VOTE: Porsch-a!

Vote: Porsche!

Both are correct!

Its Porsch-ae

Por shey..

I think carmakers forgot what are suvs

Glorified people carriers.

Suv's are definitely not off roaders

@@moeeziqbal3619 dying sedan times a sporty SUV is a good alternative.

@@nastyscorp right i agree

Yep. So did Drag Races, Carwow main menu.

just like your mom

Nick always is an awesome guy.

@@purwantiallan5089 Agreed. 🤝

don't say that, mat might never bring him again (you know cause he's insecure)

Also his pronunciation of Porsche is pretty good

Curb mode

Surf mode

Gay mode

Sicko mode

Uninstall.

The editor always gonna nail it.

Porscheh

Kkkk thats a girls name

Absolutely, BUT I love it very much this time!!

@Damar Fadlan :-))) The point is, that how it supposed to say. And as it is a German brand name it must be pronounced in the German way. That 1000% logical, even if the whole world says in the bad way without e at the end. So you and everybody just missing the point.

That’s a girl’s name 🤣

He seems to have a keen eye for filthy undercarriages!

@@xkrzilla yep. So did Clarkson.

@@TheLogicprouser the girls name looked quite cool.

@@TheLogicprouser So is Mercedes

Leipzig? Stuttgart more like

@@user-ht2qb9tm1c the macan assembly is in Leipzig tho

@@user-ht2qb9tm1c Stuttgart is where they make the proper Porsches so not the SUVs

@@jadamsnz yea man the Porsche Carrera GT is not a real Porsche

Same at the NA Headquarters in Atlanta, I want to take my Macan S there at some point.

Let's not forget the 20k+ price saving difference and the better looks of the Porsche👍

@@AM-zq8ro both are amazing cars

@@AM-zq8ro the Porsche looks better? With the plastic braces? 😬

@@NightPwnGaming 20k can buy you a few upgrades if you choose😉

@@NightPwnGaming Porsche did looked far better man.

is that true?

Whats the ground clearance options with air suspension?

@@bpw8214Yes

It’s actually 40mm gain. There are different options on the Macan. The base comes with ground clearance of 202mm. The GTS comes with 187. the air suspension is lowering it by another 10mm. So 177mm in normal mode, 167 in sport and shown here with the off-road mode the GTS had 217mm!

Computer says no...

@@rasherbasher8203 AVG Antivirus and Smadav say no.

Your English is limited

2 syllables. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f9NimLymrMrRlo0.html

Trust me. There is no -a at the end. It's just an -e. Say a normal E and you're good.

it stunk of Porschefanboy

@@antekqwe well someone who can’t even pronounce one correct sentence, can’t afford the BMW or the Porsche anyway 😂

The Cayenne did the Transsyberia Challenge with Stock Suspension and Dampers. Absolutely insane. You should have alook at that, the Cayenne is a beast at Offroading!

First gen Cayenne is the best offroader Porsche ever did... GTS the worst of those because of lower stock ride height, but its not the end of the world. Same base platform VW Touareg got even more clearance though. If you get the Active anti roll bar option for the Porsche, it decouples the roll bars in terrain mode for more wheel travel as well.

@@GoldenCroc No active roll bar disconnect on mine - and the V8 is a great engine, without the worries of expensive turbochargers. Sounds great in sport mode, as well . With the fast depreciation of these vehicles, older ones in decent shape are also reasonably priced, esp. if you can do a lot of the maintenance yourself (finishing up a CV axle replacement right now - did not notice a torn boot until it was too late, and crud got in to the joint and wore it out).

@@johnathonmcalister6645 Very good, my suspension air compressor is on the fritz currently sadly, hopefully I will get it going again soon.

Yeah I think it did better overall. A good test would be like ice traction using identical tires

The Porsche handled better...

German quality bro

Well, the conditions were not especially hard imho

Yeah so hard and difficult terrain. Wonder if a Grand Cherokee could do it.

@@purwantiallan5089 Not true right everything depended on the tires and the driver. Although I can see that the grabus fanboys get an orgasm on the forum.

Give this director bunch of credits, Tom Spain.

Yep. But still cant match Cayenne and Subaru Forester.

Still lost 😂😂

@@danieljakobsen1289 its way sporty than the macan gts, take it to the drag strip and track and the x3m will destroy the macan gts

1 Subaru Forester 2 Porsche Macan GTS 3 Porsche Cayenne 4 BMW X3M 5 BMW X3

Ratio you are saying cap

Ratio bot

🙏

@@oscarrose7148 wtf, I’m not a bot

@@carwow np ❤️

⬆️⬆️ Congratulations lucky winners 🎉🎁

Scamming a c/programme😢🤔

What if the offroad battle is between Cayenne GT vs Focus WRC 07?

Yet again insane... what about awesome🤔

I’ve had an X3M Comp for 3 years, it’s amazing and so crazy fast. I don’t notice the ride issues at all and would highly recommend it.

@@irishphil9480 That’s good to know, just reviews we have read and videos watched, it appears to be ‘too uncomfortable’ for British roads? In fairness though we’ve never test drove one 😬, we’ve currently got a M5, which was supposed to be the same ‘harsh’ ride but we love it?? Moral of the story I suppose is to just bite the bullet and go and take one for an extended test drive 🤷‍♀️

@@karene4990 where are you based? I have had several M3’s, had an F10 M5, an X5M and now the X3M. The X3M is considerably faster than all of those. The engine is amazing. In fact so good I have a brand new M4 Convertible being delivered in weeks. Please feel free to ask me anything about the X3M. My wife is 34 and has a degenerative back disease and has never had an issue in it.

@@irishphil9480 X3M Competizione still cant match Nissan Pickup tho.

@@purwantiallan5089 I can’t disagree

I think at the end of the day, both of these vehicles did an exceptional job. A good set of off road tires and maybe a lift kit would help immensely

@@PapiAndrey a lift kit? Maybe they should just actually make these wanna be SUVs off road capable. They have the clearance and flex of a car, it's crap. I have a $750 jeep Cherokee that would destroy both of these "suvs" offroad, and could take me many places these cant. Deep mud, bigger rocks, steep breakover angle, sand driving, these will never do it with that clearance.

@@nelsondln okay? Nobody cares about your $700 dodge. Suv means sport utility vehicle, not off road machine. The main purpose isn’t to go off road, cars are meant to drive on the road. You don’t use channel locks to pull teeth out, but they would suffice if you had to do it. They are capable of it. A $4000 old cayenne would do better than these and your shitbox. No lift kit or anything other than tires and it’s awesome off roading, low range, center locking Torsen diff, front and rear diff, etc. Just because you drive a shitbox that has lost most of its value does not mean you should flex it 😂

@@PapiAndrey @Andrey good sir, I can assure you that a cayenne is not beating an xj off road, its not happening. A man such as yourself who loves his BMW and Porsche suvs, is surely lacking in firsthand experience in the worlds of mechanics and off roading. You make this quite obvious by suggesting lifts for bmw and Porsche suvs, which as I stated before have ridiculously low clearances to begin with. Talk about using channel locks hey? Also, the off road highlights of the cayenne you listed are a joke if you know anything about cars. Great low end and a front and rear diff, ya dont say?? Does it have tires as well? And third in your lack of knowledge expose, you obviously know nothing about the jeep XJ and it's off road capabilities, which is currently still quite popular in the offroad world for a reason. Anyone who has any knowledge of off road capable vehicles would never argue that a cayenne would out perform an xj, obviously offroad. Use google and see for yourself. There is a reason the XJs are legendary and sought after, and quickly rising in price, i bought mine 12yrs ago for $750 which was a steal and have restored it and loved it. I also own a 530i which is a great car. As you said, the main purpose for these vehicles is to be on the road, which my jeep does perfectly fine, obviously inferior handling and not as fast as the Porsche or bmw, but all three will drive the speed limit and turn corners with ease. In regards to sport utility, I'll say again, the jeep will get you far more places and through much more than the low riding German SUVs. Price is irrelevant, we're talking about capabilities, but I understand that an X3M owner probably doesnt understand that, and if it's old it must be trash right? I wouldn't brag that you spent 70k on a suv that wont get through mud, and my 20 yr old cheap AF jeep will tow you out.

@@nelsondln Im not some German fanboy, I do however like the cars for their intended purpose. Don’t take my previous comment too seriously, I have nothing against the xj and im well aware of their capabilities, there’s a reason why they are popular for off roading. You know nothing about me in the real world, you only have a KZfaq comment to go off of. Anyways, my main point to your original comment is that the two cars they used are not meant for off roading, they are considered sporty compact SUV’s. The cayenne I mentioned is larger and has the low range, this Macan doesn’t have it, although it’s awd system is very good. I wouldn’t take either of these out for serious off roading. The G63 is also good off roading, but that’s the sporty model and the stock wheel/tire setup isn’t mean for off roading. They have a version suited for that. Do you think a trackhawk will do better off road than grand Cherokee 4xe trackhawk? Certainly not, it’s not meant for that. Do you see where I’m coming from? That’s my main point if you look over the nonsense of me messing with you

so good

Since when was off-road about power. 😂 in the test that required power I.e. the uphill drag race, the BMW won!

@@andywmoffat lol exactly, i know porsches are good vehicles but the way their fans think its a perfect car makes them conjure up ridiculous aspects about the vehicle which is quite laughable like saying off-roading is about power😂. I can bring a Toyota pickup with way less power and would smash these two cars.

@@andywmoffat it's a bot... same generic bullshit comments..

You commented 3 times in 1 video. Cringe

@@KungFuWizardOfJesus it's a bot. Same bullshit generic comments... always seems to amazed by every video.. everything is "Insane"... stupid bot...

Hope Carwow uploaded Offroad battles with this X3M Comp vs Ford USAF Reserve Rally Car.

Is that the Pig Latin pronunciation? Iway illway efinitelyay etgay ethay PorschA (roughly).

Thank you so much for another insane comment

Oya kiyana ekak thama Okith

@@sonalhansaka827 Hi!

@@nicalev insane in the membrane... insane

@@sonalhansaka827 😂😂👍

For all practical purposes I would go for X3, given more space, similar performance, and bit cheaper maintenance now a days.

Porsche is definitely not better looking. The front of the Porsche is hideous. The rear is pretty nice. Bmw takes it for me

@@Eren-da-Jaeger for me always Cayenne. Cayenne has better reliability.

the macan is kinda ugly and already looks outdated

@@kaz8103 the front pf Porsche trucks are hideous. They used the car platform front with the small round lights. And for me. It's ugly. I understand why they did it so it looks like a porsche

Acura vehicles aren’t sold in the UK.