Not exactly hard to believe since different ish teams, and different art styles per subsidiary of the Cod franchise

@@repstyle8518 and 3 years of development

Imagine if they actually waited more than 1 year to release a cod like with MW being in development for 3 years, it’s so much higher quality than CW and it’s astounding.

@@michaelzhang9806 sadly activision wouldn't let it, and there were development studio switches, and work from home

@@mirabile1221 No 5 years

In terms of animations and sounds its one of the best among fps games . might even be the best

Yea I like MW2019’s animations and Sounds. But I don’t like it’s gameplay. The meta is mostly camping, which really sucks on every map, especially Shipment which is pure cancer. I’ve seen montages of gamers raging and dying for every second on KZfaq.

@@DJWixel jeez man calm down

The animations are cool and all, but I don't think it's the most realistic among all fps games, the reloads are too aggresive to be considered realistic, but among all CoD games it is the most realistic, but there are games that are more realistic than MW19, like EFT. Just saying.

@@Bruhidk8835 Well you can’t just compare to Arcade Shooter game to Military Simulator or something idk what genre is EFT

that was a thing Treyarch kept doing since BO2 tbh, it was really obviously in BO3 though

@@pilotsayshello1758 yes true But the concept of guns was futuristic so it worked Not for cold war

Perspective issues?

@@tanmay_6363 What? Futuristic? There isn’t anything futuristic about a gun being more big and uncomfortable to use. They all look big or bigger than the Desert Eagle for goodness sake!

@@blazecraftworks8944 The deagle on cold war looks like a toy comparing it with the mw2019 deagle

Ong

It looks like he's patting it

He just got to much beef in his arms

There’s not even a mag slap in mw stop hating

@@carterjanes3151 what does mw have to do with anything?

@@Timkikusu But it at least makes sense, right? Hope I'm not speaking nonsense.

I hate how absolutely spot on this is lmao

Dude. Bo4 wasn't meant to be realistic. It was meant to take place around 2040. Idk why everything has to be so real or else everyone's like "uh oh bad game". Notice how I said game? Supposed to be fun. Not realistic. If you really want realism, go play battlefield.

@@ashton7209 nobody's saying it had to be realistic, we're just saying it shouldn't look like shit.

@@RandomPerson-vx8mu fair enough, but it... it didn't. It had some pretty good graphics, compare bo4's graphics to bo1. Or bo2. The technological advances between those two times were astronomical. Some people just like to hate on games to hate on games. Have you ever tried to be a game developer? It's actually really hard work. I tried taking video game design in high school and good lord was that shit tough and confusing. The programming, hours, and money that goes into it is astonishing. Then people come out and shit on cod games year after year after year. No matter what treyarch does, they're constantly told "oh its not good enough, you need to do this and this and this", but some people couldn't even make a scratch game if they tried. Again, it's hard work, and it's good enough. Who CARES if it doesn't "look up to your standards". If it's fun, then it's fun. I literally never pay attention to the gun sounds or anything in a game cuz im having too much fun playing it.

No they are only 1 year apart

@Aayush can you read? he said they LOOKED years apart,not that they were.

@@marcowulliampopirers2216 my bad

@@marcowulliampopirers2216 calm the fuck down, Marco...

Nah I’d say 2-4 years

Over reloads?

@@kimjunn879 its because the maps have things outside it too

no, its just because IW doesnt care about optimization anymore and is followed by Treyarch in this regard. thanks Activision.

@@ToriusHeart literally Treyarch has really good optimization lol

Lmao all battlefields are like mw but with huge maps and they take up 20 gigs

Next video : Call Of Duty Modern Warfare VS fortnite

@@redneck1737 He did this video 1 year ago man, if you wanna know, check his channel!!

Oh shit it's Mike Trollnoda on a cod vid

Graphics apart, bo4 is better than mw.

@@alvaro267 ehh wtf

White noise in mw is louder than the bo4 guns. Then again walking in mw is the loudest thing I've ever heard

It's weird since BO4 was designed to be a BR game.

@@Bloodhurl67 a brazillian game?! Nah, the brazillian version sucks

@@mauriciorossi1845 Battle Royale... Not Brazil.

It also opened my eyes to how Joe Cecot needs to be fired

They didn't wanna make cold war either.

@@dcuniverse8874 cold war was only made in one year but bo4 dosent have much of a excuse

@@kuszanz6553 isn't every cod made in 1 year?

@@kuszanz6553 other companies were making sh*tty games so activision asked treyarch to extend bo3's cycle to compensate But Activision being the a-holes they are told them to drop bo4 in its time of the cycle as if they had 3 years to develop it Last time treyarch had proper development time was between bo2 and bo3, and they are still not getting it this time because they are developing zombies for the incompetent sledgehammer Activision are clearly biased to iw (who are sitting on practically the entire cod development budget but still can't make good maps and games that caters to multiple playstyles) and raven (who keeps fu*king up stuff)

@@mdemanuel1911 not since ghosts every other game had 2 nearly 3 years development time (except bo4 and cold war)

Actually its a futuristic version of the Gepard PDW combined with the Mac-10, not the MSMC.

That's what I was saying

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/heCVi8-B3d6cZX0.html

@junokentgaming03 also it’s not a handle it’s a grip smart ass

@@kainko6182 dimwit

You hate Cold War because the Guns are Worse than MW? Man, let me teach something, Call of Duty's guns always are simple and unrealistic, only Modern Warfare are realistic guns, if you want realism play Battlefield or another game which focus on realism.

@@angerami77 I love MW guns because they all feel different. In Cold War the attachments make no difference in how they feel (other than ADS), and the differences between each AR, each SMG, each LMG are so minimal that at the end of the day you pick a gun based on numbers, not how fun it is to use. I tried battlefield 4 and WW1, and even that felt kinda meh. Better than Cold War though.

@@rawr7505 actually cold war guns all do feel different the main difference is unlike MW4 they don't Over exaggerate the hell out of all its animations its more traditional to classic cod where the guns will feel different but not have recoil go to the moon for zero reason cold war recoil is very subtle especially with certain attachments increasing/ decreasing the recoil to the point where it becomes harder to control its subtle when you watch the gameplay but very obvious while playing

@@prrocker9637 part of the thing is I’m not an OG Call of Duty player. I’ve tried Black ops 3, play a lot of MW 2019, and deleted Cold War. My cousin who’s been playing COD since Black Ops 2 loves how Cold War guns feel. Yeah, Cold War might be a more traditional COD. It’s multiplayer and zombie mode suck though, along with my personal taste of gunplay finding it rather lacking. I know a large portion of my distaste for the game is because I prefer something akin to Arma, Squad, Tarkov, or MW2019. I guess I just need to be more careful with the games I buy🤷‍♂️

@@rawr7505 if more realistic gunplay is your thing Cod is Def not the series for it hut at least you acknowledge that honestly MW4 is WAAAY more floaty then it should be especially compared to real tactical shooters a great tactical shooter is rainbow 6 siege honestly blops 4s biggest fault is console optimization and specialists which barebones fixes and you can see where what they learned from 4 was carried over to cold war cause it plays like a dream MP has a few issues nothing to counter trophy sustems is one but all in all its the best COD game since blops 2 and that's an entire console generation worth of games we talking about acknowledging it's not your cup of tea is one thing though but gotta give credit where credit is due

Like what?

@@masterchief6739 diamatti

@@shampoo765 there is no similarity between the reloads

Bro don’t forget they are the same company

@@TheRyoGamer no

No gun sounds like mw

@@deathtrooper2048 I think you missed the part where they they recorded them straight from the source, but of course it’s gonna sound a tad diffrent when translated into ingame audio

Cod games always use a modified version of a previous games engine typically treyarc will tweak and improve the decent base of a IW engine thats what they did with w@w vs cod 4 and so on the main issue with blops 4 is on console the engine is struggling to handle what they're trying to do you saw the same thing on 360 and ps3 with blops 2 but to a lesser degree MW4s engine looks great but its movement is garbage compared to every cod previous that said Treyarc took the engine tweaked and improved it to make it feel more like cod for cold war which you can just feel the second you start moving and shooting Engine wise they are very similar its just modified to fit thr current Devs needs which treyarc has a history of always 1 upping IW which sadly IW hasn't been able to do since MW2 the most IW brings to the table nowadays is just a mew engine for treyarc to mess with and go ham

@@prrocker9637 www.gfinityesports.com/modern-warfare/black-ops-cold-war-engine-modern-warfare-ps4-ps5-xbox-one-series-x-pc/ Not quite there chief. The games feel completely different and I much prefer modern warfare.

@@wontbackdown813 so a modified engine like I said while not 100% the same exact engine its no different then what they've done for over a literal decade its not surprising certain tools would be originally created for a previous Cod game especially since IW has never done anything close to the scale that treyarc does with stuff like zombies as for the movement MW4 Is the least cod feeling movement in the franchise post cod 4 go back to any cod game and go to MW4 and its night and day preferring the movement is one thing but its clear MW4 is not a cod in feel honestly the movement system feels like its emulating rainbow 6 and other shooters like it cold war falls a lot more in like with cod as a franchise which we can't really say with a lot of Post MW3 IW titles

@@prrocker9637 okay but giannis is still a better franchise player

@@prrocker9637 Treyarch has always had a fast paced arcade shooter feel while IW uses new engines like you said.

the audio in CW is VERY similar to that of BO4's, and it isn't a good thing. All the guns are handled and animated to like they're light and weightless and the audio is nearly the same for each gun, as if someone's stamping their foot on the ground repeatedly and with that bass reduced. It's pathetic

@@deagle.2 their engine for audio went down dramatically for black ops 4 and they didn't change it back for cold war They should've sticked with bo3 or when back to bo2 for the audio

@@deagle.2 cw is a reskin of bo4

@@deagle.2 that’s because it’s made by the same studio behind bo4 which is treyarch ever since Bo3 they have a nasty habit of reusing audio and even graphical effects same thing with sledgehammer which is the studio behind cod AW (which was notorious for having shitty sound effects on all the guns) and cod ww2 (same issue even CW carries over some of its font) and when you get these two studios and try to make them attempt to follow the style of MW your just gonna get shit

Thats what i am thinking too

The origin would make the most sense

@@Rackcoon929 sg12 is literally futuristic aa12 why origin would make more sense?

@@Rackcoon929 no its definitely more of an aa12

@@ECcR0 so it's not a similarity video, but the comparison of the the 2 weapons

Bc they don't

Maybe because thats how cod has always been? You haven't been in the franchise for you long, have you? And tbh there isn't much difference, most of the weapons in mw are super easy to control. The only ones that are impossible to control are the lmgs (some of them), the rest, assault riffles, smgs, super easy.

@@max_-dude1683 I just pointed it out because ever since MW2019, the recoil has been more realistic in the next installments. The bounce and gun shake is more visible. I've been following COD ever since Black Ops 2 btw.

It makes sense from an In universe POV. You have exo suits and super powers and all that crap so you could get a mod for stronger arms that could help with recoil control.

Recoil in guns has always been basically non existent except for a few guns in some games even the old modern warfares and black ops had basically little to none recoil for all guns

Treyarch

@Selo06 really ain’t that bad

@@karsonwright6332 not bad, but not good. Bo4 looks the same as every other current gen (or I guess it’s considered last gen now) cod games. MW was the only one to really change that up

@@branpod Ik this is very unpopular opinion and I’m not supporting this game, actually one of my least favorite COD games, but modern warfare looks realistic and all but I just find it to look so bland and boring with the maps and all. The new rebirth map looks great wish there was more maps that didn’t look so gray though

@@karsonwright6332 yeah, I think art style definitely more subjective. It’s clear who wins in graphical fidelity, but which style you like better is completely up to preference

They're trained not hating ok

honestly an absolute legend

@@damienwilliams3173 it took my 45 minutes to make

"SG12 7:16" "R9-0 Shotgun: 7:36" w h a t ? ?

@@bagasangga ok what's wrong with it?

@@FastnOut SG-12 = AA-12, R9-0 SG = DP-12 Shotgun These 2 are not the same shotgun

Ayo dont diss my boy Burnout like that

@@lazyassmf not dissing just not realistic

@@NotoriousMach aight, good point.

@@lazyassmf i love burnout paradise

@@NotoriousMach b04 was never supposed to be a realistic game

it's even worse

nah man even cod mobile on highest graphics be looking better than that shit

BO4 the best

Nah both of these games are fine. *But old school cod games is the best*

@@noobthro5630 mws gun design is the best tho

Sam Fisher yeah

FR

Nice in your op

@@jeffx7894 what?

@@KTLyons i said in your opinion mw is better

@@jeffx7894 no modern warfare is a much better game even tho I liked black ops 4

@@dennylambert7370 ik mw is good

En casa de cartoon viviras tu que dices

on a lot of firearms, the selector switch might be too far from your right or left hand to switch while aiming down sights. then again, they could’ve just used the left one to change the fire mode. welp

@@mauromaresmr no. Selector switch’s in guns made after WW2 are always made so you can utilize them without taking your hand off the grip

Actually, the MW19 AK reload is based of the Sleight of Hand Volk from Infinite Warfare

Holy shit, you're right.

Certain blueprints do, yeah. I got my M16 blueprint by preordering BOCW but if you check the bundle store for the M4A1 you can try and look for a blueprint with a carry handle.

It should of had free dlc

@@allseeingeye3182 i agree i bought em and they were sick, not alpha omega, that one sucked

It's the laziest COD ever made, looks even worse than BO3 and doesn't even have campaign + Most of the zombie maps and MP maps are recycles from other cods, but that's just Treyarch's way of "innovation"

@@dybixs1400yeah but they have another 4 maps with a different story and the chaos maps look better than any of the maps that came before and after black ops 4

It's a stock sound

It's treyarch and thier terrible naming at guns half the time. Let's see, Rampage, swordfish, rampart, strife, Maddox, VAPR, koshka, paladin, outlaw, sdm, MOG, abr 223, cordite, hellion Salvo, spitfire, Auger, VKM 750, Mozu, Grav, saug, switchblade, daemon, s6 stingray, locus, vendetta, peacekeeper, Argus, havelina and tigershark. That's all of the mediocre names treyarch decided to name thier guns in bo4.

@@primus8026 they couldn't even try to call it the galil

@@Adrian-zb4ck exactly

@@Adrian-zb4ck well they need permission from the actual gun brand to use the name so instead they come up with fake names lol

More than majority of these guns are fake. They got the rights to call the m16 the m16 late game, but they were too lazy to get the permission to call the Grav the Galil? Smh

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/heCVi8-B3d6cZX0.html

Its not even necessary for vanguard to have ads tacticool reloads. They're just trying to fit in for no reason.

Bo2 AN94 is just undefeatable

trust me i grinder for dark matter on bo4 and that was probably one of the top 3 worst guns in the game, i’d rather run around with a combat knife honestly😂

Mozu with Skull Splitter

@@toastyshmost2727 agreed, it was awful

MW2019 took 3 years development. Not 1....

Mw had way longer to develop tho..

Bo4 has shit graphics compared to other games, compare doom 2016 with Bo4, Bo4 looks like a 2012 game

Mw2019 especially for me. Worst cod ever.

The singular bullets are reloaded off screen but every Treyarch game has it when you use a speed magazine or cyclinder, forgot what it’s actually called, they show it

@@karsonwright6332 I think its stupid that we have to use a attachment slot for it.

Cause you need the speed loader attachment to reload it like waw

@@karsonwright6332 Irl it is called a speed loader or moon clip. In game it might be the "sleight of hand" perk.

@@UFC93 u act Ike ur getting a gameplay benefit off of setting the bullets go in on screen

@@CallMePseudonymous except jak 12=full auto sg12= semi auto

Both are trash imo

@:) mw was trash in multiplayer but had good graphics, gun mechanics, engine and fantastic campaign

@:) bo4 had mediocre zombies, blackout was good but they didn't care about it, multiplayer was trash

@:) I won't consider warzone in MW because it's also merged with cold war

@@tanishkchaudhary4923 replace mediocre with terrible for zombies

Nope, if it was It would be so cartoony

@@CallMeAsna well, it does look cartoony af... Especially when compared to MW2019 which looks almost photo realistic.

Last gen is Ps4/Xbox One tho

Nah, MW is more realistic

@@DEAL0151 True but it's about coolness.

@@gray01216 the whole COD franchise has been based on realism 🤦‍♀️😒

Which weed do you take

@@doomstan BO2 was futuristic and not realistic yet one of the most loved and coolest CoD's. Your point is?

Nerf gun

No they don't?

so do bocw guns

R90 is also called the dp12 irl btw

@@Abdullah_8654 اتكلم من الناحية التقنيه مو القيم بلاي لأنه القيم بلاي كل شخص يفضل اسلوب غير عن الثاني

No not really The only reason you say is because Cod mobile pulled most of bo4's assets when it first released. Even the cosmetics in that were taken straight from bo4

@@jbroz_tv0138 yeah kinda right cod mobiles graphic will be comparible to bo4 when they use unreal engine as for graphics and lighting but they stick to unity i guess which makes the lighting not bad but also not good and not clean and colourful

"Neat"

bo3 does the engine better than bo4

Strife*

If you look closely, MW's FN SCAR is actually quite botched.

@@whis3791 the irons aren't correct but what else?

@@feelixtheglovinggiraffe759 If I remember correctly, the vent holes are wrong too.

Overwatch is better

@@iicustodianlaw well your not wrong

Fr, games should be made with time and care. I prefer to wait than having a game that feels incomplete or poorly made, like BOCW.

@@neogmz I feel like when cod gets a hit game, they should have a sector configured to keep it fresh and hackerless and updated