Black Ops Cold War Ultra Settings VS Ray Tracing 4K | 7900 XTX

Black Ops Cold War Ultra Settings VS Ray Tracing 4K | 7900 XTX | R9 7950X 3D

Рет қаралды 1,510

Ай бұрын

ENEBA - great place to buy games (PS5, Xbox, PC)! ene.ba/Bang4Buck
All games, DLC! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-Store
Gift Cards! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-GiftCards
Affiliate
SCAN.CO.UK - A great place to buy PC parts tidd.ly/4aLCyyk
Check out how the RX 7900 XTX Nitro+ and Ryzen 9 7950X 3D performs in Black Ops Cold War, using Ultra Settings VS Ray Tracing Ultra at Native 4K.
My PC Specification
AMD Ryzen 9 Ryzen 9 7950X 3D
Asus ROG Strix X670E-F Gaming WIFI Motherboard
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900 XTX
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 6400Mhz @6200MHz DDR5 32GB 16x2 CL28-37-37-28 trc 68 1.43v
Custom Waterloop
EK CoolStream XE 360mm Radiator
EK-WB Velocity AMD Waterblock
XSPC Photon X270 Reservoir V2 with D5 Vario Pump.
AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition Driver 24.4.1
Corsair HX1000i PSU
Samsung 850 EVO 1 TB
Samsung 860 QVO 1 TB
Pioneer 1TB SSD APS-SL3-1T
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD 1TB
LG B9 "55" 120Hz 4K HDR Smart TV.
Thermal Take View 71 Full Tower Case
Windows 11 Pro Version 22H2
#7950x3d #rx7900xtx #coldwar #blackopscoldwar

Пікірлер: 22

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

The RX 7900 XTX performs better with Ray Tracing set to Ultra at native 4K, than my RX 6900 XT did at 1440p with Ray Tracing set to High.

@BigBoss-fk6un Ай бұрын

7900xtx is more powerful but in this game RT is almost unnoticable, almost no difference between RT OFF and RT ON

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

@@BigBoss-fk6un The RTAO is noticeable. The Sun Shadows and local Shadows not so much.

@wolveslands6701 Ай бұрын

Biggest difference i noticed was ray traced ambient occlusion and contact shadows beneath the soldiers helmet at 9:03.

@Alinord85 Ай бұрын

RT In this game it's a scam

@joshuapicarello Ай бұрын

I don't notice much of a difference between them, aside from the massive fps hit with RT enabled.

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

I notice the RTAO the most.

@okaybutwhythough7456 Ай бұрын

Shadows and AO are definitely the more subtle RT effects, especially in a game that already has good baked lighting AO, and okay shadows. Very noticeable if you know where to look, but performance is gonna be more important.

@sawomirbartosiak2487 Ай бұрын

This game has never had well-optimized RT, which in many cases does nothing. And it can even outperform the RTX4090 without DLSS

@flaminggasolineinthedarkne4 Ай бұрын

They look exactly the same no matter rt preset in terms of reflections. but shadows are a bit softer with rt enabled.

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

There is no RT reflections in this game. Only Sun Shadows, Local Shadows and Ambient Occlusion.

@TheVillainOfTheYear Ай бұрын

Not a lot of apparent ROI for RT in games like this where they take such pains to make good lighting and shadows for the non-RT settings. Full path tracing is where the real improvement is.

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qtlhadqInOC5dnU.htmlsi=TiqN3fJT_JZ9acvP

@TheVillainOfTheYear Ай бұрын

@@Bang4BuckPCGamer cyberpunk is an interesting example. In some areas, there's literally no discernable difference. In others, the light bounce effects change the whole scene to be more atmospheric and moody.

@wblebon Ай бұрын

Is it me still see no difference with ray-tracing enabled

@thaddeus2447 Ай бұрын

Awesome that AMD can do raytracing however, still doesn't worth with all that hit to performance..

@BigBoss-fk6un Ай бұрын

what is your SoC voltage for 7950x3d?

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

1.2v maybe. I have not been in my bios for a while. Why do you ask?

@BigBoss-fk6un Ай бұрын

@@Bang4BuckPCGamer just interesting how you have reached 6200mhz with cl28. I have 64gb ram with 7950x, 2 sticks of 32gb acer predator palas II 6000mhz cl30 and I can't even reach stable 6000mhz cl28

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

@@BigBoss-fk6un My Ram speed of my Dimms are 6400Mhz CL32. I just clocked them down and tightened the timmigs.

@BigBoss-fk6un Ай бұрын

@@Bang4BuckPCGamer my dimms are 6000 CL30-38-38-78 but I just have reached stable only 6000 CL30-36-36-48 with trfc 360. 6000 CL28-36-36-48 trfc 400 was stable with memtest 10.6 free. But in memtest pro 10.7 this settings are unstable and there are errors. I don't see any noticable difference between 6000 CL30-36-36-48 with trfc 360 and 6000 CL28-36-36-48 trfc 400. In both cases I don't exeed 1,35v for RAM but yours 6200 CL28 is so perfect result

@Bang4BuckPCGamer Ай бұрын

@@BigBoss-fk6un You are not going to get anything special done with that low voltage. 1.45v is a safe limit for DDR5