in al seriousness this is so not a bad idea haha

No they won’t. They probably think that it’s a clever idea.

I would attach two hoppers to the net and intercept the ship mid air.

@@tiagankoob820 pressurized doesnt equal strength. I doesnt make the vehicle any stronger

@@Sonderax noh u wrong man.. Pressurized makes Rockets much stronger.. Remember wat happened to SN4 ? The methan tank was emptied before the Lox tank which was on top...causing it to collapse instantly.. The mistake was detanking or unpressurising the lower tank first before the 2nd.

@@Sonderax another example, blow a ballon. Lol

@@merxellus1456 I think that was SN3

@@airor9874 yea right

And now she'll be stuck up there for all eternity.

@@Mr.Dobalina_Mr.BobDobalina If she wasn’t thrown away when the Starship landed :)

They could add RCS thrusters to slow it down further.

@@YAHYEL-ANUNNAKI It might be more appropriate for cargo rather than passengers. No need for anyone on board.

Elon has said that they need the legs for Mars and they are probably going to keep the landing burn most likely

There is much less gravity on Mars so a Starship catcher is not needed.

@@ThrustersX lets just smash starship into the ground

Lol. We will get that on mars!

@Julio Cesar You are right, in the past I tried trading on my own but made almost no profit until I was link to a professional, the result was exceptional

I think that's on the average, try trading with Mr. STEVEN WEST my first investment of $500 was without fear ..

Trading with Mr. WEST made more profits for me than other professionals I traded with in the past

@Rosendo Lee He is obviously the best I have ever traded with, I make profits every week

@@angelinahaley2602 How do I reach him please, I'm interested

they scrapped the ships, why is this any better than the ships?

@@reasonerenlightened2456 what?

@@WhatEvenIsAGoodName The effect would be similar to the effect of a human body hitting the water surface horizontally. The pain is excruciating

@@reasonerenlightened2456 I'm asking what ships you're talking about being scrapped, not falling into a pool. Again, what?

You mean liability

That looks dangerous and won’t really look @Matt Fairman here has a point

they scrapped the ships, why is this any better than the ships?

@@reasonerenlightened2456 what ships are you on about? The fairing catchers if so this is a completely different thing

@@reasonerenlightened2456 starship is meant to be a reusable vehicle idk what the heck your talking about dude

Thanks

Unlikely. Planes could be easily landed via a similar system but they don't because trial and error has proven the landing procedure for planes

The effect would be similar to the effect of a human body hitting the water surface horizontally. The pain is excruciating

Thanks

Exactly 💯!

In real life I was thinking a much more flexible net

Yes that's a great idea! Would help a few issues I have!

Starship is only at 66 m/s terminal velocity, which is 238 km/hour or 142 mph.

Especially for crewed

I think I had a small epiphany. You need to think of it like an "how to catch an egg without breaking it" problem.

Thanks! Yes they would need to add ribbing but could remove the header tanks and landing fuel

​@@NickHenning3D so, to continue the "how to catch an egg without breaking it" problem - what you need to have, is for the catch arm/net to already be moving at the same velocity and direction as the ship when it comes into contact with it, so that there is only minimal to zero impact force. Then immediately start the decceleration after contact. Obviously that's an insane feat of speed, power and precision, and In order to do such an insane feat, you would need an electric motor that can move and control the arm with milisecond precision, and be capable of accelerating and deccelerating it along with the mass of the ship. That's an insane size motor, but guess what company could be capable of making such a motor??

Thanks!

lollllllllllllllllllllllllll

I am a fan of removing as much mass from Starship as possible for bigger payloads. But yeah its a nutty idea!

Yeah its a crazy idea! Thanks

Thanks!

I would attach two hoppers to the net and intercept the ship mid air. Even better Idea, get those engines working properly.

@@reasonerenlightened2456 lol. Maybe land with engines seems more reliable.

Thanks! Yep it's crazy!

Thanks! Great points

That's the goal!

Yeah will need extra ribbing but can loss the header tanks and landing fuel

Lifted to 200 m and then died from falling about half kilometer down

Skydiving starships have been very accurate since SN8, the problem is the landing burn itself right now

in fact its a tlupatac

@@Vo0d0o2009 i walked right into that trap

This is for daily use on Earth. Mars still get the flip and burn