I built this exact configuration too

I bought an RX 6600 back in april 2022 and now I regret not waiting a few months for the price to drop I really should have went with RX6500XT

@@kajojo2399 6500xt is really bad compared to 6600

its a solid build, it will last years and years if you don't mind lowering the settings.

@@kajojo2399 nah the “5” level cards in both AMD and Nvidia is not worth it, it is always a good idea to save up for a few more months to actually get what you want instead. The 6500 xt is significantly weekend than the next in line 6600 and the 1650 is significantly slower than the next in line 1660 or 2060

The GTX 580 was released in November 2010 for £400 The GTX 1050Ti (which was a tad faster in some respects) came out in October 2016 and cost about £150 6 years for a £150 card to go toe to toe with the flagship from 6 years ago I'm still waiting for the 1080Ti's version of that card

Remember the 970 and 1070 at sub 400 range? They were like 350

3080 seems to be a "people's top" for another couple years, considering 40xx and 7xxx prices.

@@bladeoflucatiel I still use the 970 and it does the things I need it to do!

@@bladeoflucatiel The 10 series is where they really went apeshit and no one talks about it.

Tech channels are now like these car TV programs where you watch stuff you'll never own. But contrary to the TV they'll never brand them as such, they'll still review them as if most people realistically aimed for cards like 4090 lol

in which way ?

RX 6600 is insane for its price, I'd definitely recommend it over the 2060, 3050 and 3060. Driver issues are barely noticeable. Despite many people saying they're worse than Nvidia, I actually prefer them due to the more simplistic interface. The drivers aren't worse, just not all games support them as much as they do Nvidia drivers.

I got myself a used one for 160 USD and its served me well so far really a great card if you can get it at a good price

@Spin Lock I got mine used for 200$.

its literally barely better than a 1060 3gb that release 7 years ago, at 1,5x the price..... under no sun on no world in no galaxy in no single universe is this a good deal, its the definition of stagnation...

@@robinbinder8658 that not true at all

So true. I remember looking for 1060 to upgrade and when I saw that $200+ price I was bewildered. How come a mid-range GPU cost that much. Now I want to go back to those times, when building a PC did not require selling your kidneys.

And this is why you go with AMD these days, Nvidia doesn't deserve our money considering how overpriced their stuff is.

I believe that article is referring to GPU shipments throughout Q3 and not total market share. It additionally includes laptops, which also slightly alters the outlook. Going by their numbers, or rather JPR's, the sale numbers in millions of units sold: Desktop: AMD: 0.69 (10%) Intel: 0.26 (4%) Nvidia: 5.94 (86%) Total: AMD: 1.05 (8%) Intel: 0.62 (4%) Nvidia: 12.19 (88%) For context: Q3'21 had shares of Nvidia 83%, Intel 0%, and AMD 17% Q2'22 had shares of Nvidia 80%, Intel 5%, AMD 15% That is to say that Intel sold more Discrete GPUs through laptops than they did as standalone GPUs. The numbers and terminology is a tad misleading, as it's intended to be used in the context of market outlook and investment, but it's still a decent accomplishment for Intel. So just to riterate: The 8% and 4% numbers are NOT total marketshare, but rather share of shipped GPU's during Q3 2022.

@@c-simile1632 yeah, to me, laptop discrete counts the same as laptop integrated as to what people that actually care about hardware would buy. People that get laptops with intel discrete are the same that get integrated graphics because they just arent tech savvy enough, it's the same people that get 1650s. Not dissing, but I think it's important to mention.

Agreed on both accounts.

I have the Powercolor Fighter RX 6800, a good card. It is not the best RX 6800 out there, but it gets the job done with a small OC and Undervolt. Temps are really good and design is simple.

you wouldnt feel that way if you tried harder at not being poor

@@juanshaftpatel7488 omg so true tip you such a wise man

This is how new 3kliksphilip subscriber is born

@@Jako1987 oh no I clicked the notification because I already SUBSCRIBED AND SMASHED THAT LITTLE BELL ICON

Haha, I must have done the same. Picked up my tablet from the charger only to be confused when it started playing this.

@@ArturMarinhoFeV So that wasn't an accident after all? 🤔 Or just a little happy accident

Wait, Isn't the 7600(x) a zen4 apu ?

@@SozImaScrub i meant the G-Series, imagine what an apu with 14-20 rdna 2 cus could do

Sorry for asking randomly here but I have i7 6700k and 1070 when should I upgrade ? Any advice/suggestions ?

@@dankcreme3687 upgrade when you need to, the 1070 is still a solid card and if its running the games you play well enough then don't get an upgrade for the sake of an upgrade. Unless you really want to build a new system and have the money spare that is.

@@Wulf__ got it thanks

I think both rdna3 and ada support av1 encoding natively, so unless they artificially limit their cards all new gpus should have the same capabilities as intel, so keep an eye out!

@@shiba7651 Holding out hope for AMD then. Nvidia's artificial limiting means I'm not considering their geforce cards for it.

I have an arc a770 personally and their encode quality is way worse than nvidia and amd. You can clearly see artifacts even at 150mbps bitrate.

@@EnzoBergstrom Using AV1? Or HEVC? Mainly interested in real time transcoding and looking at some of the hardware AV1 encodes even below 10Mbit/s they look pretty good.

@@EnzoBergstrom Not even remotely true. The evidence is in the VMAF scores. Intel has been on top of encoding for years now with their IGPs and Quicksync. Arc and AV1 dont change that, they still are a notch above Nvidia and AMD, and reviewers like Eposvox show that in their reviews.

The 6500xt was sooooo close to being the next value king, But AMD just had to mess it up.

@@gervee_desu if it has 6gb vram then it would be top g

@@2kliksphilip Well it was a pretty good ad for a steam deck, I've been wanting one for quite a while now and I just didn't expect it in this video. Now I might just get it for my birthday :)

I've been gaming on my 380 since 2016 I think. I'm still getting 120+ FPS in the games I care about. The only struggle was running Elden Ring.

@@jonathanzimm5511 I'm very glad to hear! that makes me glad, the computer is for my sister's boyfriend's son to play roblox and stuff like that. I can't imagine it'd be too intensive, but if he ever starts playing things that are more intensive then I don't want it to just be a slideshow

omg he would buy the gou taht i bughe right now in hes videos as well ! im so happy that a got somthing that at least is good enughe for him to choose it!

mind elaborate a bit? Am interested in purchasing an a750. Would love to see some feedback from non-tech reviewers.

​@@raylxh1925 Well, my feedback on it is likely similar to that of tech reviewers, and I haven't done tons of testing as I've only had the card for about a week, but sure. For starters, it's probably important to mention my PC: - i9 9900k - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB RAID0 SSD boot disk - 1000w Gold EVGA PSU - Arc A770 Limited Edition /w 16gb of ram. - I have a 1440p 144hz display It's important to note that with this system, I do not have PCIe gen 4, but I was lucky in that my motherboards were one of the few z370 chip set boards to get resizable bar support added. Without resizable bar, this would have been a really stupid purchase. Not having PCIe gen 4 doesn't seem to make much of a difference, as far as I can tell. First impressions with the physical hardware: - The packaging is really nice, maybe a bit overdone considering the price of the GPU, but it is nice. - The GPU is built like it's a laptop, which both makes it more complicated to perform any kind of work on it, and that also means intel is probably spending way too much money on the actual assembly of it. - Despite being smaller than my 1070ti, the A770 is physically heavier - The A770 is a very pretty card and it looks great in my PC. The good: - While emulating Breath of The Wild with Cemu (1440p, cranked AA, view distance, and everything else to it's maximum), it actually had more stable framerate than my old card - When I tired to play BeamNG drive, it ran great and I was able to crank the settings a bit higher than my old card, with similar performance. - Dirt Rally 2.0 with settings absolutely cranked runs amazingly - 3DMark Port Royal (ray tracing benchmark) puts the A770 between a RTX 3060ti and a RTX 3070 in terms of ray tracing performance. - When I tried the XeSS feature test in 3DMark, it gave a 50% uplift with the quality preset, and XeSS actually improved the visual quality as it seemed to clear up some visual oddities that were there without it The okay: - I'm really excited to have newer features such as AV1 encoding and decoding. I've enabled AV1 in KZfaq playback, it's never crashed once, looks great, and the bitrate is definitely lower than vp9 while retaining the same visual quality, which is great. But, as it stands, there aren't many situations when I can take advantage of the AV1 encoding on it. Discord just got support for AV1 encoding, but I believe it's only for RTX 4000 cards. - When I tried GTA V, the performance seemed to be a bit worse than my 1070ti. To be fair, it's still pretty good as I'm playing it at 1440p with most of the settings set to their maximum, but the performance dips more and it doesn't feel as smooth. - The driver software. It's okay and is slightly better than it used to be, but it needs a lot of work. For example, there isn't any way to remove a game from the game list. It's also a huge driver download. The not great: - Portal RTX completely refuses to launch. It seems like the Intel drivers may not support every feature that the card tries to use. Some people reported it as somewhat working on a older driver version, but I had no such luck. - While Cemu did have much better performance on the Arc card for me, it also has some minor graphical bugs with a few specific items in the game, but it's pretty minor and is easily ignore-able. - Overclocking. It's just.. vague without any proper indication on what exactly you are changing with the performance slider - You are in a lot of ways, a beta tester for a new product, and the next version will likely be a lot better. My thoughts? For a budget, the A750 is very, very promising after the recent price drop to $250. The performance shouldn't be too much slower than the A770, while being much cheaper. The potential performance on the card is great and if ray tracing is something you are interested in, it seems very capable at it and was clearly something Intel focused their efforts on. Additionally, I don't own many new games that have XeSS or RayTracing support, so I can't provide much input on that outside the 3DMark benchmarks. If you have are okay with potentially having some issues and you have a system recent enough to have resizable bar support, I think it's definitely worth considering it. If you want something that will feel polished and more or less "just work", you should look at an AMD or Nvidia card.

@@BelleDoesStuff great info tho, thx a lot.

@@raylxh1925 Welcome :)

probably drivers will make it worth, for now AMD seems the cheaper/performance

If Apple’s high-power SOC concept keeps paying off we might see the PC space switch to some sort of socketed package. Tricks like putting your GPU cores right next to the CPU could lead to some crazy advancements, at the cost of modularity

Also just to add a bit to what you said, the best used cards are 2060, 70, and 80 Supers (not great for mining performance); 3060Ti, 3070, 3080, 3080 12GB and 3080Ti - however I would definitely stay away from used 3090s and potentially 3080 10GBs as they've been out the longest and have GDDR6X which seems to have a higher failure rate than the GDDR6 based 60 Ti and 70 - 3080 Tis can be overly expensive so if you can't get one for close to $700 I'd bit the bullet and get a 4070Ti (3080 12GB can also be found for prices very close to 3080 10GB but they are closer to a 3080Ti in performance and also are newest so least mined on. Then from AMD, used 6800, 6800XT, 6900XT or 6950XT and maybe new for the incredible value 6600-6700XT range. I would strongly avoid buying any 10 Series, 400/500 Polaris AMD, Vega 56/64/7, and RX 5700 and 5700XT cards as they've been through either two full mining booms or have higher failure rates.

Why don't you buy it for your friend and then they can pay you, if they can't pay you then you sell it on ebay brand new

@@omster_ Cashflow brother, it's not infinite

Agree cpu prices are great atm went from a ryzen 3 1200 to a ryzen 7 3700x for £105 off ebay. Made a huge difference in some of the newer titles I have as I didn't realise just how big of a bottleneck the 1200 was even with an old card (R9 290).

What I find mindblowing is that, as 2PintsMichael said AMD's graphics seem to be cursed. More often than not they offer more value for the price (so far) than nvidia with drivers that are great, especially the software they come with. But you got every "expert" coming out of the woodwork most likely sporting a novideo card claiming how "WELL I TRIED GIVING AMD A CHANCE BUT THE DRIVERS ARE TOO BAD" when what most likely happened is that their friend had one (1) blue screen and thats it. Yes amd drivers are notoriously unstable at launch, but post-launch they have ironed out all the problems. And again its even crazier how in spite of having had worse driver problems on launch than amd intel still caught up insanely quickly and im so confused, even though deep inside i am glad people are giving intel a chance DESPITE the disastrous day 1 drivers, i just wish they've done it with amd until now too.

5:24

They kinda already are. In terms of raw horsepower at their price points when they behave, you can't beat them with new cards. An A380 is better than a 1650 and a 6400 (unless you need a low profile, single-slot card), though you're better off buying a 5500XT or a 2060 used unless you want a great encoder. An A770 is better than a 3060/Ti and a 6700. The key word is behave though. Intel has put in a lot of legwork to fix all the launch day problems, but lagging real-world DX11 performance, kinks to work out with DXVK and DX9 and... Arc Control... still keep the cards down. I've had the patience to stick through with my A380, but I can easily understand why someone else would want to save themselves the headache and buy Nvidia instead. And support is still highly limited, so any problems you have will be greeted with, "WOMM" or complete silence. All the problems on launch day and now have driven away most reviewers and people. If it wasn't for the ill will towards Nvidia, I doubt people would be anywhere near as hopeful about Battlemage, and the rumors flying about late last year of AXG getting axed didn't help. Simply put, no one is going to give Intel a second look until Battlemage arrives and they better be on their A-game this time. t. Arc Stockholm Syndrome Sufferer + WR Holder for the A380 Graphics Score in Fire Strike.

@@xFluing AMD is like Nvidia right now. We kind of expect good on launch. Nobody has any expectations from intel as they have not proven themselves

@@randomlycasual4941 i mean just stop deluding yourself? You know thei track record and what to expect. Expect shit launch drivers with improvements over time and stop writing them off due to your unwillingness to learn

I have the same cpu thinking about buying the same gpu as you. Have you noticed any bottlenecks in any game so far? I am aiming for 1080p 60 fps gaming.

usually a budget gaming rig in most peoples eyes is a brand new pc with components which still have warranties and the like, not something which is sold as is. Used cards are extremely risky at the moment due to the chance of them being mined. I feel like there is no point of even entertaining the used market at the moment as either it is too old or too good to be true.

@Transistor Jump downside, a second hand 1080ti is out of warranty and at the end of its lifespan. Its getting to 10 years old now, which even for good components will struggle at that lifespan.

I can't tell if he's laughing or crying 💀

@@TrueKyanite Both. Both.

@@TrueKyanite nah bro he's dying 💀💀💀

Mining doesn't reduce the performance of a card, literally just replace the thermal paste when you buy it

Damn. Hd7770 for 10 years. I'm also frugal, but this impresses me. I even remember saying I'll wait for 20xx series to release, to buy myself a 1050 and sat there playing dota in 30fps on my 3770 iGPU. I gave up tho, and bought myself a laptop xd

though unfortunately I paid more than I should for that system

And I still got 250€ for my old processor and graphics card, which is more than I expected to get out of it again

Nao é nao minha 7900xt e 6600xt foram mais baratas doque as equivalentes da nvidia

​@@luisaazul Depende das gerações, essa agora obviamente qqr placa vai ser mais barata que a 4090. E por exemplo, minhas 4850 HD e R9 270X foram mais caras que as opções da Nvidia nos respectivos lançamentos.