How very true

He also said the truth needs to guarded by lies.

Boris ain't no Churchill, he has been taking dirty Russian money for years.

UK returning the favor 👍

Zelenskyy is far more churchillian than our sorry blonde clown. 🙌🏻🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

my theory is not to become involved. but if we do, they need to arm taiwan now and not wait like they did with the ukraine. america is always sticking their nose in everyones business. we fought two WORLD WARS in that same part of the world and it seems to never end. this could cause WW3 and the end of civilization and the planet.............and for what ?

Taiwan's situation is totally different to Ukraine's situation. The USA has already given/ sold Taiwan a lot of homing torpedoes and anti-ship missiles.

Ukraine is not saving Europe you loon

​@@willw8011 Taiwan has a huge infiltration problem, dependence, embargo and lack of allies issue. There are CCP agents, triads in many places. They also don't have civilian firearm ownership. Their national service is only 4months. Their reserves are low readiness. If the CCP makes it to land after a successful missile bombardment, Taipei may have to sue for peace.

@John Grigg CCP right now is having to deploy domestically at the moment to quell unrest.

Nobody cared about Ukraine until its invaded. They are using Ukraine as Vietnam to Russia.

Is this some joke? What the???

@@bmw318iyu It’s a well known fact that when it comes to specialised weapon platforms, the British are top of their game. The UK are masters at developing specialist tech. What they may lack in numbers they retain in sophistication, quality and engineering genius. After all, the British develop jet engines used by the US military and the M1 Abrams tank armour - a British derivative.

I hope that's true and even if it isn't it made me smile. Wonder if they say 'Up your trump' with american lethal aid?

and her fachist regime

@@jebise1126 in Ukrainian your nickname is “f..k y...self”, and its not a joke

@@jebise1126 I mean, the UK government isn't great (and because I live in a free and non-facist UK, I can actually say that) but calling them facists when the ruzzians are frog marching around Europe is a bit much... Also saying up your trump is definitely something that should be being said in the direction of ruzzian warships more, it worked last time :D.

@@jebise1126 I was waiting for a Sexpistols reference 😄

Not United Kingdom, England, they love wars

@@user-gh3mq3er3q When Putin arrests the last general that gives him "bad news", yup. Nothing. Luckily for the Kremlin they don't bring back the dead bodies either so they don't have pay out those wives waiting for their "brave soldiers" to take that final bath and cash in.

I hate to point out the obvious but were not supposed to be excited about weapons to kill… You've been brainwashed every single time you see stuff like this… One day one of these missiles will be heading your direction hey there is a chance more likely atomic bombs but you never know. KZfaq and all the media keep showing people rockets missiles and death were just going to think it's normal a way of life

@@jeffrenman4146 That's only obvious if there isn't an evil empire that's trying to impose its autocracy on you via violence and death. When that happens you better have some really good defenses to fall back on to prevent your freedom from being seized by those who hate it. If you want to be a slave to tyranny, that's your choice.

@@PrimarchX sad but agree

its over kill and not needed. Western countries have huge numbers of Harpoon that they will discontinue soon and thats much better. You dont have to worry about money then and can fire a saturation attack at a russian ship and waste 10 missles if you have too knowing over half will get shot down . Just give Ukraine large numbers of Harpoon

With an appropriate name for a weapon being used against a godless army

It should all go to Ukraine to rebuild and protect her country, The west will never give it back to Russia , not in my lifetime 👍🇺🇦🇺🇦

Because that is money for Russia's creditors not Ukraine*

@@yt45204 The creditors will probably sue their western governments to get their money back that was seized. Even if Russia* "defaults" by paying in rubles borrowing will just be more difficult in the future, nothing terrible will happen to Russia; Greece defaulted on their debts at least 4 times in their past and they are still around.

@@yt45204 Yes but that Russian* money is money that would have been paid to creditors anyway. Creditors want the money in $ but if Russia* can't pay in that currency as the sanctions hit their central bank that was helping to pay off their debts via JPMorgan; the Russians* will tell the creditors to take it up with the US government if they don't want to take rubles and buy dollars on the open market. And what are the creditors going to take from Russia* anyway as collateral, the sanctions prevent them doing transactions involving Russian assets openly. That's why it's a "default" with quotation marks; Russia* has the money to pay off its debts but it has been hindered in doing so, it's not like Sri Lanka who literally does not have any money and needs to grovel to the IMF.

I match Satan II; it's part of the epic lineup, I suppose.

Brimstone is closer to the Maverick in terms of range.

uk :)

That's true, the Brimstone is just a copy of our US hellfire missile. If you compare them, you can't tell the difference. They did the same thing with our SRAW fgm-172 developed back in the 1980's. They copied it and call it the NLAW. Practically every weapon they have is a copy of a US weapon.

@@captainamerica9028 just like in 47 then when you copied, stole our Mach 1 research and made it out you did it yourselves. Sounds a bit familiar 🤔

Good then

@Michael Pezzullo Yes

@Michael Pezzullo it has the same capabilities as the Hellfire.

Just what Russian tank crews want to hear 😂

Ukrainian farmers revving up their tractors in anticipation 😀

Just don't buy a land rover ....or any rover

lol, you are deluded.

@@jackd1582 ha ha, oh yes, there are exceptions my good chap! And rest assured I have absolutely no intention of buying a British motor!

@@jf7243 :d . Yep with these oilprices ..can't have it leaking out every gasket n oriface . I was dead set on a range rover and wire spoked MG ..once upon a time haha. But Lucky I didn't go BMW either

Oil leak . More referencing MG

Because Boris and chums know it is the only way to try and slither out of the mess they are in here in their own country.

I no longer believe that I'm the most naive person in the world, now that I've read this.

@Mohsin Khan It’s not a club for dictators sorry. That said I wonder why Turkey is still a member

@Mohsin Khan yea right.

Missles don't bring peace you nutjob 😂😂

United kingdom. Not England

@@TheLewisLegend you are correct, my mistake. That's why I said "I don't know much about military" 🤣

Zelenskyy will be selling these on ebay

@@TheLewisLegend Yes we are a union of cousins.

Excellent.. Timor Leste sends ..2000 fighter jet to Ukraine 👏👏😁

The one advantage of arming jet fighters with these missiles is that they can carry them much longer distances, and so take the fight to the enemy.

A land launched missile would likely have a shorter range, lacking the boost from the jets speed & altitude. It would also be easier to hide from using terrain, when launched from the ground.

They don't need guiding after launch, they have a millimetric radar and the intelligence to identify the right target from a group and attack it. The first test of this seeker took out the correct tank in a line of tanks, APCs, and trucks. It ignored the trucks and APCs and hit the tank it was set for. These are smart weapons.

@@saturn5mtw567 I misread that as _hand launched_ for a moment 😆

we should've given them those migs and everything else they needed long ago

Seeing as Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe, I'd be worried about sending them weapons such as these. Undoubtedly some will be sold to Russia and China.

@@chemistryofquestionablequa6252 sure dude keep thinking that

@@lordraydens I will. How do you think Zelensky became so rich, from acting and comedy? And all the money laundering and influence peddling by people like Hunter and Joe Biden...

@@chemistryofquestionablequa6252 bidens get rent-free room in your head. nevermind putin and all his oligarchs tho

The amount of kit the ruskies have already picked up,if they send this stuff,it will be picked up too,

@@Rasmajnoon that is a huge worry. That’s why I’m so surprised they’re sending them. I’ve seen what these missiles can do, if they are land launched they would decimate any landing crafts before they get anywhere near the shore. Maybe they’re hoping just the threat of them possibly being there would be enough to deter them.

@@oldgreggscreamybaileys6618 i dont believe the aarming of ukraine wil help the civilians it is already a shambles with corruption,money laundering etc ,ytake a peep at oliver stones two documentaries,ukraine on fire,also alex christoforou,the duran,scott ritter,eye opening

lol

All HAIL Bandera or die underneath his boot.

Still you flunk in fluent Ukrainian, wee lad. Build an Orthodox church.

Nonsense, as Sun Tsu says: "If a battle cannot be won, do not fight it." Great Britain is doing exactly what it did in 1914. We've learnt nothing.

I think one is correct John.

Slava Ukraini. 💛💙

@@johnbobson1557 And what does that quote have to do with Ukraine? You're not making sense.

@@johnbobson1557 I'd say we are doing exactly what we did in WW2 and we've learnt nothing. Except in 2022 we have hundreds of Neville Chamberlains instead of just one.

I doubt it will be air launched, it will not have been certified for their aircraft.

@@bobthebomb1596 Then we should give Ukraine advanced western-designed planes.

@@menna7927 It would take a long time to train them on new different fighter jets. Many months, apparently. Fighter jets are very complicated.

@@menna7927 Which their pilots are not trained to fly, let alone fight with.

@@menna7927 fool

Probably loaded with stuff. Take a look at existing clips on YT of it hitting things like trucks, speedboats etc & it will show little to no collateral damage.

You're right. Are you volunteering to run up to that truck with a sledgehammer and break it into bits? Thought not.

@JZ's Best Friend Ya know what's worth more than a million pounds??? One's life and freedom. Ask all the dead Ukrainians and those sent to Siberia. I think JZ needs a better friend.

The footage came from a video of a Brimstone hitting a Vehicle Borne IED, a truck packed with explosives.

Good point. If we do the no-fly zone over Moldova before Russia attacks, then it would provide a massive deterrent.

Moldova should be more concerned about invasion from Ukraine rather than from Russia. It looks like Ukraine wants to capture ammo depot in Transnistria, which is officially part of Moldova.

Brimstone is many things, but it’s not the hand of God, so no it won’t take out the bridge.

No, the Brimstone is on par with the Hellfire. Taking out bridges requires tomahawks or JDAMS.

@@achosenman9376 OK. Thank you for the answer.

Bridge should have been Demo’d day one .

@@roceye OK. Thank you for the answer. I hope Tomahawks and JDAMS will be sent to Ukraine then.

Why would they mention it?

@@ellenfaulkner7616 because they were saying they'd have to start from scratch to develop a ground launch system

I had no idea that Ukraine has Tornado or Eurofighter jets. Wait, they don't. How are they supposed to use this?

You mean Tocha, that Ukrops fire at civilians.

@@ed1998 the 'Tonka' is the nickname given to the Pavania Tornado in UK service, the people firing at civilians are most definitely Russian troops.

@@David-tm4yj You believe what BBC and CNN tell you. You think Azov battalion are good guys who don't use civilians as shield. You think the Ukraine are winning. You think the Ukraine has never shelled the Donbass since 2014. You think 2014 Maidan was organic and not funded by Obama. You support the current thing. You are an idiot.

@Sign In My bad, they come on a TER. So for every hard point you get 3 Brimstone missiles.

Its possible that he knows and don't care about how many who dies. It is also possible that he don't really knows how to get out of this mess he have caused for himself. A wise leader would have pulled out and cut the losses, and hoped western sanctions would end as soon as possible. But Putin seems afraid of losing. The idiot is doubling down. He take the forces that remains and regroup them to Donbass. And gather some extra forces (reservists) and throw them into battle. Maybe he gamble and hope he wins. Personally I think everything about this was has been a mess for Russias part. If this war continue as before then Russia will soon run out of tanks a few months from now.

Lies. The war in Ukraine is between Russia troops and NATO fighters.

@@Kingdom-cg6bm You are a liar and a Nato troll and a USA puppet. There is NO WAR in Ukraine.

I think most Russians are unaware that the worst times are still a few years ahead. The stabilization of the Ruble has given false hope to many Russians that they've survived the worst part of the economic damage. Hyperinflation is coming for Russia

@@sunnydisinfectant which rubles stabilize lol ? it is set by the soviet price - no market price lol like it used to be in communism - nothing different. you can not buy dolars in soviet with the price . do you know what is dolar street price in russia ?( illegal- legal is forbidden) 1 dolar costs 350 rubles to 400 rubles - that is real market price and not what putin writes for national bank lol

Best way to keep them out of Russia's hands is to detonate them on Russian targets 😉

No they haven't, only empty NLAW and AT4 which are one use only that they are parading on their TV

@@stoprussia979 Early days of the war one was shown to be captured in a small bunker they have almost certainly been captured

But Nlawe and Javelins that exactly that porpouse, fire and forget. Its not issue to let them into the hands of the other side

@@HeadhuntexGamer And as my comment states im more worried about brimstone falling into their hands because its got some serious tech for its seeker .

All jokes aside NO its very dangerous, ukraine doesnt need it honestly its too advanced and there are huge stockpiles of other older missles. Harpoon is much better anyway it has a longer range and bigger warhead, you can fire many and dont need to worry about the cost as much as many countries will phase it out by 2030. If brimstrone falls into russia hands they will give it to north korea and china who will try to copy it just like they copy everything else. There will be russian spys all over ukraine its far too dangerous to risk that

Well it depends on what parameters you go by?natos air superiority fighting goat herders in the middle east?or natos ability to take on eastern europeans,theres a huge difference and all this garbage about russia doesnt have a clue to hi tech weaponry ,watch the next two weeks!watch scott ritter and colonel macgregor for a more realistic overview

Look at Mariupol and ask yourself how a poor military beat up the best of the Ukraine fighters and NATO special forces there😂😆🤣😭👻

@@alberthenriette8976 15000 troops vs 3500, fighting close to Russia They should've taken it in days, not months. Russia has had terrible performance and every time someone denies it and pretends Russia is destroying not just Ukraine but NATO, there is little to do but laugh

@@alberthenriette8976 ooo a liar.

I guess it makes sense, if you had super pinpoint accurate data it would be easier to engineer countermeasures or figure out how to stay just out of range

yep, it's usually not a great idea to give away operational capabilities, or requirements ^^

I doubt that. Judging just by the size of the missile, there is no way it has that much fuel. Not even 37 kilometers (assuming it was a typo) let alone miles.

That's air launched from a great height that makes all the difference with range. Ground launched would be significantly shorter range

It is generally excerpted that the brimstone and brimstone 2 go 20 miles ,32 kilometres the ship launchers like it said is a veriant and is much larger to take out ships not tanks and goes further as it's more of cruise missile size , the new veriant the sea hawk I think ( who knows but it needs testing 🤔

That's about the same range as the German Howitzers they're getting.

@@ricardosmythe2548 Ah, I see! Air launch.

Moot point Russia got hipersonics

@@saulpizarro4684 So has the West, do keep up, Hypersonics (note how to spell it correctly) don't mean diddly squat, it's a host of other things that will make them special.

Just imagine how wonderful a world would be without homo sapiens ruining it for all other species.

No worries. Russia will get them. Right up their ...

@@bipl8989 hope so. 👍💪

🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺

@@bodarkghost1864 🇬🇧🇱🇷🇸🇯🇺🇸🇸🇪🇮🇹🇩🇪🇨🇰🇺🇦, and I've missed a few careful what you wish for 💪💪💪

Oh great more weapons to exterminate each other. How about sending food and medicine, or how about you let them sit at the table and leave them alone to negotiate some kind of deal? These buffoons here think those missiles are free but they don't know that once you let a Brit set foot on your soil, chances are he probably planted his flag. Ukrainians will be paying for those weapons with interest, while UK and US exploit Ukraine resources for centuries to come. And this is the reason why they installed this guy Zelensky. The guy is a complete joke with zero experience in politics and diplomacy, they are manipulating him on every level. His entire cabinet is comprised of some comedy production team he used to be part of. A total buffoon, he might as well put a for sale sign because that's what he's doing, he's literally selling Ukraine.

plus Harpoons.

@UNEDITED Moskva and Saratov aren't going to try anytime soon.

@UNEDITED How old was Saratov? And what is a Russian landing ship doing on fire and joining Moskva as now twin reefs?

Just wait for one of Russia’s landing ships to open its bow doors, then target both of them inside whilst shouting ‘in coming’ to the Russia’s, L🤣L

@UNEDITED They didn´t need any special weapon to defeat you guys in the battle for Kyiv.

First was in development in late 90's - and was fitted to bombs. Since I left in 2003 I was unaware it is now fitted to a missile.

@@Sgt_Bill_T_Co , you’re thinking of Paveway perhaps. Brimstone is the actual missile

@@64mickh I'd worked on Dart at BO - so not actually Brimstone. :).

No duds this the best

I don't think U.K. is sending these yet, only if Russia tries a sea invasion. Last I heard was they were training Urkaine how to use for now. It's a very classified warhead

Surely a device could be added to self destruct upon motion stopped, once it had been set, on firing.

@@royhenderson9826 it has a advanced "self destruct" option. These can be controller operated. It's a very advanced system, I believe U.S and U.K worked on this together

Well it's kind of in the national interest to be able to make some stuff in your own shop, right.

@@bipl8989 Yes, but sometimes you just take the best available and its from an ally, that is in a National interest too.

@@bipl8989 It's called license-built.

We have the Hellfire we don’t need the Brimstone also the SDB2 or Stormbreaker. It would be pointed to buy 2 of the same product

WAS THAT PART OF THE TANK BREAKER PROGRAM?

Yes I would have thought detonate a short time after motion stops, after being fired.

The video literally says they self destruct if they don't find their target

@@redrock425 i dont think anyone is going to capture them after theyve been fired... use your brain

I'm upvoting this, but only because of your nickname.

'Turkiye'

@@andriandrason1318 One person's Turkey is another person', Turkiye. "A rose by any other name still smelleth sweetly.' I suppose.

They need to send at least a 1000 switch blade. 600 to Ukraine to target the Russian artillery all over the Ukraine. The Russians rely on their artillery in a big way bombarding before they move forward. Switch blades can deal with the artillery and Javelins plus NLAW to deal with the armour they will be able to inflict huge damage on the Russians and blunt their attacks

Sounds good. I hope Ukraine gets Tomahawks then.

nah tb2 does the same job (4 times better actually) for less than 1m usd

@@loremipsum3147 Please troll someone else thanks.

@@ThatCarGuy lol sure bro I'm a troll I'm a bot actually

That car guy, you're right, those tommyhawks would take out those ships. I don't know if the military would give another country tommyhawks though, because they would fear one of them ending up in the hands of Russia or China, and they could copy it. One of our drones was shot down over Iran, and China bought it from them and copied it. I recently saw a video of a Chinese military parade and they had one of our Reaper drone copies on a flatbed trailer. They also had identical copies of our Hummer jeeps that we are replacing. Basically everything in their parade was a copy of our US weapons.

Hi I totally agree, was cringing each time I hear what weapons and help are being given to Ukraine but then I started being cynical and thinking that information is being released intentionally. Tell everyone the UK is sending thousands of starstreak missiles then send a handful and if you're lucky you've got a no fly zone without doing anything.

All this info is carefully vetted,Can't you see the value in broadcasting this? We told the Russians they were morons to invade, did that work, did they listen? They've had 60 years to stop the corruption and reorganize their military like UK or US did they or did thy just keep stealing?

Loose lips sink ships! Tanks too! 😂👍🇺🇦

Russian satellites can see every inch of it. Nobody needs these videos.

@@dmitriyfolomeev5020 I would respectfully suggest that most people enjoy watching these videos, especially when the tanks pop their turrets and three or four Russian crew are instantaneously painlessly cremated!👍🇺🇦

Zelenskyy hasn't received or stockpiling weapons, there can't be a system where all, or any weapons sent by the 27 different countries can directly be used

Israel? Moral compass? Child genital mutilation? Racism?

More is better, better is more These enable Ukraine to further utilise their own anti-Ship missiles whilst retaining operational ability to punish a Russian landing attempt with shorter range UK/other anti-ship missiles

Those are cruise missiles with jet engines, not rockets, so they can be shot down. And they can’t rise up and strike near vertically from above, AFAIK. And they don’t have a guidance system that’s as precise and as good at hitting moving targets, I suspect.

1.Neptune is a sea skimming anti ship missile. It isn't built for land targets 2. How is Britain going to send Iron Dome when it's an Israeli weapon?

I'd rate it as a bit more than OK, it's done stunningly well.

Did you not read the article?

@@ellenfaulkner7616 did you not watch the video?

problem is their facilities are getting destroyed, by us supplying them they have a steady supply and can focus on defense and attack without manufacturing being in there. Plus it allows us to show Russia what they are up against when the real professionals use such weapons.

Could also be stock rotation same as the supermarket. . .putting yesterday's bread out front

Exactly. We don't want any more torpedoes ending up on Sandwich golf course, do we.

Na, the industry are lapping it up. Look at them share prices rocket

putin asked for it

Brimstone was tested in combat in 2010 so what is your point exactly? Talking rubbish.

@@biddyboy1570 in modern warfare ?

They knew: Russian strategy is based on executing unpredictably stupid moves to confuse and disorganize the enemy 😄

@UNEDITED Everything is a hypersonic missile if you launch it straight up and let it fall down. The Kinzal is a normal ICBM with some maneuverability once it reenters the atmosphere. An actual hypersonic missile uses the air in front of it to ignite fuel, similar to a fighter jet. Russia does not have this technology ready.

@UNEDITED We smoke that Moskva pack, you heard. Forever getting high on dead russian soilders, sunflowers forever lil nerd.

@UNEDITED have you found your white stick yet.

? The hellfire is likely the most accurate missile in the world, hence having the AGM-114R9X version which is the bladed version that literally chops it's enemy to death and is used on single person assassinations, like how the US got Soleimani among others. "The Hellfire R9X is a Hellfire variant with a kinetic warhead with pop-out blades instead of explosives, used against specific human targets; its lethality is due to 45 kg (100 lb) of dense material with six blades flying at high speed, to crush and slice the targeted person-it has been called the Ninja bomb and the Flying Ginsu. It is intended to reduce collateral damage when targeting specific people. Deployed in secret in 2017, its existence has been public since 2019. This variant was used in the killings of Jamal Ahmad Mohammad Al Badawi, accused mastermind of the 2000 USS Cole bombing, and Abu Khayr al-Masri, a member of Al-Qaeda's leadership"

@@ThatCarGuy If it is used for single person assassinations then how come they murdered so many innocents when they assassinated Soleimani. Their only crime being to stand near him.

​@@ABC1701A It didn't kill any innocents... It literally has no explosives as proven above... Hence why all the pictures of his body he was chopped up... Not burnt and blackened like we see in Ukraine. Rather sad to see someone stick up for terrorists though.

@@ThatCarGuy So the unarmed drone chopped up not only his body and also those of the other nine innocent civilians murdered along with him. A murder that was in violation of international law incidentally. US and Russia, two sides of the same nasty coin.

@@ABC1701A " So the unarmed drone" What? Blocked. Im either dealing with a troll or someone who can't read. I never said that.

Great missiles to compeliment each other.

@SplurbBat I have no problem with us paying to help the Ukrainians, I just want to be sure that the money is not coming from the defence budget.

@SplurbBat Yawn.

I think you will discover that the printing presses are working overtime churning out the pound notes. It's almost certainly the treasury that's paying for most of this. But that does mean you and me through taxation and a devalued currency.

@@MrBlaxjax I know we will pay either way, that's not my concern. My concern is that money is not taken from the defence budget.