I claim I saw it

I mean technically it’s ain’t wrong

New opening just dropped

Finally succumbing to the click bait titles😩

It’s still India

and yet.. they hang on till the endgame somehow... because they definitely are thinking of all these things a GM can think of.. lol. Also if you look at his acc he has been steadily climbing nonstop with only 230 games, new acc from April.. He's almost 2100 now, he's really good! xD He plays amazing moves in time pressure then suddenly blunders.. obvious

@@OArchivesX Is it really healthy to be so suspicious? It's not like it's going to help your own play. I don't think this game was very suspicious. Sometimes some strong players lose an email and start a new account, for example, and grind quickly up the ranks.

@@marcofrey2903 lol, to be naive.. sorry but it's clear, for reasons already listed. Doesn't matter to me, just pointing it out. Red flags all the way bud. If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, it's probably a duck. They, a rando non-title player happens to be against a GM and play as accurately as any other game against other 2000s? "Sometimes they lose an email" LOL what? when has that happened? How do you lose an email? Just silly. strangely happens a lot to Danya! if you know how GMs are, they can literally adopt IMs. Let alone someone several tiers below them. And this "smurf" had winning chances ... in an endgame. When Danya plays against a viewer who is also 2000, it's night and day difference.

Danya is post graduate student right ?

@@OArchivesX Id rather assume the best and seem naive than be paranoid due to a lack of understanding of the game. Because thats whats happening logically your thinking theres no way this guy takes Danya to an endgame but the dudes a very high rating and alot of whites moves were forced. If your not at least 1800 u have no god damn clue whats going on in regards to whos cheating or not. Danya isnt being humble when he says hes unsure if someones cheating hes just smarter than you and knows its very possible a 2000 rated player can play a good game.

He had an authentic grunfeld before this game but it randomly resigned him in the middle for some reason so hes not uploading it. Opening's cursed.

*India

You mean Naroditsky’s King’s India vid

@@victorkao1472 Oh grammarly Victor ..

@@raymondlego1701 huh?

@@raymondlego1701 wat

@@raymondlego1701 ?

The kings Indian is a great opening, however, Daniel is not playing it.... This is the kings India opening. Don't worry too much it's a rookie mistake confusing the two!

​@@Simon-zv9sv what a masterful comment good sir

xD​@@Simon-zv9sv

I'm absolutely sure that he will make it, especially after the success of his most recent course. But I'm also sure that it will be a LOT of work, considering the number of important variations and also the amount of analysis already spent on the system.

Yea, the question is what he would recomend against Be2 0-0. I think playing mainline bayonet doesn't make sense anymore as the lines are so deeply analyzed + white has option of dxe and goodbye winning chances. Gawain gives Nbd7 e5 Qe7 which is probably reasonable, it's kind of trendy now (check out great game Yordanov-Ponomariov from this years european championship). I'd love a course about Na6 though, there is rarely some content about that and I think the line has big potential. Danya has played it many times also.

@@michamotyka648 I personally really like Gawains take on the Nbd7, but there are some problem lines though if the oponent knows what to do. The Ernst improvement for example is apparently like +1.5 for white. And I really agree that going into the all the Mar del Plata stuff with the Bayonett probably isn't wise these days, unless your willing to go to extreme lengths in your preparation. I've not really looked at Na6 in that position, to me it feels a bit wierd since you often want to play a5 to prevent b4 before the knight goes to c5. But this isn't possible with the knight on a6. But I see that even Ding has played it against Carlsen so it has to have some points that I just don't understand yet. Thanks for the game suggestion, I'll check it out!

Is learning theory that important? I’m only 600 and I’m trying to figure out where to start

@@baconbitz7804 At 600 absolutely not! You should be focusing on full board awareness, basic tactics and not blundering pieces. Choose an opening system for white and one for black and learn the very first moves and ideas by looking at youtube videos for both. Don't go deeper than move 4 or 5. It's more about learning to develop your pieces reasonably and letting your oponent make mistakes. Once you hit 12-1300 you might find that players stop blundering completely obvious tactics. But I mean Hikaru says tactics can still take you to 2500, so they should always be your first focus. There is an age old saying: Strategy sets the game, Tactics ends the game. A very strong opening reportoire will eventually maybe give you consistently +1.5-+2 advantages into the middle game, but a winning tactic will win or lose you +5 in any part of the game. However at some point that varies from player to player you may find that you get bad positions early without blundering something obvious, and that your opponents just plays a lot quicker and seems to know what to do. For me this was around 1600. At that point I got some chess books and chessable courses and decided on what ideas and philosofies resonated with my playing style and I've been building my reportoire based on the Modern Tiger and the King's Indian since then and it's nowhere near done. And that's it for me; 2 openings basically make up my entire reportoire. Lichess has some really cool tools that let's you analyse your perfromance based on openings, and it's striking how in my most prepared lines I perform almost 200 rating points higher than the others. At 2100, 200 rating points improvement are pretty hard to find (atleast for me). At 600 though you can find hundreds of rating points by improving your understanding of pretty much any part of the game.

P.S. not everything can be distributing the covid vaccine, so let’s cut the medicine some slack.

What are you smoking?

😂😂Someone needs to create a dictionary or something with all Danya's expressions..

​​​@@SuperYtc1yeah, I agree, the medicine needs to gain some potential energy and remember, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs! 😂 Edit: grammar

@@nellanina992 this is gold 😂😂

Yeah same goes to the catalan even danya says its incredibly complex and only did it once(i think?) in his speedrun but I play it as white and it leads me to great position especially if the opponent doesnt know theory (Im 1600). Would like to see Catalan, nimzo and ruy lopez once in a while.

Well this speed run is mainly to teach principle ideas. The problem with open siciliana and Ruy Lopez openings is that there are 8 moves in any given position that are legit ideas. This combination of openings have been amazing because you are prepared against anything! I dont know your strenght but if you are newer focus on these openings before those critical main lines because you will literally miss 90% of the ideas in the positions. GL!

i really want to see Ruy Lopez be played since i main it in my bullet games as a 700 elo, i just find it fun not that i win with it alot

It's impoasible to do in a speedrun up to 2200 rating. People play mostly offbeat openings in that range.

I’m not the only one who searches that!

Every GM plays different versions. I think there was a SR game in the alapin where i always play a Queen a5 line. This man played another version and i was freaking out! XD. I guess thats what makes gm’s so special.

Yes, as playing 3 Bg7 4e4 prevents 4..c6 5.. d5 so if you want to play slav style, you should play c6 first

You can play like that, but the problem is basically when white plays cxd5 black has zero winning chances. It's basically some sort of symmetrical gruenfeld where white has tempo up. I don't think it makes sense if you are real kings indian player and looking for unbalance

Pirc 😐😐

Focus on the acquisition of capital

2000 elo is well above amateur

Amateur stops at like 1400

That's told to players below 1000, 1300 at most. Also, it depends on how far you want to study openings. Also, many of these moves are natural moves that you can find without knowing them in advance. Also, you can learn opening theory by studying your own games with an engine instead of explicitly studying openings.

Lmao I'm 2k and barely know any accurate lines, more a mix of different lines. So whenever you see a 2k player match Danya's 20 years of experience and 3k elo...yeah ;) Also 2k online is 1600 FIDE, which is the starting point for competitive chess...A CM could be defined as the line where amateurs become serious chess players. Just because 95% of the people are bad doesn't mean the lowest tier of the remaining 5% is suddenly pro.

Every game is a banger with KID at that level it’s crazy - and to think it’s fallen out of fashion (at top level)

Yeah its kinda confusing but i think he means that after fxe5 you play Nxe4 like what happend in the game and is the same position tacticaly. If you go for the rook then you loose a piece.

Late, but in case you haven't found it yet: Gawain Jones is the author

Me too, it was creepy. I think that was some technical issue, at least I hope so 😂.