I see it a little differently. I don't think he proved he was "more human" than humans; I think he proved he was what humans aspire to be. In every way. And that's what made it beautiful. But I suppose that's what makes this movie so great, that it can be viewed from so many different lenses.

from another video tryng to farm likes hahah @Howlingburd19 1 year ago (edited) K/Joe didn’t want to be just “another replicant”, he wanted to be something more, so it was devastating to see him learn he wasn’t the child of Rick. But reflecting on the events that happened throughout the movie, Joe did the most human thing to do, and saved Rick to help him reunite with his child. At the conclusion of the movie, Joe ended up becoming a lot more than just “another replicant”. Despite being a replicant, Joe proved he was more human than a lot of humans, and that’s why I love his arc and his character. It’s just so deep and poetic :) And this movie is still a masterpiece in 2023

@@WRXSEVEN "More human than human, that's our motto" - Tyrell in the first movie. And that was for the flawed Nexxus 6 models. Now, many years later? Debatable.

Deckard not rick

Such a beautiful question.....but essentially.....he means nothing to him. And that is what he needed to realize. His point and purpose not only as a replicant.....but a person of self awareness

Not pink, she was blonde. Every bit of this movie is incredible

“What am I to you?” “For a couple of days I thought you were my dad...”

I liked Roger Moore.

I think my take on that question is that K Considered deckard his father due to his memories and then he says all the best memories are hers much Alike an older brother breaking the ice and so he lays down Comfortably like a Child laying on his porch peacefully in the snow, K Always Lacked and yearned for family and in the end he sacrificed himself for one

and the happy memory of snow at his last moment, is not even his

Well he has some of his daughters memories, so in a sense Deckard is his father. Memories inform basically everything that we are.

​@sdghtjsdcgs which then answers the question: what makes us humans, human? The entire franchise boiled down into one question..

The entirely of Philip K Dick’s epic literary output is driven by that question.

@@sdghtjsdcgs Be careful. It's easy to implant false memories. Do you really want to be your own failed memory?

Maybe that was why he was "okay," he knew it was time to punch out.

He didn't die he just needed a little rest.

The great thing is that both these movies are masterpieces in themselves and are so alike and yet so very, very different. I don't compare them as each adds to the other.

In the end, we all strive to be kenough

He was K-nough

He was just Ken

💯🥲

The moment that we hear the “Tears in Rain” music again is very special.

Youre not me

2049’s storyline a bit convoluted, but i still liked it

To this day, both Blade Runner films have so much to say about what makes us who we truly are.

Or with cause, the most human death they could have

the end

Just like Roy

I mean, i don't remember him dying or implied to have died

@@arm6075pretty sure that’s what’s implied bro

He probably deep down know K found peace

"Oh... guess he wasn't okay.... shoot"

Dependant on how he leaves the place he's leaving with his daughter and probably goes to see iff he's ok but looks at him than leaves with the vehicle

Probably took his body to the car and buried it.

Prolly squatted on his face and ripped a huge fart.

Isn’t this kind of a 2nd movie to the original one? Or this was a remake?

@@huhwhat6887 sequel

You're wrong, but to each their own.

​@@WarBastard88 The sound design, pacing, set design, cinematography, color grading, script, and social commentary are all leagues more advanced and intentional in 2049 than in the first film. These are the criteria an informed opinion on a film is based on. Why take the time to write me this, and not elaborate an objective criteria for me to possibly change my opinion and agree with you? Or are you just looking for ways to belittle others with no risk to yourself?

I watched the first one a few years ago and I thought it was bland. I had seen it all before: visuals, plot line, subject matter, etc. Of course, _Blade Runner_ can't really be held to account for that, since it did all of that first (maybe not first, but kind of). _2049_ feels new. I haven't seen a movie like this yet. It's more than its predecessor.

im 19 and its my favorite movie all time

Denis Villeneuve was initially scared he would do just that. He said "One wrong move would tarnish the original". That's why he was reluctant to direct. Luckily, he reconsidered.

Not for nothing, but what relevance does your age have here? The first film was released before you were born.

@@FortyHurtsjust curious, are you suggesting that his age means he can’t have an opinion on the first film? Or the opposite?

I’ll be honest, I’m 18, and I’ve only seen the first. It’s gained a cult following, similar to the original from what I hear, and I stumbled across that and saw the film. Now I’m terrified that the original won’t live up to the sequel. I’m sure my opinion is wrong but it wrecked me for a few days.

Like tears in the rain

I think it already is

In 25 years from now... maybe less...

Gosling and Ford are like legendary actor Gary Cooper. Underacting, few words, but the face speaks volumes.

three actually

Rachel saved him from Leon, Roy saved him from falling, and K saved him from being tormented by Wallace and Luv.

It’s still debatable whether Deckard is a replicant or not I actually believe that Deckard is a human with some synthetic parts like a replicant

@@joshuasantana685 The only one that would truly know that Deckard was a replicant has died in the first movie Dr. Eldon Tyrell R.I.P.

@@joshuasantana685 Like his junk? Can I shape it into a cat?

a stranger! its a callback to earlier, "sometimes you have to be a stranger to love someone"

Took ridley scott creating the directors cut to do it right.

What moments?

As a devoted Blade Runner fan, I couldn’t have asked for a better sequel.

Villeneuve wanted David Bowie. Would have been awesome

I think Leto actually kills his role in this movie. Maybe it’s because he’s playing himself in a way to a exaggerated degree (a rich man with a god complex who believes he’s ascended above all others)

Jared was perfect as Wallace. What is Wallace? He is a wannabe Tyrell, with a god complex, and a serious case of small dick syndrome. Old man Tyrell made a replicant that can have kids. Wallace took over the remains of his business, built a bigger tower above his pyramid, made better and more obedient replicants, and yet he still can't unlock the mysteries of the womb. Hence he acts the way he does. He is frustrated by his symbolic impotence.

Ironically Jared Leto being a egomanical creep irl is what made him play this role so well.

@@R0NYFL0NYHow is he that? Not that I seriously doubt it, but I’m genuinely curious

“Commendable” lmao this is one of the best sequels ever made.

It was a great movie, with a commendable connection to the first...

dafuq you mean commendable?! This was way better than the original. Sad both the original and this sequel didn't do well in the box office.

@Cypher45 Maybe work on your vocabulary there special Ed 😆

do you twats know what commendable means??? you're acting like he called it shite 😭

Who's to say he died? We don't know if he died or not.

There are other K’s he isn’t unique.

he dies. its very clear. he bled out. @@jaywilson4520

@@jaywilson4520He’s clearly shown taking his last breath.

He could if the story continued he'd be cloned

Like the first Blade Runner, this sequel made me rethink how we should view science fiction.

The script has Joi asking him to read for her in which he proceeds to recite the poetic lines from "Pale Fire" by Vladimir Nabokov, which were the base lines that he recited earlier during the baseline test: "The blood-black nothingness began to spin.... A system of cells within cells interlinked, within cell interlinked ... within one stem......And dreadfully distinct... against the dark......A tall white fountain played..."

its 'Tears in rain', found it

Sucks the replicant rebellion would have been something. Also I don't think K is dead - or perhaps he could be recreated for Part III (cloned with implants).

The Godfather, Dark Knight, Captain America and Star Wars Franchises all spectacularly disagreeing with this statement.

Don’t forget Toy Story.

Fury Road

Your "evidence" is based solely on wishful thinking. And btw Harrison Ford recently came out and confirmed that Deckard is a replicant, there is no debate about this anymore. The "he has been around for decades" is implanted memory. Tyrell lied, the whole point was to see if those nexus 7's could be tricked into believing they are humans, Deckard is a Nexus 7. Nexus 7 was a prototype model, that could mate, it was imperative for Rachel and Deckard to hook up. Replicant's can of course not mate with humans, they only look like us because they are suppose to, they are androids basically.

@@FabledGentleman Please provide your evidence to support your statements.

@@normancarter5419 Harrison Ford finally admitted last year that Deckard was a replicant. There is no debate about this anymore. I knew he was a replicant since early 90's. It's very obvious once you look at the movie without ignoring all the things he goes through. The only reason Harrison Ford and Ridley scott "disagreed" on this for so long, was to underlay the whole core point of the film. Which is this: If you can't tell the difference between a replicant and a human, does it really matter?

@@FabledGentleman Again, Please provide your alleged credible, verifiable evidence to support your statements - links to interviews, media articles, KZfaq postngs, etc.

@@FabledGentleman Provide your evidence of, the link to, the media articles, the interviews on the internet or KZfaq where Harrison Ford admitted that Deckard was a replicant, all I hear or see is writing. Your quote: "I knew he was a replicant since early 90's. It's very obvious once you look at the movie without ignoring all the things he goes through." You are ignoring the movie, you are ignoring all the things Deckard went through, replicants didn't attack other replicants, they helped and protected each other, replicants knew the difference between and who were real people and who were replicants, Batty and Leon and Zhora and Pris could have told Deckard he was a replicant if he was one, you mention about his memories are implants, etc., you IGNORE IN REAL TIME IN THE MOVIE the meetings, discussions, talks, etc., the interactions between and involving Deckard and Bryant and Gaff and his years of service as a policeman, a blade runner, his history with them in the movie in going on in real time, NOT flashbacks, NOT photos like with Rachel. Just the sheer biology of reproduction - you need a sperm and an egg. Again, Tyrell said that Rachel alone was extremely special from all other replicants. All the male replicants don't have the sperm capacity or otherwise they could have sex with a real person and have children. Additionally, Dr. Ana Stelline, Deckard's daughter, is a real person, not the result of 2 replicants.

A GOOD JOE