has a very annoying intonation and cadence. I couldn't listen to her.
@reginafisher9919
@reginafisher9919 Ай бұрын
How can this generation have families when they can't even move out of their parents home!!! They can't afford to work and barely pay for a car payment and insurance!!!!! Are you kidding!!
@brian5001
@brian5001 Ай бұрын
"Industrial Society and It's Future"
@sirhch1
@sirhch1 19 күн бұрын
First went to China in the early 80's. It was overpopulated then from what I saw. The population was then about 1 billion. China will not get back to 1 billion until about 2475. We need faster population declines to make the world more liveable. Once it becomes more liveable, people will have children again. This is NOT a extend the chart type of issue. As circumstances change behaviours will change.
@bencarter2334
@bencarter2334 15 күн бұрын
Experts are saying that the Chinese population will reduce by 50% by 2100.
@RM-xf9gi
@RM-xf9gi 12 күн бұрын
Afghanistan and Nigerian women don't have agency! Lab babies and robots will help the wealthy countries with their needs if the low population trend continues.
@excellentcomment
@excellentcomment 17 күн бұрын
Ezra, you are so right that we don't want public policy that intrudes on family planning. How's this for a hands-off public policy to support family development: last year, Florida eliminated sales tax for all baby-related goods; diapers, formula, clothing, strollers, etc.
@keyboarddancers7751
@keyboarddancers7751 19 күн бұрын
Good that this issue is becoming more and more prominent in mainstream public discourse. Global demographic decline takes effect over decades and there is no historical precedent for its recovery. S Korea, Japan, china, Russia, Ukraine and Scandinavia are excellent and varied models of this decline.
@sarahknehr1362
@sarahknehr1362 17 күн бұрын
Fascinating discussion but oh my so much privilege being shown! Having kids being fun? Historicly they just happened. Kids were just part of life. And then they were useful for hunting, gathering, farmering. Starting in at least the 70s we started hammering it home that if you had kids before you graduated college you had ruined your life and your chances. I think people really took to heart that kids ruin lives. Now, im all for sex education and I have three kids myself, so I can say that kids make life more: hilarious, stressful, satisfying, and anger inducing. But they certainly don't make it easier.
@Ruth-os4mi
@Ruth-os4mi 13 күн бұрын
Taboo subject : The correlation between fertility rates and intelligence.
@kriskeena9438
@kriskeena9438 6 күн бұрын
Is it possible that here in the US, the Forced Birth contingent is driving people to make permanent decisions about their fertility as a way to protect themselves from 2nd class citizenship, breeding sac status and coercion?
@jennifershappyplace6938
@jennifershappyplace6938 Ай бұрын
Because no one can afford it. Simple.
@vinista256
@vinista256 Ай бұрын
Exactly. For women, especially, having children is the #1 risk factor for financial ruin (because they tend to end up with the caregiving responsibilities if the couple is unmarried or the marriage breaks up).
@kreek22
@kreek22 Ай бұрын
Because people, especially women, are victims of rising expectations, otherwise known as running on the hamster wheel.
@bagofdoom7693
@bagofdoom7693 Ай бұрын
Why does africa which i would assume is mostly poorer than america have so many births?
@YodasPapa
@YodasPapa Ай бұрын
@@bagofdoom7693 for real. I'm not saying financial worries play no role but your question makes it plain that it can't be as simple as "can't afford it".
@jaumartinez9006
@jaumartinez9006 Ай бұрын
@@bagofdoom7693low iq
@sirhch1
@sirhch1 19 күн бұрын
Finite planet. As populations grow, constraints on resources increase, making life "more expensive" for individuals and for the planet. We need to get back to a population of around 2 billion for humanity to not destroy the planet ecosystem. Obviously doing it quickly will be problematic, but as resource constraints ease and things like housing become less expensive and ai gets more pervasive, having children may again become possible for more. The big "problem" now is AFRICA. Just Nigeria and Ethiopia alone are projected to add 500 million by 2100. A lot of that is already baked in (see pop pyramids for these two). This complicates the desired overall population decline and means resource constraints are still going to get worse. There should be a MAJOR international effort to bring down African birth rates as a major part of fighting climate change and overpopulation ... but religions don't like that.
@yujuy.1329
@yujuy.1329 2 күн бұрын
Misogyny is ending the world and ppl refuse to just accept that fact. Men don’t want to be better partners so 4b all the way.
@jamesmurphy9426
@jamesmurphy9426 Ай бұрын
Crocodile Tears Less humans is less taxes Less consumer addiction
@johnmitchell2741
@johnmitchell2741 Ай бұрын
I didn.t need to say anything. The comments said it all
@22Too
@22Too Ай бұрын
In the past, men were building their careers over many years, and once they were established, then they married young women of childbearing age. The current pressure for women to build their own careers, outside the home, is pushing back the age at which women have babies.
@jamesbennett5430
@jamesbennett5430 Ай бұрын
It ebbs and flows with affluence. When times are bad family grouping is essential and nonsense is intolerable. When times are good less tight grouping with fewer rules are allowed - the Germans have a word - verboten (forbidden) - that which isn’t forbidden is allowed. Bad times breed strong men. Easy times breed weak men.
@mereniecrosby7120
@mereniecrosby7120 13 күн бұрын
I did that! Had my third 10 years after my first and second and ive always worked. I got my degree while working and raising them. Its easier with two involved parents. I think its all about happiness. If you're not happy in your environment you will find it difficult to be a parent. Also, l find with my Gen Z child that she and her friends are quite self centered and don't have time for parenting.
@johnkawakami8395
@johnkawakami8395 Ай бұрын
These US aligned Asian countries are paternalistic and fascist. What do they have in common, aside from fighting each other? They are dominated by the US government.
@andyarellanoChannel
@andyarellanoChannel Ай бұрын
this makes no sense; why would you ask a question you know the answer for? weird.
@robertblake9892
@robertblake9892 13 күн бұрын
Years of abortion on demand, men rejecting fatherhood....
Best Of: A Powerful Theory of Why the Far Right Is Thriving Across the Globe
1:30:59
New York Times Podcasts
Рет қаралды 130 М.
The Men - and Boys - Are Not Alright
1:58:05
New York Times Podcasts
Рет қаралды 17 М.
CAN FOXY TRICK HIM?! 🤣 #shorts *FOXY AND NUGGET!*
00:17
LankyBox
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Қайрат Нұртас & ИРИНА КАЙРАТОВНА - Түн
03:41
RAKHMONOV ENTERTAINMENT
Рет қаралды 296 М.
‘The Strongest Democratic Party That Any of Us Have Ever Seen’
1:08:34
New York Times Podcasts
Рет қаралды 19 М.
South Korea’s Fertility Rate Hits 0.68: What Next?
9:32
TLDR News Global
Рет қаралды 266 М.
Peter Hartcher on why China is tanking its economy on purpose
20:32
The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age
Рет қаралды 118 М.
The De-Population Bomb
1:06:24
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
The Democrats' New Chance in Wisconsin
55:43
New York Times Podcasts
Рет қаралды 1,8 М.
The Tote Bag Trend Makes NO Sense
14:49
Future Proof
Рет қаралды 127 М.
How to Discover Your Own Taste
1:02:27
New York Times Podcasts
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Confidence Man with Maggie Haberman // The American Story
27:04
New-York Historical Society
Рет қаралды 324 М.