If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, I'll be able to start my pigeon and squirrel sanctuary. Fuji XT4 amzn.to/31wORkb or bhpho.to/3mXJUs0 Fuji 70-300mm bhpho.to/3qoRhen Tamron 18-300mm bhpho.to/3rhcqpL All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
@jpragmatic77592 жыл бұрын
Photography KZfaqrs : LEICA M11 Why you should buy one Camera conspiracies: Fuji 70 - 300 the best vlogging lens ? 😂 don’t change
@MichaelZi2 жыл бұрын
I got Fuji 70-300 and its a briliant piece of glass. Always sharp, fast and reliable. I am love it !
@nickjessel77592 жыл бұрын
Try the Fuji 70-300 with the 1.4 TC too. It’s a lot slower, but for its size is a magic alternative to the 100-400.
@ChristianThueringer2 жыл бұрын
great idea, thank you!
@actstuntcam Жыл бұрын
My understanding is you get much better images just cropping.
@bulbigood6558 Жыл бұрын
Now you can just buy a new Fuji camera with 40mp sensor and you will get the same result with cropping. Maybe even better
@seanpoole60252 жыл бұрын
I’m loving you social commentary and sense of humor. Keep up the great work!
@bernardoramos141210 ай бұрын
In your very particular way of presenting the content, I liked it and I probably go for Fujinon 70-300. Thanks, man!!!
@MWB_FoolsParadisePictures2 жыл бұрын
That was a great review! I like that you touched on how the flaws may be subjective depending on what you're using the lens for.
@coolbananaboy50752 жыл бұрын
I've watched 1 million of your video's and this is the first one I've fully understood and fully agreed with - even the pizza for dinner. Thanks for dummying it down for me. I will now watch your next 1 million videos and will once again pretend I know what u r talking about.
@VinylCherry2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!! Finally someone finally did a review that gave us real answers!!! I was looking for a longer lens. Than the 55-200 .. and the Fuji always locked on so amazingly.. your the first one that actually talked about how it compares on the long end ..You rule!!
@nikytamayo2 жыл бұрын
That is absolutely woeful focus speed and stabilization, but impressive sharpness for that range. Looks like a great all in one lens for static shots though.
@Snudur672 жыл бұрын
The Tamron? Yes
@kooistradurk24 күн бұрын
@@Snudur67it’s great (on a tripod)
@agenericaccount39352 жыл бұрын
Sony should feel alright about this. Tamron was the unstable one in the relationship after all 😂
@awake7802 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment
@garypardyphotography2 жыл бұрын
In Canada, we have octangular stop lights - not green/amber/red lights, just like a reflective octangular placard with the word STOP on it.
@JeffreyAK382 жыл бұрын
Well done. Thanks for this review, I was just wondering which lens would be better as a photographer and you helped me make my decision. I like the all in one of the 18-300 for my full spectrum xt4.
@MagicalMonkeyMan3 ай бұрын
My first time watching a camera conspiracies video, subbed halfway through! Loved this style.
@chublez20 күн бұрын
Thankyou for this. 1. You saved me wasting money on that earthquake tube. 2. I kept watching just for the jokes.
@dwslumpАй бұрын
Clicked for a lens review / comparison and stayed for a very entertaining video, your sense of humor is great :D
@eelpern51232 жыл бұрын
Love your content. Not a lot of people can blend humor and technical details. You are unique. Thanks for the information and also for making me laugh. "Tamron/Tampon" 😭
@chcomes2 жыл бұрын
Exposure jumps, jitter, change of white balance mid-shot (2:45)... I felt transported to a different era, when CC knew nothing and we learned nothing...
@nerdMike2 жыл бұрын
The most requested lens comparison of this time!
2 жыл бұрын
Love the new music
@funnybeingme4 ай бұрын
Just tested the Tamron 18-300 E-mount for Sony ZV-E1 on Dynamic Active Stability with 1.1 X Digital Zoom. Works amazing! Super stable even with walking. The crop is perfect with no vignette. This would be my all in one set-up and I don't have to worry about low light since the ZV-E1 is great at that.
@Bo_Hazem2 жыл бұрын
Looking at it from an a7 IV perspective, the Tamron 18-300mm could be a perfect lens with crop mode that is already with in 4K@60fps.
@sweetpapa7 ай бұрын
I love this review. Made me laugh a bunch of times throughout. Great comparison. I'm trying to decide between the 2 and I'm going with the Fujifilm.
@UrbaneHobbit2 жыл бұрын
The Fuji is made with gold and platinum nanotubes. Every shiny surface in each image looks slightly metallic and therefore more beautiful
@Nuri_91 Жыл бұрын
Great review, and a funny one at that. Loved it!😄
@GreenhornPhototaker2 жыл бұрын
Fuji definitely looks better to me, not sure it is worth giving up 18-69 focal length though
@aengusmacnaughton13752 жыл бұрын
Are you sure that there isn't some switch to enable stabilization on the Tamron lens? I cannot imagine it being any worse with it off!!!!!
@cameraconspiracies2 жыл бұрын
It's fighting the IBIS or something. No switch.
@aengusmacnaughton13752 жыл бұрын
@@cameraconspiracies -- Not familiar with Fuji menus (G85 owner here!), is there a way to disable one or both through the menus?
@cameraconspiracies2 жыл бұрын
@@aengusmacnaughton1375 No, it's none or both.
@aengusmacnaughton13752 жыл бұрын
@@cameraconspiracies Darn! G85 Wins Again!!! 🙂
@angeloregina2 жыл бұрын
@@cameraconspiracies Isn’t there any settings in the Fuji body like non compatible lenses to switch off the IBIS.
@remontheroad2 жыл бұрын
Man, if half the KZfaqrs were not taking themselves as seriously as you do, KZfaq reviews would be a lot more fun to watch! Thanks for the comparison. I definitely don't want the 18-300mm anymore, for now.
@bsw782 жыл бұрын
I'm going to like all the videos you do where you prefer Fuji 🙂
@WMedl2 жыл бұрын
An injury to camera conspiracies!
@johnwightman27612 жыл бұрын
I found the stabilization to be horrible as well, until I switched IS mode to "continuous" from "shooting only". Great lens after that (although I'm a stills photographer so can't comment on video).
@johnwightman27612 жыл бұрын
I should clarify that I meant in camera IS (X-T4).
@Tipton_Wildlife2 жыл бұрын
I'm a Canon shooter but your channel makes me want to learn about why I'm a canon shooter.
@thomashill57682 жыл бұрын
I have the 70-300 and I like it. The stabilization is one of my favorite things about it but there are a few annoyances. It is soft. You can't really crop any photos. Also no ois switch on the lens and you catastrophically lose focus when you zoom. The size/weight/range of the thing is awesome tho...
@ldr82762 жыл бұрын
Would you take the 100 to 400 instead.. Despite its size, weight etc?
@PS-nv2qp2 жыл бұрын
Soft? What do you mean by soft. How sharp do you want your lenses to be?
@actstuntcam Жыл бұрын
I've seen it compared to the 100-400 and it was equally sharp. Also, I've looked at the Tamron back to back with Fuji and it is a lot softer.
@POVwithRC Жыл бұрын
@@PS-nv2qpWell, sharper than what it is, you lunk.
@pauloh35912 жыл бұрын
Exactly at 8:15 a blue car is passing by in the background simultaneously to both split screens.
@johndao58702 жыл бұрын
The rare video sample of Fuji 70-300mm. Thanks.
@Alseki72 жыл бұрын
You have such a unique sense of humour (+ the fuji love); another great video :)
@dkhuntin102 жыл бұрын
The Fuj! 😂 that made me crack up for some reason. Great video. I just got this lens today after a six month wait.
@NeuePerspektiveCH2 жыл бұрын
And what is your personal impression after 4 weeks?
@CJ-xg4fi2 жыл бұрын
4:04 me every time I'm out taking photos
@bruhitsme26015 ай бұрын
You actually go out and take pictures, unlike people who sit in their room to do telephoto zoom lens review.
@andresgonzalezcerda76352 жыл бұрын
After use the Olympus ibis..., no return my friend.
@samuelsherman55132 жыл бұрын
I have the nikon Z50, and am looking for a better lens for wildlife than the 50-250 dx. I'm considering the 24-200, which would be a 36-300mm equivalent. I feel like the little bit of extra versatility at both ends would mean I wouldn't be needing to switch lenses as much for wider shots, and have a little more reach on the long end which would be nice for just carrying one lens when hiking. The only thing I can't decide is if I'd rather just go straight for a dedicated lens for wildlife in the same price range like the tamron 100-400, which should be a 150-600 equivalent. Wouldn't be as good for hiking, but I'll probably end up with both, so it's just a matter of which I would pick up first.
@busymamatips14752 ай бұрын
Perfect as usual lol. I’d love to hear your thoughts on the Fuji 18-135mm.. the Sony 18-135 is impressively light so good for travel photography (not great for video)
@-grey2 жыл бұрын
I'm going to describe the magic feel to the fuji lens: Low contrast, slight green blue tint that looks cyan.
@luxdalet2 жыл бұрын
Really want the fuji 70-300mm! But it's out of stock everywhere 😰
@jedibug2 жыл бұрын
I thought you hated the XT4, I'm so confused.
@jedibug2 жыл бұрын
@@ThomasGTV I believe he sold the flat earth Santa gifted one, and regretted it. Then borrowed this camera body from a friend.
@HGQjazz2 жыл бұрын
This Tamron is going to make all other zooms obsolete. This is the only lens anyone ever needs.
@ALSNewsNow Жыл бұрын
Did you actually watch the comparison?
@MENMProd2 жыл бұрын
lol nice review ! yeah a little disapointed .. I think we all ( Fuji users ) hope that this lens will change everything... as you said this is they first x-mount so not bad for a first time ;p
@tomapaunovic2 жыл бұрын
Is this some kind of Fuji cripple hammer happening here? Because on Sony version of Tamron 18-300 stabilization works just fine.
@Dumontjon2 жыл бұрын
I sold my fuji 50-140 and I'll be buying the 70-300 once they start showing up on the used market.
@robin144412 жыл бұрын
Why on earth would you sell the 50-140 ? I'm just curious, because this is a dream lens for me. Maybe it didn't fit your usage ? Else, what were the issues you had with it ?
@Dumontjon2 жыл бұрын
@@robin14441 it's an absolutely fabulous lens, but I was never going to shoot professional events, or portraits with it, and it was far too heavy to lug around as a landscape lens. I also probably only used it 3-4 times in the 2 years I owned it. I bought it for $1500, and sold it for $1300, so at least it's somewhat affordable on the used market. I used the money to buy an x100v, which I'm thrilled about.
@SatanSupimpa2 жыл бұрын
Sony owns part of Tamron, Sony gets paid no matter what.
@tomslittlecorner2 жыл бұрын
I love the 70-300,very nice and good lense:)
@xdyzeN2 жыл бұрын
Never thought i'd have this fun watching a review video ahaha awsome vid btw Just a question, photography wise, specially with surf photography, do they both have the same zoom/range or whatevers the right word for it at 300mm?
@paoloreyes23972 жыл бұрын
Me: Oh there's a used Tamron 18-300mm X Mount in the marketplace Watched your video. Me: Ok i'll pass.
@NeuePerspektiveCH2 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts...
@hepgeoff2 жыл бұрын
Wait, did I hear you say the word "beautiful" and "Fuji" in the same sentence? I do love the 70-300 on my X-T4.
@KimLim-f5u25 күн бұрын
ahhh the "Tonneh" 🙂
@MajmunskaPosla2 жыл бұрын
Tamron has Parkinson disease
@MarcoPolo-lb8up3 ай бұрын
Are your shirts S or XS?
@stevebackart40476 ай бұрын
Nice review! As a videographer, maybe it's time to shift to the Sony ecosystem. Vastly superior auto-focus in the a6700, very good built-in image stabilization, and the newest sensor works great with the speed limitations of the Tamron. You will appreciate Sony's advantages as their auto-focus takes a back seat to no-one. One KZfaqr posted a great comparison between the Tamron and the Sony G 70-350mm equivalent, and the Tamron proves to be quite compelling, particularly given its versatility.
@eddyg17942 ай бұрын
Got the feeling I was watched weird Al Yankovich but for cameras! lol
@mianshams2 жыл бұрын
Best review so far
@hughesy6062 жыл бұрын
Manual focus - which is sharper? Er, the one you nailed focus on? 🤦🏼♂️
@ianlewer23282 жыл бұрын
This was the best review!!! 😊😊😊
@ldr82762 жыл бұрын
Definitely helped me make my mind up! Broski you don't have a "Thanks" button so I can buy you a coffee for your ridiculous efforts in the cold!
@LockeLeon2 жыл бұрын
So the 18-300mm is awesome as long as you have a body with IBIS.
@cameraconspiracies2 жыл бұрын
How do you figure? This was with IBIS and it sucked.
@how-tohermit53192 жыл бұрын
Toneh balls. Looks like the background of credits in a '70's movie. Or it's a condition of not 'releasing the shutter'.
@ericwilliamson98694 ай бұрын
"Oh the cinematic journey..." Hahahahahaha
@deblashbrook32092 жыл бұрын
I have eye and brain wobble from watching that Tamron 😵💫
@rafaelxenes20342 жыл бұрын
Funny as ever and a great camera gear video. Very cool analysis. 👍
@actstuntcam Жыл бұрын
I think the stabe issues are the biggest reason not to buy the Tamron. If you only shot photos, or shot on a tripod, I'd consider it. But that shakiness renders it useless for video. Maybe it could work with IBIS, DIS and BOOST!?
@dave.mac.d2 жыл бұрын
Hmm, should I wait for Tamron to bring their 17-70 2.8 to X-Mount, wait to see what Sigma might make, or pick up a used Fuji 16-55 2.8? Currently have the Fuji 16-80mm and 16mm 2.8 for video.
@kitbentley38092 жыл бұрын
Why would you get the 1655 if you have the 1680?
@dave.mac.d2 жыл бұрын
@@kitbentley3809 I'd replace the 16 2.8 and 16-80 with it...
@rokhaugfoto2 жыл бұрын
i love my 70-300.
@area285 ай бұрын
Haha, very funny review, made me laugh - and getting the information which I should buy - thank's
@KinuGrove2 жыл бұрын
Lol love the humour mixed into a grear video.
@ashleybraganca69522 жыл бұрын
Dude your so funny :D Thank you for doing this for us
@aengusmacnaughton13752 жыл бұрын
"Looks like it's pizza tonight." That's what she said. No, really -- that *is* what she said!!!!
@donelliot76502 жыл бұрын
The Fuji X-T4 has IBIS. wouldn’t the results be the same if stabilization is independent of the lens? I’m probably lacking some knowledge on this, but it seems like if the body is doing the work, the lens OIS would just confuse things..
@gillyb44 Жыл бұрын
Love my Tamron 18-300 on Fuji very sharp and colours are pleasing.. Handheld the IBIS works well on XT 1 and X S10. Thanks for the comparison. Auto focus is awesome too
@jenezung2 жыл бұрын
When will they make 28 75 for fuji
@clippercrafters50672 жыл бұрын
With a gimbal do you think the tamron would be tolerable?? Or does sigma have some magic glass that I should Take a look at in the same ball park as far as zoom range, sharpness, and overall quality.
@radiozelaza2 жыл бұрын
Harsh Polish winter prohibits me from getting out with my Tamron. It may freeze to death
@JohnsClicks2 жыл бұрын
Why get an 18-300 on an interchangeable lens camera in the first place?
@prathyushraj27592 жыл бұрын
Tamaron 18-300mm or XC 50-230mm ois 2 which lens produce better image quality?
@cdill30002 жыл бұрын
For someone who sold the X-T4 you sure do borrow it alot fr subsequent vids LOL. Good Stuff 😆
@mrsleakyshit2 жыл бұрын
I have the Sony E mount version of that lens and it NEVER loses focus like that.
@JetBen5552 жыл бұрын
yeah 3rd party lens on Fuji X mount sucks
@anil5092 жыл бұрын
@@JetBen555 Viltrox 56mm works pretty good for me
@JetBen5552 жыл бұрын
@@anil509 not for video auto focus
@toddm69992 жыл бұрын
Is there a flat low light winter Canada 🇨🇦 lens?
@EnduroLRA2 жыл бұрын
Tamron- did something changed with AF or stabilization after any firmware update?
@deleteddeleted8212 жыл бұрын
I love your videos :D
@vk42442 жыл бұрын
So how does a Panny Boy with a 14-150mm perform in comparison :-)
@PhearNoneGearGadgets2 жыл бұрын
Nice image, stab and focus so so
@DixonLu2 жыл бұрын
Did you get a pre production model? The B&H link says it's coming soon.
@cameraconspiracies2 жыл бұрын
Let's hope.
@Neilendil2 жыл бұрын
Let me know when you find out why Grimace is hanging out with green hat 🤔
@JohnDrummondPhoto2 жыл бұрын
Tamron has good quality glass but not if you need IS. My full frame 150-600 G2 was OK for stills with Canon cameras (both DSLR and mirrorless) but unusable for video, just like yours. The native Canon RF 100-500 is so much more stable it's not funny. It's also sharper, which it better be for $2800 USD. I'll never buy Tamron again. Not that they make anything for RF. If Sigma make anything for Fuji, I'd like to see how that looks.
@cameraconspiracies2 жыл бұрын
I'm with you on the Tamron boycott lol.
@Moosethemountaineer2 жыл бұрын
The stabilization in my 24-70 g2 from Tamron is fantastic. I've never used a 150-600 but I imagine that focal length really isn't meant for handheld shooting regardless of brand
@migueltrujillo59322 жыл бұрын
Canada Mounted Police 4:26?
@mstuartkendall2 жыл бұрын
Dude; You are a Hoot!
@hughesy6062 жыл бұрын
Keep dissin’ those Tamrons and make them cheaper for those that know the difference ;)
@Lordvader3302 жыл бұрын
Fuji if you want 300mm, the color was better too.
@marcograpples6692 жыл бұрын
Hi Casey, thanks for being in the forefront of reviewing gear we will never buy. I am doing a summer trip with my college friends to Greece, and I will be making a video documenting the whole thing. I will be taking my iPhone 12 with a phone gimbal to do the vlogging portion. And to capture the cinema I will be taking my gh5 with the lumix 12-35mm f/2.8, lumix 35-100mm f/4-5.6, and a sigma 30mm f/1.4 for toneh. I have a budget of give or take $500 (American) to add either an action cam or a small drone that I can carry with me on a daily basis. Should I buy the drone and use our phones as action cams for the water related stuff, or should I place my budget on a decent drone? If you recommend the action cam, considering we want it for water related stuff, should I get the dji action cam or the go pro hero 10? Last thing, if you were to do the same trip with your friends, what camera and lenses would you take? Please give me your American affiliate links for the reccomended products
@SydneyTravellersGuide2 жыл бұрын
My god, these videos are so funny
@VIAMYCAMERA2 жыл бұрын
No pretending reviews 👍👍👍
@Snapit5512 жыл бұрын
Great review Kasey 👍 Tamrod sucks and Fudi lens is better