Thank you Denkmark! Greetings from Germany

tak til danskerne for deres flittige indsats.

There are crowd funding and collection of money from some Ukrainian and foreign groups to donate drones to the Ukrainian army plus Ukraine is starting to increase its weapon production . Things could change unexpectedly...Everything is possible... Remember that although money and arms do play a big role in a war but there is something that money alone and military power can not necessarily bring into life and that is the goodwill to live and evolve ... Sing the song of freedom And allow life to be created to all you and me Liberty coming above the sea , Know the truth to set you free It is a better world for all to see Being reborn again is a key ...

France is sending 8 a month, every month now. Along with Ukraine has a repair station in their borders.

I just wonder it takes so long to be given to Ukraine may the very good lord be whit you and keeping you all safe❤❤❤❤

check out the sniper video they did

@@_bearcat Great, even if they make 1000 a day, it wont make a difference UNTIL russians are firing 5:1 or so. France is producing some very small ammount of 155mm shells, so its not about guns and weapons but the ammo. Without ammo, those fancy SPGs and howitzers are nothing. So, you are telling they are building plants in Ukraine to maintain those systems - does that include shells or Ukraine will have to rely AGAIN on deliveries??? IF western countries REALLY want Ukraine to prevale, there would already be scores of such factories in western Ukraine. West ONLY wants this war to last as lon as possible, as they believe it will weaken Russia - but it failed and Russia ramped up its military production and its economy is in war-mode for 3 yrs. They ramped up production of t90M, t72 (with bunch of letters), cruise missiles, drones etc. But, biggest issue for UA are soldiers. Ukraine is just not capable anymore to replace nor rotate weared units on the frontline... I always supported weaker side, wheather its a fist fight or war. But this looks like alerady battered fighter that now has only left arm is trying to beat Mike Tyson in its prime and crowd supports armless fighter, whilst throwing drinks and snacks on Mike, prologing the inevitable KO.

@@_bearcat So, troll is a person with opinion thar differs from "ukraine is winning"

@@_bearcat Than why am I troll?

@@_bearcat Tbh, I have no idea what was wiritng.... HONESTLY. Surprise me... Copy paste me one of those

@@APOLON-bm7ym Tell that to Stalin in September 1941: -"Your resistance is futile. Make peace or Surender!" ;)

The air to ground guided bomb?

Yesterday the Netherlands had its last flight of F16 they are gonna be transferred soon

The problem for Ukraine is the u.s. cannot support them much longer with weapons. The Ukrainians need to get along with Russia especially that Ukraine has been losing for a long time. The u.s. needs to mind its own business and stop sticking their noises were it doesn’t belong. Ukraine is being bombed thanks to the u.s..

United we are strong

And we cant let Putin win this..... -Slava Ukraine!

Totally agree! Highfive here from Denmark 💙💛🇩🇰

God curse democracy. Long live autocracy.

It was heartening to see the joy of the soldier. You would be very confident and happy giving such a machine to someone like him. They never explained fully what makes it so good. Id recommend googling it to see exactly why he likes it. A serious piece of artillery. That target was destroyed with one shot from a great distance. 1998 would be considered brand new compared with most of the stuff there

Pretty new for artillery systems

i mean. the vast majority of artillery systems are still somewhat "primitive". computer aiming and full automation is very new for artillery as they where previously deemed not be very accurate so computers wouldnt help that much, but as munition and computers also improved, it granted a much bigger leap in performance. as mentioned by the archer commander. it aims at targets, not grids. most artillery still targets grids, many of these grids are quite large and require heavy saturation to hit its intended target. so going from stationary manual artillery to the PZH2000 or the archer is like going from super props to afterburner capable jets. in a world where the vast majority of artillery are on super prop levels, PZH2000 being on the level of a F14 vs the archer being a F18, while one being better, both are so much better than the majority that they all end up on roughly the same level.

Imagine archer beeing older and still beeing more modern and reliable =)

​@@emptyforrest It's not uncommon in modern systems though, PzH 2000 isn't really unique - the Archer is capable of that as you mentioned, so is the Krab, K9 or the multiple Czech and Slovak wheeled SPGs (Morana, Zuzana 2 and so on). It's just that most of the artillery systems out there (by raw numbers, not by types) aren't that modern - a lot of countries still use the M109 which is a very obsolete system, comparable to the Soviet 2S3.

I am glad that most of us Europeans have learned from the past centuries.

Oui, l'Europe doit combler le vide laissé par les États-Unis ayant abandonné l'Ukraine après toutes leurs promesses.

Yes, agree.

Vive l'Europe vive l'Ukraine libre

Vive l'Ukraine dans l'UE, ils le méritent bien!

There is a video on United 24 dedicated to AHS Krabs, Ukrainian gunners speak highly of them.

​@@peakeverything7531i don't understand why IT isn't mentioned here since IT is the most numerous system in Ukraine and the the most potent.

They are crap

Like your father ​@@Itachi21x

​@@Itachi21xThey are so bad that next 50+was bought by Ukraine. As only 155mm bought by Ukraine 😏

"Sniper howitzer" what a combination of words.

It is garbage thats why they dont talk about the shitty polish nonsense.

Glory belongs to God. Not to a country which unfortunately is a puppet state

@@tsfrancis278stfu and eat a himars

@@tsfrancis278 shut up

@@tsfrancis278 Lol.

They’ve forgotten about it. Estonia also gave the biggest contribution according to the ratio of their capabilities. But…unfortunately,it’s our reality

Jdi do hajzlu s prohnilou Ukrajinou,ať žije Rusko a svobodná Evropa

Says what?

United24 made another video dedicated to the Krabs and from the video the soldier highly praise the weapon.

In words only.

Please make your fellow human beings and political representatives understand it as you do. I mostly see prayers sent to Ukraine....but it doesn't help. They need weapons to defend themselves. Greetings from Sweden

@@srenjensen2836Ummm so $59 Billion+ in aid….more then the rest of the world COMBINED is not enough?

​@cowboyx9380 not when you're fighting a superpower, no. Look what Afghanistan and Iraq cost us.... but it's also more than just in words only like the other person said

Have you seen what shit the Republicans are pulling un Congress? Clearly the US could do much more if it common sense prevailed!@@cowboyx9380

Mitähän asiaa karvattomalla, mulla ei kieli taivu tuohon murteeseen

🇫🇮 🇨🇦 🇺🇦

There were so many programs to replace the M109 and they all failed.

👀

It is garbage!

There is dedicated video on United 24 for AHS Krabs, Ukrainian gunners speak highly of them, probably the editors forgot about them, same for ZUZANA-2 system.

This clip is just about systems donated from the west.

​@@kored8688Poland belong to NATO so it's western block. 😏

Yeah Caesar is a towed gun replacement.

Ring ring ring?

Chip on your shoulder, regarding HIMARS? You a brit?

@@Drochaid nope. From an EU member state.

This video is about artillery systems, not radars. M270 is using the same pod as HIMARS, but it's 27 years older. UA are under no obligation to provide videos of ANYTHING to the public, and providers of them and of radar systems especially may indeed have demanded they keep them out of the public eye.

Par ce qu'ils sont formés. Par exemple plusieurs milliers de soldats ont été formés en France sur les ceasars et autres machines en + des combats. Et il me semble que d'autres pays de l'Europe les forment aussi. 🇨🇵🇬🇧🇪🇺🇺🇦

Ground handling is not so much an issue with tracked vehicles, or the arches articulated mid steering, all these vehicles have a very low ground pressure. However, the M777 is probably less expensive which makes it available in larger numbers.

Us have the best howitzers in the world in all classes

​@@LSmoney215 not in all classes

@@leonj.6665Yes, all classes, and that is because the digital firing system delivers absolute accuracy, which allows target destruction with less munitions. Regardless this tech is on most NATO guns, so its moot.

Towed guns are obsolete. Why french Caesar was designed to replace them at 19 tons is useful.

British AS90 isnt nearly as advanced as the others. My father used to work on them in the REME. We are basucally ditching AS90 for the Swedish Archer which in all hoensty is just miles better then AS90.

With the Krab.

@@ashleygoggs5679 with all due respect, the Archer is the equivalent of the F-22 of the howitzer world. Just wish it had longer range, but we cannot have it all can we?

@@TankandDimples that along with the problem that the crew is not protected makes it a problem. I think it is surely one of the best in the world, better then Caesar or M109 or M 777 and so on. I do not know why they didn't put the AS 90 on the list, because it is also one of the best in the world. The mrsi is also not the best with 3 shots compared to 5 or 6. It is a great system but doesn't fit heavy combat situations on a more flat ground. The PZH 2000 can shoot 5 times in mrsi, can shoot a distance of up to 75 km and is able to shoot 10 shells per minute untill the magazine of 60 rounds is empty. In combat situations against Tank battalions or so, it is not good to be unprotected even if you are 20 km away. Yes it is a great system but why didnt they make a cabin for the crew that would be so much better and safer.

Sry iam lost wht "Krab".....?!??

@@proud2befknamerican466 Polish SPG based on K9 Chassis and AS90 turret with a 155/52 howitzer from Rheinmetall.

It is garbage!

@@84erElessarok, gotcha

​@@HedgehogZone Because?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

and then someone says: 'catch it and fry it'...

and then someone says: 'catch it and fry it'...

Their proficiency doesn't really matter, because CAESARs are usually already on the move when the first shell hits, thus counterfire will just hammer an empty position. "Tailored for shoot-and-scoot tactics, the CAESAR is fast to set up, taking around 60 seconds for the crew to be ready to fire and 40 seconds to leave after the shots. It can fire six rounds per minute." All artillery systems have their perks, but if I had to pick one for the job, the CAESAR would be it. Hits as far & hard as the others, but fundamentally easier to operate, maintain & repair, lower profile & operational footprint, and most mobile of all. CAESARs are the kind of artillery you need for 21st century warfare. The others are either too static, or over-engineered.

Both Caesars and Archers are gone before the shell lands.

@@nian60 If you counter battery does not have shells in the air before the incoming shell is at its apex, you are not doing counter battery fire. Of course, the counter battery radars that pick up those shells are extremely visible in the radio wave spectrum, and thus vulnerable.

@@nian60 Also, if you wait until the shell lands you have no trajectory to use to find the artillery that shot at you,.

@@nian60 Absolutely, but what I pointed out is the issue of mobility AND/OR over-engineering, depending on the system. Archers fall in the second category, without providing significant/mission critical benefits over the CAESAR. All these systems may have their place on the battlefield, but imo the French took the most balanced & operationally sensible path with their artillery piece.

Great day information for Rvssian intelligence. Altought they probably already new, it just gets better.