Let me explain why the Canadian coat of arms is so awful. Visit my Canada Guide website! www.thecanadaguide.com
Пікірлер: 1 400
@lancer0116 жыл бұрын
I definitely prefer JJ's coat of arms. Could maybe use a few additions though. At the very least I'd add some hockey sticks along the bottom and slather everything in maple syrup. Seriously though, it's time for Canada to get rid of these British symbols that mean nothing to most Canadians these days. Imagine how many more Canadian historical figured we could have on our money if we got rid of the queen on our coins and $20 bill. Also I cringe any time I'm at an event in Canada where people sing God Save the Queen when there is no obvious reason to. It's not our anthem!
@SamM-pe9lb6 жыл бұрын
But it warms our British hearts 💓
@hououinkymeowma23816 жыл бұрын
I agree with the coat of arms design. Minus the foolish syrup idea. The Queen should not be removed.
@yomomz39216 жыл бұрын
hockey sticks is brilliant! maybe one hockey stick crossed with a sword or stylized rifle at the bottom - to show that Canada's generally peaceful and fun-loving, but can fight well when need be.
@adelioaltomar27456 жыл бұрын
I like it too! While I'd suggest keeping it simple to make it, another addition could make this look really legit. Be kinda cool to see this be made official by the government.
@layton55376 жыл бұрын
lancer011 i
@amcalabrese16 жыл бұрын
Q. How many Canadians does it take to screw in a lightbulb? A. Two. One to screw in the bulb and one to stand around and tell everyone who passes by "we are Canadians not Americans."
@bruhchamp165935 жыл бұрын
Or he could even say “We are Canadians, not Britons.”
@Shivcel1725 жыл бұрын
@@bruhchamp16593 no one wonders if a Canadian is British. Accents are a thing.
@maithfull4 жыл бұрын
1 english and 1 french lol
@f0rm0r4 жыл бұрын
@@maithfull yeah, we need another person to say "et parlons français" or whatever
@andrewmoore70223 жыл бұрын
No 4 1 English speaker to screw in thelightbulb 1 French speaker to also screw in the lightbulb, one to say they're not American in English and the other to say they're not American in French
@Young_Anglican4 жыл бұрын
J.J. : "I hate this thing. This thing is the worst thing in the world." Also J.J. : *Pulls out huge laminated copy of thing*
@lunahlulah67724 жыл бұрын
like the trudeau photo he owns too? and the one of the queen?
@ryanhuntrajput4743 жыл бұрын
USA might be our friend but UK and the commonwealth realms along with France are our family you don't abandon your family and blood just for the sake of one new extravagant friend.
@jakebeaudry81893 жыл бұрын
@@ryanhuntrajput474 Technically America was a formerly estranged big brother who left the family.
@ryanhuntrajput4743 жыл бұрын
@@jakebeaudry8189 with all due respect, it doesn't work like that if you abandon the family and after leaving the family you try to kill another member so you can have his inheritance as well you truly deserve to be banished and treated like a social pariah .
@jakebeaudry81893 жыл бұрын
@@ryanhuntrajput474 Hence why till recent history that America is the enemy and we still have doubts about them. The situation would be different if they stay by the crown and commonwealth.
@harrybelyea10986 жыл бұрын
“The thistle, shamrock, rose entwined, the maple leaf forever !”
@SilentBudgie3 жыл бұрын
That was changed to “The lily, thistle, shamrock, rose, the maple leaf forever!” to include the French.
@SylviaRustyFae2 жыл бұрын
@@SilentBudgie Gotta love how whenever the French Canadians insist on bein included they try to stick themselves first
@hpsauce10786 жыл бұрын
England never conquered Scotland, James VI inherited both kingdoms under a personal union after the death of Elizabeth I...
@robinshea68276 жыл бұрын
I've heard it's because when Scotland and England unified, it was seen as Scotland 'handing over the reigns to England'. James VI moved down south, and the government was based down south. Especially with England's bigger population, army, and economy, and its empire starting off successfully. And Scotland being bankrupted by an unsuccessful attempt at an empire.
@danielrice27416 жыл бұрын
Yes that is one glaring mistake, glad you brought that up. I'm a small "c' conservative when it comes to changing symbles
@TheMetallicaboy006 жыл бұрын
Accordingly to what i've read the unicorn was adopted as the national "mascot" in the late 14 th century, because this creature (for some reason) is the rival of the lion, England's symbol, so i guess the unicorn was chosen on purpose. The crown with a chain represents the monarch power, that is the only thing that can keep the unicorn tamed.
@alexander97035 жыл бұрын
England did technically conquer Scotland, briefly. Edward I was acknowledged as Lord Paramount of Scotland, whom all claimants to the Scottish Crown acknowledged English suzerainty. This was brief, obviously, didn't last and has absolutely nothing to do with the coat of arms.
@finaltuned27555 жыл бұрын
@Alex Saunders, By that logic that means the Catholic Jacobites led by Prince Charles conquered England briefly as well, and that England was a long conquered nation before that with the Norman ascendancy - which was a Papist integration of more land with Rome the capital to set down more roots in foreign lands. King Edward I of England was invited over, he was an opportunist, he saw an opportunity in Scotland's lack of stability after the death of King Alexander III of Scotland and Queen Margaret Queen of Scots (Maid of Norway) dying on the boat journey over to Scotland being the catalyst that started it off in the first place.
@GreatKhanMatt6 жыл бұрын
Not true regarding the chain around the Unicorn as Scotland was actually not conquered into the UK. In fact a Scottish king joined the crowns when he became King of England.
@flynn6596 жыл бұрын
I also don't get the France conquored thing. EDIT: I think he meant the French territories in mainland America.
@iandrsaurri6256 жыл бұрын
It is chained because according to mythology, the unicorn is extremely dangerous and uncontrollable without a chain on it.
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
I'm not British!
@diogeneticist35856 жыл бұрын
In that case, perhaps you should research more thoroughly before speaking authoritatively?
@jonasbeithrasmussen96376 жыл бұрын
He probably mean the one hundred years war were england claim the french throne and conquered a third of france.
@ianrclose57526 жыл бұрын
The reason the unicorn is in chains is not *purposefully* to do with conquering Scotland, but because unicorns were always thought to be feral animals that needed to be chained up and tamed (as opposed to lions?)
@rebootmyth87536 жыл бұрын
The chains are there because the unicorn is a fantasy beast, and heraldry rules required that fantasy beasts be shown with chains. They were there since before the union. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Arms_of_Scotland
@LoydAvenheart5 жыл бұрын
That's a weird rule, wonder why that is.
@wholelifeahead5 жыл бұрын
Also Scotland was never conquered, Scotland inheritied England
@historytales2025 жыл бұрын
And *technically* Scotland “conquered” England because asked king James of Scotland to be their king, but king James quickly began appealing to the largest demographic.
@1000eau3 жыл бұрын
But wasn't the unicorn considered a real animal when the coat of arms was created ?
@jakemurray26356 жыл бұрын
I think it's important to keep at least some of our (canadas) British history alive as tens of thousands of Canadians died for that coat of arms and for the king
@rajkaranvirk75252 жыл бұрын
I disagree Canada isn’t a colony anymore, keeping antiquated institutions is a sign of regression not progress, also this isn’t a flag, it’s a coat of arms, they ultimately would’ve died if any other coat of arms existed. You can’t bring up war veterans to keep old institutions.
@Emily-qd9bq2 жыл бұрын
@@rajkaranvirk7525 You have some good points, but I do like our current coat of arms. We are not a colony but are still in the commonwealth, it is nice to acknowledge our roots especially since we are a country where we delete everything old to make room for the new sadly. We have to remember where we came from, maturing as a country recognises this while at the same time moving forward. Also, I think the intention with the coat of arms is important, as is it intended specifically Canadian government to be a symbol currently, or just something to represent us? In a nutshell, it represents us, and I would argue that it even does so currently as those things are constant -- it isn't like our founders can change. What isn't constant is influence, especially with everyone coming here now, but that doesn't mean it still does not represent us. I get that JJ thinks it doesn't represent us currently, but it still whether he likes to think about it or not, does represent Canada in a sense that the government looks at, which isn't the current "culture" or whatever he and other people so often look to for a new coat of arms.
@LindaAndrews-ly1qf11 ай бұрын
@@rajkaranvirk7525 your name implies you aren’t of British heritage. Get the hell out of Canada if you want to disrespect our British heritage.
@taylorcalum36856 жыл бұрын
Scotland was not conquered!
@lucatiziani35276 жыл бұрын
You are right, it's almost the opposite, since, after Elizabeth I's death, the crown of England was offered to the king of Scotland, James VI, who became James I of England
@aymarafan76695 жыл бұрын
@Calum Taylor I think it represents Nova Scotia, colony of the Scots at one point and is now Canadian province.
@eldoradolou4 жыл бұрын
Perhaps J.J. was watching the movie "Braveheart", before he made this video.
@aid44516 жыл бұрын
A few corrections: -Scotland wasn't conquered by England. They were in fact united by King James the first. -The unicorn is in fact chained as it was thought to be dangerous. -The red ans white roses are Tudor roses symbolising the formation of the Tudor dynasty with the houses of Lancaster and York coming together with marriage.
@ryanhuntrajput4743 жыл бұрын
@Avignoné Énervé exactly
@dchan193623 жыл бұрын
@Avignoné Énervé actually Brits did conquer portions of France including Calais. The Plantagenet Dynasty can trace their roots to Aquitaine region of France. English kings also called themselves kings of France till the 1800.
@hotwax9376 Жыл бұрын
I was going to make the same point about Scotland as well, but you beat me to it.,
@Jackson-nr2mw4 жыл бұрын
I actually quite like the old coat of arms cuz it's like a cool older symbol from a older period of canadian history. Since Canada doesn't have alot of history I think its important to celebrate what little history we do have
@rhinestonecowboy97202 жыл бұрын
Incorporate the indigenous Canadians more, Canada’s history could go back all the way to the ice age.
@ATIMELINEOFAVIATION6 ай бұрын
@@vibes292 that would actually make more interesting heraldry instead of the boring crap Britain has
@videogamebomer6 жыл бұрын
You look alot younger without the mustache
@sean..L6 жыл бұрын
He's still ugly though. Inside and out.
@CarlosRios16 жыл бұрын
*yoonger
@semiautothanoscar96126 жыл бұрын
With a moustach he looks like borat.
@Mrskateboardboy6 жыл бұрын
Still pretty freaky though.
@haiironosora97146 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one that thinks he's kinda handsome
@irishpennsylvanian96716 жыл бұрын
Put that on a blue sheet, and voila! You got yourself a US state flag!
@yomomz39216 жыл бұрын
irishpennsylvanian - that's silly nonsense! Canada would never be a state! or would it..... ? hmm...
@fds74764 жыл бұрын
Let's not.
@Christopher_TG3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to Cody's List of Shame.
@huaninhkhanh12212 жыл бұрын
Put it on a white sheet and you got yourself a mexico state flag
@jenlennon66146 жыл бұрын
Give the Beaver and the Moose some crowns and they'll be kings of their own little world.
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
Mark Johnson Nice callback.
@gilgalad73995 жыл бұрын
such is the coat of arms of Chile gcdn.emol.cl/educacion-para-ninos/files/2012/08/escudo-chile.jpg
@pachonman956 жыл бұрын
Quick correction: the French references represent the heritage of French Canadians, one of the "founding nations" of Canada.
@EthanPureOak3 жыл бұрын
Unless you’re stereotypically a bri’ish person and hates on the oi’rish then yeah
@ayes16692 жыл бұрын
ur hot
@Ash-yh5oy2 жыл бұрын
@@joshuataylor3550 they have appeared in your coat of arms before though.
@ZaFrOCDI6 жыл бұрын
England never owned France. It was normans who conquered England 1066 and installed new crown and they had same time parts of France under France crown. It became vassal more powerful than leader of the vassaliser; France.
@robbson23906 жыл бұрын
Also Richard the Lionheart, he owned more of France than the French did at the time.
@diegocano84056 жыл бұрын
In fact, monarchs like Henry VIII were known as king of England, Wales, Ireland and... FRANCE!
@ZaFrOCDI6 жыл бұрын
Diego Cano did he own France as hole? Was he the only king of the France crown for long period of time? For common history from 1066 to end of 100 years war conflict it was just a fraction if any.
@robbson23906 жыл бұрын
During the 100 years war the French owned very little land, the English owned more land, it wasn't until the war of the Roses that the French started taking back France.
@eruyommo6 жыл бұрын
S.E.M Asantehene I'd like to remind you that most national symbols show what a country wants to think of itself more than factual reality. And there was a British claim for the French crown for centuries. Also, they weren't so crazy thinking so since they had control over most of the French territory.
@KaiserDeclan6 жыл бұрын
It's not dat bad
@sillybilly4146 жыл бұрын
Frankly I like it
@engmac81786 жыл бұрын
I love it
@Sparx6326 жыл бұрын
It’s not very unique but it definitely looks nice imo.
@lukejohns59006 жыл бұрын
Yo is that a Kaiserreich avatar
@user-lh5ei7iu9g6 жыл бұрын
Personally I love it! And I'm not British.
@thewaterbokforum1966 жыл бұрын
Its nice to see the Welsh and Cornish are represented on the UK coat of arms
@radfordpilgrim43936 жыл бұрын
no one cares about Cornwall, but representation of Wales and NI should be there definetly
@saurabhbanik78116 жыл бұрын
Bees in British Heraldry ,Cornwall and Wales are seen as part of England and not separate entities. The harp in the British CoA represents the island of Ireland as a whole i.e both NI and the republic of Ireland.
@jonathanwebster709111 ай бұрын
Technicalllllllly…while they’re not represented in the UK coat of arms (which is simultaneously that of the monarch…it’s…complicated), they are included in the coat of arms of the heir (or at least, they were until the King came to the throne). Because the heir is Prince of Wales, the arms of Scotland are at the centre (an “inescutcheon”) of his coat of arms. And because he’s also Duke of Cornwall, the coat of arms of Cornwall (basically, nine yellow dots, or ‘bezants’ on a black, or ‘sable’ background) is also featured: it’s below the main coat of arms of the Prince of Wales. And the heir has a totally separate coat of arms that he uses just for Scotland, with allusions to his titles of Duke of Rothesay, Prince and Great Steward of Scotland, and Lord of the Isles, all of which he holds as regards Scotland.
@SirAnthonyChirpsALot2 жыл бұрын
"The lion represents England and the unicorn represents Scotland. These are the two founding kingdoms of Great Britain." Wales weeps in the corner. A dragon would've been too epic for the coat of arms anyway.
@IntelVoid2 жыл бұрын
How about we just say the shield is one if the dragon's scales.
@erikvanderheeg5729 Жыл бұрын
Wales is not a Kingdom - it is a Principality.
@okaysad7990 Жыл бұрын
Wales actually used to be on the coat of arms before being replaced by Scotland
@imperators_87003 жыл бұрын
England never “owned” France they just claimed the French throne
@battlepans19273 жыл бұрын
This post was made by the Anjevin denier gang
@grzybjak6 жыл бұрын
1:14 "And at the bottom there are 3 Maple Leafs" **LEAFS** Are you a filthy Torontonian?
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
Drowsy Sailor oh God, they’ve brainwashed me!
@JoshuaKimbrough6 жыл бұрын
Drowsy Sailor He From Van City
@bruhchamp165935 жыл бұрын
You got some ‘splaining to do, J.J.!
@elliotlazarus92574 жыл бұрын
I like the current one. It’s more than amazing. It’s rooted in history and represent how this country was founded.
@User-qo8rw2 жыл бұрын
It's important the retain our symbols of our founding nations. It's what created the foundation of Canada. We have been blessed with many of immigrants from all over the world to help build our nation. But it's important to know the roots of our country. The coat of arms is like a story of how our country was born.
@infxrnalsylvan Жыл бұрын
It represents Britain more over canada.
@User-qo8rw Жыл бұрын
@@infxrnalsylvan Did you not read my comment? I said it represents the roots of our country which was very British, and there's nothing wrong with that.
@withamarshview14363 жыл бұрын
"The McCullough design is hereby approved."
@xowky46 жыл бұрын
I might be the only one who likes our coat of arms aha then again I am also fond of our historical ties to Britain, and I'm a fan of the traditional aesthetic. To me it looks elegant, and unless a newer one is equal in how it's structured (basically nice to look at), I will always prefer the one we currently have.
@SenorMeinKrafter6 жыл бұрын
...kind of looks too messy to me, personally.
@slenderfoxx37972 жыл бұрын
You're not alone I agree with all that you said lol
@AlexS-oj8qf6 жыл бұрын
I would like to point out things I think is a Mistake: "Scotland was Conquered by England". Scottish monarch inherit English throne because the English ones keep dying out without any heirs. And because there is no other contestant on the English throne, the Scottish royal family merge the crown since both are inseparable, creating a Personal Union, which happens a lot. You don't have to conquer a nation to annex it, back then. "Back when France owned by England" Country couldn't own another Country. It's the monarch or person who control over the land, not the state. Also English kings were only control half of France (Aquitania, Gascony, Anjou, Normandy) and they never actually obtain the French Crown themself. Maybe the Fleur de Lys is a homage to the French Heritage of Quebec, because Canada was a French Colony. Also Canada is a British dominion and their head of state is Queen Elizabeth II, so yeah, the similar coat of arms is make sense. You're not independent, Canada, just self governing.
@northatlanticcommonwealth11884 жыл бұрын
Canada is no longer a Dominion the British government relinquished all political power in Canada in 1987, the queen is still head of state in Canada, but her title their is queen of Canada as in ruling Canada as an independent nation
@BoraCM4 жыл бұрын
By the time Great Britain had colonised Canada, it had lost all of their holdings in France a few centuries prior.
@isaacorganist4 жыл бұрын
@@northatlanticcommonwealth1188 She was relinquishing her power and the British Governments power so we can change our own constitution.
@rajkaranvirk7525 Жыл бұрын
Canada is NOT a dominion anymore, the British have absolutely no powers in Canada.
@rajkaranvirk7525 Жыл бұрын
@@isaacorganist Dude the British government have absolutely NO powers in Canada anymore.
@misterpat66 жыл бұрын
"The coat of arms of Canada which is quite a hideous abomination." -J. J.
@sean..L6 жыл бұрын
I bet that's how his parents feels about him.
@-rizen6 жыл бұрын
This guy Do you mean you
@jessmorgan67326 жыл бұрын
OK, we went over this before, but I'd really like you to draw it. Supporters (currently the lion and unicorn): polar bear on left, moose on right Crest (currently the crowned lion): a beaver holding a maple leaf Shield: divided into three sections by an upside-down Y shape: in the first section, a white pine on red, yellow and black; in the second section, a grey inukshuk on white; in the third section, a white Metis infinity symbol on blue Compartment (the very bottom, currently occupied by flowers): rippling water
@hasshamhabib20686 жыл бұрын
Yes
@yomomz39216 жыл бұрын
Polar Bear is badass! if Canada doesn't swipe the imagery, I'm pretty sure Alaska's gonna call dibs at some point - it's too badass to ignore.
@Knutwolf6 жыл бұрын
The fleur-de-lises represent Francophone Canada, the whole New France thing.
@joelpenner68376 жыл бұрын
I like the old Coat of arms. Very classy, tells the story of our nations foundations. and after all, who doesn't like unicorns and Lions?
@currently78863 жыл бұрын
Things that never existed in Canada or in the Americas for that matter (whereas Lions did exist in Europe, and the Unicorn is simply because Scotland is so special)
@LaFacedera2 жыл бұрын
@@currently7886 There are 24 lions on the coat of arms of Belgium but there have never been lions in Belgium.
@vroomkaboom1082 жыл бұрын
@@currently7886 lmao, anglo-saxons and francophones also didn't exist in canada yet here we are. Just what in the world is so outlandish and upsetting about a country giving a damn about its roots? At this point every J.J. video is just canadians of the past: "haha my parents, culture, language and institutions are all british, i do feel very british! I love being part of the empire and i will cherish all of the heritage it gave me!" J.J:"NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT DO THAT YOU HAVE TO STRICTLY BIND YOURSELF TO THE ACCIDENTAL GEOGRAPHIC POSITION YOU HAPPENED TO BE BORN ON NOOOOOOOO"
@User-qo8rw2 жыл бұрын
Nicely said. I agree completely.
@peterl48492 жыл бұрын
The reason the unicorn is chained up is to show that the scottish kings were so strong and powerful that they could tame the untameable unicorn
@wheatpennycollector84636 жыл бұрын
I love how you changed your channel logo. Keep up the good work man.
@flawlessbinary74496 жыл бұрын
I think we should also represent the founding races: - The Aboriginals; - The English; - The French.
@imperialcrusader26476 жыл бұрын
The Amerindians weren't founders, just the English and the French. Canada is Anglo-French and should stay that way.
@Gabdube6 жыл бұрын
There is as much difference between the aboriginal nations as there is between the French, English, Breton, Scottish, Irish and Basque historical settlers.
@angeloreyes19516 жыл бұрын
Flawless Binary ah yes the five races of the world, black,white, asian, English and French.
@principetnomusic6 жыл бұрын
Why French? We're talking about humans here.
@principetnomusic5 жыл бұрын
Vick Nad That would make sense if the First Nations were still the majority
@Perrygallo6 жыл бұрын
We must not forget that Canada has a monarchy, a monarch whose Coat of Arms happens to represent the UK as well. Let us remember: Canada's Coat of Arms is more about its allegiance to the Queen than it is to British history. The Union Jack is flown around Canada to commemorate our membership of the Commonwealth, our monarchy, and yes, also our British history.
@hotwax9376 Жыл бұрын
In fairness, JJ is on record against the Canadian monarchy, so take that as you will.
@soap85725 жыл бұрын
1:51 actually they say the Unicorn is dangerous when it's loose... And that's why it's chained up
@Arjibi3 жыл бұрын
Jay Foreman: Celtic winging moroN
@mrman85413 жыл бұрын
It's say its the best coat of arms after the British coat of arms. Oh and by the way, the unicorn isn't chained up, the chain is broken.
@MerkieAE6 жыл бұрын
Love your videos! Keep it up!
@captainpalegg28606 жыл бұрын
When he said “every country has one”, that peaked my interest and I just had to Google image search “United States coat of arms”. Definitely nothing I hadn’t seen before, but I never really connected the dots that that’s what it was-probably because we call it the Great Seal or something weird like that. I guess the founding fathers associated the phrase “coat of arms” with the British monarchy or something.
@Christopher_TG3 жыл бұрын
The official coat of arms of the United States is simply the design that's inside the Great Seal ( rb.gy/qwib7g ). Like the Canadian coat of arms it still follows European heraldic tradition, but it's far simpler with only four elements (escutcheon, supporter, crest, motto) as opposed to Canada's seven (escutcheon, supporters, crest, torse, order, motto, compartment). Plus its armiger is the country of the United States while the armiger of Canada's coat of arms is the Queen of Canada.
@conserztasfia00782 жыл бұрын
Me too I googled "coat of arms of bangladesh" and saw the national emblem of Bengal bruh I guess the tern "coat of arms" is for constitutional monarchies
@Shkk Жыл бұрын
By coat of arms he meant logos of Nations some call it cost of arms some call it seal some call it state emblem or national emblem. Some countries call it coat of arms as their emblem follows the rules of heraldry and if I am not wrong usually European countries and many of their former colonies have coat of arms .
@Shkk Жыл бұрын
@@conserztasfia0078 No the term coat of arms is used when it follows rules of heraldry. Some countries do not follow so they call their symbol has national emblem or seal eg. India , Bangladesh, Japan , China etc.
@DA-uv1fs5 жыл бұрын
Your suggested coat of arms is a lot like Australia's--taking the UK coat of arms to acknowledge its historical ties, and adapting it with local animals and symbols. They should do it!
@lior33006 жыл бұрын
big amblem showing moose and a banner saying "Sorry eh!" on a maple leaf cover
@TheFreshman3212 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 so true.
@RealLifeW0rld6 жыл бұрын
The coat of arms is *ALREADY* very very *GREAT* !!!!
@currently78863 жыл бұрын
Go away with that British nonsense
@ryanhuntrajput4743 жыл бұрын
@@currently7886 being cultured is considered awful now great let me guess none of your ancestors fought any wars against America and paid in blood for canada sovreignity did they , the people who saved this country and made this country chose this COAT OF ARMS IT SHALL STAY THIS WAY UNTIL THE END OF TIME .
@currently78863 жыл бұрын
@@ryanhuntrajput474 My ancestors. Bruh. Not only have my ancestors been in Canada for hundreds of years, but they also fought in many wars for Canada. Indeed 3 of my immediate family members are in the military now. What are you on against?
@ryanhuntrajput4743 жыл бұрын
@@currently7886 o really and you still want to abolish all the regalia symbolism and nostalgic british and french memorabilia which reminds us of great history culture and heritage how could you possibly condemn and denigrate the exact ideology which brought prosperity wealth and peace to the north you do realise if you're not lying your ancestors fought to prevent republicanism and corporate take over of a country by fighting wars for the british or french and now you want sell our sovreignity for a couple of dollars it's our identity to be a constitutional monarchy and association with the French without them we are just another USA. You should Be proud of who you are be proud of being a Canadian .🇨🇦
@currently78863 жыл бұрын
@@ryanhuntrajput474 Easy. The Christian worldview is subjective and is in now way the absolute truth as absolute truth is unavailable to us as humans. We need to do away with a divinely appointed monarch and likewise the institutions that gain their power from it. Instead the power should be granted to the people by the people themselves. The symbols of the British history are entangled in a religious world view that does not hold up under scrutiny. As it pertains to the CoA, Canada being an independent nation should have one that represents Canada and the goals of Canadians rather than supporting a historic sovereign. Claim the sovereignty coupled with its own identity.
@Shovlaxnet6 жыл бұрын
Moose and beaver as the animals, maple leaf, totem pole, Quebec symbol, maybe a Gaelic symbol (Atlantic provinces) and perhaps a Mountie riding in the middle of it all.
@quintiniusverginix78276 жыл бұрын
How come French- and Gaelic-Canadians get symbols but not English-Canadians? They're the majority after all
@Shovlaxnet6 жыл бұрын
I couldn't think of a good English Canadian symbol. Thought the maple leaf was that.
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
I don't like the idea of a coat of arms having "ethnic" symbols in a country as diverse as Canada. That's not what Canada is about. Aboriginal symbols are different, because they represent the history of the land.
@Shovlaxnet6 жыл бұрын
Then could British and French symbols be a different thing, since they have a lot of history in Canada? Also, I might have a bit of a weird perspective on this stuff since I come from Florida, and our flag has the flag of a long-dead empire in it.
@eggy5436 жыл бұрын
Shovlaxnet J.J.'s coat of arms beaver and moose remind me of Handy and Lumpy (both from HTF) respectively.
@-gemberkoekje-55472 жыл бұрын
I believe the design looks great. The things id change is: -Removing the scottish and irsh symbols and replacing them with native symbols. -Replacing the Lion with a Moose -Replacing the Unicorn with a Horse -Replacing the top Lion with a Beaver
@JensontheBasterd Жыл бұрын
Horses aren't native to Canada
@-gemberkoekje-5547 Жыл бұрын
@@JensontheBasterd so what?
@RexTee4386 жыл бұрын
where is your mustachio? :(
@user-sd5dz2dc6u6 жыл бұрын
Tee Rex he shaved it off.
@misterpat66 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iatoZ8-ZsdXadYU.html
@stefane45816 жыл бұрын
France was never owned by England?
@stefane45816 жыл бұрын
Cucumber Man yes but England didn't control ALL of france only half of it
@lizmutton45276 жыл бұрын
Geneva Mapping yes that's right! Normandy and parts of Brittany was owned by England back in the 1300-1400s but they eventually lost it because of the Hundred Years' War. Also not half, more like an eighth
@gwendalduforum4 жыл бұрын
More like "French kingdom of England" at this time
@captainspaghetti84064 жыл бұрын
I am a hobbyist who is interested in heraldry. Most of the terms used in this video were downright wrong and inaccurate. A coat of arms refers not only to a "country's logo" but any armorial achievement that can be borne by individuals, corporations, municipalities, etc. Most of the elements of the shield that you pointed out, including the "lion" and "weird helmet" and "flowers" have names, respectively the "supporters", "helm", and "compartment". While I do agree the Canadian coat of arms isn't the best national coat and could definitely be improved, please do your research before making another video that concerns heraldry.
@miguelangel97086 жыл бұрын
Had to take my break right now to watch this... Worth it...
@stuartfindlay64034 жыл бұрын
Scotland wasnt conquered by England - they mutually entered a union.
@skogenfjr70356 жыл бұрын
I personally take a great deal of delight in the representations of our national British heritage. The Coat of Arms is a prime example of this. Additional examples include but are not limited to: The reigning monarch on our coins, $20.00 and $1,000.00 bank notes, the Ontario and Manitoba versions of the Red Ensign (as well as other provincial flags), even the political system as a whole. I also fly a canvas Union Jack or a Green Leaf Red Ensign from time to time. There are many things that make Canada a nation we can mutually pride ourselves in (Maple syrup, hockey, beavers, moose, lots and lots of snow, red /black checkered plaid shirts, poutine, bagged milk, Kraft Dinner, early thanksgiving, universal health care, etc.) and the British symbols, motifs, homages, and other such reminders are a key part of this great nation that spans from sea to shining sea.
@maple25242 жыл бұрын
Canada is a predominantly white, predominantly Anglo-Saxon country with sturdy historical ties to the United Kingdom. It’s still a dominion, still has queen Elizbeth II as its head of state, and is still a member of the Commonwealth. I feel as though many of Canada’s efforts to set up a unique and independent cultural identity are done as an effort to differentiate them from their Southern neighbours, and even though having a patriotic identity is fine, I don’t see what the Frozen North stands to gain from abolishing its history and getting rid of symbols and ideas that sons of the nation died for very recently.
@marcmortimore89336 жыл бұрын
love how his voice goes super deep at the end of each sentence!
@jonathanwebster709111 ай бұрын
I actually really, really like JJ’s design (less is more as regards heraldic design, to put it simply). Although I’d put the totem pole on a helmet (as it’s above the shield, it would be the crest of the coat of arms, which is properly put upon a helmet, but often omitted).
@abdulplayz86122 жыл бұрын
Tbh I think Canada's coat of arms look kinda cool
@warbearin6 жыл бұрын
"Abuut" oh that hurts to hear. - About.
@dramani1006 жыл бұрын
Nice video ...glad I recently found your channel
@carly.16724 жыл бұрын
0:35 J.J. : Every country has a coat of arms. *Cries in Turkish*
@izimations3 жыл бұрын
Lol Turkey just used the Cresent to replace it right!
@engmac81786 жыл бұрын
Canada wasn't founded at the same time France was owned by Britain, damn your history is bad
@nicopare38086 жыл бұрын
It's not the same without the moustache.
@noobpro97593 жыл бұрын
A Mountie and a hockey player holding a shield that has a bowl of poutine on it with 5 maple leaves in the shape of a cross, the middle one being big enough to see behind the poutine with the Motto above on a banner.
@jamescobalt82095 жыл бұрын
I'm into the one you drew. Maybe add some poutine, a bottle of maple syrup, have the beaver holding a hockey stick, the moose with a lacrosse stick (used in Canada's *actual* official sport), a stubby bottle, and a pot leaf
@The_Alt_Vault6 жыл бұрын
What’s wrong with it, it shows off your British heritage as well as the French heritage but is also uniquely Canadian, the only thing I might say could change would be the unicorn to a moose but that’s about it.In the end the Anglosphere excluding America all have similar coats of arms with distinctive differences which honour their British legacy and their unique qualities.
@trlacr17814 жыл бұрын
But JJ is incredibly obsessed with the US.
@dbharu24896 жыл бұрын
Your version of the coat of arms is oh so much better. I love flags and even though the canadian coat of arms isn't a flag it sets of so many alarms
@TenOrbital3 жыл бұрын
You just did a Canadian version of the Australian arms - kangaroo and emu (EEM-YOO), state shields packed into one shield, wattle, federal star, etc.
@SarahMorrigan6 жыл бұрын
Add an element from each of the provinces. A dogwood flower from BC, a wild rose from Alberta, that big stone tower from Nunavut, a trillium from Ontario, etc.
@superchaz15206 жыл бұрын
Love your vids
@jacobgagen4476 жыл бұрын
That coat of arms has symbolism that has extremely importiant meaning to canada. Your coat of arms has no history in it, but it has 2 animals that live there. Great. Canadian history makes us who we are weather we like it or not. And as a matter of fact, name somthing on the “old” coat of arms that doesn’t have to do with canada
@frankietobarensis50335 жыл бұрын
Basic everything, but for historic purpose keep the format change the bearers and the shields heraldic symbols to include the canadian provinces like they used to in the old days
@jimking22994 жыл бұрын
The beaver isn't just an animal that lives here. It's been a prominent Canadian symbol for a very long time, largely because the insanely lucrative trade in beaver fur was responsible for much of the early exploration of the country.
@SilentBudgie3 жыл бұрын
You think the beaver has no relevance to Canadian history? Seriously? Beavers were the main reason the interior of the country was first explored by Europeans.
@andrewmoore70223 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's not like the country was pretty much colonized for the beaver trade no relevance to Canada at all.
@ryanhuntrajput4743 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmoore7022 exactly
@CarterNickerson6 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video about Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
@Gabdube6 жыл бұрын
The Unicorn also represented France. France and Scotland have that symbol in common, mostly through inter-marriage of their nobilities, and because Scotland was France's historical ally. Fun fact: there were scots on both sides of the battle of Québec, which pitted french troops and canadian militia against scottish highlanders and english troops, on a field owned by a former scotsman. Among the canadian militia were immigrants from scotland, bretony and other parts of the french-allied political sphere.
@elderr.perales-vazquez9346 жыл бұрын
France is in the flag because they used to own Canada before Britain
@sausagejockyGaming4 жыл бұрын
No the french parts are in the british flag because during the angevin kingdom the Uk owned like 3/4 of france
@jdbtl6 жыл бұрын
So many mistakes. JJ, please do proper research next time and don't give such a biased version of Canadian history. 1. The chains on the unicorn do not represent England's "conquest" of Scotland, which is btw not an accurate way to describe how England and Scotland were united anyway. Unicorns are traditionally chained in heraldry, as a sort of symbol of the bearer's strength - a unicorn is legendarily wild and untameable, so if you actually managed to tame it, you must be very powerful. 2.The other parts on the UK shield do not represent other parts of the 'British Empire', they represent other parts of BRITAIN. Since France was no longer claimed when Canada was formed in 1921, its inclusion on the Canadian arms couldn't possibly be symbolising ownership over France. Obviously, therefore, it represents French Canadians, one of the founding peoples of Canada, while the other parts represent English, Scottish, and Irish Canadians. 3. FFS, Canada wasn't a colony in 1921. It was a Dominion, which by that time essentially meant it was independent, a position formalised just a few years after that. Why can't you accept that many Canadians at the time still saw Britain as the mother country and felt a special tie to it, but were nonetheless independent members of the Empire, like Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland? It's perfectly understandable that you don't see that legacy as relevant anymore, but that doesn't mean that it has "nothing to do" with Canada - clearly, it's pretty central to Canada's history, and moreover it's a heritage that was celebrated way past the point at which Canada effectively was fully independent, not something that existed only when Canada was a colony and has now gone away because Canada is now independent. I do actually like your design, it's a lot more like Australia, which used native animals and such (adopted soon after Australia federated into one Dominion just like Canada - apparently them being a "colony" as you wrongly termed it did not stop them from strongly asserting a more independent identity while maintaining the same loyalty to the 'mother country' as Canada). Would be nice to also represent the provinces. However, I also like the current coat of arms, most importantly because I don't think a country's historical legacy and where it came from have nothing to do with it - it's actually much stranger for a country to turn its back on its past and the basis for its foundation (which in Canada's case, the preamble of the constitution states quite clearly). Certainly, this doesn't have to be represented in the coat of arms, as Australia, NZ, and others show, but it's not a bad thing either. Perhaps Canada's coat of arms overdoes it, I could agree with that - a compromise solution could be to change the supporters (the animals on either side) with Canadian animals as you propose in your version.
@jdmussel88556 жыл бұрын
"The chains actually signify that the unicorn cannot be oppressed, since the chains are broken and, if reattached to anything, will be broken again. The unicorn with the chain has been used as a Scottish royal symbol since long before the union with England." www.heraldry.ca/misc/coatArmsCanada.htm
@seanseanston6 жыл бұрын
Well if you want to be technical, Ireland wasn't independent at all in 1921. And probably you could argue no dominion was in effect until the Statute of Westminster in 1931.
@jdbtl6 жыл бұрын
Regarding Ireland, you're right, dominion status officially only took effect the following year. Regarding dominions, the term 'dominion' was one that dates at least to Canada's Confederation in 1867. Though its meaning evolved over time, it was from the beginning always meant to be a state of greater independence than a 'colony'. It's pretty clear that by 1921, if not earlier, it had come to mean virtually independent with the main exception of foreign affairs, hence Ireland in 1921 was granted 'dominion' status. This meaning of dominion was formalised and enhanced into complete independence with the statute of Westminster. Legally speaking, yes, dominion status was officially, de jure, still much more like being a colony with Britain still being able to make laws for dominions etc., but as with so many things in the British constitution, what's on paper is not a perfect representation of reality. For example, when did Britain become a parliamentary system instead of a monarchy, with the prime minister really being chosen by and responsible to parliament instead of the monarch? On paper, Britain (as well as Australia and Canada) are still fully monarchies. In reality, though, they're obviously parliamentary systems.
@TripWagstaff52136 жыл бұрын
Part of me would like to see a new coat of arms and part of me doesn't because the coat of arms is one of the last major things we still have that represents our British heritage, and since we've lost so much of our British symbols it would be nice to keep at least one thing that shows our history.
@rajkaranvirk75252 жыл бұрын
You can always read books on history instead of keeping them intact in your government, Canada isn’t a colony anymore, the fact that Canada’s national Animal(the beaver) isn’t even on its own coat arms speaks volumes of how outdated it is
@HEAK412 жыл бұрын
Thank Mr.JJ
@kevinsaldanha25606 жыл бұрын
U look handsome without the moustache
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
Oh, you.
@finalanime15816 жыл бұрын
I like the old one because I'm British
@goodcookgaming53526 жыл бұрын
**plays Maple Leaf Rag in the background**
@joaopedroauriemo2 жыл бұрын
Very clever use of Maple Leaf Rag
@seantitus27693 жыл бұрын
I like J.J.'s, with one addendum: put the Crown at the top. :D Anyway, the problematic thing about the current one isn't so much that it has imperial roots, but that the British symbols far outweigh the other elements in it. Canada purports to be bilingual with three "founding nations" (the British, the French, and the First Nations). There is nothing signifying the First Nations, and the references to the French (the fleur-de-lis) are clearly thrown in as a mere token in the mix rather than given an equal presence as a founding nation. The national balance portrayed (between the English & the Scots) is definitely more relevant to the UK rather than Canada.
@_bruce1325 жыл бұрын
As a Canadian, I'd like my 5 mins back.
@justballin85086 жыл бұрын
The British coat of arms doesn’t have any Fleur de Lis. It has the yellow lioms for England, a red lion for Scotland, a harp for Ireland and smaller yellow lions for Whales
@celeste18796 жыл бұрын
I was thinking we could have the national animal (Beaver) in the middle of a shield in the middle of the coat of arms, and under the beaver the national motto. Then we could have moose on either side and 2 hockey sticks which are handle to handle on the bottom. Maple leaves could line the top like tinsel almost. Maybe we could also incorporate Tim Hortons, maple syrup and poutine too..... probably not though aha. I also really like the idea Lancer011 had. :). I'm not sure I have an opinion about removing the hints to our British/ French history, though.
@TriggerHappy9236 жыл бұрын
I love your drawing! 😂
@RealLifeW0rld6 жыл бұрын
Canada's current COAT OF ARMS is the BEST !!!! 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇬🇧🇬🇧
@amanigillings6 жыл бұрын
I look forward to your videos.
@GavinLepley Жыл бұрын
As an American, I never knew our Great Seal was our coat of arms.
@kirbyfan1076 жыл бұрын
There's something that has always bothered me about the Coat of Arms that nobody ever seems to point out, the Union Jack is backwards for some reason! I get that it may make sense because of how it is positioned, but it has annoyed me for a very long time, and I don't know why.
@fds74764 жыл бұрын
Maybe because it hangs sinister and points left, while the French one hangs dexter and points right.
@ouroboros5553 жыл бұрын
It is correct, you are seeing it from behind. Left side to the pole, same on official vehicles with flags on the front.
@poots6056 жыл бұрын
I liked your new coat of arms you made :D
@soupycask6 жыл бұрын
I think it should be kinda like yours but the shield should have the provinces and territories of Canada on it, maybe some symbols representing the provinces and territories? And then have the Canadian Maple leaf at the top
@nittanyburg206 жыл бұрын
Do a video on the best and worst coats of arms
@eDENjoetree6 жыл бұрын
England never conquered Scotland. Scotland effectively conquered England via joining of the crown.
@qrower6 жыл бұрын
*you should make longer videos!*
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
But I thought people only like watching short stuff!
@pinkiepieofrainbowdash19056 жыл бұрын
Ikr?
@pinkiepieofrainbowdash19056 жыл бұрын
J J sorry people don't like short stuff they like long! So please????
@pinkiepieofrainbowdash19056 жыл бұрын
:)
@superpokemonbros.94416 жыл бұрын
qrower Leave Him alone!!! He is probably a very busy man
@liudwan444 жыл бұрын
Actually the tree golden lions was the coat of arm of William the conqueror, who was kind of a duke from France
@thebigfarter4 жыл бұрын
I like the idea of putting a totem pole on it, if theres one change I could make I would pick that
@RickyPro8886 жыл бұрын
Australia's the best one
@MaxwellBergen6 жыл бұрын
ya cause it actually has animals native to auz, thats why ours should have a moose, or beaver, or polar bear etc
@MaxwellBergen6 жыл бұрын
Masticatious stfu
@billrobertjoe6 жыл бұрын
no america has best 1(exuse my english im sweedish)
@ertio12976 жыл бұрын
No, actually the Italian one is much better.
@user-ex7vb3bk2o5 жыл бұрын
Actually 'The Republic' from Star Wars has the best.
@TheMuslimdon6 жыл бұрын
Notification squaaaad👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@JJMcCullough6 жыл бұрын
Right on!
@eggy5436 жыл бұрын
J.J.'s coat of arms beaver and moose remind me of Handy and Lumpy (both from HTF) respectively.
@golamkashef52552 жыл бұрын
Amazing drawing skills!
@BrochJam6 жыл бұрын
I really like Nunavut's coat of arms, which your drawing kinda reminded me of. I like how they ditched the British-style shield shape and used a lot of First Nations imagery. Plus one if the shield bearers is a narwhal.
@RANDOMNAME-kj1zv6 жыл бұрын
You don’t think it’s maybe because... Canada was made by Britain? 😮😮😮 The Coat of Arms is fine, you on the other hand... Canada is a nation of British heritage, don’t change it... please.
@shivamrai28866 жыл бұрын
RANDOM NAME Beavers and Totem Poles represent Canada more than a Lion and Unicorn. Australia has more of a British heritage but they have their own animals as a coat of arms.
@currently78863 жыл бұрын
Canada as made by Britain in 1867 3.5 Million Canada as made by Canadians in 2020 ~38 Million Keep the Roman Empire's symbols because Europe was made by Rome, please don't change it. Bruh...
@aidankerr11252 жыл бұрын
Scotland was not conquered. It’s own King inherited the English crown bringing unification of the two kingdoms under a common Sovereign. This was followed by political, legal and economic unification in 1707 which was ratified by the pre-Union Scottish Parliament and separately the English Parliament.
@ilhambudi954 жыл бұрын
Perhaps most complicated coat of arms in the world.