BMW iX1 xDrive 30 - 130 km/h range test

No video

BMW iX1 xDrive 30 - 130 km/h range test

Рет қаралды 7,231

9 ай бұрын

If you use my referral link when ordering a VW Id.3/4/5 within Germany
we both get 200€ charging credit
Id.3:
www.volkswagen...
Id.4:
www.volkswagen...
Id.5:
www.volkswagen...
My German KZfaq Channel:
/ @batterylifede
Become a member for exclusive and early content and behind the
scene info:
/ @batterylife
‪@BMW‬ #bmw #iX1 #30 #range
Merch is out as well:
batterylife.my...
If you want to support the Channel
/ batterylifeev
paypal.me/batte...
My music in my videos is available at Epidemic sound
Referral link:
www.epidemicso...
Links to my spreadsheets of the cars tested:
Charge Curve Comparison
docs.google.co...
Charging Curve
docs.google.co...
EV Consumption
docs.google.co...
Take care

Пікірлер: 21

@NDAWELOL 9 ай бұрын

I really hope to get a more detailed review of the IX1 from you very soon. Thanks for the range test!

@user-uq9wl7uw4x 5 ай бұрын

In comparison to your video's about the latest xc40, c40, EQA this car seems to be quite efficient in avg consumption. Didn't expect that!

@GaMar75 9 ай бұрын

thx a lot.

@can_sakar 9 ай бұрын

hello, thanks for the video very helpful! I wonder whats that blinking purple bulbs on the cockpit while you are driving?

@BatteryLife 9 ай бұрын

Thanks. Those are infrared sensors to monitor the driver. Your eyes can't see them, but the camera does.

@Joe-lb8qn 9 ай бұрын

Dissapointing about the non-adjustment of range in real time. My Kia does that pretty much in real time. Even more dissapointing is the actual range. My Kia Soul, same battery size, aerodynamics of a house brick, would do better than that.

@simondehaas8784 9 ай бұрын

@@garysmith5025I suspect you are underestimating the impact of driving at 130. At 110 I was surprised to see in Chris' recent tests that this car was more efficient than the new Kona. It was a little warmer I think but not enough to explain a big difference as far as I could see.

@techwhizard 9 ай бұрын

Is Kia soul AWD and twin motor? No…

@Joe-lb8qn 9 ай бұрын

@@techwhizard correct. So this has a too small battery for its motor and drive train. If I was buying something that's going to cost 50% more at least I'd expect more range even if that's via a bigger battery

@techwhizard 9 ай бұрын

@@Joe-lb8qn 50% more also gets you a 50% batter car. Battery size is fine. Not everyone or every country drives over 110km/h. Most countries are only 100km/h limit. AWD, twin motor luxury interior, adaptive lights and adaptive cruise that works and keeps car in middle lane unlike Kia or Hyundai. You get what your pay for

@patrickcrombez150 9 ай бұрын

Thanks for the test, but the music 🤢😳🤬

@user-rl6ux7zz7n 9 ай бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍

@andrei450 8 ай бұрын

Very similar to the XC40, isn't it?

@360theosiris 8 ай бұрын

Ordered one since my employer in all its wisdom decided we can no longer order Tesla. This range is really disappointing, didn’t know it was THAT bad.. Any idea if the 17’ rings increase range significantly?

@KDR816 6 ай бұрын

Reducing temperature to 19/20° and reducing wheels will help a lot.

@pauldarlington9157 9 ай бұрын

Just collected ours today and with a headline like that I’ll give this video a miss! Sorry😊

@BatteryLife 9 ай бұрын

Changed

@davidjolly7386 9 ай бұрын

Is it better or worse than the Skoda enyaq.

@KDR816 6 ай бұрын

It's smaller but otherwise it's better in every aspect

@timofthomas 9 ай бұрын

wow, that's a disappointing range - especially compared with something like the ME3.2 Enyaq.....

@sunseeker-yb5qt 3 ай бұрын

I don’t think its disappointing. At the time of your posting (11/23) Auto Bild tested a few cars for real world range. There was the iX1 like here with 313PS AWD and a Skoda Enyak 2WD with 179PS. Test temperature was 22-25°C. At 130kmh the BMW scored 334km, Enyak 278km. Even if we consider the battery difference of 4kWh (58kWh Enyak vs 62kWh for the iX1), the BMW shows its very efficient.