May God bless you and keep you in protecting and safeguarding the Faith
@jaimearviso46424 жыл бұрын
Faith is in Jesus Christ is all that needs protecting.
@zacharyvandress11204 жыл бұрын
@@jaimearviso4642 so the church and it's Authority should not be protected?
@jaimearviso46423 жыл бұрын
@@nosuchthing8 There is nothing obvious about it. It's an issue ultimately of how you interpret that scripture in regards to Peter. Your very claim of Church Authority hinges upon scripture. Luther wrestled the monopoly the Catholic Church had on the Word of God and the Christian faith. It is that simple.
@roberthaddad78504 жыл бұрын
Well done Karlo and Cy. Keep up the great work! Robert from Sydney, Australia.
@acnowmc77493 жыл бұрын
Love your videos
@ggarza3 жыл бұрын
2 Thessalonians 3:6, the Greek Lemma, “paradosis,” usually translated, “tradition,” in English, is strangely rendered, “teachings” in the NIV. In the Tyndale, Coverdale and Geneva translations, the word is rendered, “instruction.”
@DavidRodriguez-er4rq2 ай бұрын
To fool people they mistranslated
@teamjesus12194 жыл бұрын
Hello Greets, Love & Blessings from Austria-Vienna. I admire your work and your love, patient, tenderness and attitude you are all having and showing. It is all appreciated a lot and prayers for you and and highly reward for all in heaven and on earth. (english isnt my language but trying my best). what your work and whole attitude amazes me most is that at least on youtube sometimes it seem that protesters mainly trying to make their choosen name honor and to protest and even worst to me it seem like even if JESUS CHRISTUS himself would told and explained them they wouldnt want to believe almost choose too like the pharisee ... and therefore that you are still working to help them in such an Lovely, tender and patient way is admireable for me and i wanted to tell you this that you are an big role model and inspiration. please pray for us/keep us in your prayers, specialy for the addicts - maybe at Holy Mass or one Rosary , the smallest Line is thankfull appreciated. be sure you are all in ours allways 🌹 threw the Immaculat Heart of our most beloved Mediatrix Most HOLY Mother Maria 🌹in the ALLMIGHTY Name of JESUS CHRISTUS ✝️🌹🕊️Amen🌈📿 Ave Maria🌹
@heb5972 жыл бұрын
Regarding 2Tim@-17, i noticed Prots stress the qualifiers attributed to the man of God ("complete" and "fully" and "every") but fail to stress the qualifer attributed to Scripture which is "All". The qualifier "All" leaves open the possibility of other things being inspired of God. Stressing the qualities of the man of God does not teach Sola Scriptura. Let me give an example: All military documents and manuals are useful/profiitable for making a soldier complete, fully equiped for every military duty. The above does not mean Sola Manual. Soldiers need Military leadership, training, battle field Intel and much more. Prot's only source of Truth is Scripture and yet they don't even understand basic grammatical logic. 2 Pet 3:16 "as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures."
@michaelrome35272 жыл бұрын
This is proper exegesis. Thank you.
@dannisivoccia27124 жыл бұрын
The word of God is the sacred traditions.
@dannisivoccia27123 жыл бұрын
@@nosuchthing8 My ⚓ holds.
@DavidRodriguez-er4rq2 ай бұрын
✝✝✝✝😀The early church had writings that we don't have today. Papias of Hierapolis had wrote the five books of the sayings of the Lord. We don't have them now. He got them from men that knew the Lord directly by word of mouth not written scriptura. But we do have the tradition and can trust that he was a good bishop and Catholic brother.
@SimonDaumMusic8 ай бұрын
It appears that what stands above scripture and tradition, is spiritual discernment, knowing God and charity. Paul makes it very clear that even if we knew and understood ALL mystries of God, but had not charity, it would be in vain, applying the same principle to faith, works, the gift of prophecy, the gifts of the spirit and sacrifices. And that makes a lot of sense, because charity is the purest form of love, and to love in that manner means to know God, and to know God in that manner means to have life eternal. So the scriptures and traditions, as well as revelations, all are given to learn about God in the hope it will lead to "knowing God"... but without spiritual discernment and charity, nothing is of lasting value and benefit..
@abd-ix5qd3 жыл бұрын
Wow! Thank you Karlo!
@Figy73 жыл бұрын
There is no scripture in the Bible. This is Luther's delusion. Show me a passage in the Bible, where is Sola Scriptura? On the contrary, there is a tradition in the Bible. It begins with the sentence: "Now, brethren, keep ye the tradition which ye have received from us by word and by word." This corresponds to the history of the Church.
@tongakhan2303 жыл бұрын
The use of the word Tradition means the way of conducting the Christian congregation. Not ones made up by humans.
@Figy73 жыл бұрын
@@tongakhan230 Protestants confuse this Corinthian tradition with the human tradition, against which the Bible speaks.
@garrybraithwaite58074 жыл бұрын
Regarding scripture as the only source of truth necessary for our salvation and spiritual life, here are some quotes from the church fathers and others: Irenaeus, “We have known the method of our salvation by no other means than those by whom the gospel came to us; which gospel they truly preached; but afterward, by the will of God, they delivered to us in the Scriptures, to be for the future the foundation and pillar of our faith,” Clement of Alexandria “They that are ready to spend their time in the best things will not give over seeking for truth until they have found the demonstration from the Scriptures themselves,” Origen “No man ought, for the confirmation of doctrines, to use books which are not canonized Scriptures,” St. Cyprian of Carthage “Whence comes this tradition? Does it descend from the Lord’s authority, or from the commands and epistles of the apostles? For those things are to be done which are there written . . . If it be commanded in the gospels or the epistles and Acts of the Apostles, then let this holy tradition be observed,” Athanasius “The Holy Scriptures, given by inspiration of God, are of themselves sufficient toward the discovery of truth. Athanasius (concerning the New Testament) "These are fountains of salvation, that they who thirst may be satisfied with the living words they contain. In these alone is proclaimed the doctrine of godliness. Let no man add to these, neither let him take ought from these". Cyril of Jerusalem “Not even the least of the divine and holy mysteries of the faith ought to be handed down without the divine Scriptures. Do not simply give faith to me speaking these things to you except you have the proof of what I say from the divine Scriptures. For the security and preservation of our faith are not supported by ingenuity of speech, but by the proofs of the divine Scriptures,”
@wonderingpilgrim4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for these readings. This clearly took some time to write!
@brianmorris47023 жыл бұрын
Yet you don't ....write down what they say about Sacred Tradition hmmm.
@garrybraithwaite58073 жыл бұрын
@@brianmorris4702 Look at the second quote from St. Cyprian of Carthage, "If it be commanded in the gospels or the epistles and Acts of the Apostles, then let this holy tradition be observed,” Any way I was writing about what early Christians said about scripture as the only source of truth. If you have any quotes regarding what the early Christians said about "traditions" please give them.
@brianmorris47023 жыл бұрын
@@garrybraithwaite5807 yet the early Christian's also wrote about the authority of the church since Scriptures also speak as the church being the pillar and foundation of the truth so how about writing what the early Church fathers really wrote.
@brianmorris47023 жыл бұрын
@@garrybraithwaite5807 also you failed to provide dates as the certain fathers wrote the passages.
@larrylim80504 жыл бұрын
To those who claim all are given authority to interpret the scriptures: If my opinion on what the scripture says differs from billions of other Christians, who has the correct interpretation?
@garrybraithwaite58074 жыл бұрын
Well there are certain principles set out for scripture interpretation. For example the first principle is; compare scripture with scripture. So it is not a matter of your opinion or my opinion
@aGoyforJesus3 жыл бұрын
Jesus expects people without an infallible Magisterium to understand Scripture.
@jeremysmith71763 жыл бұрын
@@garrybraithwaite5807 Where do these principles come from? If we both start with different interpretive principles and come to different conclusions how do we know who is right?
@garrybraithwaite58073 жыл бұрын
@@jeremysmith7176 Bible scholars over time have decided on these principles. Do some research on Hermeneutics, which is the branch of theology that focuses on identifying and applying sound principles of biblical interpretation. The Christian also has the indwelling Holy Spirit and Jesus said: "He will guide you into all truth"
@jeremysmith71763 жыл бұрын
@@garrybraithwaite5807 So something other than the Bible is authoritative. Got it.
@gomezjkv2 жыл бұрын
The traditions of men are, by their very nature, designed to orchestrate our lives in such a way that no one would violate the Laws given by God. But, God’s own laws are fashioned in such a way that no one can keep them perfectly. For example, one of the Laws of the Sabbath require that no one perform any ordinary work but there is also a law that says that on the eighth day after a male child is born the child must be circumcised. If a male child is born on the sixth day of the week (ie. Friday) then a rabbi must then violate the Sabbath law by performing a circumcision on the following Sabbath day. I think the greatest support for Sola Scriptura (though I do not agree with the precept) is Act. 17:2. Paul reasons, “from the scriptures” and not from tradition.
@joshrichards91212 жыл бұрын
What traditions are sacred?
@jzak57232 жыл бұрын
I'm thinking that any traditions, teachings, or doctrines (those not explicitly written down in Scripture) that are taught to the Church by the Holy Spirit, would be sacred.
@HillbillyBlack10 ай бұрын
ive been doing a dive into this trying to help others understand this from a loving standpoint. Too often i feel Catholics get jaded by this conversation and theres always deep resentment and animosity in the conversation. I think if both sides are honest with the conversation that there could be a consensus reached. Sola Scriptura defended conversation. God has spoken, scripture is his revealed word of God. Gods word is found no where else. Scripture is the only thing the Church has that is God breathed. “well who do you think gave you those scriptures?” Moses gave us the law and formed the levitical priesthood and the profits gave us the rest. The Torah is the backbone of scripture. It predates the church and the church cannot survive without the Torah. Jesus and the 11+Paul quote and echo ONLY the Torah during their ministry. The early church after the Jewish 12 were Hebrew deficient and knew nothing of the Torah in detailed comparison to the Gospel. Given the Gospel is a fulfilled reference point of the Torah, it would be an impossibility for Torah deficient men to manifest the NT scriptures. The NT letters and scriptures were written and circulated by-the 11+ Paul while they were alive and well before 70ad with Jerusalem’s destruction. Peter and Paul both affirm this and Pauls writings echo this reality continually. “Well, without the Tradition of the early historical church you only have scripture and your own interpretations.” Scripture interprets its self through and analogy process and always has since Moses. Scripture validates its self. There was never a discouraged interpretive break in scriptural understanding like there is with Rome. Oral tradition over time warped the levitical priesthood to usurp the word of God for Tradition. This is why they missed it with Christ. Tradition expected a conquering King vs a savior of Sin. Christ NEVER condoned tradition and the apostles only likened tradition to the Gospel teachings. Never extra-biblical practices. “Well how do you know you are correct and history is wrong. By what standard do you measure truth?” The word of God is only understood by spirit filled believers in Christ. This is a radical difference between the believing and unbelieving. “The message of the cross is foolishness to those perishing, but to those being saved it is the Power of God. “ The power of God is available to those in repentant obedience. Those in dwelt by the spirit of God in Salvation. Those without forgiveness from the Cross cannot understand the mind of God or scripture. Those of only the flesh are blinded by the god or this world from seeing the light of the gospel. Therefore 2 types of people exist. Unbelieving - unable to understand scripture Believers - scripture is revealed by God by the spirit placed in you. The Text is clear and EASY to understand. The radically changed do not remain complacent but are transformed by the renewed mind and thrusted into holiness by convicted sanctification through the scriptures. And such individuals live God, and love their neighbor. When they love this way, argumentation becomes the sin in the way of fellowship. This is why those in-dwelt by the holy spirit are one church. Catholic, Protestant, all who trust in Christ. “Well, what about the 30,000 denominations. everyone sees things different. None of you are aligned” This is a classic uniformed perception perpetrated by argumentative politics designed to tear down others, so that they can only see One Direction. This is not an opinion from informed knowledge. Truth is revealed to the the person who’s contrite and broken before God. Truth is not revealed to the ambitious power hungry pastor looking to grow his numbers beyond depth to mega-size standards on the skewed scripture twisting of prosperity or themed churches like rapper churches. The message of Christ is the cross, and it’s one message, not an adaptive allegory meant to fit within the human social constructs. So, divergent spiritual views are only problematic in radical contrasts. Theres a major difference in the revealed Torah and Gospel message between the Mormon and Reformed Baptist or the Baptist and Red Hill Churches. Only one is Biblically Formed. ALL faiths must be tested against scripture. All Churches answer to scripture and the evidence of those who are spirit filled revealed will teach a pure rigid Gospel message word for word in holy Scripture WITHOUT personal opinion or side stories or conjecture. The Word of God is sharper than a 2 edge sword and fully sufficient for salvation. ALL must be measured by scripture. Churches who’s sole mission is the Gospel even in the face of congregational, dwindling or collapse are not only biblical but blessed. The Church is not measures by its numbers but by its message. MOST reformed non catholic denominations are unified in scripture with minor divergences like the rapture, communion or tribulation. If we all agree salvation is an inner spirit transformation and radical change by God through his son, minor diverging differences are meaningless until they compromise the message of the Cross. This is why 30,000 denominations are still worldly unified yet minorly different. Those TRULY born from above WITH an obvious radical heart/mind change recognize one another across the spectrum of religion, culture, race, age, gender.
@DavidRodriguez-er4rq2 ай бұрын
Remember it want until the council of Nicea did the 'bible' get put together. Plus the Protestant Bibles are missing books. Plus miracles, saintly miracles, Eucharist miracles, incorruptible saints still continues to this day.
@HillbillyBlack2 ай бұрын
@@DavidRodriguez-er4rq well also keep in mind that the council of Nicaea just simply created a table of contents for the New Testament. The New Testament is scripture in a commentary sense but it’s not reveling scripture. It’s declarative scripture. Revelating in prophetic scripture is only in the Old Testament and that’s the primary scripture the New Testament authors are always speaking of. The early church used the old testament through the Septuagint as primary scripture. Scripture existed before the New Testament as primary scripture before even the church. However I do not think that they used the deuterocanonical cannon as “inspired” text. More just historical reference. I’ve seen Polycarp quote from it. For example, Matthew 5:17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. Christ affirms the pentateuch - (Law) and the Nevi'im - (Prophets) If the deuterocanonical cannon is “inspired” as scripture in accordance to the council of Trent, which category do these seven books fall into in order for Jesus to fulfill them? As far as I can tell in research there’s no law or prophetic passages in them. The law is sealed after Moses and before the prophets plus there doesn’t seem to be mention of any existing profits during the timeframe of these books. Ironically the entire old testament minus the deuterocanonical books is classified as Law and prophets according to the Mishnah. Isn't that odd? The law and the prophets are encompassed in fulfillment but these outliers are their own thing? It’s like creating the circular argument. The church says so but Jesus says no but the church that Jesus started says so but Jesus still says no lol I just wanted your thoughts on that. Basically how far does church authority go even in light of a clear line in the sand authority from Christ in scripture? If that set of books is not inspired fulfillment text and they’re just historical text then we can’t take them at scripture correct? Which would be in line with the early church.
@rosiegirl24853 жыл бұрын
I know that Jesus was tough on the commandment to honor your father and your mother because the people weren't caring for their elderly! Here we are in the 21st century...and people either put their elderly in a home to let "others" care for them! It's much easier then doing it ourselves, and putting our lives on hold for them! We forget very quickly what our parents put on hold for us..or how much they gave up for us! Or you get those who don't even bother with their care...and they should just be ashamed of themselves! Trust me...when they are gone..your gonna miss them more then you know! God bless our elderly! ♥
@rosiegirl24853 жыл бұрын
@@nosuchthing8 Thank you!
@ijustcamefrombiblestudy2243 Жыл бұрын
So writings of Paul is not Scripture, it's not the Bible?
@d.rey5743 Жыл бұрын
No they believe that the writings of Paul are divinely inspired
@RGTomoenage114 жыл бұрын
I think Paul was talking about Mohammed....
@rightlydividing76074 жыл бұрын
Psalm 138:2 2 I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name. Job 23:12 12 Neither have I gone back from the commandment of his lips; I have esteemed the words of his mouth more than my necessary food. I can’t find the scripture where tradition is elevated above God’s name or more necessary than one’s food.
@rightlydividing76073 жыл бұрын
@User 3115 They do, they openly claim scripture and tradition are equal.
@rightlydividing76073 жыл бұрын
@User 3115 Yes, because God said so. Psalm 138:2 King James Version 2 I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word ABOVE all thy name. Since there’s only one Jesus Christ, there’s only one perfect, infallible, inerrant bible. Deuteronomy 8:3 King James Version 3 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord doth man live. Matthew 4:4 King James Version 4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. Luke 4:4 King James Version 4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. 8 : 3 + 4 : 4 + 4 : 4 ______ 16:11 AV KJB
@raydudo36723 жыл бұрын
@@rightlydividing7607 tradition is the Word of God just as scripture is the Word of God. When Paul gave the Corinthians traditions “by word of mouth or by written epistle,” was the word of mouth tradition *less* than the written? No, both are equally inspired! God bless
@rightlydividing76073 жыл бұрын
@@raydudo3672 Only if tradition is supported by scripture. Although tradition never parallels salvation in the church age (Ephesians 2:8-9 King James Version 8 For by grace are ye SAVED through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 NOT of works, lest any man should boast, Romans 11:6 King James Version 6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. ) For example, the eucharist contradicts scripture, making it man made doctrine. Isaiah 44:15 King James Version 15 Then shall it be for a man to burn: for he will take thereof, and warm himself; yea, he kindleth it, and baketh bread; yea, he maketh a god, and worshippeth it; he maketh it a graven image, and falleth down thereto. Since Jesus has one literal physical body, which priest would have his literal physical flesh when there’s “no schism” in the body? 1 Corinthians 12:25-27 King James Version 25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. 26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it. 27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular. In addition, I’m saved and in the body. How do I taste? Furthermore, the scripture prohibits the consumption of blood Before the Law (Genesis 9), During the Law (Leviticus 17), and After the Law (Acts 15, 21). When you contradict the scripture and don’t apply it to the right group of people (Jew, Gentile, Church) you’ll never have sound doctrine. 2 Timothy 2:15 King James Version 15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. May the Lord open your eyes.
@raydudo36723 жыл бұрын
@@rightlydividing7607 I write all of this in love to you. I hope none of this comes off as prideful or posh! “While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body” (Matthew 26:26) “I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.” (John 6:51) “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me.” (John 6:53-57) “Many of his disciples, when they heard it, said, ‘This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?’...After this many of his disciples drew back and no longer went about with him.” (John 6:60,66) Clearly the Eucharist is scriptural, but we just disagree on the interpretation of these scriptures and the ones you cited. And if we disagree on an interpretation of the Bible, specifically these verses, how do we settle it? The Bible says we should “tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.” (Matthew 18:17 -that’s a good indicator that there is one, objective, authoritative church that can settle disputes among believers).
@Mygoalwogel2 жыл бұрын
This is what Sola Scriptura means: Luke 1:4 Scripture is what gives certainty of doctrine. John 5:39 We have eternal life from the Scriptures only because they bear witness about Christ. John 10:35 Scripture cannot be broken. John 20:31 The Gospel of John alone is enough to tell us what to believe so that we can have life in Jesus' name. John 22:24 The Gospel of John is a true testimony. No authority may contradict it. Acts 17:11 We are to examine the Scriptures daily to see if anything taught as doctrine is true. Acts 24:14 We are to believe everything laid down by the Law and written in the Prophets. Romans 15:4 Scripture was written for our instruction to encourage us and give us hope. 1 Corinthians 14:37 If anyone thinks that he is a prophet, or spiritual, he must acknowledge that the things Paul wrote to us are a command of the Lord. 2 Corinthians 1:13 Paul did not write anything other than what lay people of Corinth and Achaia could read and understand. Some partially understand; some fully understand. Paul will boast of all on the day of the Lord. Galatians 1:20 Paul did not lie in what he wrote. Galatians 3:22 The Scripture imprisoned everything else under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 1 Timothy 3:15 This letter tells us who may and may not become overseers and deacons. 1 Timothy 4:13 We are to devote ourselves to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation, to teaching. 2 Timothy 3:15 The scriptures are able to make us wise for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. 2 Timothy 3:16 Scripture is profitable for correction in righteousness. No doctrine that isn't supportable by scripture may correct scripture or render it unprofitable. 2 Timothy 3:17 Scripture makes preachers (men of God) complete. Scripture fully equips preachers for every good work. 1 Peter 5:12 This letter is the true grace of God. We must stand firm in it. 2 Peter 3:2 We are to obey the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior through his apostles. 2 Peter 3:16 Those who twist the scriptures do so to their own destruction. 1 John 1:3-4 The writings of the apostles are what give us fellowship with the apostles, with the Father, and with His Son. James 2:8 Love of neighbor as taught by scripture is enough to keep us busy for the rest of our lives.
@Mygoalwogel Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord You either didn't read or you didn't use your basic reasoning skills. "2 Timothy 3:16 Scripture is profitable for correction in righteousness. *No doctrine that isn't supportable by scripture may correct scripture or render it unprofitable."* No other authority may contradict Scripture. If *anything* contradicts Scripture, it is wrong and Scripture is right. _Therefore,_ Scripture *ALONE* is inerrant. "John 20:31 The Gospel of John *alone* is enough to tell us what to believe so that we can have life in Jesus' name." John 22:24 The Gospel of John is a true testimony. *No authority may contradict it."*
@Mygoalwogel Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord 1. Well of course your doctrines contradict scripture. Lateran Council 1 Canon 21: We absolutely forbid priests, deacons, subdeacons, and monks to have concubines or to contract marriage. Lateran Council 2 Canon 6: For since they should be and be called the temple of God, the vessel of the Lord, the abode of the Holy Spirit, it is *unbecoming* that they *indulge in marriage* and in *impurities.* 1 Timothy 4:1-3 Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and *teachings of demons,* through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who *forbid marriage* 1 Corinthians 9:5 *Do we not have the right* to take along a believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? Canon 21 continued: We decree in accordance with the definitions of the sacred canons, that *marriages already contracted by such persons must be dissolved,* and that the persons be condemned to do penance. Matthew 19:6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate. 2. Jn 20:31 does NOT claim that John is a mere biography. It claims that it is "written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might *have life* through his name." To have life, we don't need that biographical details that John _admits_ that he did not include. To have life, we need what he _did_ include. 3. Logic: 2 Tim 3:16-17 Scripture teaches the church. Scripture reproves the church. Scripture corrects the church. Scripture completes the clergy. Scripture fully equips the clergy. Can the church reprove, correct, complete, or equip Scripture? No. Can clergy complete or equip Scripture? No. When your church and clergy contradicted Scripture above, who gets to correct whom according to Scripture?
@Mygoalwogel Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord 1. Well of course your doctrines contradict scripture. Lateran Council 1 Canon 21: We absolutely forbid priests, deacons, subdeacons, and monks to have concubines or to contract marriage. Lateran Council 2 Canon 6: For since they should be and be called the temple of God, the vessel of the Lord, the abode of the Holy Spirit, it is *unbecoming* that they *indulge in marriage* and in *impurities.* 1 Timothy 4:1-3 Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and *teachings of demons,* through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who *forbid marriage* 1 Corinthians 9:5 *Do we not have the right* to take along a believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? Canon 21 continued: We decree in accordance with the definitions of the sacred canons, that *marriages already contracted by such persons must be dissolved,* and that the persons be condemned to do penance. Matthew 19:6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate. 2. Jn 20:31 does NOT claim that John is a mere biography. It claims that it is "written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might *have life* through his name." To have life, we don't need that biographical details that John _admits_ that he did not include. To have life, we need what he _did_ include. 3. Logic: 2 Tim 3:16-17 Scripture teaches the church. Scripture reproves the church. Scripture corrects the church. Scripture completes the clergy. Scripture fully equips the clergy. Can the church reprove, correct, complete, or equip Scripture? No. Can clergy complete or equip Scripture? No. When your church and clergy contradicted Scripture above, who gets to correct whom according to Scripture?
@Mygoalwogel Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord I did already. Right here. 1 Timothy 4:1-3 Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and *teachings of demons,* through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who *forbid marriage* 1 Corinthians 9:5 Do *we* not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do the other *apostles* and the *brothers of the Lord* and *Cephas?* Paul had the right to marry. Paul did not marry. Nobody forbade Paul to marry. No Apostle forbade marriage. The Apostles say that forbidding marriage is a doctrine of demons.
@Mygoalwogel Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord Did you seriously not see 1 Cor 9:5 above? All Apostles, even Pope Peter, have the right to marry. To take away the right of Apostles to marry is to forbid marriage. Duh.
@medgstronghold33474 жыл бұрын
Hello somebody ask here if anïmals also have soul ang spirit???
@mark008204 жыл бұрын
They might probably not answer that question here because this is not the Topic of this Video.
@Sean-lv6fx4 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure the Church teaches they have souls, but not eternal souls, meaning when they die that's it for them.
@teamjesus12194 жыл бұрын
@@Sean-lv6fx but there will be animals in Heavens, right? GOD bless
@Sean-lv6fx4 жыл бұрын
@@teamjesus1219 - Not as far as I am aware no.
@renjithjoseph71354 жыл бұрын
@@teamjesus1219 no, their souls are as as mortal as their bodies. Only eternal spirits are in heaven: humans, angels and God
@republicradio4314 жыл бұрын
Its going to get so hard wen we invent robotic "life"
@teamjesus12194 жыл бұрын
Its only going to happen if JESUS allowes it - it is HIS and only/just HIS Divine Will that is happening, in Heavens and on earth. we in HIS CHRUCH/BODY of JESUS DONT need to worry ✝️🌈📿🕊️💚 not even about evil. it will only affect/touch us if it is JESUS DIVINE WILL - and if so then we can be fine with it. Brother,Sister HIS FIAT shall come and be our will in body, mind and Soul - HIS FIAT shall be ours All for/too the Glory of GOD, HIS HOLY CHURCH and the sake of all. HALLELUJAH 🌹🕊️💚 GOD bless you 🌹🕊️🌈 threw IMMACULAT MAMA MARY 🌹🕊️📿 in JESUS Allmighty Name 🌹🕊️✝️ Amen ps: sorry for my x-factor english, trying my best! GOD bless
@mitchellc4 Жыл бұрын
So we should measure tradition of the Catholic Church by scripture Hello I think the problem is putting “tradition” on the same level as scripture What Catholics seem to do is say they can trace their authority back to Peter, and since they think they are a succession of that authority, then what is taught from that seat of authority is truth The problem is that’s the same thing the Pharisees did They sat on the seat of Moses They were supposed to be successors of Moses so their tradition would be true But what did Jesus say about their tradition?? And why did he say it was wrong and how did he conclude it? Compared it to scripture If you teach tradition on the same authority level as scripture and it’s not founded in scripture and contradicts it then it’s wrong So saying “we are successors of Peter” doesn’t make your tradition true, let alone the same level as scripture Because it’s the same thing the Pharisees did “We are successors of Moses therefore our tradition is true and authoritative” Now insert Peter for Moses and that’s basically the Catholic argument I don’t think it works
@mitchellc4 Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord Hello Thanks for responding So you are proving my point kind of You judge tradition based on scripture
@mitchellc4 Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord Hello Thanks for responding I don’t think anyone on this comment has said scripture is the only deposit of faith What is said is that you judge whether a tradition is true or not by if it contradicts scripture Which you yourself just said If a tradition contradicts scripture then there’s a problem
@mitchellc4 Жыл бұрын
@@tafazzi-on-discord The obvious problem is we think some of it does contradict scripture That’s the point
@SoulofaGypsyWoman4 жыл бұрын
Hello, I was raised Catholic all my life and attended mass but I always felt empty and wondered why God couldn't speak to me like He did to other people in the Bible. So I started to study the Bible and pray asking God to guide me. And I came to find the truth from God and that is only Jesus Christ is the only way to God. There is no such thing as Mary's intercessions or saints, purgatory or confession to priests. If you are searching for truth with your honest heart allow God to lead you and not man, because man errors many times Jeremiah 29:13 And ye shall seek me, and find me when ye shall search for me with all your heart. Jesus said, God is spirit and true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. Let the Lord lead you. John 4:23 Please don't follow religion. Follow Jesus Love in Christ. :)
@joaodealbuquerque88194 жыл бұрын
Mwangi Wanjiku hey mwangi, where did the bible come from?
@SoulofaGypsyWoman4 жыл бұрын
@@joaodealbuquerque8819 Hello João It is a book written by men inspired by the Holy Spirit.
@FJhei4 жыл бұрын
Mwangi Wanjiku and those men were catholics. You're welcome
@SoulofaGypsyWoman4 жыл бұрын
@@FJhei Hello. I'd like to see where they said that. Kindly show me.
@joaodealbuquerque88194 жыл бұрын
@@SoulofaGypsyWoman it is indeed a book written by mem inspired by the holy spirit, amen, but they were written separately, so who knew which ones were inspected and which ones were not? Who compiled the Bible? Please remember that there were a LOT of fake gospels being thrown around in the first centuries, so who knew which ones were the real deal?
@harmur802 жыл бұрын
Four areas the Roman Catholic Church negate the Word of God. Concerning Mark 7:13, the Catholic Church does indeed negate the Word of God because it elevates one man (Their Pope) to be the head of the Church. But, the Scriptures clearly teach us that only Christ is the head of the body of Christ, the Church. “And He (Christ) is the head of the body, the church” Colossians 1:18 Moreover, in claiming that the pope is the “Vicar of Christ,” the Catholic Church again negates the Word of God which tells us that Christ is our one and only High Priest (Hebrews 3:1). And it is Christ alone who mediates for us (1 Timothy 2:5) and intercedes for us (Hebrews 7:25) before the throne of God. No priest or Pope can mediate or intercede for us. ONLY CHRIST. Thus, the Catholic Church negates the Word of God. St. Paul wrote, “Therefore God exalted him (Christ) to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven AND ON EARTH and under the earth, and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:9-11). The fact that the Pope readily receives the adulation of the masses, is again an area where the Catholic Church negates the Word of God, which teaches us that only Christ is to receive such adulation and honor and glory. (Again, see Philippians 2:9-11 above) To bow down or kneel before a priest, bishop, or pope is to give undue allegiance and/or honor to a mere man, and again this negates the Word of God, which tells us… “Oh come, let us worship and bow down; LET US KNEEL BEFORE THE LORD, OUR MAKER!” (Psalm 95:6). No Pope, should ever accept such allegiance or honor from men. And likewise, nowhere in the New Testament do we find the Apostles readily accepting such allegiance or honor from men. ... and this is only the tip of the iceberg, when it comes to how the Roman Catholic Church negates the Word of God. thanks, harry murphy
@agulu772 Жыл бұрын
I bet when Abraham bowed down to essau he was comitting a sin
@starcityoldy4 жыл бұрын
Catholicism started from Thomas Aquinas. You have no tradition prior to that.
@annettea43344 жыл бұрын
Just flinging out random accusations convinces nobody. Please read the Church Fathers, the early Christians - Clement, Ignatius, etc - who were taught by the Apostles and their disciples. Compare what they describe as their rule of faith and their beliefs to those of the Catholic Church today. Then you'll have historically valid examples of what Catholics uphold today that they didn't in the 1st century. For example, Ignatius 3rd Bishop of Antioch (35-c. 113 AD) in his letter to the Smyrnaeans ch.8 in 110 AD says "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church." See what he says just before about heretics abstaining from the Eucharist, saying it's not the body of Christ. You might be able to convince a Catholic with historical facts, if not with your personal interpretation of biblical verses. God bless.
@HossJr4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, but I kept digging and found that the Catholic Church was instituted by our Lord and savior Himself, Jesus Christ
@larrylim80504 жыл бұрын
If my opinion on what the scripture says differs from billions of other Christians, who has the correct interpretation?
@rightlydividing76074 жыл бұрын
P K Paul would disagree 1 Corinthians 10:4 4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
@whitevortex83234 жыл бұрын
@@rightlydividing7607 Praise God. Catholics believe in two stones. The cornerstone and the foundation stone. Christ placed his foundation on Peter but he himself is the corner stone. Christ is the spiritual rock but Peter is the foundation stone. Ephesians 2:20. Paul Agrees with Catholics, he is a catholic saint. Praise God.