Archie and Lily are now titled prince and princess. Case close regarding Meghan’s claims regarding royal racism and this proves her lies in the OW interview. In addition Harry stated this in Tom Bradby interview “Right, wouldn’t you describe that as essentially racist?” Tom asked referring to Meghan's mention of the royal family member asking for Archie's skin colour, to which Harry said, “I wouldn’t, not having lived within that family.” Harry said so himself that the royal family is not racist and in OW interview, both Meghan and Harry stated that the conversation was with Harry and NOT Meghan regarding Archie's skin colour. Harry should know if that conversation was racially motivated or not. Both Meghan and Harry have been proven to tell lies repeated over the past few years and they have no credibility. There was a very serious accusation of racist comment allegedly made by one of the royal family member during OW interview but my problem with her accusation was the vagueness of her accusation without context of the conversation or naming of the specific perpetrator noted in the accusation. For example, a mixed race family often will speculate on the hair colour, skin colour, the eye colour of the baby without any sinister intent. Speculating the skin colour does not mean that it was racist. Did they twist the context to make it sound more sinister than it actually is? The reason that I am bringing this up is because, she has done that twisting the truth, misleading the audience to fit her victim narrative repeatedly through out the interview. She had more than 10 factual inaccuracies through out the interview. Another concern with this point of racism accusation is the fact that Meghan gave the account of having multiple conversations about Archie’s skin colour during the pregnancy but Harry’s account of this is different from Meghan. He stated that it was only one conversation prior to their marriage and he was even vague about it by changing the subject to the fact that his family wanted Meghan to continue to act because there was not enough money for her. So I wonder on accuracy or truthfulness of their accusation. Both of them proved to be misleading with a lot of their later statements and in my view, if you lie once a lot of your claim’s credibility gone out the window. I also do not believe that neither Charles nor Catherine are racist. Both Charles and Catherine are well travelled and have met countless people from all different walks of life including world leaders, people of different ethnic background. With those experiences came worldly wisdom and knowledge. King Charles has tirelessly campaigned for unity of all different faiths/ethnicities and has done a lot for the black youth with his Prince's Trust which helped them turned their lives around. Both of them are all busy with their own schedules that include royal engagements, Duchy’s financial dealings, learning the rope for the future monarchical role, decision makings regarding modernising monarchy, looking after her own young family in the case of Catherine. Their plates are full with things to be concerned with already that they have no time to worry about Harry’s and his biracial wife’s baby skin colour for which they cannot change or do anything about. It is just absurd to suggest what Meghan suggested in the OW interview. Another thing to note is that King Charles allowed Harry to marry a biracial woman who is as light as a Caucasian and he is supposed to be concerned with the colour of the baby who will be lighter than his/her mother by logic. I mean what will be the point of him concerning over the baby’s skin colour when they already accepted the biracial mother into the family knowing that she will have a baby with Harry? It just does not make sense. There was an insinuation that Archie was not given the title prince and HRH due to possibility of his skin colour. That is a total BS. The thing is Archie not being given the royal title is due to 100 year old George V protocol and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. George V protocol states that only up to grandchildren of the Reigning Monarch and in direct line to the throne thereafter is allowed to have HRH and prince title. Archie as a great grandchild at the time was not eligible for the title. Anyone can understand that and Meghan as a somewhat smart? person should understand that very easily. She twisting things is very clear with this. There was also insinuation that Archie was not given protection due to his skin colour. Again, Meghan twisting things to suit her own agenda. Andrew’s 2 daughters do not get royal protection, so as Princess Anne’s and Prince Edward’s children. It is not surprising that Harry’s children will not get royal protection either as he is not direct line to the throne. Again nothing to do with Archie’s skin colour. Meghan stated that she only wanted Archie to get the title prince so that he can have security. Again, Eugenie and Beatrice are titled princesses and HRH and yet they are not eligible for royal security protection. Princess Anne and Prince Edward(Earl of Wessex) have prince and princess titles and HRH and yet they only have the royal security while doing royal duties/public engagement and not 24/7 security. The decision of who get the security in the royal family is not made by the royal family themselves but from RAVEC for the Metropolitan Police department. This discussion about Archie not getting the security linked to his skin colour should not have been made from the start as that decision is nothing to do with the royal family. This security was provided courtesy of the UK tax-payers and after they chose to step back from positions of working for the people of the UK as working royals, they are not entitled to the security. There was also insinuation that Royal family was racist. If that is the case then, I don’t understand why would Prince Charles spent $3million out of his own pocket to pay for their extravagant royal wedding with the blessing of the Queen and walked Meghan down the aisle. It would have been easier to disagree to the wedding from the start. They were given royal titles as a wedding gifts. No privileges were spared to them. She was the first fiancee along with her mum Doria to spend Christmas at Sandringham with the royal family and the first royal woman to go on royal train with the Queen for royal engagement mere weeks after her wedding. Even Catherine, future Queen Consort, was not given these privileges. Some very ungrateful and disgraceful 2 some. Now we all know that both Archie and Lili are as white as Caucasian and visually Caucasian and therefore, if King Charles did not bestow them with royal titles, it would not have been related to their skin colour. King Charles has been talking about streamlining the monarchy for years before Meghan came on the scene where minor royals will not have royal titles or official roles so that it is not overcrowded at the expense of the tax payer's burden. So Apart from Andrew's 2 daughters, Princess Anne's and Prince Edward's children do not have prince and princess titles. He was thinking that Harry's children will lead private lives without the burden of having the royal titles. Obviously, Meghan and Harry are obsessed with royal titles because to them status is everything.

@@joannelim5483 about Archie security issue - why 1 year old should have separate security???? As far as I understood Cambriges(at the time) kids also didn't have their own security - only same as their parents.

@@user-je5ju6ir2c Exactly, they just twisted things to make it sound like they are victims when they are not.

It might help if she did her job instead of commenting on every issue of the day.

She's brilliant! All common sense, no woke nonsense! 👏👏👏

Meghan

Depends on a person's life experience. Normal people who ask don't represent a country with a terrible colonial past.

Exactly.

@@marksolum1794 Britain doesn't have a terrible colonial past. The Western world has, on balance, brought countless advancements and broader freedoms to the world at large. Britain and later America ENDED slavery as it had been practiced world wide since ancient times. People who complain the most about the "evil" West, somehow never divest from all of the wonderful Western rights and comforts they likely would never have had if world history had gone some other way. If the West is so terrible, why are so many non-Westerners coming here daily?

Wondering what the baby would look like as opposed to "concern" over the colour of the baby's skin (that was the word used) are two different things. The word "concern" should be the focus of discussion. Why should there be a concern! Be concerned with an older mother prima gravida and neural tube defects. But concern over skin colour!!!

Well they cannot Only the lucky few who will then go on to achieve and do good in life.

Same here. She made a very positive impression. If we had a thousand like her we would solve so much of Britain's problems.

Absolutely does

Not so unconscious either. She’s welcome to stay in America.

@@Kwesekara1672 poor America!!,😅🤣

⁠@@Pawsforthought222 That’s where she came from & that’s where she belongs. The toxic fallout from her royal racist claim is still having ramifications & still causing trouble for the RF.

Good point.

Absolutely!!!!

And in Australia 🇦🇺

And Canada.

A two tier education system and a propagandist ,Right Wing press keeps the people away from truth.

Yep..100%

she has been fired and before she found success with her school, has been maligned and discouraged unceasingly. but she kept at it and never stopped working and picking herself up. so good luck to you. good teachers are a a gift and we appreciate you.

@@iociccio936prefer to stay in your silo do you?

On paper I don’t think I would like her, when she talks she is so real. She’s really got me thinking

Yep..I went off the interviewer after watching her agenda with Dr Jordan peterson.. I was so obvious and eh schooled her very politely

I thought the interviewer was good. She questioned, then left her guest to speak, and dropped in a question to extend the conversation where necessary. It's her job to tease out the thoughts and opinions of her guests, and that's what she did.

It must do your absolute bloody head in..I know it does my friends

This is a problem in Canadian schools. They no longer fail children because heaven forbid that a child stays behind a year and learn the material and not be with children of their peer group. My mum was a teacher and said you couldn’t pay her enough to put up with the bad behaviour that is allowed in the schools these days.

There are no consequences from parents, from agcool, from the police or any authority ..that is why behaviour is thr way it is...then add into the mix soft judges and social media

Curiosity is well and good. Every parent is curious about the child(ren) they are carrying. For instance, mental or physical issues that one’s family might have a trait. But skin tone never crossed my mind, or the minds of my family and if Meghan had not been black, it wouldn’t have been a subject to that family. Was there a point where Kate and Will kids skin tone was a discussion. How can you people who has never experienced racism sit back and say what you think racism is or isn’t. Yes, it is a racist remark to be concerned if you are a black mother and her white family is concerned, not about mental or physical issues of an unborn child, but its skin. You vipers, you will be punished for your lack of acceptance and your worry about the skin tone of an unborn child meant as ridicule to a white father.

@@jean12fication At last a voice of reason. Thank you. How convenient that there appears to be a universal amnesia about the central issue about the word "concern"!!

​@@jean12ficationthe discussion was had during the early months of the relationship, Megan was not even engaged to Harry at the time, let alone pregant.

She has had a fair amount of criticism from parents, news media and parents

That makes sense. When I was at school there were some good teachers, a few great teachers, and many poor ones. Unfortunately the bad ones do huge damage. They mean well, they are probably dedicated, but their approach causes harm e.g. lining children up in order of achievement.

100% agree

She probably has opposition from those with poor teaching and/or parenting skills/those with a minus IQ.

A more racist and divisive one is the answer to your question

As an American I had never heard of her before, but she is fantastic!! Loving her outlook and educational priorities, giving the kids high expectations if they work hard and have standards of behaviour! Glad she doesn't let herself become a token board member due to checking off the various minority aspects, rather needs people to see her for her achievements. Makes me think of the movie Stand and Deliver, based on a true story of a math teacher who taught poor & working class Hispanic kids in a failing school algebra, then calculus with high standards, rigor and expectations that students would rise to the level that was expected of them. After all the students taking the Advanced Placement (AP) Calculus test passed, the Educational Testing Service questioned the students' exam scores and made them re-take the test, which they all passed again, proving they had not cheated!

They are not on public display They arnt children of senior royals, I've never seen them on the balcony, They arnt first cousins to a future monarch They arnt grandchildren of the REIGNING king,And NOT ONE member of the royal family attended the wedding, So very different situation, And nobody but the media are using the word racist.

If the royals are so enlightened why did they accept BBC calling Archie a monkey?

​@@Carad0cbecause they don't carry on about it, neither has Gary

@@Carad0c Royals work for Murdoch. Murdoch controls British press.

And she would be a well deserved candidate!

I’d rather she had a school to teach teachers.

keep the windows stay open !

Indeed!😊

She has spent a lot of money trying to pass and telling everyone she is, she is the racist.

Twitter honestly feels like being in a colosseum during the Roman Empire . Either you are the one swinging the sword or the one being run through. There is a slim chance of having a reasonable debate with someone, but don’t bet your drachma on it.

What do you mean by "his hound"? I have a good grasp on English now but I haven't heard this description before

@@Woodzta his gold digging side kick ,,

@@iociccio936 I would say she is far more qualified than you to comment.