I'm pretty sure that shooting up a school is already illegal and that SCOTUS wholeheartedly agrees. 🤦

It effects men’s right I thought that was obvious

Democrats trying to get around the constitution. Again. All the left judges were just talking over the Idaho representatives. Get real. Understand the federal government is UNCONSTITUTIONALLY using funding to supersede state laws.

@@jacobholley6181rights of the baby take precedence over the regrets of the mother for opening her legs when she was drunk.

@@rebchizelbeak5392 Rights of fetus doesn't take presidence over the right of the woman. Why can't you guys ignore abortion, like you do school shooting???

Well said, absolutely insane.

No condition exists where your health is not in immediate jeopardy where that wouldn’t occur. Nice strawman.

@@rebchizelbeak5392 can you unpack that? I am not picking up what you’re putting down.

@@rebchizelbeak5392 I would like to see an example of the state legislature criminalizing life saving medical procedures by requiring inaction. Procedures the A.M.A. advocate for, and without which, needlessly endanger the life, health, and wellbeing. Lawmakers generally pass legislation meant to protect patients from harm, not put patients in harms way intentionally.

​@rebchizelbeak5392 it's like you immediately came to the comments without listening to the actual vid. JFC

Nobody has the right to commit murder.

​@@rickybobby7276 What if you don't want the baby anymore?

@@rickybobby7276letting the pregnant person having a medical emergency die, thus the fetus also dying, is preferred? You want 2 deaths instead of 1 and the potential of future babies?

​@@mbagirl9567 We all know that's a loophole to find a way to perform abortions by activist doctors who want to participate in murder.

@@rickybobby7276 hope this doesn’t affect any woman or girl in your life. The cases presented were women that wanted their babies, now they can no longer have children and the almost died. Is that something you would want for a loved one in your own life?

The vast majority being brain washed into arguing for the very small minority of cases and claiming that as their base argument for the large majority getting abortions due to selfish reasons (inconvenience etc)

But all five were babies, which you want to kill.

@@rebchizelbeak5392 Keep up. I bet you have no clue what EMTALA, the law being debated, does for pregnant women experiencing emergency medical crises. Or how Obamacare's Medicaid expansion, which the likes of you opposed, saved the lives of thousands of actual, born-alive babies.

@@rebchizelbeak5392That’s a false equivalency. You do know that ectopic pregnancy, ruptured uterus, preeclampsia, etc all exist. Just because they were born doesn’t negate the point that this is a slippery slope. Yes, it sucks that the fetus must be killed should a medical emergency occur but that’s for a doctor to decide.

@@Teez_well Ectopic pregnancy is a red herring. It is always fatal to the fetus, 90% of the time within the first trimester. Surgical removal of the fetus and placenta is the only treatment that can prevent serious, life-threatening risk to the mother. Interestingly, previous abortions increase the risk of ectopic pregnancy. My mother had such a pregnancy in Canada back when there was a blanket ban on abortion. The only problem she had in getting appropriate care before it was life-threatening is that multiple pregnancy tests (urine and blood) consistently came up negative. No doctor would have refused to intervene earlier had they known she had a baby in her left fallopian tube. Ruptured uterus? It typically occurs in the third trimester or during a full term attempt at vaginal labor following previous C-sections, a history of PID, or structural uterine abnormalities/defects. Or uterine scarring from previous abortions. In other words, when removal of the fetus is necessary, but the death of the fetus is not. In the first trimester, it's vanishingly rare and is associated with comorbidities that would likely cause future infertility regardless of whether an abortion is performed. Ironically, scarring from previous abortions is one of the associated comorbidities for first trimester uterine rupture. Just something to think about. Preeclampsia is typically diagnosed at about 20 weeks or later, and mild cases can usually be managed with bed rest until the pregnancy is full term. In more severe cases, medications to reduce blood pressure and prevent convulsions may be given. In the most severe cases, steroids are given to mature the fetus's lungs and the baby is delivered at or before 36 weeks. Preeclampsia is associated with first pregnancies, pregnancies following an earlier preeclamptic pregnancy, maternal age of 35 or older, obesity and assisted reproduction treatments such as IVF. There's going to be some overlap there--for instance, women over 35 are more likely to need IVF. So do women who are having fertility problems because of previous abortions. My sister in law had preeclampsia with her first pregnancy (age 35). She went on bed rest and her son was born healthy but two weeks early. She and her husband wanted two, so she lost weight, got her BP under control, and when she was 37, they tried again. This time, it was worse. Not only did she get preeclampsia even worse this time, but the baby needed surgery in utero to correct a defect in her heart. All of which would appear to be an argument for: 1) not waiting too long. It increases the risk of abortion-worthy complications 2) be healthy in general, and avoid avoidable comorbidities like obesity 3) C-sections should never be done for convenience because they can complicate future pregnancies 4) previous abortions also put you at risk of an abortion-worthy complication, so should not be done on a whim Maybe the left needs to rethink things. Give women proper information and proper advice. Don''t do shit you might regret later, whether that's getting knocked up, electively aborting for convenience, or waiting too long before you even try.

Texas fighting EMTALA as well. Women with wanted pregnancies that go wrong go into sepsis, lose their fertility, etc etc.

Florida is better. Best state in the country.

I hope you have that same energy my mother is on the news for first degree homicide of her infant..

@@supriseimblack Your point being?

@@supriseimblackbut you survived…. Somehow.

You're a "mass of cells."

@@jamapx Ohh you hurt my feeling. You are just a mass of cells too then. ☺☺

Or that there’s nothing else they could do and may lead to criminal charges or lawsuits if misdiagnosed lead to the death of the baby. Same reason why they stopped the IVF procedures in Alabama

@@jacobholley6181 your ignorance is astounding!

Its murder.

And slaves used to be property where the owners could do anything to them. Then people came to their senses and intervened.

Not when a third human being is involved.

@@rectorkirk1158so standing idly by when a woman has an ectopic pregnancy - which always results in the miscarriage of the fetus and an excruciating painful death of the mother - is perfectly ok with you.

@@rickybobby7276let’s hope people come to there senses and and overturn the ruling that stuck down roe v Wade 🙏🏽

Sit down, fanboy.

There is a difference between precedence within the courts and the position of the psych board.

@@FactsOverFear thank you, I didn’t catch that distinction in the argument.

But not the standard for stabilizing a person in a medical emergency as is required under EMTALA.

For the vast majority of abortions, this is not the case, also why ask a justice about things a doctor is supposed to know? They chose their career path and are expected to obtain the knowledge and ability to do so.

It was so very clear they were searching for a way to support Idaho's law and buying Idaho's fiction of "no daylight"

@@Yurrsawwwft it’s hard enough to make life and death decisions. I worked in labor and delivery, you have no idea how many ectopic pregnancies happen or water breaking at less than 18 weeks, and a host of other emergencies for which abortion is necessary. Hope nothing like this happens to any woman or girl, in your life. Now doctors have to fear prison to make decisions that are already difficulty enough. No one in medicine signed up for this.

@@Yurrsawwwft lawyers and politicians making medical decisions, with zero medical education.

@@mariaespiritu9512 what’s the percentage of those? And how many abortions were actually necessary? And I don’t mean the doctor thinks it was. When all other options were exhausted and abortion was all that’s left, how many? Are you in favour of abortion with the exception for those very small percentage cases?

Why? They're talking to other highly educated individuals, not the public. We just get to listen in...

Kagan was apparently suggested to the Obama administration by Justice Scalia as someone smart :)

​@ascensionblade Interesting. Apparently they became friends before he died ( even going hunting or shooting together). That's one of the things I like about her, she's willing to engage across the aisle.

Leaving statutes not statues.. 🤦🏾‍♂️

That’s oversimplifying sprinkled with circular logic ending in a complete and total misinterpretation of the law. Good job!

that's Sotomayor 😂

Jackson is the one that sounds "like" AOC also she stretches her a's like "thaaat"

If you played a drinking game where you took a sip every time she started out: "Help me understand, I'm not understanding this...." you'd be drunk inside of 20 minutes.

She doesn't care about the law. She cares about her political agenda. She is a disgrace.

@@GraceUndrFyrShe’s smarter then you’ll ever be.

He's a Patriot

Because life is important evil is murder of the the innocent.

"Evil"? Please define "evil." You mean you disagree?

@@lindaknorr9643 Stop eating meat.

@@Lychee-Nut nope

I’m pro choice through and through AND I agree, for this to be fair, both sides need to be able to speak. 🗣️

Well, if you like legislators making your medical decisions, you are pro government.

@@jacobwatson3781 I think government should stay out of medical health decisions. The government imposing your will on women’s healthcare is a pro government stance.

Since women had the right to vote the country has been in decline. You are promoting that women vote for abortion because you are irresponsible and avoid accountability.

There is a federal right to abortion under law, and the when this court rules that be sure to cry extra loud.

There is also no federal law saying you’re allowed to enforce your religious doctrine on every American either. Actually it explicitly says you CANT do that.

@@dragonflarefrog1424 really? What law would that be?

@@ASDFUIL The law in controversy here. Glad to help.

@@dragonflarefrog1424 Where does the law mention abortion?

Is it evil for a woman to desire and request abortions at least sometimes?

Can men get a financial abortion to the fetus then?

@@hollowhammer3526 It's simple. Don't put your schlong into places you don't want to be responsible for. Or wear a sleeve. Besides, men seem quite able to find all sorts of ways to not take responsibility - financial or otherwise.

If you count Barrett and Kavanaugh as "left leaning justices" 🤨

It not like a right leaning judges who have already kill woman with their rulings

That’s how appeals work. The general was cut off by crazy Republicans justices. Is that ridiculous to you too?

@@danoberste8146 Barrett and Kay let him speak. The Libs continually cut him off before he could finish the first sentence of his reply. One of the Justices (I’m guessing Roberts) even pointed it out later on. These libs are acting like it’s a hearing and they got their 5 minutes to preach. That’s shameful

@@dragonflarefrog1424 They might have been cut short but every time at least got to finish their sentences. The libs constantly asked a question then immediately cut the counselor off before he could finish a sentence. It’s a question and answer session, not a chance for the Justices just to preach their views

All the cases mentioned in this hearing was about women who WANTED to have a baby. Did you really watch it?

But look on the briefer side… your position on letting women die to save a non-viable fetus that will also die will rase widowers to an all time high. That’s what you’re going for, right?

They actually talked about it 3 separate times with different judges. Perhaps you were doing something else and listening for those specific words. Different words were used, but that was the topic. You, clearly, did not really listen to the case.

She does want answer, but his answers were bad. Typical Republican - Angry that bad answers aren’t accepted.

You think you control women .. wait till the election you’ll find out .

No not true. She gets the line of reasoning. Orals are not meant for complete sentences

I'm pro choice and I had the same reaction. I want to understand. I thoight there were some good questions but what do you learn without answers? I appreciated the one judge who said "Let him anwer!" And the other judge who said "I'd like to hear your answer to that question." I also detest when someone demands a "yes or no" to a question that has an answer needing explanation. "Are you still beating your wife, yes or no?!" What does a person who never beat their wife answer?

Cry more.

GOD IS TRUTH

@@milicadjukich4416 God is imaginary.

Do you love Filipino Truth Social bots? Vote republican 2025!

Which God are you referring to. The black God.?

@@LauraPfeiff TRUTH SOCIAL is Hardline Revolution !!🔥🔥 I Love It.

How so?

When the Idaho lawyer was asked what would happen if one doctor decided that the abortion was necessary but another doctor later said different, the lawyer admitted that a prosecutor could make the decision to file charges against the doctor. You better hope nothing happens to any woman you care about in a state with these laws. How can a doctor make sound decisions if he’s worried he’d be sent to prison for making that decision?

So you do know that is a DC lawyer arguing on behalf of the Idaho AG’s office? No Idaho lawyers are actually arguing this case.

Which is why voting whould be limited to folks with intelligence.

No man, that's how Chinese parents name bebbes, 'cept it's silverware they throw. :D

Which lawyer? SCOTUS is accusing who of what? Which Justice sre you referring to? Be specific rather than use overly broad derp accusatory language that says effing nothing. I don't mind bots. I mind ignorant people trying to join the intellectual fray with just their ignorance.😊

​@christianhorlikc5441 so you're a bot? This video doesn't say the name of the person representing the state of Idaho so you're request is in reasonable and if you listen you'd know what I was taking about so I don't mind questions and requests for specifics but I'm not doing research for your questions that don't even matter to the point of you just listen.

@@huzzindaable Let's make it easier for you. Is it the first lawyer or the second lawyer? You wrote something exceptionally vague while simultaneously criticizing SCOTUS. Then you couldn't even bother taking an actual position. That's what makes you grotesquely ignorant. You judged all of SCOTUS w/o representing one side or the other. FYI, Justices generally stop lawyers from talking when they either establish a position or fail at establishing a position. You're self-important enough to criticize SCOTUS but you're just too slow to follow what's going on.

@christianhorlikc5441 If you can't tell who the lawyer for Idaho is, maybe just stop trying.

@huzzindaable You still don't get it. Lawyers for either side are routinely "interrupted" by any of the Justices when they can't answer the Justice's question logically OR they have already addressed the question and are still speaking pointlesslly. What you wrote originally can easily be applied to the government's lawyer. Your derp opinion literally can be applied to every lawyer who has ever argued in front of SCOTUS. JFC. Again, I don't mind that you didn't know any better. That ignorance is no longer an excuse. And you going to that ignorance obstinately trying to discredit something. When you wonder why certain people condescend to you, it's cuz you're purposefully derp to promote a political hack point. Congrats.

Where did you get your info. Re: Republicans?

And if you're middle class and want to be poor vote Democrat 2024.

@@brendahogan5779 it’s what we vote for. We’re American first, Unless… It’s welfare. Criminalizing homelessness. Wic. Social security. Medicare. We hate unions and love at will employment even though it takes all of the power away from the workers. We hate regulations even though they protect our communities and the middle/lower class wage workers. Any time the middle class gets something from their taxes we call it socialism yet we run to bailout billion dollar corporations with the very same tax dollars without batting an eye. In other words, both parties want to capitalize the gains and socialize the losses, but republicans take it to a completely different level in terms of screwing us over lately.

Ha ha ha ha. I guess others didn't get your humor, but I did!

@@jehovahsthickness6242 Boy so much wrong with what you posted so lets start from the top, I have no problem with helping those out who need it when they hit a bad spell in life but I am entirely against welfare as your occupation. If you can walk and talk then you can work. Social security is fine as is medicare other than the fact that we allow to many people to use these programs who dont need to and they have overloaded the system bankrupting them. Entitlement programs make up the lion share of federal spending followed by defense and now the interest on our debt. Our forefathers never intended for the federal government to be your caretaker, to them that would have been the opposite of freedom. Unions kill jobs period, need proof see Detroit. UNNECESSARY Regulations kill jobs and there are scores of them. If it isnt a regulation that promotes safety for the worker or customer/population then it shouldnt be on the books. Those unnecessary regulations are what has caused our Federal Government bureaucracy to swell to the bloated pig it is today. The federal government should never be the largest employer in the nation. They are inefficient and cost the taxpayer more than if you let the private sector do it. Now onto taxes, your dollar is taxed so many times its absurd, it should be the goal of a free society to pay as little in taxes as you can, you pay payroll tax, ssi tax, income tax, gasoline tax, retail tax and on and on all on the same dollar. That should piss anyone off who isnt being a leech off the system. True conservatives are for as little government in your lives as possible and keeping as much of your money as possible. We are 35 trillion in debt and teetering on the precipice hyperinflation. The unchecked spending cant go on forever and if I had to bet youll see it come home to roost within 5 years, When it does I would not want to be in the United States because its going to get real ugly.

You are trolling

@@techsavvy2887 I don’t talk to deep state Rinos!

Do you really not know when the national election is? It is November 2024.

@@thomassenbart when is the transfer of power?

@@jehovahsthickness6242 Jan 1 is the transfer of power but you said vote/election 2025. Do you understand the difference? There is no vote in 2025.