Love that Leo. Sparkly awesomeness

Gorgeous

Yeah, her leo looked like the outer space.

I miss watching Morgan at worlds this year 😭

@Glenn delos Santos Did I say that?

@Glenn delos Santos Oh, I . mean maybe it's just the lack of tumbling in the Netherlands routines. Morgan and Brooklyn have the difficulty and dance!

Glenn delos Santos yeah i mean gymnasts who could go for just power but still choose to prioritize choreography (:

@@ragansmithgymnastics7782 Eythora from Netherlands actually had some quality tumblings (like triple twist to front flip) this year but too bad she downgraded in these Championships

Yesss!!! Now if she could up her difficulty a bit she could really contend. She is a rare gem

This isn’t a dance competition. This is a gymnastics competition and difficulty should be rewarded, not pretty choreography. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@@pedropelaez You do realize that the "artistic" in Artistic Gymnastics is there for a reason, right? It's not just about tumbling; it's about creative presentation and artistic expression. Dance choreography has always been a part of floor routine, and without it, you'd be deducted heavily. If you ever watched in the earlier days of the 70s during the Korbut & Comaneci era onward, you'd see an even greater display of it. Watch Dominique Moceanu's fun routine from the 96 Olympics. The point of floor is not to merely tumble, it's meant to PERFORM. Learn your gymnastics.

Just like the “artistic” men’s floor? In the past the uneven bars were super close that didn’t allow for the difficulty we see today. Give me the most difficult routines done cleanly over pretty but simple (relatively speaking) routines. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

@@pedropelaez Men's & Women's artistic gymnastics do not comprise the same events nor are performed the same, so trying to make that comparison is just silly. Whether you "care" for one type of routine over the other is totally your opinion, but don't discredit dance and artistry as if it isn't and hasn't always been a part of Women's Artistic Gymnastics. You'll just be showing your ignorance to the sport.

Her last two passes were weak...last one landed very low...no amplitude...big difference between her and Simone. Also Simone's dance style is totally different, Simone's style is bouncy, sassy and fun, Brooklyn's is mega dramatic, it isn't fair to compare styles...when done well.

Exactly what I say. Biles is WAG's greatest acrobat/power-gymnast of all time, and don't get me wrong, I love her for that, but if you were to take the tumbling out of both routines, you'd be left with far more from Moors' programmes than you would from Biles'--and that's nothing to do with Moors being 'balletic' because to use another VERY underrated American gymnast--in terms of their artistry--Kim Zmeskal. By far one of the most artistic Americans ever and not balletic in anyway.

@@kathymilesmorgan6047 I don't know what about it "isn't fair"... Brooklyn Moors has superior artistry and style on this routine than Simone, and really to any other WAG elites right now. I think you're right that in general, most folks would judge balletic routines more "artistic" than the bouncy/playful routines, but in that latter category I do think that even Laurie Hernandez's 2016 floor has the edge over Simone. And of course, because artistry isn't really being judged, it all has nothing to do really with how excellent and dominant Simone is. Brooklyn Moors is not about to beat her for any floor medals. But, because I'm procrastinating I feel compelled to also defend Brooklyn's tumbling, which, though it has form issues, is by no means "weak". A double front to front full is on the higher end of difficulty for what's being done in WAG now. Same with the last pass, which had a major issue with form/amplitude, but in terms of difficulty, in a quad when lots of gymnasts brought back a simple double back tuck, there's no issue with the difficulty of a 2.5 punch front.

@@_padfoot I could not agree more with your comment about the tumbling. I've said in several comment sections that all D+ fwd twisting elements should be increased by 0.1, that the Maldonado (front triple full) should be bumped up to an H and that the bwd 3.5 should also be increased to a G. So on that basis if this were to be scored properly her middle pass would be an E+C + 0.2 CV = 0.7 (G). Then in the EF she actually added a stag jump to her Podkopayeva giving it 0.1 in CV therefore making it a G and her last pass would be worth an E with CV. So I fully agree, minus the form issues this is very difficult tumbling and could have contended well had it not been for covid postponing everything. But who knows, hopefully we'll see her make a suprise return for 2024.

her score was decreased o.o?

Gymnasmic this just happened to kara eaker as well

@@lb7617 yeah, that was very sad to see :(

I'm so sad about Eaker. .4 off?!

what was her original score? would she make the finals?

Ty tired of the thong like Leo

@@sahpire75 They're ridiculous. What's more is that the FIG actually has rules against that, yet it allows all it's biggest manufacturers to violate them.

Yeah... but they dont want to reward the power and athleticism either. They are destroying this sport. Where they downgraded this routine in tumbling they should have given more value to her artistry, expression and dance .....

Elina Mauno Completely disagree. This routine is poetry

@@tuckertootsie9639 I'm happy you love it! That was just my personal opinion and I can still see why people do not agree with me:D

@@elinamauno8833 I think if anything there more areas of her previous programme that didn't match the music because the choreography was too dramatic wherease the music was too light and delicate. Also I think going with heavier, more dramatic, _nocturnal_ music whilst having such similar choreography to her previous programme is what reveals that even more. Regardless, I still enjoyed both, but I think this years choreography is more wholeheartedly suited to the music than 2018's.

nope... after an inquiry, it dropped her score and she finished behind nina and is the first reserve

@@kameroncoleman9293 You're kidding, these children and their unnecessary inquiries...I hope they all learn from this. If you get a score that's in and around the range you're used to in qualifications, sit down and shut up.

MD-722 has same thing w kara like y’all got yourselves kicked out of finals 💀

@@kameroncoleman9293 I know! Cause I really looking forward to seeing them in finals too, esp this routine, I'm disgusted with whoever's idea it was to have the inquiry and whoever allowed it to happen

MD-722 armine’s excuse was because she couldn’t see the scores and claimed there were 8 teams still to go even tho only Simone had to go on beam so it was dumb

Misógina internalizada Opresora héteropatriarcal yep!

It was supposed to be, and the inquiry was to try and get it credited and named after her, but IMO she dropped her leg too soon so it was more like a two and a bit...

@@madnatty She should try it again

She tried. The leg came down just past the 2nd rotation and she tried to dance out of it. Judges weren't having it. Triple attitude "has" to end exactly where it started with leg still in position. I don't think danced out of triple could be credited. But I also think with more work she can do it

It's the problem of the Code. It does not reward artistry. Artistry have poor few tenths in the calculation compared to acrobatics.

remember this is gymnastics, not a dance recital, ria!!

Ria Bright It’s not Biles’ choreography first of all. She didn’t come up with it. Also that’s not how this sport works

@@macjamesward Remember this is ARTISTIC gymnastics, both should be balanced, it's not trampoline or acrobatics.

Mauricio M you think a leap should be judged the same as a triple double? lol you’re delusional babe!! maybe try watching rhythmic if that’s what you’re into ;)

There were tiny errors all over landing leaps i can seewhy they downgraded

If you force a review they get a chance to view your routine in slow motion thus harsher penalties

No it was a 5.3. After the inquiry it was a 5.2. She definitely needs to increase her tumbling level and clean up her landings. She is so stunning to watch

Marc Myron 13.566 (5.2/8.366). D score was 5.3 but they submitted an inquiry and it was lowered to 5.2. 😬 She’s 3rd on floor after 6 subs.

sopranomegs omg 😂😂😂😂 so she actually lost a tenth trying to get a higher SV? Is that even allowed?😂😂😂

Marc Myron Unfortunately yes! It’s a gamble to submit an inquiry. I’ve very rarely seen it make a score lower though. Lol

Christian 74 lol just my opinion check my channel out

I agree with you but it clearly isn’t worth a .5 deduction. I would take a deduction for lack of control though

.5? lol

J F TI me she fell out the skill

You would be very wrong to take that deduction. It's a very common transition out of that kind of turn in dance and is controlled really well. I could maybe understand a deduction for lack of control if her core was unstable in the transition (by that I mean hunching over/collapsing - you know a transition into the ground is controlled when their upper body remains in alignment), but even in slow motion it's apparent that Brooklyn is in complete control during her transition. I understand that it's a transition you don't see in turns often given how rare back attitude turns are in routines nowadays, but the way she handles it is actually extremely appropriate and smart from a choreography composition standpoint. A big marker of her style is how well one thing flows to another - tumbling and dance elements included. This transition helps that.

I disagree. She can pull off the drama. I was a stage actress for many years, and one of my mentors taught me that there is no such thing as "overacting," just bad acting. You have to commit to every moment of the performance, and Brooklyn does that like few other gymnasts ever have.

@@saramurray3057 I agree, but as much as I love this routine I get where the OP is coming from. Her expression is top notch and although she does actually dance at times, I do wish that she would have danced more (than just express the music through emotion) so as to maintain a greater fluidity of movement throughout. For instance, I'd love to see a rhythmic gymnast perform a ball routine to this music and I personally think that watching an RG (or dancer) perform to this (even freehand) would have helped a bit; especially during the times where she repeats the choreography.

No it wasnt. And when they devalued the landings they should have given her higher value for presentation and artistry

That was a bad camera angle

How is it to be blind? The leap is really good...

please send in the video of you doing it better pftt

@@diandracocco7102 well Sherlock im not a gymnast so i wont be able to do that lol, smh ,pff it was an opinion not an open invitation to stupid people to respond with stupid questions lol wow kids

@@stevenvalencia6353 no you're right. It was a messy leap.

They don't need it apparently

Why? Suni has very nice choreo. As does grace and simone (say what you will her routines are well put together) this is more of a "dance" routine than a womens artistic gymnastics elite level routine (and I love Brooklyn) her tumbling just isnt enough. Dont blame USA...blame the code. And no america doesn't need it when ever member can throw a double double in their sleep. These routines are in the code as and designed to be TUMBLING orientated with dance skills and a gymnasts personal brand of artistry (whether its dance, movements, expression, etc). So no. They shouldn't lose points compared to a ballet style routine in WAG.

Atrocious and Brooklyn just dont go together in the same sentence. She is not a strong tumbler but far from atrocious