Thank you appreciate it. I’m all about trying to deliver honest thoughts good or bad. Even if a company pays me to review their product I’ll tell it like it is. Once you get the reputation of being a sellout it’s over. Thanks for being part of the channel.

Yup that’s probably the best choice. The R5mkIII will be a better upgrade than the markII for sure.

Thanks for the comment. The R5 is amazing. You can check out my work on my webpage. www.vaskoobscura.com Welcome to the channel if it’s your first time here.

Thanks really appreciate it glad you enjoyed the video and welcome to the channel. The R5 Mark II is about to come out so if you're thinking of an R5 wait a few more months and the price will really drop. :)

Thanks for the advice. Definitely putting that on my radar.

I’m just interested to hear your experience on why you like R5 more than C70. I have R5 , sometimes I think C70 would be good to have.

@@martinekwall4671 the c70 it’s an amazing cinema camera with amazing image quality but is not that good for run and gun situations, like I do usually. Like weddings or baptism for example. R5 is far superior in low light, have in body image stabilization, it does both photo and video in very high quality, it’s sharper than c70. But if you are very serious about only filmmaking, then C70 it’s a beast of a camera with greater colors, superior dynamic range (but not that much compared with clog 3 from R5 how many talk) and have a nice filmic look, perfect for films, documentary, corporate etc. I said I love more r5 because it’s what I use more, it’s a very fast camera to use in everything.

That makes sense. The R5mkII doesn't look like much of an upgrade at this point. Thanks for the comment.

I know exactly where you're coming from. I bought a Sony A7III when it first came out and was setting up to move to Sony. I missed the Canon experience and sold the A7III for the EOS R. For me, like you said, it was about the experience of using the gear. I just had more fun with Canon but Sony do make some exciting cameras for sure.

If you shoot sports the R5II will have a stacked sensor with a really fast readout speed that would probably something you could take advantage of. But then again if you're upgrading from a 5DmkIII, which is a camera I used for a long time, then even the EOS R is a big upgrade. Honestly it comes down to your budget. If you want to spend money the R5II will be a fantastic camera. If you want to save a little money and get a great camera at a good price wait a few months and the R5 will drop in price. You'll get great value for your money. Hope that helps.

Thank you so much. Really appreciate the comment and the sub. Welcome to the channel. I’m so curious to see what the R52 will be.

Thanks for watching. Appreciate the comment.

The R3 is Canon’s best sports and action camera. Hope that helps.

Hi thanks for the comment and welcome to the channel if it's your first time here. I assume you're shooting with lights and tripod as well. I used to shoot a lot of paintings myself. Used to work in an art gallery. The 24-105 L is a great choice for art reproduction because it doesn't have a lot of distortion and you get the versatility of that zoom range. But in the end primes are the best way to go for image quality and no distortion. Those sigma art lenses are fantastic from what I hear. If art reproduction is a big part of your business I'll point you in the direction of a used Fujifilm GFX medium format camera. They come in 50 and 100mp sensor sizes and the detail they can pick up is unbelievable. You'll be able to see a brush hair if it came off in a brush stroke. In medium format 100mm is equivalent to 85mm on full frame.

Thank you so much,@@vaskoobscura_ ! This is all very helpful. Much appreciated! :)

These cards are great. In retrospect I should have picked up the 1tb. I’ve filled this one up on set a few times. But they offload fast too with a good card reader.

Nice. It’s a pretty sweet combo. Best of both worlds.

@vaskoobscura_ yesirr. Thanks for replying. Hope I helped the algorithm push your video.

No it just stops recording. Would be nice if it automatically split up footage.

That’s a valid point for sure. The price will stay at whatever price the market will pay. Appreciate the comment.

People saying they are jumping the Canon ship for a Sony but I have read the Sony menu is a nightmare. Do you have any knowledge on that?

@@michaelcentofanti3811they aren’t a nightmare to use but isn’t user friendly as Canon

The 5DIV is a different animal. The price of the R6 dropped pretty far compared to where it was prior to the MK II.

@weaverrealestatephotograph7716 I personally think it sucks.... now anyway. For my usage. It works great for product photography in studio. And yes it can shoot more obviously. But video... trash. Compared to r7 or r5. R6 I'm sure included. It's outdated. I've gone to shoot real estate on it, and used my r7 instead. Just wasn't for me. I have 2 5d4 in my studio. I've brought them to a wedding, ran them for the ceremony... after watching back the footage at 1080, vs my r7 and r5... I chose not to include that footage. You call it an animal... I call it hmm... " should be lower priced " lol And before you ask my credibility, I am a full time photographer/ videographer as well.

Because big companies like B&H and Amazon get thousands of units. Supply usually lasts well past the date the camera company stops manufacturing the product. Traditionally retailers use Black Friday to get rid of old inventory. But you never know recent supply chain issues could mean inventories are low.

All good points for sure. We can debate back and forth but all out points will be moot when the R1 finalyyyyyyy comes out. Canon has been dragging their feet on that project. They're the only big brand out there without a true flagship camera. Thanks for the comment by the way. Welcome to the channel if it is your first time here.

@@vaskoobscura_ Canon dragging their feet is frustrating. Imagine if they released the R5 a few more years earlier. They would not have lost so much market share to Sony. I'm not sure the Apple way of thinking, do it better, not first will work against a company like Sony that's about to buy Paramount.

Thanks for the comment. The video frame rate is 24 frames per second just as it is in all my videos. If the frame rate looks off it's probably on your end or slow internet connection. Everything looks fine on my end.

It's an idea i've been toying with but haven't done yet. If you want you can contact me via my webpage. Shoot me an email and let me know what you needed help with and we can go from there. www.vaskoobscura.com/contact