Thanks.

​@@anshumanpanda1227哈哈哈¹

Sir it's mistake in subtitles that bodgidharma is birth in south India totally mistake ,he is from Nepal (south Asia 🌏 near from tebet and neighborhood of china) Buddha also brone in lumbini, Nepal that time there only Buddhist kingdom. In ancient time not in India,India is a hindu and Muslim country

Sir it's mistake in subtitles that bodgidharma is birth in south India totally mistake ,he is from Nepal (south Asia 🌏 near from tebet and neighborhood of china) Buddha also brone in lumbini, Nepal that time there only Buddhi st kingdom. In ancient time not in India,India is a hindu and Muslim country

@@sharmilarai7950 Even if he is born in Nepal, will that make you or me a Buddha? We are doing a disservice to our ancestors by doing such one upmanship and not following their teachings in actuality.

me🙋

Yes. Suru anna fan 😂🤣

No fan of Surya, but surely of Bodhi Dharma himself!

Yeah !!! Of the Film

Yes

Dont spread hindu propegenda. Only buddist make india proud you all bramhns foreigners

Would you say he would get away if you held him in place?

He was teaching that pride will kill and you go to hell. 😉

Muslims and British destroyed all Tamil culture. Pride is nothing. When you don’t know what he want teaching ❤

Always holding your head up won't work, try to become like him not only him, think about the teacher of bodhidharma? How he could have been? Think about the adhishiva and try to become one. Saying I'm tamilian won't help you, தியாகமும் தொண்டும் முக்திக்கு எளிய வழி ஔவை தாய், ஔவையார் எப்படி இருந்திப்பார்?

@@shortfiring good 👍 we have to do Sadhana. Adhiyogi or shiva or the first yogi or first Buddha. He gave instruction in the form of shaivam. Even Isha yoga teaches that in coimbatore and world wide. That guy saying , Bodhi dharma is Tamil. And he is proud. I was there In Tamil Nadhu. Mostly Muslims and converted Christians due to money 😂 Just opposite what he was teaching 😆 You should be ashamed that your state Tamil Nadhu lost the teaching of Bodhi dharma. Thu 💨

​Our proud king pushyamitra sunga cut off the heads of thousands of Buddhist monks and upheld the supremacy of Sanatana dharma🚩🚩🚩🚩

Atha yellaarum senthu antha manusanana saavadichittingale😢

那是古印度

@@Clay_Figurine_Legend_Share 古印度就不应该感谢吗？？？佛祖也是出生在尼泊尔的古印度人，不应该感谢吗？少翻墙出来丢人现眼，天天仇恨日本，仇恨印度，仇恨美国…

感谢您在中国继续少林修行。来自印度的合礼礼。

​​@@Nive-ev5zt😢🥺

The secondpart--- @nathanwatche As i said in some of the comments, buddhism was attacked in its origin place in 12th century and was on a decline, parallely crusades was happening in the west and the gunpowders,chemicals and technology used actually developed in India and china and were put to wrong use. Once Constantinople fell in 1452, the need for a trade route to india and china led to voyages which resulted in the colonization of americas( it is wrong that Columbus or vikings discovered America's first: buddhists from India and china reached Mexico in 6th century with their message {Reference:An Iglorious Columbus, or Evidence that Hwui Shan and A Party of Buddhist Monks Discovered America in 5th Century AD} and the capture of atahualpa(the gun technology used in the battle was also developed in indo china but it was never meant for large scale violence)and then lots of gold and resources were taken. Colonialism had begun. Had buddhism in india given some time, colonialism on such a large scale would have never happened. Many of the ideas on which Newton developed were introduced by trade route to Europe from kerala and tamilnadu parts of india{for eg.,the kerala school of astronomy and mathematics}. [[Before long, the southern parts of India fell to caste system and majority of people became illiterate. When the British started Indian invasions, a majority of Indian land was controlled by chitpavin brahmins(peshwas) and the society was fragmented along caste lines and so the British could capture India easily. When respected king shivaji and his son sambaji tried to break the brahmin domination, they were given strict punishment by the brahmins in aurangzebs court(& brahmin conspiracy within his kingdom too). From shivajis lineage shahuji, along with phule worked for oppressed classes in India which were more than 85% population. 50% of population were doing menial jobs and women were downgraded in brahminical system. Savitribai phule, phule's wife was the first educated woman in india from the last 800 years ]]. And then industrial revolution that happened in the west was on the line of colonialism--- had it happened along buddhism, we would've seen a completely different world today with no world wars, no cold war, no large scale violence. Technology would've been used in right way and world would have lived as one, in harmony🌍❤ PS::The Mahatma Gandhi magic from 1920-1950 made sure that we moved towards the constitution over manusmriti. Tall leaders like Babasaheb Ambedkar and Nehru wrote and strengthened the constitution. Initially there was no provision of reservation in the constitution and Nehru fought hard to bring the 1st amendment(1951). Premier public sector industries, dams and big educational institutions (which then facilitated reservation) was created under visionary leadership of nehru. Today is a transition from that period of 800 years(from 12th century when ~200 international universities were destroyed/burnt) in which the rule was that ~90% people were punished with lead melted and poured into their ears if they attempted to read vedas, to nehrus primeministership when again institutions like iits and aims were created and opened the doors for all. And till before independence, only 5% people were literate but today 75% are. To reach till here, tall leaders like mahatma gandhi, jawaharlal nehru, shastriji, indira gandhi, rajiv gandhi had to risk and place their lives.

@@Vicky91-lq6yc__KhargeForPM industrial revolution happened in the west. India and China didn't have any role in that.

​@dr.nirmalraj3839 It is not about india or china or west. These are just names. It may have been the other way round that west was buddhist, or that the industrial revolution happened in the east and so on. Or it may have been that we lived on a planet by another name. Your point that India and China have no role in industrial revolution is not completely right because history is always continuous and evolving. For eg., the numerical system we use today(0,1,2,..) is from india while europe followed roman numerical system which was very difficult to represent large numbers, and without adopting a different number system, running factories and maintaining accounts would've been difficult. Also note that the gun technology used in battle with atahualpa was borrowed from indo china, and if this was not the case, colonization of americas may not have happened. And so on,etc. Similarly if the west had not given us modern technology, you wouldnt be reading my comment. So the only contention here is that technology should be used for peace and not for wars and terrorism.

First of all, watch the full video

Yeah

The true history of india is hidden from us. You can trust this comment: Whole india was buddhist till 12th century. The indus valley civilization was buddhist. The time period between 1500-500 bc is buddhist and not vedic & had 28 buddhas starting from tanhankara buddha ending with gautama buddha. So aryan migration didnt happen but a branch came to india in 7th century as islam captured iran. The parallel vaigai valley civilization was also buddhist. Early tamili and pali(both evolved from same script) evolved from ~600bc. The proof of these 28 buddhas is solid from inscriptions, traveller accounts(like fa hien notes)and other evidences. For example konagamana buddha is mentioned in asokas inscriptions,and so on. Another instance is we can see picture and notes on vipassi buddha from cave 17 of ajantha. Yet another instance is the idols of the kasappa and konagamana buddhas found in digging in Sannati in Karnataka. Buddha simply means enlightened and after gautam buddha too we had buddhas like asvagosha, tilopa,marpa ,naropa,vasubandhu,asanga,atisha, etc from north and bodhisena(who travelled to japan),bodhidharma (who travelled to china), dhammapala,nagarjuna, vajrabodhi,buddhadhata,etc from south; and outside india lao tzu, chang tzu, dogen, rinzai,kyozan,etc. Takshashila university was there at the time of buddha, and nalanda university was during by nanda empire--so pre asoka was also sraman/buddhist(infact,chandragupta maurya, grandfather of asoka, renounced his kingdom and became a disciple of the great jina/buddha badrabahu(who was from karnataka-kerala) and meditated in a cave in sravanabelagola---so pre asoka was sraman/buddhist tradition) [also note jina/jaina(meaning victor/ conqueror over papam/sin to attain moksha) and buddha(meaning realised one/ moksha attainer) are synonyms---it is only that today's historians separated and classified them under different categories]. In south part of india, we had universities like kanthaloor, kanchipuram, nagavi. All indian kingdoms/empires like cheras, cholas,pandyans,kalabhras, gupta, rastrakuta, pallavas, chalukyas,gurjara prathiharas, palas till 12th century were buddhist/samana. Some people from iran came after 8th century(first wave they came to gujarat and sindh)and were allowed refuge by buddhist kings. This was at a time when buddhists developed sanskrit from pali/prakrit. So sanskrit took form only in 7th century. What these iranians did is that they got into buddhist universities and places and slowly started capturing these. They acted themselves as bamans(baman shaman in buddhism: baman means scholar and saman means meditator) and brahman in sanskrit equivalent for baman. So slowly they became brahmans and captured and burnt near to 200 international universities around 1200-1300ad where everyone could study(there was no caste then). Then partnering with delhi sultanate and sena dynasty in north, they slowly brought caste system as now people had no means of studying other trades as education was attacked so they started practicing their trades by birth. Next they mixed and corrupted buddhist/jina texts ,buddhist jataka kathas,etc to compose vedas(part of the vedas was nothing but the avesta/illogical ideas these iranians brought with them while the part that made sense such as ayurveda was copied from buddhist texts) ,gita, puranas etc, and either took over or destroyed various philosophical and scientific works after 12-13th century which were written in sanskrit and sanskrit was developed only till 8th century(india till 12th century was a learning centre with nearly 200 international universities then which taught various philosophies, science, metallurgy, medicine,and many other disciplines). Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. [[A missing link is that if india was buddhist till 12th century, then what are the statues of shiva,vishnu, durga,kali come from? To understand this we need to know that the first sculptures made in India were of buddha during buddhist kushan rule in 1st century ad. Then consequently other statues and sculptures of buddha and bodhisattvas were made. The two arts that developed called mathura and gandhar arts were buddhist. Now the iranian outsiders acted as brahmins(bamans) and took over these places and corrupted them. For example, a buddhist temple during the buddhist gupta rule is now called mundeshwari temple, which is claimed as the oldest hindu temple{kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6qefLqJnrDWnoE.htmlsi=896sTrwexIG6lJTO}. A straightforward example is the worship of buddha as "teliya baba" in nalanda even today. Ayyapa( swamiye saranam ayyapa similar to buddham saranam gachami), tirupati balaji, khajuraho, konark, kedarnath badrinath etc were all temples of bodhisattvas/buddhas. For example, ayyapa temple is a temple dedicated to ayyapa/aryadeva who was an arahant/realised one, and whose disciple is the great master paramabuddha(padampa sangye) who travelled to tibet and china. Another example is the tirumala temple of bodhisattva venkateshwara(ven means sin and kata means cutter--i.e, venkata means cutter of sin/papam,i.e., moksha-giver).Infact temple/mandir is a integral part of our culture which got twisted, captured and corrupted from 12th century. {Madras High Court verdict opens up space for Buddhist history in Tamil Nadu www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-verdict-on-thalaivetti-muniyappan-opens-up-space-for-buddhist-history-in-state/article65775967.ece/amp/} Shiva and vishnu are integral ideas of our culture which became twisted and corrupted from 12th century. Also rama and vasudeva(krshna) were buddhist bodhisattvas--we can see it for eg, from dasarath jatak katha., etc.]]. Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. During reign of muhammed bin tughlag, it was shariat law for muslims and manusmriti law for "hindus". The label of hindu(meaning thief/dirty person/neech) was given to the depressed classes at that time(sc,st,obcs of today). This anyone can read from ibn batutas original memoirs. This carried in mughal rule(in south india from the time of vijanagara empire) when many courtiers were brahmins. Here another point is that if babri masjid was built by breaking a ram temple, why did tulsidas who lived in ayodhya with only 30 yrs gap not mention this. A thing to note is that hindus and brahmins were different and this carried on till even when dayanand saraswati,founder of arya samaj, went for case to not call them brahmins as hindus. This situation changed when phule,periyar and others awakened the depressed classes(note obcs and sc,st make 80%of indian population atleast). The brahmins thought a lot about what to do because their ground was shaking. They came up with an idea called hindu-muslim riots so that attention of these depressed classes(known as hindus) were turned superficially to muslims. The first planned hindu muslim riots happened in 1893 and as per the plan, ganesh utsav was made public and riots were planned with violence from both sides. Important to note not a single such hindu muslim riots in medieval india and suddenly they are happening. Gandhi and nehru saw through this and worked to stop this like khilafat movement to unify etc. As the british announced elections which meant representations for depressed classes too(who were called hindus by brahmins then), brahmins formed rss and hindu mahasabha, and called themselves hindus too to act as representatives of hindus( just as they acted as representatives of buddhists by becoming bamans). Partition resulted due to brahman tactics of riots and also british supported this because by then cold war had started and pakistan was made an ally of america then. Now gandhi and nehru knew that caste system(which was mixed with religion then) cannot be attacked directly so they built institutions for public like iit,aims, bpcl,ongc,hpcl,bsnl,bhel,power grid,and many many more so that depressed classes too can study, become educated and do other jobs and break varna,i.e trade by birth(the first thing that bamans did to establish caste was burn universities and this was undone by the sharp understanding of nehru). Now rss is systematically selling psus to undo this again because if 80% of the depressed classes are supressed and their reservation is taken back by selling govt psus,theyll again become uneducated and jobless and under them).Note that when gandhi came to india in 1915, only 4% of india was educated. Then when india was so poor due to british misrule that there was big shortage of grains for everyone and people had no food, india asked food grains to america which mocked saying we can only give lowest quality fooder, indira gandhi successfully headed both green revolution and white revolution. Indira Gandhi successfully led the country through cold war funded jp and khalistani movements. See that both jp movement and anna movement were so similar and rss was behind them. The purpose was these movements was to supress the depressed classes(hindus) and maintain brahmanical order. Nehru escaped assassination attempts five times. Shastriji worked tirelessly to protect the country. Indira gandhi and rajiv gandhi gave away their lives to create equal society and unite india. Now rahul gandhi doing the same through his 4000km bharat jodo yatra. See that both india and china contributed to 65%gdp of world till 12th century. India weakened after this due to caste system but both india and china contributed to 50%world gdp well into 18th century till british rule.

The secondpart--- @nathanwatche As i said in some of the comments, buddhism was attacked in its origin place in 12th century and was on a decline, parallely crusades was happening in the west and the gunpowders,chemicals and technology used actually developed in India and china and were put to wrong use. Once Constantinople fell in 1452, the need for a trade route to india and china led to voyages which resulted in the colonization of americas( it is wrong that Columbus or vikings discovered America's first: buddhists from India and china reached Mexico in 6th century with their message {Reference:An Iglorious Columbus, or Evidence that Hwui Shan and A Party of Buddhist Monks Discovered America in 5th Century AD} and the capture of atahualpa(the gun technology used in the battle was also developed in indo china but it was never meant for large scale violence)and then lots of gold and resources were taken. Colonialism had begun. Had buddhism in india given some time, colonialism on such a large scale would have never happened. Many of the ideas on which Newton developed were introduced by trade route to Europe from kerala and tamilnadu parts of india{for eg.,the kerala school of astronomy and mathematics}. [[Before long, the southern parts of India fell to caste system and majority of people became illiterate. When the British started Indian invasions, a majority of Indian land was controlled by chitpavin brahmins(peshwas) and the society was fragmented along caste lines and so the British could capture India easily. When respected king shivaji and his son sambaji tried to break the brahmin domination, they were given strict punishment by the brahmins in aurangzebs court(& brahmin conspiracy within his kingdom too). From shivajis lineage shahuji, along with phule worked for oppressed classes in India which were more than 85% population. 50% of population were doing menial jobs and women were downgraded in brahminical system. Savitribai phule, phule's wife was the first educated woman in india from the last 800 years ]]. And then industrial revolution that happened in the west was on the line of colonialism--- had it happened along buddhism, we would've seen a completely different world today with no world wars, no cold war, no large scale violence. Technology would've been used in right way and world would have lived as one, in harmony🌍❤ PS::The Mahatma Gandhi magic from 1920-1950 made sure that we moved towards the constitution over manusmriti. Tall leaders like Babasaheb Ambedkar and Nehru wrote and strengthened the constitution. Initially there was no provision of reservation in the constitution and Nehru fought hard to bring the 1st amendment(1951). Premier public sector industries, dams and big educational institutions (which then facilitated reservation) was created under visionary leadership of nehru. Today is a transition from that period of 800 years(from 12th century when ~200 international universities were destroyed/burnt) in which the rule was that ~90% people were punished with lead melted and poured into their ears if they attempted to read vedas, to nehrus primeministership when again institutions like iits and aims were created and opened the doors for all. And till before independence, only 5% people were literate but today 75% are. To reach till here, tall leaders like mahatma gandhi, jawaharlal nehru, shastriji, indira gandhi, rajiv gandhi had to risk and place their lives.

​@@Vicky91-lq6yc__KhargeForPMgreat post. Information. 😊

Bodhidharma was spreading message of Buddah , a Bihari !

​​​@Aju_Min_Joyful Message to all indians to trust this genuine post and realize our real history---- The true history of india is hidden from us Indians. Pls read and trust this comment: Whole india was buddhist till 12th century. The indus valley civilization was buddhist. The time period between 1500-500 bc is buddhist and not vedic & had 28 buddhas starting from tanhankara buddha ending with gautama buddha. So aryan migration happened but to iran and this branch came to india only in 7th century as islam captured iran. The parallel vaigai valley civilization was also buddhist. Early tamili and pali evolved from ~500bc. The proof of these 28 buddhas is solid from inscriptions, traveller accounts(like fa hien notes)and other evidences. For example koragamana buddha is mentioned in asokas inscriptions,and so on. Buddha simply means enlightened and after gautam buddha too we had buddhas like asvagosha, tiopa ,naropa,vasubandhu,atisha, etc from north and bodhisena(who travelled to japan),bodhidharma (who travelled to china), dhammapala,nagarjuna,buddhadhata from south; and outside india lao tzu,rinzai,kyozan,etc. Takshashila university was there at the time of buddha, and nalanda university was during by nanda empire--so pre asoka was also sraman/buddhist. All indian kingdoms/empires like cheras, cholas,pandyans,kalabras, gupta, rastrakuta, chalukyas,gurjara prathiharas, palas till 12th century were buddhist. Some people from iran came after 8th century(first wave they came to gujarat)and were allowed refuge by buddhist kings. This was at a time when buddhists developed sanskrit from pali/prakrit. So sanskrit took form only in 7th century. What these iranians did is that they got into buddhist universities and places and slowly started capturing these. They acted themselves as bamans(baman shaman in buddhism: baman means scolar and saman means meditator) and brahman in sanskrit equivalent for baman. So slowly they became brahmans and captured and burnt near to 110 international universities around 1200-1300ad where everyone could study(there was no caste then). Then partnering with delhi sultanate and sena dynasty in north, they slowly brought caste system as now people had no means of studying other trades as education was attacked so they started practicing their trades by birth. Next they mixed and corrupted buddhist texts ,buddhist jataka kathas,etc to compose vedas, gita, puranas etc after 12-13th century which were written in sanskrit and sanskrit was developed only till 8th century. Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. [[A missing link is that if india was buddhist till 12th century, then what are the statues of shiva,vishnu, durga,kali come from? To understand this we need to know that the first sculptures made in India were of buddha during buddhist kushan rule in 1st century ad. Then consequently other statues and sculptures of buddha and bodhisattvas were made. The two arts that developed called mathura anf gandhar arts were buddhist. Now the iranian outsiders were worshippers of fire(avesta was their scripture) and as they acted as brahmins(bamans), they started fire worship in front of these idols and this is still present in India where pujaris bring a plate with fire when we worship, and then took over these places and brahminised them as durga,kali etc. For example, a buddhist temple during the buddhist gupta rule is now called mundeshwari temple, which is claimed as the oldest hindu temple{kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6qefLqJnrDWnoE.htmlsi=896sTrwexIG6lJTO}. A straightforward example is the worship of buddha as "teliya baba" in nalanda even today. Ayyapa( swamiye saranam ayyapa similar to buddham saranam gachami), tirupati balaji, khajuraho, konark, kedarnath badrinath etc were all buddhist temple. {Madras High Court verdict opens up space for Buddhist history in Tamil Nadu www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-verdict-on-thalaivetti-muniyappan-opens-up-space-for-buddhist-history-in-state/article65775967.ece/amp/} One just need to open their eyes and see that that the worship of shiva and vishnu( shaivism and vaishnavism) started only after 10-11th century. Also rama and vasudeva(krshna) were buddhist bodhisattvas--we can see it for eg, from dasarath jatak katha., etc.]].During reign of muhammed bin tughlag, it was shariat law for muslims and manusmriti law for "hindus". This anyone can read from ibn batutas original memoirs. This carried in mughal rule when many courtiers were brahmins. Here another point is that if babri masjid was built by breaking a ram temple, why did tulsidas who lived in ayodhya with only 30 yrs gap not mention this. A thing to note is that hindus and brahmins were different and this carried on till even when dayanand saraswati,founder of arya samaj, went for case to not call them brahmins as hindus. This situation changed when phule,periyar and others awakened the depressed classes(note obcs and sc,st make 80%of indian population atleast). The brahmins thought a lot about what to do because their ground was shaking. They came up with an idea called hindu-muslim riots so that attention of these depressed classes(known as hindus) were turned superficially to muslims. The first planned hindu muslim riots happened in 1893 and as per the plan, ganesh utsav was made public and riots were planned with violence from both sides. Important to note not a single such hindu muslim riots in medieval india and suddenly they are happening. Gandhi and nehru saw through this and worked to stop this like khilafat movement to unify etc. As the british announced elections which meant representations for depressed classes too(who were called hindus by brahmins then), brahmins formed rss and hindu mahasabha, and called themselves hindus too to act as representatives of hindus( just as they acted as representatives of buddhists by becoming bamans). Partition resulted due to brahman tactics of riots and also british supported this because by then cold war had started and pakistan was made an ally of america then. Now gandhi and nehru knew that caste system(which was mixed with religion then) cannot be attacked directly so they built institutions for public like iit,aims, bpcl,ongc,hpcl,bsnl,bhel,power grid,and many many more so that depressed classes too can study, become educated and do other jobs and break varna,i.e trade by birth(the first thing that bamans did to establish caste was burn universities and this was undone by the sharp understanding of nehru). Now rss is systematically selling psus to undo this again because if 80% of the depressed classes are supressed and their reservation is taken back by selling govt psus,theyll again become uneducated and jobless and under them).Note that when gandhi came to india in 1915, only 4% of india was educated. Then when india was so poor due to british misrule that there was big shortage of grains for everyone and people had no food, india asked food grains to america which mocked saying we can only give lowest quality fooder, indira gandhi successfully headed both green revolution and white revolution. Indira Gandhi successfully led the country through cold war funded jp and khalistani movements. See that both jp movement and anna movement were so similar and rss was behind them. The purpose was these movements was to supress the depressed classes(hindus) and maintain brahmanical order. Nehru escaped assassination attempts five times. Indira gandhi and rajiv gandhi gave away their lives to create equal society and unite india. Now rahul gandhi doing the same through his 4000km bharat jodo yatra. See that both india and china contributed to 65%gdp of world till 12th century. India weakened after this due to caste system but both india and china contributed to 50%world gdp well into 18th century till british rule.

@mahn9105 it is one India🇮🇳. Both kanchipuram and pataliputra were some of the most beautiful and advanced ancient cities of the world. Foreigners used to come to study at universities in kanchipuram, nalanda, vikramshila, nagavi, kanthalloor and 100 more such world class universities all over India. What happened in 12th century when all this was lost I've explained in previous post. This post is genuine and it should be trusted.

​@@manh9105 bodhidharma is the founder of kung fu, he is the founder of Zen.. If buddha is great, bodhidharma is also great.. As this movie is about bodhidharma, not about buddha.. Talking about bodhidharma is relevant here.. Bodhidharma is a tamilian.. He invented kung fu.. Tamils have right to take this pride.. This is not Seperatism .. Whenever you see martial arts remember bodhidharma..

I am Kancheepuram❤

@@saireddy356 " just shut up" I see that Hinduism has taught you well. Fabulous. 👍

this is not real , this a movie based on folklore and some legends stories.

@@komedykingdom yeah the mutination of that monk arm is not included in the real story . But the folk stories are not false stories .

@@NirodhaSriLankan folk stories are false , because no archeological evidence that shows bodhidharma know martial arts ,just Indian propaganda

​@MaxineWashington give proof that it is false

All Because of the British

Me starting at 5 am

☺️☺️

The director Brandy Yuen Zhen Yang who filmed this was deeply inspired during the filming process and later went on to become a monk after this movie was completed.

@mihachentsov9912 It almost felt the bodhidharma in this movie is originally a buddha. The walking style, the talking,

another movie i can recommend is 'zen : life of master dogen' a japanese movie that also impressed me alot

​​@GoodJob7117 I pay my respect to the bodhisattva in you,🙏

Bodhidharma was spreading message of Buddah , a Bihari !

@savenatures1259 Tamilnadu was buddhist centre till 14-15th century. Bodhidharma went to china, Bodhisena went to japan,Vajrabodhi and buddhadatta went to sri lanka from tamil land❤

​@@manh9105nepali not bihari 😀

​​@manh9105 ​ you're taking about one of the 28 recorded great buddhas between ~1500-500bc. There were other buddhas too. And bihari, nepali, etc are just names we've created in our mind. No need to be too obsessed with names. But on your insistence, Kondanna buddha, one of the 28 buddhas,was from telangana-andhra region. Similarly sarankara buddha was from kerala-tamilnadu, mangala buddha was from karnataka-kerala, and so on. Infact, tanhankara buddha,the 1st of the 28 mentioned buddhas, was from tamil nadu. The 28 great buddhas were not confined only to bihar, but to the length and breadth of india. Vaigai valley civilization of south india was as advanced as the parallel indus valley civilization and both had the same culture and similar script. The evidence of link between vaigai/indus script and tamili/pali script has been obtained in graffiti in Tamil Nadu. Tamilnadu was buddhist till 14-15th century atleast.

Same bro 🎉 I will watch watch it after my exams are over

​The true history of india is hiddenfrom us. You can trust this comment: Whole india was buddhist till 12th century. The indus valley civilization was buddhist. The time period between 1500-500 bc is buddhist and not vedic & had 28 buddhas starting from tanhankara buddha ending with gautama buddha. So aryan migration didnt happen but a branch came to india in 7th century as islam captured iran. The parallel vaigai valley civilization was also buddhist. Early tamili and pali(both evolved from same script) evolved from ~600bc. The proof of these 28 buddhas is solid from inscriptions, traveller accounts(like fa hien notes)and other evidences. For example konagamana buddha is mentioned in asokas inscriptions,and so on. Another instance is we can see picture and notes on vipassi buddha from cave 17 of ajantha. Yet another instance is the idols of the kasappa and konagamana buddhas found in digging in Sannati in Karnataka. Buddha simply means enlightened and after gautam buddha too we had buddhas like asvagosha, tilopa,marpa ,naropa,vasubandhu,asanga,atisha, etc from north and bodhisena(who travelled to japan),bodhidharma (who travelled to china), dhammapala,nagarjuna, vajrabodhi,buddhadhata,etc from south; and outside india lao tzu, chang tzu, dogen, rinzai,kyozan,etc. Takshashila university was there at the time of buddha, and nalanda university was during by nanda empire--so pre asoka was also sraman/buddhist(infact,chandragupta maurya, grandfather of asoka, renounced his kingdom and became a disciple of the great jina/buddha badrabahu(who was from karnataka-kerala) and meditated in a cave in sravanabelagola---so pre asoka was sraman/buddhist tradition) [also note jina/jaina(meaning victor/ conqueror over papam/sin to attain moksha) and buddha(meaning realised one/ moksha attainer) are synonyms---it is only that today's historians separated and classified them under different categories]. In south part of india, we had universities like kanthaloor, kanchipuram, nagavi. All indian kingdoms/empires like cheras, cholas,pandyans,kalabhras, gupta, rastrakuta, pallavas, chalukyas,gurjara prathiharas, palas till 12th century were buddhist/samana. Some people from iran came after 8th century(first wave they came to gujarat and sindh)and were allowed refuge by buddhist kings. This was at a time when buddhists developed sanskrit from pali/prakrit. So sanskrit took form only in 7th century. What these iranians did is that they got into buddhist universities and places and slowly started capturing these. They acted themselves as bamans(baman shaman in buddhism: baman means scholar and saman means meditator) and brahman in sanskrit equivalent for baman. So slowly they became brahmans and captured and burnt near to 200 international universities around 1200-1300ad where everyone could study(there was no caste then). Then partnering with delhi sultanate and sena dynasty in north, they slowly brought caste system as now people had no means of studying other trades as education was attacked so they started practicing their trades by birth. Next they mixed and corrupted buddhist/jina texts ,buddhist jataka kathas,etc to compose vedas(part of the vedas was nothing but the avesta/illogical ideas these iranians brought with them while the part that made sense such as ayurveda was copied from buddhist texts) ,gita, puranas etc, and either took over or destroyed various philosophical and scientific works after 12-13th century which were written in sanskrit and sanskrit was developed only till 8th century(india till 12th century was a learning centre with nearly 200 international universities then which taught various philosophies, science, metallurgy, medicine,and many other disciplines). Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. [[A missing link is that if india was buddhist till 12th century, then what are the statues of shiva,vishnu, durga,kali come from? To understand this we need to know that the first sculptures made in India were of buddha during buddhist kushan rule in 1st century ad. Then consequently other statues and sculptures of buddha and bodhisattvas were made. The two arts that developed called mathura and gandhar arts were buddhist. Now the iranian outsiders acted as brahmins(bamans) and took over these places and corrupted them. For example, a buddhist temple during the buddhist gupta rule is now called mundeshwari temple, which is claimed as the oldest hindu temple{kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6qefLqJnrDWnoE.htmlsi=896sTrwexIG6lJTO}. A straightforward example is the worship of buddha as "teliya baba" in nalanda even today. Ayyapa( swamiye saranam ayyapa similar to buddham saranam gachami), tirupati balaji, khajuraho, konark, kedarnath badrinath etc were all temples of bodhisattvas/buddhas. For example, ayyapa temple is a temple dedicated to ayyapa/aryadeva who was an arahant/realised one, and whose disciple is the great master paramabuddha(padampa sangye) who travelled to tibet and china. Another example is the tirumala temple of bodhisattva venkateshwara(ven means sin and kata means cutter--i.e, venkata means cutter of sin/papam,i.e., moksha-giver).Infact temple/mandir is a integral part of our culture which got twisted, captured and corrupted from 12th century. {Madras High Court verdict opens up space for Buddhist history in Tamil Nadu www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-verdict-on-thalaivetti-muniyappan-opens-up-space-for-buddhist-history-in-state/article65775967.ece/amp/} Shiva and vishnu are integral ideas of our culture which became twisted and corrupted from 12th century. Also rama and vasudeva(krshna) were buddhist bodhisattvas--we can see it for eg, from dasarath jatak katha., etc.]]. Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. During reign of muhammed bin tughlag, it was shariat law for muslims and manusmriti law for "hindus". The label of hindu(meaning thief/dirty person/neech) was given to the depressed classes at that time(sc,st,obcs of today). This anyone can read from ibn batutas original memoirs. This carried in mughal rule(in south india from the time of vijanagara empire) when many courtiers were brahmins. Here another point is that if babri masjid was built by breaking a ram temple, why did tulsidas who lived in ayodhya with only 30 yrs gap not mention this. A thing to note is that hindus and brahmins were different and this carried on till even when dayanand saraswati,founder of arya samaj, went for case to not call them brahmins as hindus. This situation changed when phule,periyar and others awakened the depressed classes(note obcs and sc,st make 80%of indian population atleast). The brahmins thought a lot about what to do because their ground was shaking. They came up with an idea called hindu-muslim riots so that attention of these depressed classes(known as hindus) were turned superficially to muslims. The first planned hindu muslim riots happened in 1893 and as per the plan, ganesh utsav was made public and riots were planned with violence from both sides. Important to note not a single such hindu muslim riots in medieval india and suddenly they are happening. Gandhi and nehru saw through this and worked to stop this like khilafat movement to unify etc. As the british announced elections which meant representations for depressed classes too(who were called hindus by brahmins then), brahmins formed rss and hindu mahasabha, and called themselves hindus too to act as representatives of hindus( just as they acted as representatives of buddhists by becoming bamans). Partition resulted due to brahman tactics of riots and also british supported this because by then cold war had started and pakistan was made an ally of america then. Now gandhi and nehru knew that caste system(which was mixed with religion then) cannot be attacked directly so they built institutions for public like iit,aims, bpcl,ongc,hpcl,bsnl,bhel,power grid,and many many more so that depressed classes too can study, become educated and do other jobs and break varna,i.e trade by birth(the first thing that bamans did to establish caste was burn universities and this was undone by the sharp understanding of nehru). Now rss is systematically selling psus to undo this again because if 80% of the depressed classes are supressed and their reservation is taken back by selling govt psus,theyll again become uneducated and jobless and under them).Note that when gandhi came to india in 1915, only 4% of india was educated. Then when india was so poor due to british misrule that there was big shortage of grains for everyone and people had no food, india asked food grains to america which mocked saying we can only give lowest quality fooder, indira gandhi successfully headed both green revolution and white revolution. Indira Gandhi successfully led the country through cold war funded jp and khalistani movements. See that both jp movement and anna movement were so similar and rss was behind them. The purpose was these movements was to supress the depressed classes(hindus) and maintain brahmanical order. Nehru escaped assassination attempts five times. Shastriji worked tirelessly to protect the country. Indira gandhi and rajiv gandhi gave away their lives to create equal society and unite india. Now rahul gandhi doing the same through his 4000km bharat jodo yatra. See that both india and china contributed to 65%gdp of world till 12th century. India weakened after this due to caste system but both india and china contributed to 50%world gdp well into 18th century till british rule.

The secondpart--- @nathanwatche As i said in some of the comments, buddhism was attacked in its origin place in 12th century and was on a decline, parallely crusades was happening in the west and the gunpowders,chemicals and technology used actually developed in India and china and were put to wrong use. Once Constantinople fell in 1452, the need for a trade route to india and china led to voyages which resulted in the colonization of americas( it is wrong that Columbus or vikings discovered America's first: buddhists from India and china reached Mexico in 6th century with their message {Reference:An Iglorious Columbus, or Evidence that Hwui Shan and A Party of Buddhist Monks Discovered America in 5th Century AD} and the capture of atahualpa(the gun technology used in the battle was also developed in indo china but it was never meant for large scale violence)and then lots of gold and resources were taken. Colonialism had begun. Had buddhism in india given some time, colonialism on such a large scale would have never happened. Many of the ideas on which Newton developed were introduced by trade route to Europe from kerala and tamilnadu parts of india{for eg.,the kerala school of astronomy and mathematics}. [[Before long, the southern parts of India fell to caste system and majority of people became illiterate. When the British started Indian invasions, a majority of Indian land was controlled by chitpavin brahmins(peshwas) and the society was fragmented along caste lines and so the British could capture India easily. When respected king shivaji and his son sambaji tried to break the brahmin domination, they were given strict punishment by the brahmins in aurangzebs court(& brahmin conspiracy within his kingdom too). From shivajis lineage shahuji, along with phule worked for oppressed classes in India which were more than 85% population. 50% of population were doing menial jobs and women were downgraded in brahminical system. Savitribai phule, phule's wife was the first educated woman in india from the last 800 years ]]. And then industrial revolution that happened in the west was on the line of colonialism--- had it happened along buddhism, we would've seen a completely different world today with no world wars, no cold war, no large scale violence. Technology would've been used in right way and world would have lived as one, in harmony🌍❤ PS::The Mahatma Gandhi magic from 1920-1950 made sure that we moved towards the constitution over manusmriti. Tall leaders like Babasaheb Ambedkar and Nehru wrote and strengthened the constitution. Initially there was no provision of reservation in the constitution and Nehru fought hard to bring the 1st amendment(1951). Premier public sector industries, dams and big educational institutions (which then facilitated reservation) was created under visionary leadership of nehru. Today is a transition from that period of 800 years(from 12th century when ~200 international universities were destroyed/burnt) in which the rule was that ~90% people were punished with lead melted and poured into their ears if they attempted to read vedas, to nehrus primeministership when again institutions like iits and aims were created and opened the doors for all. And till before independence, only 5% people were literate but today 75% are. To reach till here, tall leaders like mahatma gandhi, jawaharlal nehru, shastriji, indira gandhi, rajiv gandhi had to risk and place their lives.

​@@Vicky91-lq6yc__KhargeForPMnice try so according to you aryans came from somewhere outside to India can how can panini write grammar in chidambaram tamilnadu 1000s of years ago why didn't they mention about their original birthplace if they were really Aryans. Don't spread fake stories

​@@RishikRiodidn't understand ur comment brother--clarify what ur saying da

@@Vicky91-lq6yc__KhargeForPM I'm saying that hinduism is not a religion it is a descendent of sanatan dharm Buddhism also followed it. You can find the same philosophy like Buddhism in hinduism in their puranas and vedas. There is no person or group called Aryans. According to foreigners Aryans looks white the how come rama and Krishna were dark in colour then why did Shiva appear to non Aryans in their meditation if Shiva we're Aryans god. First of all Buddhism is an atheist philosophy but hinduism is a theist philosophy so there is no chance that hinduism came from Buddhism, our gurus and rishis stopped Buddhism spreading to India as it teaches atheism so hinduism is older than Buddhism. So which religion is yours Buddha before he born?

Namo budhhay

I am hindu but namo buddhay

@@logic_found hindu religion sucks

​@@logic_foundBuddhism Hinduism Se Hi nikala hai, aur Usi Ka hi part hai

@@user-dq4tr2ph2e true

As a Chinese I have been thinking the same thing, but the answer is clear, it was the Communists Party who brainwashed the Chinese, causing hatred towards the Indian, the Japanese and the American. Indian influenced China a lot. What’s interesting thing is that many people didn’t realize the Buddhism is slowing going back to Indian under a Chinese master.

Due to Communism imported from West in China and Christianity/Islam imported from West in India

​The true history of india is hidden from us. Whole india was buddhist till 12th century. The indus valley civilization was buddhist. The time period between 1500-500 bc is buddhist and not vedic & had 28 buddhas starting from tanhankara buddha ending with gautama buddha. So aryan migration didnt happen but a branch came to india in 7th century as islam captured iran. The parallel vaigai valley civilization was also buddhist. Early tamili and pali(both evolved from same script) evolved from ~600bc. The proof of these 28 buddhas is solid from inscriptions, traveller accounts(like fa hien notes)and other evidences. For example konagamana buddha is mentioned in asokas inscriptions,and so on. Another instance is we can see picture and notes on vipassi buddha from cave 17 of ajantha. Yet another instance is the idols of the kasappa and konagamana buddhas found in digging in Sannati in Karnataka. Buddha simply means enlightened and after gautam buddha too we had buddhas like asvagosha, tilopa,marpa ,naropa,vasubandhu,asanga,atisha, etc from north and bodhisena(who travelled to japan),bodhidharma (who travelled to china), dhammapala,nagarjuna, vajrabodhi,buddhadhata,etc from south; and outside india lao tzu, chang tzu, dogen, rinzai,kyozan,etc. Takshashila university was there at the time of buddha, and nalanda university was during by nanda empire--so pre asoka was also sraman/buddhist(infact,chandragupta maurya, grandfather of asoka, renounced his kingdom and became a disciple of the great jina/buddha badrabahu(who was from karnataka-kerala) and meditated in a cave in sravanabelagola---so pre asoka was sraman/buddhist tradition) [also note jina/jaina(meaning victor/ conqueror over papam/sin to attain moksha) and buddha(meaning realised one/ moksha attainer) are synonyms---it is only that today's historians separated and classified them under different categories]. In south part of india, we had universities like kanthaloor, kanchipuram, nagavi. All indian kingdoms/empires like cheras, cholas,pandyans,kalabhras, gupta, rastrakuta, pallavas, chalukyas,gurjara prathiharas, palas till 12th century were buddhist/samana. Some people from iran came after 8th century(first wave they came to gujarat and sindh)and were allowed refuge by buddhist kings. This was at a time when buddhists developed sanskrit from pali/prakrit. So sanskrit took form only in 7th century. What these iranians did is that they got into buddhist universities and places and slowly started capturing these. They acted themselves as bamans(baman shaman in buddhism: baman means scholar and saman means meditator) and brahman in sanskrit equivalent for baman. So slowly they became brahmans and captured and burnt near to 200 international universities around 1200-1300ad where everyone could study(there was no caste then). Then partnering with delhi sultanate and sena dynasty in north, they slowly brought caste system as now people had no means of studying other trades as education was attacked so they started practicing their trades by birth. Next they mixed and corrupted buddhist/jina texts ,buddhist jataka kathas,etc to compose vedas(part of the vedas was nothing but the avesta/illogical ideas these iranians brought with them while the part that made sense such as ayurveda was copied from buddhist texts) ,gita, puranas etc, and either took over or destroyed various philosophical and scientific works after 12-13th century which were written in sanskrit and sanskrit was developed only till 8th century(india till 12th century was a learning centre with nearly 200 international universities then which taught various philosophies, science, metallurgy, medicine,and many other disciplines). Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. [[A missing link is that if india was buddhist till 12th century, then what are the statues of shiva,vishnu, durga,kali come from? To understand this we need to know that the first sculptures made in India were of buddha during buddhist kushan rule in 1st century ad. Then consequently other statues and sculptures of buddha and bodhisattvas were made. The two arts that developed called mathura and gandhar arts were buddhist. Now the iranian outsiders acted as brahmins(bamans) and took over these places and corrupted them. For example, a buddhist temple during the buddhist gupta rule is now called mundeshwari temple, which is claimed as the oldest hindu temple{kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6qefLqJnrDWnoE.htmlsi=896sTrwexIG6lJTO}. A straightforward example is the worship of buddha as "teliya baba" in nalanda even today. Ayyapa( swamiye saranam ayyapa similar to buddham saranam gachami), tirupati balaji, khajuraho, konark, kedarnath badrinath etc were all temples of bodhisattvas/buddhas. For example, ayyapa temple is a temple dedicated to ayyapa/aryadeva who was an arahant/realised one, and whose disciple is the great master paramabuddha(padampa sangye) who travelled to tibet and china. Another example is the tirumala temple of bodhisattva venkateshwara(ven means sin and kata means cutter--i.e, venkata means cutter of sin/papam,i.e., moksha-giver).Infact temple/mandir is a integral part of our culture which got twisted, captured and corrupted from 12th century. {Madras High Court verdict opens up space for Buddhist history in Tamil Nadu www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-verdict-on-thalaivetti-muniyappan-opens-up-space-for-buddhist-history-in-state/article65775967.ece/amp/} Shiva and vishnu are integral ideas of our culture which became twisted and corrupted from 12th century. Also rama and vasudeva(krshna) were buddhist bodhisattvas--we can see it for eg, from dasarath jatak katha., etc.]]. Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. During reign of muhammed bin tughlag, it was shariat law for muslims and manusmriti law for "hindus". The label of hindu(meaning thief/dirty person/neech) was given to the depressed classes at that time(sc,st,obcs of today). This anyone can read from ibn batutas original memoirs. This carried in mughal rule(in south india from the time of vijanagara empire) when many courtiers were brahmins. Here another point is that if babri masjid was built by breaking a ram temple, why did tulsidas who lived in ayodhya with only 30 yrs gap not mention this. A thing to note is that hindus and brahmins were different and this carried on till even when dayanand saraswati,founder of arya samaj, went for case to not call them brahmins as hindus. This situation changed when phule,periyar and others awakened the depressed classes(note obcs and sc,st make 80%of indian population atleast). The brahmins thought a lot about what to do because their ground was shaking. They came up with an idea called hindu-muslim riots so that attention of these depressed classes(known as hindus) were turned superficially to muslims. The first planned hindu muslim riots happened in 1893 and as per the plan, ganesh utsav was made public and riots were planned with violence from both sides. Important to note not a single such hindu muslim riots in medieval india and suddenly they are happening. Gandhi and nehru saw through this and worked to stop this like khilafat movement to unify etc. As the british announced elections which meant representations for depressed classes too(who were called hindus by brahmins then), brahmins formed rss and hindu mahasabha, and called themselves hindus too to act as representatives of hindus( just as they acted as representatives of buddhists by becoming bamans). Partition resulted due to brahman tactics of riots and also british supported this because by then cold war had started and pakistan was made an ally of america then. Now gandhi and nehru knew that caste system(which was mixed with religion then) cannot be attacked directly so they built institutions for public like iit,aims, bpcl,ongc,hpcl,bsnl,bhel,power grid,and many many more so that depressed classes too can study, become educated and do other jobs and break varna,i.e trade by birth(the first thing that bamans did to establish caste was burn universities and this was undone by the sharp understanding of nehru). Now rss is systematically selling psus to undo this again because if 80% of the depressed classes are supressed and their reservation is taken back by selling govt psus,theyll again become uneducated and jobless and under them).Note that when gandhi came to india in 1915, only 4% of india was educated. Then when india was so poor due to british misrule that there was big shortage of grains for everyone and people had no food, india asked food grains to america which mocked saying we can only give lowest quality fooder, indira gandhi successfully headed both green revolution and white revolution. Indira Gandhi successfully led the country through cold war funded jp and khalistani movements. See that both jp movement and anna movement were so similar and rss was behind them. The purpose was these movements was to supress the depressed classes(hindus) and maintain brahmanical order. Nehru escaped assassination attempts five times. Shastriji worked tirelessly to protect the country. Indira gandhi and rajiv gandhi gave away their lives to create equal society and unite india. Now rahul gandhi doing the same through his 4000km bharat jodo yatra. See that both india and china contributed to 65%gdp of world till 12th century. India weakened after this due to caste system but both india and china contributed to 50%world gdp well into 18th century till british rule.

There is a reason why Indias architect Nehru gave the slogan :"India China bhai bhai" (which means india and china are brothers). The reason is evident from above post. What changed later and the indo china war, nehru shouldn't be blamed for it. There are others reasons why Mao declared war on india. It is not a straightforward topic because it was cold war politics and all of india, china, russia, america, europe were in a way involved. Whatever be the political situation now, india and china have shared civilization till the past 700 years. For example,even till 16th century,there were relations between Chinese Kingdoms and, kerala and tamilnadu.

@@Vicky91-lq6yc__KhargeForPM I agree that Indian and China are brothers, we have been influenced by Indian since the Buddha time until 1949, there were to many stories, and the most wonderful part of it is the novel "Journey to the west" which was based on true story that in 7th century the monk Xuanzhang take a long trip from the then capital of China, Xian, acrossed Afghanistan arrived India and brought back lots of buddhist books. there are many factors nowadays that the mainland Chinese are aggressive, mostly because of brainwashing by the media. Inso-China relation shall be as good as before, but sadly, the Chinese Communists Party ruined it.

It's the way that these stories are told that make you believe the new guy. More than the old guy (Krishna. Buddha). This was a good movie though and teaches us. To be as bad as we can be. Then repent and become Buddha. Then because there is no comfort in Buddha cut your arm off.. Wait that's Krishna dogma. LOL So many Old story's that are not really based on the truth but, folklore. Including this one.

What you believe is irrelevant. If you showcase good behaviour which is in line with dharma, that's all it matters. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism are part of Sanatana dharma

事實上，禪宗佛教在中國也已經不存在了，尤其是經過文化大革命的洗禮後，中國的傳統文化已經所剩無幾。而在台灣等其他華人多的國家，就如電影裡達摩大師所說的那樣「說理的人多，而悟理的人少」，大部分的佛教徒做的是一種形式上的信仰，跟隨教義唸經、吃素、打坐，而很少能去思考佛教的本身哲學理念。

@@hugocheng6243 Can u type it in English? Cannot copy your words to be translated.

Bhudhidharma

Not only him even Buddha was Indian though now it is Nepal.

Tamil king..there was no india those days back

@@tiger1995grvr Pallava Prince.. Pallava is not Tamils..They are from North. They just ruled some part of Tamil Nadu.

@@MrKambathasan what a joke 🤣🤣.. basic history brother

​@anandmeleppat5042 you can trust this comment: Whole india was buddhist till 12th century. The indus valley civilization was buddhist. The time period between 1500-500 bc is buddhist and not vedic & had 28 buddhas starting from tanhankara buddha ending with gautama buddha. So aryan migration didnt happen but a branch came to india in 7th century as islam captured iran. The parallel vaigai valley civilization was also buddhist. Early tamili and pali(both evolved from same script) evolved from ~600bc. The proof of these 28 buddhas is solid from inscriptions, traveller accounts(like fa hien notes)and other evidences. For example konagamana buddha is mentioned in asokas inscriptions,and so on. Another instance is we can see picture and notes on vipassi buddha from cave 17 of ajantha. Yet another instance is the idols of the kasappa and konagamana buddhas found in digging in Sannati in Karnataka. Buddha simply means enlightened and after gautam buddha too we had buddhas like asvagosha, tilopa,marpa ,naropa,vasubandhu,asanga,atisha, etc from north and bodhisena(who travelled to japan),bodhidharma (who travelled to china), dhammapala,nagarjuna, vajrabodhi,buddhadhata,etc from south; and outside india lao tzu, chang tzu, dogen, rinzai,kyozan,etc. Takshashila university was there at the time of buddha, and nalanda university was during by nanda empire--so pre asoka was also sraman/buddhist(infact,chandragupta maurya, grandfather of asoka, renounced his kingdom and became a disciple of the great jina/buddha badrabahu(who was from karnataka-kerala) and meditated in a cave in sravanabelagola---so pre asoka was sraman/buddhist tradition) [also note jina/jaina(meaning victor/ conqueror over papam/sin to attain moksha) and buddha(meaning realised one/ moksha attainer) are synonyms---it is only that today's historians separated and classified them under different categories]. In south part of india, we had universities like kanthaloor, kanchipuram, nagavi. All indian kingdoms/empires like cheras, cholas,pandyans,kalabhras, gupta, rastrakuta, pallavas, chalukyas,gurjara prathiharas, palas till 12th century were buddhist/samana. Some people from iran came after 8th century(first wave they came to gujarat and sindh)and were allowed refuge by buddhist kings. This was at a time when buddhists developed sanskrit from pali/prakrit. So sanskrit took form only in 7th century. What these iranians did is that they got into buddhist universities and places and slowly started capturing these. They acted themselves as bamans(baman shaman in buddhism: baman means scholar and saman means meditator) and brahman in sanskrit equivalent for baman. So slowly they became brahmans and captured and burnt near to 200 international universities around 1200-1300ad where everyone could study(there was no caste then). Then partnering with delhi sultanate and sena dynasty in north, they slowly brought caste system as now people had no means of studying other trades as education was attacked so they started practicing their trades by birth. Next they mixed and corrupted buddhist/jina texts ,buddhist jataka kathas,etc to compose vedas(part of the vedas was nothing but the avesta/illogical ideas these iranians brought with them while the part that made sense such as ayurveda was copied from buddhist texts) ,gita, puranas etc, and either took over or destroyed various philosophical and scientific works after 12-13th century which were written in sanskrit and sanskrit was developed only till 8th century(india till 12th century was a learning centre with nearly 200 international universities then which taught various philosophies, science, metallurgy, medicine,and many other disciplines). Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. [[A missing link is that if india was buddhist till 12th century, then what are the statues of shiva,vishnu, durga,kali come from? To understand this we need to know that the first sculptures made in India were of buddha during buddhist kushan rule in 1st century ad. Then consequently other statues and sculptures of buddha and bodhisattvas were made. The two arts that developed called mathura and gandhar arts were buddhist. Now the iranian outsiders acted as brahmins(bamans) and took over these places and corrupted them. For example, a buddhist temple during the buddhist gupta rule is now called mundeshwari temple, which is claimed as the oldest hindu temple{kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6qefLqJnrDWnoE.htmlsi=896sTrwexIG6lJTO}. A straightforward example is the worship of buddha as "teliya baba" in nalanda even today. Ayyapa( swamiye saranam ayyapa similar to buddham saranam gachami), tirupati balaji, khajuraho, konark, kedarnath badrinath etc were all temples of bodhisattvas/buddhas. For example, ayyapa temple is a temple dedicated to ayyapa/aryadeva who was an arahant/realised one, and whose disciple is the great master paramabuddha(padampa sangye) who travelled to tibet and china. Another example is the tirumala temple of bodhisattva venkateshwara(ven means sin and kata means cutter--i.e, venkata means cutter of sin/papam,i.e., moksha-giver).Infact temple/mandir is a integral part of our culture which got twisted, captured and corrupted from 12th century. {Madras High Court verdict opens up space for Buddhist history in Tamil Nadu www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-verdict-on-thalaivetti-muniyappan-opens-up-space-for-buddhist-history-in-state/article65775967.ece/amp/} Shiva and vishnu are integral ideas of our culture which became twisted and corrupted from 12th century. Also rama and vasudeva(krshna) were buddhist bodhisattvas--we can see it for eg, from dasarath jatak katha., etc.]]. Al beruni was the first one to use the word "hindu" which is a derogatory word in persian(see the meaning of hindu and hindukush) to refer to the people here. During reign of muhammed bin tughlag, it was shariat law for muslims and manusmriti law for "hindus". The label of hindu(meaning thief/dirty person/neech) was given to the depressed classes at that time(sc,st,obcs of today). This anyone can read from ibn batutas original memoirs. This carried in mughal rule(in south india from the time of vijanagara empire) when many courtiers were brahmins. Here another point is that if babri masjid was built by breaking a ram temple, why did tulsidas who lived in ayodhya with only 30 yrs gap not mention this. A thing to note is that hindus and brahmins were different and this carried on till even when dayanand saraswati,founder of arya samaj, went for case to not call them brahmins as hindus. This situation changed when phule,periyar and others awakened the depressed classes(note obcs and sc,st make 80%of indian population atleast). The brahmins thought a lot about what to do because their ground was shaking. They came up with an idea called hindu-muslim riots so that attention of these depressed classes(known as hindus) were turned superficially to muslims. The first planned hindu muslim riots happened in 1893 and as per the plan, ganesh utsav was made public and riots were planned with violence from both sides. Important to note not a single such hindu muslim riots in medieval india and suddenly they are happening. Gandhi and nehru saw through this and worked to stop this like khilafat movement to unify etc. As the british announced elections which meant representations for depressed classes too(who were called hindus by brahmins then), brahmins formed rss and hindu mahasabha, and called themselves hindus too to act as representatives of hindus( just as they acted as representatives of buddhists by becoming bamans). Partition resulted due to brahman tactics of riots and also british supported this because by then cold war had started and pakistan was made an ally of america then. Now gandhi and nehru knew that caste system(which was mixed with religion then) cannot be attacked directly so they built institutions for public like iit,aims, bpcl,ongc,hpcl,bsnl,bhel,power grid,and many many more so that depressed classes too can study, become educated and do other jobs and break varna,i.e trade by birth(the first thing that bamans did to establish caste was burn universities and this was undone by the sharp understanding of nehru). Now rss is systematically selling psus to undo this again because if 80% of the depressed classes are supressed and their reservation is taken back by selling govt psus,theyll again become uneducated and jobless and under them).Note that when gandhi came to india in 1915, only 4% of india was educated. Then when india was so poor due to british misrule that there was big shortage of grains for everyone and people had no food, india asked food grains to america which mocked saying we can only give lowest quality fooder, indira gandhi successfully headed both green revolution and white revolution. Indira Gandhi successfully led the country through cold war funded jp and khalistani movements. See that both jp movement and anna movement were so similar and rss was behind them. The purpose was these movements was to supress the depressed classes(hindus) and maintain brahmanical order. Nehru escaped assassination attempts five times. Shastriji worked tirelessly to protect the country. Indira gandhi and rajiv gandhi gave away their lives to create equal society and unite india. Now rahul gandhi doing the same through his 4000km bharat jodo yatra. See that both india and china contributed to 65%gdp of world till 12th century. India weakened after this due to caste system but both india and china contributed to 50%world gdp well into 18th century till british rule.

again fake Indian propaganda

​@@komedykingdom😅 Just watch the movie.

那是佛性。平生不修善果，只爱杀人放火。忽地顿开金绳，这里扯断玉锁。钱塘江上潮信来，今日方知我是我。

​@@Clay_Figurine_Legend_Sharewhere did he killed

Proud to be Buddhist

​@@ashok33466do u know who is the father of kalaripaatyu agustya Muni and pusurama

@@Mog801 all hindus r losers lmao😂

​@@rjclue2630 nepali are Hindus and Hindus have similar name 😂

@@DeusEstAmor________137 Hindu means rapist, fraud, thief in Persian and Arabic dictionary .

Nepal is not the centre of the Eastern world. India is the left, right and centre of the Eastern world and the birth place of Buddha.

​@@DeusEstAmor________137 Nepal was buddhist. The whole indian sub continent was. Today's situation may be different due to caste system.

​@@Vicky91-lq6yc__KhargeForPMlol adi sankara laughing in a corner

Indian people completely forget about budhism n they worship cows now they need great budhhism religon back

വിക്രം 🔥

വിക്രം ഷാവോ ലിനിൽ കുങ് ഫു പരിശീലിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട് ⚡️

Fahadh Faasil dialogue

Proud Tamilan🔥❤️

Pallu Pudungi Dynasty lost many times to Mighty Cholas and Pandyas 😂😂😂. Always Cheras, Cholas and Pandyas 🔥🔥🔥💪

@@colorparadise7075 yov nee yenna ya pallu pudingita 😂aayiram tha irundhalum namma kings ya .

​@@A_r_u_n2803Illa bro naan Tirunelveli kaaran naala Chinese la reply varum nu parten😂❤❤

@@colorparadise7075 Nakkal ya unnaku😂

We had a new version of the English subtitle which is closer to the original meaning. (Please turn on the CC subtitle)

Indian

​@@darlingsfan9482tamilan first no matter what

​@tiger1995grvr tamils were buddhists till 14th century. International universities in kanthallur,& kanchipuram were burnt/destroyed. Heuin tsang studied first at nalanda university and then came to kanchipuram university for further studies. When ibn batuta came to india, tamilnad and kerala were most beautiful places when north india was by then damaged by caste system.

@varun8695 Bodhidharma went to china, Bodhisena went to japan,Vajrabodhi and buddhadatta went to sri lanka from tamil land❤

​@@tiger1995grvr😂😂😂 Indian da pakki apram thaan on tamil uh

U should be ashamed dat u can't preserving our culture. British & Muslims destroyed our culture.

​@@PraveenKumar-kt1qrwhat hell are you blabbering moron?

Indian hindu okk

​@@darlingsfan9482no not indian hindu tamilan firstu

divide and rule@@tiger1995grvr