use calculus, not calculators

  Рет қаралды 11,732

bprp calculus basics

bprp calculus basics

Жыл бұрын

Use calculus, not calculators! Tangent line approximation (aka local linear approximation) and differential to approximate the irrational number sqrt(100.5)
Get a dx t-shirt 👉 bit.ly/dxtee
Use "WELCOME10" for 10% off
Subscribe for more precalculus & calculus tutorials 👉 #justcalculus
-------------------
If you find this channel helpful and want to support it, then you can
join the channel membership and have your name in the video descriptions:
👉bit.ly/joinjustcalculus
buy a math shirt or a hoodie (10% off with the code "WELCOME10"):
👉 bit.ly/bprp_merch
I use these markers 👉 amzn.to/3skwj1E
-------------------
😊 Thanks to all channel members 😊
Seth Morris Andrea Mele John Calculus Maths Class
---------------------------------------------------------
"Just Calculus" is dedicated to helping students who are taking precalculus, AP calculus, GCSE, A-Level, year 12 maths, college calculus, or high school calculus. Topics include functions, limits, indeterminate forms, derivatives, and their applications, integration techniques and their applications, separable differential equations, sequences, series convergence tests, power series a lot more. Feel free to leave calculus questions in the comment section and subscribe for future videos 👉 bit.ly/just_calc
---------------------------------------------------------
Best wishes to you,
#justcalculus

Пікірлер: 40
@neilgerace355
@neilgerace355 Жыл бұрын
10 ... Didn't use any calculus either :) I think that's the engineer's answer :)
@IamBATMAN13
@IamBATMAN13 Жыл бұрын
As a software engineer, I say the answer is 10.0000000023
@SbF6H
@SbF6H Жыл бұрын
@@IamBATMAN13 mfw computers are calculators
@oenrn
@oenrn Жыл бұрын
10.0 is a great approximation to 3 significant figures.
@sinpi6332
@sinpi6332 Жыл бұрын
e * e = 2e = 4
@HappyGardenOfLife
@HappyGardenOfLife Жыл бұрын
@@sinpi6332 e + e = 2e, e * e = e^2, either way everyone knows e = 3.
@aikendrum2908
@aikendrum2908 Жыл бұрын
For people who remember their Taylor series, it is very fast to factor out the 10 and use (1+x)^n ~ 1 + nx where n=1/2 and 1+x = 1.005. You can get 10 * 1.0025 = 10.025 without writing anything down. This also works for other powers, like cube roots, etc., which are of this form, and if you’ve forgotten it, the linear term in the Taylor series (or Maclaurin series if you prefer) is easy to calculate as well.
@johncrwarner
@johncrwarner Жыл бұрын
(10 + h)^2 = 100.5 100 + 20h + h^2 = 100.5 20h + h^2 = 0.5 h^2 is very small 20h ~ 0.5 h ~ 0.025 => sqrt (100.5) ~ 10.025 I remember doing this as a sort of Newtonian calculus early on in learning the calculus.
@General12th
@General12th Жыл бұрын
Matt Parker's method!
@johncrwarner
@johncrwarner Жыл бұрын
@@General12th Like all naming conventions - we tend to associate it with the person we saw it from first or the person our teacher associated it with. In my case Newton in yours Matt Parker.
@michaeledwardharris
@michaeledwardharris Жыл бұрын
Very nice. Approximation by linearization makes more intuitive sense to me, but clearly the differential method is way more awesome.
@Dissandou
@Dissandou Жыл бұрын
They’re essentially the same
@sriprasadjoshi3036
@sriprasadjoshi3036 Жыл бұрын
That intro with "Square root of 100 is NICE number " got me,..
@drawingforyou4626
@drawingforyou4626 Жыл бұрын
10.0249 to be more exact Using long division
@Misteribel
@Misteribel Жыл бұрын
Next digits are 688 (ie 10.0249882). So 10.0250 is closer to the given approximation than 10.0249. Still cool you used long division though!
@SuperYoonHo
@SuperYoonHo Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir! i knew this method from somewhere
@finmat95
@finmat95 Жыл бұрын
4m48s to do something you can do in 4s with calculator.
@carxofa1
@carxofa1 Жыл бұрын
My guess before watching: approximating via tangent lines. Let f(x)=√x. We know f(100)=10 because 10^2 = 100. f'(x) = 1/(2√x), f'(100)=1/20=0,05 which is pretty small compared to 100, so: f(100,5)≈f(100)+0,5•0,05 = 10 + 0,025 = 10,025. It should be close enough considering the f(100)/f'(100) ratio is big
@orchestrain88keys
@orchestrain88keys Жыл бұрын
Use binomial theorem.. It will be much easier and faster.
@Misteribel
@Misteribel Жыл бұрын
If it’s so fast, could you explain how?
@PalaceOfTheFree
@PalaceOfTheFree Жыл бұрын
Ten and a tiny bit. Done
@sidshobha8023
@sidshobha8023 Жыл бұрын
Using calculus gives you better understanding than using calculator...
@txkflier
@txkflier Жыл бұрын
I guessed 10.02 which is 100.4004. So I was within 0.1% using only my brain cells.
@nemesis2022pf
@nemesis2022pf Жыл бұрын
It's aproximately 10.
@OnaSoto
@OnaSoto Жыл бұрын
Do you Americans not get thought the square root extraction algorithm in school? Do they just throw you a calculator for elementary algebra?
@robertcotton8481
@robertcotton8481 Жыл бұрын
American get taught nothing
@Crackkka
@Crackkka Жыл бұрын
🤓
@sunset6958
@sunset6958 Жыл бұрын
Hmm
@jkid1134
@jkid1134 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, not standard at all here in the states. Really weird too because it's very similar to long division, which we do learn. It's the first thing I think of when I see this though. "sure, how many digits you want?" What happened over there (also where?), did they give you an algorithm and a quiz in a week, or did they explain why what you're doing works?
@OnaSoto
@OnaSoto Жыл бұрын
@@jkid1134 If you have a perfect square, then you’ll get a result part of the natural number set. If you have a square roots that yields you a irrational number, then you can just approximate with 2,3, whatever number of decimals. root 100.5 is very easy to do, I could send you a video of the algorithm we use if you would want.
@vaib223
@vaib223 Жыл бұрын
Use binomial expansion 😨
@superman00001
@superman00001 Жыл бұрын
The world’s most cumbersome lapel mike.
@abi3135
@abi3135 Жыл бұрын
I got 8030/801 ~10.02496878 using the continued fraction sqrt(1+x) ~ 1+x/(2+x/2). Checked and it's accurate upto 6 decimals
@gaurangisinghal2074
@gaurangisinghal2074 Жыл бұрын
1st comment
@Misteribel
@Misteribel Жыл бұрын
I did, from the thumbnail, √(100∙5)… ah well, learned something regardless 😅
How to linearize f(x)=x/(1+,x^2) at a=1, calculus 1 tutorial
3:19
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 3,9 М.
use calculus, NOT calculators!!
9:11
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 44 М.
لااا! هذه البرتقالة مزعجة جدًا #قصير
00:15
One More Arabic
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
How to find the maximum curvature of y=e^x
13:49
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 13 М.
1995 British Mathematics Olympiad problem
20:59
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 45 М.
why "dummy variable" of a definite integral doesn't matter
8:01
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Calculus - Deciding which integration technique to use
8:48
Matthew Danielson
Рет қаралды 6 М.
use local linear approximation, no calculator!
7:00
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 23 М.
difference between delta y and dy, calculus 1 tutorial
11:56
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Only 1 percent can solve this
5:52
MindYourDecisions
Рет қаралды 390 М.
Use calculus, NOT calculators!
9:07
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 442 М.
show that if f is even then f' is odd by using the definition of derivative
6:38
so you want a VERY HARD math question?!
13:51
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
لااا! هذه البرتقالة مزعجة جدًا #قصير
00:15
One More Arabic
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН