The Orthodox Church recognizes Jesus Christ as the ultimate and sole authority of the Church. This belief is rooted in the teachings of the New Testament, which emphasize Jesus' role as the head of the Church and the source of all authority. Orthodox Christians believe that Jesus continues to be present and active in the Church through the Holy Spirit, guiding and directing the Church's life. In the Orthodox Church, the Pope is not considered to be the supreme head of the Church. Instead, the Church is governed by a synod of bishops, who are seen as equals and who collectively represent the authority of the Church. This conciliar structure is based on the belief that the Church's authority resides in the community of believers, rather than in a single individual.
@joshuaescamilla69284 ай бұрын
So are u orthodox or catholic ?😂😂😂😂
@vkspd4 ай бұрын
I am trying to be Orthodox@@joshuaescamilla6928
@vkspd4 ай бұрын
@@joshuaescamilla6928 Orthodox
@violenttfashion4 ай бұрын
@@joshuaescamilla6928it’s evident that he’s Orthodox… I question your reading comprehension
@Kotynow4 ай бұрын
@@joshuaescamilla6928clearly an Orthodox
@Jefehellabandz10 ай бұрын
This is insane, the First Council of Nicaea in 325 clearly outlines that no Bishop holds supreme authority.
@ChristIsLord710 ай бұрын
Wrong
@Jefehellabandz10 ай бұрын
@@ChristIsLord7very sound argument
@ChristIsLord710 ай бұрын
@@Jefehellabandz thanks. Yours was too 👍
@ChristIsLord710 ай бұрын
@@Jefehellabandz try using an actual quote ;) I bet you can’t.
@myredeemerliveth8310 ай бұрын
@@ChristIsLord7 The Canons literally state that the Bishop of Rome should see to his own jurisdiction, that is the case for every other bishop.
@MadreTheotokos5 ай бұрын
You are not Orthodox, you are Roman Catholic attending a parish that utilizes liturgics similar to Orthodox.
@isaakchatelet72605 ай бұрын
No, he is an Eastern Catholic, just like the Orthodox Churches we're before the Schism. Read some history
@InnocentAlaska5 ай бұрын
@@isaakchatelet7260you’re wrong this guy is not Orthodox. He is eastern catholic nothing wrong with that , we use ancient eastern christian worship but we are not Orthodox
@isaakchatelet72605 ай бұрын
Yes I know, your Catholics like us. I just wanted to make clear that Eastern Catholics are more complicated then this guy makes them out to be. He said that you are just Romans Catholics but with an eastern liturgy, whilst this is untrue. Every individual Eastern Catholic church has it's own history, traditions and also somewhat seperate theology. Eastern Catholocism is more complicated then he thinks.@@InnocentAlaska
@MadreTheotokos4 ай бұрын
In order to understand why any form of Roman Catholicism is not true Christianity one needs only to visit an Eastern Orthodox Church for vespers or Divine Liturgy and if one has real spiritual sense they will see with their own spiritual eyes that the Eastern Orthodox Church IS the true Orthodox One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Unbroken and undefiled. When one visits an Orthodox Church it will either repel your unrepentant prideful soul or it will burn purify your soul. Tears of both joy and sadness will flow from the faces of those who are truly seeking upon witnessing God’s fullness in His True Church ☦️ May God bless you who are seeking and may you find rest in Orthodoxy.
@MadreTheotokos4 ай бұрын
@@isaakchatelet7260 come and see ☦️
@KingdomOfItaly7939 ай бұрын
Hopefully one day the Catholic and Orthodox Churches can reunite
@Usernamebreh9 ай бұрын
they do in Jesus Christ.
@monicatofan87329 ай бұрын
You cannot mix darkness with light.
@byzantineJesusLov3R9 ай бұрын
Reunification has taken place. The Catholic Church has a byzantine rite.
@Joel-tz8ct9 ай бұрын
Catholics put the Bible together and study it first
@calebnwafor25499 ай бұрын
@@byzantineJesusLov3R They meant in full.
@GrammarPoliceBot7 ай бұрын
It’s misleading to say you are Eastern Orthodox and Catholic. You are just Catholic using an Eastern liturgy
@VoiceOfReason_7 ай бұрын
So I’m just like the Greek Christians of the first millennium then - Catholic with an Eastern Liturgy. I’m in good company 😊
@VoiceOfReason_7 ай бұрын
@@GrammarPoliceBot oh, you mean blessing sinful persons so that they can eventually abandon their sin and live lives of grace and righteousness? 👀 yeah, they were doing that back then too 😊
@dp345767 ай бұрын
@@VoiceOfReason_No they weren't lol
@obamaphone54127 ай бұрын
@@VoiceOfReason_There’s a difference between a person and a couple. The document outlined same sex couples not just an individual.
@trelomanga90097 ай бұрын
@@VoiceOfReason_not at all
@fistofthenorthstar31559 ай бұрын
I'm a Serbian Orthodox... we are not uniats, and will never be.
@bro_got_you9 ай бұрын
Same bro 🇷🇸☦️
@FinnishOrthodox9 ай бұрын
God bless from Finland 🇷🇸🇫🇮☦️
@bro_got_you9 ай бұрын
@@FinnishOrthodox thanks bro ☦️
@ribbie53628 ай бұрын
Love thy neighbor and forgive your enemies
@InnocentAlaska5 ай бұрын
@Kenngurthe father and the son cannot have a trait that the Holy Spirit doesn’t they all must be distinct but equal for it to make any logical sense that is why the Holy Spirit cannot proceed from the father and the son
@Flame15009 ай бұрын
To say that everyone accepted Vatican 1 papacy is genuinely unhinged. How can you make such a claim that is just so obviously false? Shocked to hear someone say that. Plus Eastern Catholics literally just forget basically everything Rome teaches and fail to follow the CCC on numerous issues but because they kiss the papal feet they’re allowed to do whatever they want
@baniSaqer7 ай бұрын
I live in Jordan, in a small city where there are churches for Roman Catholics, Melkite Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Protestants.. the Roman Catholics/Latin Catholics have different teachings from the Melkite ones, I have asked about many things which both had contradictory in
@Flame15007 ай бұрын
@@baniSaqer Yup, Melkites have a feast for the Dormition of Mary. Aka her death. So Orthodox. But, Well the Immaculate Conception is literally one of the most visible infallible dogmas of the Catholic Church. If Mary was sinless in nature, inherited no effects of ancestral sin, then she would not have died. It’s a complete internal contradiction.
@EddieLifts3 ай бұрын
Yeah Catholics entire proof is “we were the first church” . Lmfao buddy. Nothing you do is said clearly in the Bible therefore you’re an idiot . Fuck off with your paganism
@bobizzle1605Ай бұрын
@Flame1500 Mary didn’t die. She was bodily assumed into Heaven. 😉
@Flame1500Ай бұрын
@@bobizzle1605 Why did they wait 1900 years after Christ’s death to define this? You realise virtually nobody in the entire early church thought this
@romanthechristian523710 ай бұрын
As someone who is becoming disilusioned with protestantism, I hope this is taken as constructive criticism. Your videos would be more credible and convincing if you would cite the sources you are making these claims from. The Orthodox people and sources ive interacted with have been better about this, and because of that, I am more convinced by their claims at the moment.
@christinacanto37409 ай бұрын
Eric Ybarra has thorough content on the subject. And a thick book called the Papacy. Another in depth book is “keys over the Christian world.” For the first 1000 years, there was one church and it had a Pope…
@juliansoto26519 ай бұрын
There's no orthodoxy without full Communion. Catholicism is absolute orthodoxy. Even though Eastern Orthodox Churches have valid apostolic succession, it's illicit according to the Catholic church, the latter having both valid and licit apostolic succession.
@patrickpelletier92989 ай бұрын
A part of the problem is a lot of catholics try to gloss over the churchs errors (yes, we made mistakes) in regards to the eastern churchs. there is a comment here who delves into what was said prior to the year 800 about the pope, though, at church councils.
@micoolkidfilms32709 ай бұрын
Catholicism is true orthodoxy, the church of Christ shall live forever ✝️🇻🇦
@Thuggyballs2009 ай бұрын
his source is the Bible
@vkspd8 ай бұрын
Before the Great Schism of 1054, the Pope was an orthodox respected leader among bishops, not the sole authority. The Church's power rested on ecumenical councils, not papal supremacy
@baniSaqer7 ай бұрын
There was no Pope before the schism 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@vkspd4 ай бұрын
@@baniSaqer Yes, there were popes before the Schism. The papacy dates back to the earliest days of Christianity. According to tradition, Saint Peter, one of the twelve apostles of Jesus Christ, was appointed by Jesus as the leader of the apostles and the foundational figure of the Christian Church. The Bishop of Rome, who came to be known as the Pope, is considered Peter's successor. The title "pope" (from the Latin word "papa" meaning "father") was not exclusively used for the Bishop of Rome in the early centuries of Christianity, but gradually became associated with the Bishop of Rome as the leader of the universal church. Before the East-West Schism, there had been a long line of popes who served as leaders of the Western Church. The schism itself was a formal split between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Western (Latin) Catholic Church, with the Bishop of Rome (the Pope) on one side and the Patriarch of Constantinople on the other. The split was primarily over theological, cultural, and ecclesiastical differences between the Eastern and Western churches.
@HeartFrancisco4 ай бұрын
Says who your married Orthodox priest.lol
@Pedrammotahari4 ай бұрын
If you have the keys of heaven and earth, then hold an ecumenical council.
@Max-ns3jj2 ай бұрын
ur contradicting the council of chalcedon“Bishop Paschasinus, guardian of the Apostolic See, stood in the midst and said, ‘We received directions at the hands of the most blessed and apostolic bishop of the Roman city [Pope Leo I], who is the head of all the churches, which directions say that Dioscorus is not to be allowed to sit in the assembly, but that if he should attempt to take his seat, he is to be cast out. This instruction we must carry out..We cannot go counter to the decrees of the most blessed and apostolic bishop, who governs the Apostolic See, nor against the ecclesiastical canons nor the patristic traditions.”” (Acts of the Council, session 1 [A.D. 451]).
@Jh0nJhon6 ай бұрын
The ITALIAN church is not the Church of Christ. I born inside a Roman Catholic country in south america and i thought it was the only church but when i started to study history and found the Bible was written in GREEK, all first milenium councils were written in GREEK and the communion was always with Bread instead of waffers i converted to the ancient Orthodox Faith ☦️❤️🔥💒🇬🇷📖🙏🏻🛐
@Jeremy-ge6zv5 ай бұрын
To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, “that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.” For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers; Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you.For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established; That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the mutual faith both of you and me. The Book Of Romans 1:7-12 ✝️
@Jeremy-ge6zv5 ай бұрын
Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 1 Corinthians 5:6-8 ✝️
@masxalis69784 ай бұрын
@WestCoastByzantineof course, you aren't saying that the orthodox church is false, you are just saying that his argument is based on a misunderstanding
@AyeBambino3 ай бұрын
The Catholic Church is the one founded by Christ himself
@Jh0nJhon3 ай бұрын
@@AyeBambino Christ was never in italy , i'm sorry to tell you that. Not even Virgin Mary went to Italy
@cheesecake585910 ай бұрын
The flaw I see in catholicism that just doesn't make sense to me is that the papacy is claimed to be infallible yet popes have claimed other popes to be fallible
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
They have condemned some Popes as failures, but in the same statements in which they condemned a previous Pope, like the condemnation of Pope Honorius for being a Monothelite in private, Pope Agatho also asserted that Rome has never and will never teach Heresy. I also believe they were in error to condemn Honorius as a Heretic based on his private Letters, but that only means that the Church Councils are not inerrant in matters of historical fact but in matters of Faith and Morals. The Problem for the eastern Orthodox is that if they bring up this council as valid, they have to accept Pope Agathos claim to the indefectability and authority of Rome
@sketchye59439 ай бұрын
I think they said that the office of Pope is infallible, however the Pope himself is fallible. I do not know though.
@bettycollins33499 ай бұрын
To be infallible means no falsehood will be added to the faith. It's not that the Pope will be holy or perfect, but the Pope will never insert a lie into the faith. Even between Vatican 1 and 2, the Pope never made Vatican 2 law. Vatican 2 is just a way for all Catholic's to understand what's taking place within the Mass through their own language and culture. In Vatican 1, the Mass is in Latin, many Catholic's throughout the world never understood Latin.
@cheesecake58599 ай бұрын
@bettycollins3349 that's not the correct definition of fallibility. Also, if that were the case then how would you explain the historical market for indulgences? Was that concept not "added to the faith"? Please don't take offense. I'm trying to be sincere.
@patrickpelletier92989 ай бұрын
the pope is only infalliable when he is speaking from the seat of peter. which last happened in 1950. the pope is only infalliable when he intends to be infalliable, and is speaking on a moral issue. so when the pope spoke about social media, for example, while he had educated himself on the issue, he wasn't actually speaking ex cathedra. there is a good article from canonlawmadeeasy discussing this issue if you want more information so as to actually speak from knowledge and not what you heard from a pastor who knows nothing.
@aaronkibat10 ай бұрын
He sounds like Rocky Balboa a little
@gianlucapagliuca49110 ай бұрын
😂🤣🤣
@maciek165510 ай бұрын
He is religious
@thierry200010 ай бұрын
He is a devote catholic
@mizzwright397610 ай бұрын
I laughed too hard at this comment 😂
@gregoryphi9 ай бұрын
Cool man
@TheRealRealOK2 ай бұрын
No such thing as an Eastern Orthodox in communion with Rome. 🤡🤣
@zealousideal20 күн бұрын
Uh yes there is. Are you new
@TheRealRealOK5 күн бұрын
@@zealousideal No, but you are. Not one EO is in communion with Rome. You’re lying.
@triggered85565 ай бұрын
I was raised Catholic and I’m currently converting to Orthodoxy.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
Why the church fathers from the start of Christianity accepted the filioque and popes primacy and succession Orthodox is a no
@triggered85564 ай бұрын
@@Marcel---- what church fathers?
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
@@triggered8556 Let's start with the filioque tertullian of Carthage, St. Gregory thaumaturgus, st Hilary of Poitiers, didymus the blind, st. Epiphanius of salamis, Saint agustine of Hippo Much more accepted, the filioque or the Holy Spirit proceeds from the father and the son
@triggered85564 ай бұрын
@@Marcel---- and what are the sources of them professing the view of the filoque accepted by Rome in the 11th century? You have the burden of proof to show that; even if they use the phrase, you have to prove it refers to the double hypostatic procession of the spirit, not just an energetic procession. I’ll also note, that the ecumenical councils affirmed that the Creed cannot be changed (Canon 7 of Ephesus), and they also teach that we need to understand the Trinity through the Cappodocien Fathers who were instrumental in trinitarian doctrine. The Cappodociens beloved in the Monarchy of the Father, not the Augustinian view. It’s also interesting to consider all the Popes who were anti-filioque, how could the “vicar of Christ” be wrong about that? :) I’ll lastly point out that eastern Catholics don’t profess the filioque during the creed, and apart from their acceptance of the papacy, their theology is almost identical to orthodox, so if the Roman Catholics accept the eastern Catholics and allow their theology, then you have no leg to stand on saying the Orthodox is wrong about this. Seeing as the Uniate churches are accepted, that implies their theology is acceptable. Or do you disagree with the Roman Catholic Church?
@isaakchatelet72604 ай бұрын
@@triggered8556 Weird then that the Eastern churches changed the creed of Nicea and added the part about the trinity in it
@RaymondTT9 ай бұрын
If you study history, you will find that thisbis absolutely not true. Numerous christian leaders opposed the idea of the papacy and papal infallibility. Some Popes have even been declared anathema after their death.
@heistbros85757 ай бұрын
That's true there was always disent, however many did agree to the papacy, the fact of the matter is that the Pope existed and acted as the Holy See for centuries before the Patriarch of Byzantine excommunicated the Pope in the great schism. And as said in the video, Latin creeds already had the filioque for centuries before the schism, before it was added the idea of the filioque is as old as the church.
@HeartFrancisco4 ай бұрын
Look at Orthodox now divided some allowed married men to be ordained some allows divorce. False Orthodox
@Fac354374 ай бұрын
Pope honorius anyone??
@E.D.B4 күн бұрын
I believe it was Pope Gregory the Great who said that any bishop that claims to be the infallible leader of the church is the anti-christ.
@tommy91324 ай бұрын
so basically go with Orthodoxy if you dont wanna deal with the heresy
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
If the early church is heresy and disagrees with the early church fathers on the authority of the pope, ....sure be to orthodox
@andresa86586 ай бұрын
This guy can not make any points, false ones at that, without being pompous and condescending towards other faiths especially Christian ones. Thank you for solidifying my views on Catholicism. The Pope is not infallible. Orthodoxy is the way.
@bobizzle1605Ай бұрын
Orthodoxy still admits the Bishop of Rome is the definitive seat of Peter.
@cicerogsuphoesdown77232 күн бұрын
Not as long as rome is in schism. Which it is. It’s descended into illogical nonsense. Orthodoxy is the way
@J-PLeigh840911 ай бұрын
Eastern Catholicism must be a beautiful way to practice the faith. If I had an Eastern Church close by I would absolutely worship there, but also grateful for the close by Roman Catholic Church
@taylorrowe200210 ай бұрын
i just don't agree with using leavened bread because it is more likely Jesus used unleavened.
@myredeemerliveth8310 ай бұрын
@@taylorrowe2002 By that logic... Jesus also followed the Law. Doesn't mean we should. It's a Judaizer heresy to use unleavened bread.
@lucidlocomotive20149 ай бұрын
@@myredeemerliveth83why do you have that username if you think they are heretics? I was with you until the last sentence. I think it would be heretical to say you HAVE to use unleavened bread, but it’s not heresy to use it that’s the Latin tradition
@gunshotlagoon9228 ай бұрын
Several years ago I lived near a Roman Catholic Church (they received Eucharist the traditional Latin way) and a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church which was just across the street from it. I made very good friends with the parishioners from them both. I also attended a Syro Malabar Church north from my home. All different churches with their own liturgical expressions but still in holy communion with each other. This I believe will be what the future of the Church will look like everywhere.
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
You should visit an Orthodox Church, at least once. That might be the best decision you will make. Peace be with you 🙏☦️
@Darkside-sj3mo2 ай бұрын
I'm newly Christian, I was leaning towards catholicism, but then saw how the current pope conducts himself, and that led me to orthodoxy.
@patricklennon51956 ай бұрын
We didn’t break communion with Rome because Rome didn’t officially add the Filioque until 1024. In fact, Pope Leo III refused to add the Filioque in 809.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
The decrees of this last council were examined by Pope Leo III, who approved of the doctrine conveyed by the Filioque, but gave the advice to omit the expression in the Creed. The practice of adding the Filioque was retained in spite of the papal advice, and about the middle of the eleventh century it had gained a firm foothold in Rome itself.
@user-je5ib5nv8uАй бұрын
It’s been there since the fifth century what was the problem why did it take you 500 years to say something unless it was true
@Srhyle9 ай бұрын
Claiming that someone is infallible (other than Jesus) is just wrong. You can't even cite a verse that supports that.
@cyberbules30859 ай бұрын
Finally someone said it !! If the pope was truly infallible, then in the Revelation of John, the pope would have unsealed the cylindrical book, which was written on the inside and on the outside.
@patrickpelletier92989 ай бұрын
@@cyberbules3085 the pope isn't infallible What he is is the human leader of the Church. We pray that the Holy Spirit protects us from foolishly putting a bad leader in that position. The only time the pope is Infalliable is when he speaks from the seat of Peter, which has only happened a handful of times throughout history.
@cyberbules30859 ай бұрын
@@patrickpelletier9298 Was he speaking infaillibly, when he declared, that behind all religions is the same God? Was he infaillible, when he said, that all religions are pathways to eternity? Was he infaillible, when he said, that the young people of the world should stop eating meat to save the environment?
@patrickpelletier92989 ай бұрын
@@cyberbules3085 of course not, 1 he wasn't speaking from the seat of peter, and 2, there is no moral teaching shown in any of those. both of those have to be met, alongside many other things canonically, for him to be speaking infalliably. go look at canonlawmadeeasy, they have a good write up on the subject.
@andrewsantillan60209 ай бұрын
I know the problem is they don't believe in Sola Scriptura.
@neochris28 ай бұрын
Reunification will one day come ✝️☦✝️☦✝️☦✝️☦✝️☦✝️☦✝️ “We are not competitors but brothers, and this concept must guide all our mutual actions as well as those directed to the outside world. We urge Catholics and Orthodox in all countries to learn to live together in peace and love, and to be “in harmony with one another” (Rm 15: 5). Consequently, it cannot be accepted that disloyal means be used to incite believers to pass from one Church to another, denying them their religious freedom and their traditions. We are called upon to put into practice the precept of the apostle Paul: “Thus I aspire to proclaim the gospel not where Christ has already been named, so that I do not build on another's foundation” (Rm 15: 20).” Signed: Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill
@loydjenkins224110 ай бұрын
History shows the Bishop of Rome had no more weight or authority than any other bishop. Did he ever answer the question he brought up.?
@sharkgaming432010 ай бұрын
Proof I don’t see proof all I see is allegations from you bc I saw sources that actually state the supremacy of the pope
@christsavesreadromans10966 ай бұрын
That’s entirely false. Just read Against Heresies Book 3 Chapter 3.
@Chris-lf4sr3 ай бұрын
Papal Primacy was a claim made. Papal supremacy was not. The entire has always showed the See of Rome respect for being the See of Peter and the See of the Old Empire. The Pope was considered first among equals. It's actually quite amusing when one reads the various languages from the Councils. There are notes from the Councils that make it seem like the Pope is the only authority here on earth... those are the notes made in Latin. Literally every other language transaltion support Papal Primacy and First Among Equals. So what's more likely-the other four Patriarchates got it wrong at every early Council? Or the Latins embellished the notes based on Western-embedded ideas thay were foreign to the East? It's most like reading into the words of others that which they wanted to hear.
@Mach15-203 ай бұрын
Lies. The Greek is even stronger in some instances. And there is no difference between ”primacy” and ”supremacy”. A distinction made up by the eastern orthodogs. Stop parroting non scholar Truglia.
@Warspite394 ай бұрын
zero early Christians would agree you need to be in communion with a heretic pope like gay blessing francis
@bryce84183 ай бұрын
Saying Papel infallibility is an early church doctrine is a wild claim
@Marcel---the2nd2 ай бұрын
Wdym? Infallible in morals isn't that big
@bryce84182 ай бұрын
I mean that the doctrine of Papel infallibility started popping up much later in history, medieval era to be exact. This is not an early church doctrine. I have much love for my Catholics brothers and sisters but this is not what the early church believed.
@Marcel---the2nd2 ай бұрын
@@bryce8418 Peter’s God-given mandate and Christ’s related promises guarantee that the Church will never fall away from his teachings (Matt. 16:18; 1 Tim. 3:15), even if individual Catholics might. In 251, St. Cyprian of Carthage writes: If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he [should] desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church? (The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st edition [A.D. 251]). I think the misunderstanding that most others have with infallibility is that the pope is infallible himself, but the dogma is that infallibility is given by the Holy Spirit. Although some will probably argue that it started at some time, the church developed the doctrine not by making it but rather defining it
@jamilabdur-rashid38012 ай бұрын
Tell the Pope to open the Vatican vaults so we can see what was all lied about.
@dp345767 ай бұрын
Also, I think this guy is just a Roman that attends a ByzCat parish
@meina06145 ай бұрын
So hes not eastern orthodox but a catholic with EO mass. Lmao.
@kazb65269 ай бұрын
Why you capping
@timothystinson92925 ай бұрын
Papal infallibility was not within the church from tbe beginning
@marijadjosic97175 ай бұрын
I'm Serbian Orthodox
@E.D.B4 күн бұрын
Based
@completionofcomplex8 ай бұрын
Looked at history but I think that no papal supremacy and papal infallibility has never been part of the early church. only papal ptimacy, the pope of rome is an honorary title, because rome is doubly apostolic. 2 apostles came to rome, so the pope is the first among equals.
@perfectlambministry777.9 ай бұрын
This dude isn't really knowledgeable on history
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
Well, history shows the filioque is valid
@perfectlambministry777.4 ай бұрын
@@Marcel---- I'm Catholic now. You're right there's so much evidence for it.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
@@perfectlambministry777. Oh well, God bless you, and happy Easter!
@guineapigclips52054 ай бұрын
@@Marcel----The issue wasnt with the the filioque itself, that could have been ironed out with an ecumenical council, the issue was with the adding of the filioque to the creed.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
@@guineapigclips5205 but it's not forbidden for any alterations. Especially considering Orthodox dont actually use the first creed but rather altered it to bring clarity the Orthodox use The Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed The Catholic Church just added the filioque because the filioque is valid and we altered it to bring clarity
@memematic72276 ай бұрын
Evidence has left the chat
@dp345767 ай бұрын
We Byzantines need to stop the whole "Orthodox in communion with Rome." It's cringe and keeps the churches even further away from each other.
@ratatoskr93667 ай бұрын
So the 1000 years of Orthodox Christians who were in communion with Rome before 1054, were cringe? lol ok buddy
@InnocentAlaska5 ай бұрын
Just say eastern Catholics the term eastern will tell everyone how you worship .. the orthodox don’t call themselves Catholic even know they believe they’re the one true church . As a Byzantine catechumen I completely agree I think the phrase is very cringe.
@InnocentAlaska5 ай бұрын
@@lastsupperapologetics5710 Catholic meaning universal they don’t say they’re Catholics … very simple to understand you’re trying to play word games and it isn’t working
@InnocentAlaska5 ай бұрын
@@lastsupperapologetics5710 they don’t call themselves Catholics and you know that they think they’re catholic as in one universal church but not Catholics there is a difference
@InnocentAlaska5 ай бұрын
@@lastsupperapologetics5710 terrible example it’s like you saying you’re a social person then me calling you a socialist
@greakfreakmyboy98226 ай бұрын
The Orthodox Church is the original church and has not changed in anyway in nearly 2000 years
@andridefian4 ай бұрын
Old believers and old calendarists joined the chat.
@jeffreyjamesLawless3 ай бұрын
The calendar was messed up
@theeasternjourney10 ай бұрын
Agree to disagree, I've studied church history and councils and non of em teach papal infability or supremacy. Let me ask you a question? Church of Cyprus received autocephaly in 5th century, meaning they are self-governing church. How does that work with papal supremacy? Same for Bulgarian Orthodox Church in I believe 9th century. What about Saint Thedore the Studite that says: “But here it is a question of divine and heavenly decisions and those are reserved only to him to whom the Word of God has said: “Whatsoever you shall bind upon earth, will be bound in Heaven and whatsoever you shall loose on earth, shall be loosed in Heaven.” And who are the men to whom this order was given? - the Apostles and their successors. And who are their successors? -he who occupies the throne of Rome and is the first; the one who sits upon the throne of Constantinople and is the second; after them, those of Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem. That is the Pentarchic authority in the Church. It is to them that all decision belongs in divine dogmas. The Emperor and he secular authority have the duty to aid them and to confirm what they have decided.” Saint Theodore the Studite, Epistle 2.129 (PG 99: 1417)
@myredeemerliveth8310 ай бұрын
Yes. None of them teach it
@siege_boi8 ай бұрын
It doesn’t seem like that they agreed the pope had authority, because papal infallibility wasn’t established then
@rolandyamel637610 ай бұрын
Speaking about the church of Christ while wearing a shirt of a man sitting atop a giant pile of cash sends an interesting message to those watching this video, don't you think?
@doom798410 ай бұрын
It's just a shirt 😂
@slimero30395 ай бұрын
And Muhammad Ali is also Muslim. This KZfaqr is a member of Vatican 2. And the symbolism of society is real with them.
@Nicholasbetter1238 ай бұрын
Personaly im orthodox☦️
@georgeathonsk71269 ай бұрын
Don't say false teachings. Did you are you an eastern Catholic and then that means are you an eastern orthodox???? We the orthodox Christians we are the eastern orthodox not the eastern catholics the eastern catholics belongs to Roman Catholicism greetings from Greece
@jovaniguess4608 ай бұрын
Please ignore my profile picture, I don't want to get political, I just want to say you're right! Greetings from Macedonia
@MilesKnepper4 ай бұрын
Just a correction from a fellow Catholic. Papal infallibility didn’t become official doctrine until 1870 during the First Vatican Council.
@Mo_loves_aisha-6yoBTW5 ай бұрын
The pops did mistakes through history tho, for example he took money for the expiation of sins. That’s why I have a hard time with the Catholic Church
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
Indeed. If you have never been, come to a service, at your local Orthodox Church, brother. Peace be with you 🙏☦️
@alexhay74468 ай бұрын
This simply isn't true.
@morgangriles62516 ай бұрын
Why would u have a leader that blesses gay marriage and that’s so easily influenced by society..
@mexicangunslinger9155 ай бұрын
He doesn’t bless homosexual couples, he only blesses the people in order fore them to come to repentance.
@holyclasher4 ай бұрын
@@mexicangunslinger915but why wasn't he doing it before he can't just make up rules
@mexicangunslinger9154 ай бұрын
@@holyclasher maybe because churches were not doing it before
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
@@mexicangunslinger915no, he has "clarified" the matter. They get blessed as a couple. In a very roundabout way, but that is the case. Repent, and turn to Christ and His Church, Holy Orthodoxy. -former r. Catholic
@mexicangunslinger9154 ай бұрын
@@ElDogeRenacido stop lying
@valentinloghin40044 ай бұрын
The Ortodoxy , the most unchanged between two , the real church of Christ !!
@TheOtherCatholic10 ай бұрын
Didnt you say in another video that you are still canonically roman catholic but that you attend an EC parish exclusively? Was that you, or someone else?
@slimero30395 ай бұрын
He’s a wolf
@tonyornelas93749 ай бұрын
Is the pope infallible when he said That Jesus was a failure on the cross or that a relationship with jesus is dangerous or that atheists can go to heaven or that their should be a one world religion.
@a_person7378 ай бұрын
No Pope has ever said that before
@lacastanha9 ай бұрын
theres no way he is being serious kkkkkkkk
@momus24247 күн бұрын
The main differences between Orthodox Christianity and Roman Catholicism. the main things which keep our religions separate are: Papal Supremacy, Papal Infallibility, The Filioque, Absolute Divine Simplicity, Created Grace Doctrine, natural theology, scholasticism, Original sin, sacred heart doctrine, Immaculate conception, Purgatory, Merits/Indulgences, evolution of Dogma,imaginative prayer, "beatific vision" etc Then the Forced Celibacy of Priests, The use of Unleavened Bread in the Eucharist, The Adoption and change of the Christian calendar, The use of Renaissance statues, Pews, Child Communion, improper non immersion baptism, Cardinals, and differences in liturgical practices (Alter tables, Iconostasis, priest positioning etc) all of those things, we say the Western Church adopted and innovated and became heretical when they adopted these things. And we say that in the early church NONE of these things existed, there is no evidence of these things. No examples of Papal Infallibility, No examples of merits/indulgences, and no examples of unleavened wafer bread, and such. In fact in the west, In Rome. It looked a lot similar to how we Orthodox exist today. Our priests can get married, we use Icons and not statues, we use the old calendar etc Orthodoxy Vs Roman Catholicism: Energy Essence Distinction vs Absolute Divine Simplicity Ancestral Sin vs Original Sin Non Filioque Trinity vs Filioque Trinity Patriarchy vs Papacy Revealed Theology vs Natural Theology Hesychasm Vs Scholasticism Theosis vs Sanctification Married Priest vs Celibate Priests Infant Communion Vs Non Infant Communion Iconography vs Statues Full Immersion Baptism vs Sprikle Baptism One Baptism vs Confirmation Baptism Leavened Communion Bread vs Unleavened Communion bread Julian Calendar vs Pope Gregory's Calendar We are not the same Religion, we do not have the same faith, and anyone who looks into either religions genuinely will see how different we are.
@E.D.B4 күн бұрын
Some of these are non issues though for instance scholasticism isn’t necessarily evil. It’s only wrong when take to the extreme that Rome has taken it to. Calendar isn’t really an issue either. What’s wrong with the beatific vision?
@dramaclouds5 ай бұрын
The RIGHT and ONLY way is Orthodoxy. All the Saints followed Orthodoxy.
@dramaclouds5 ай бұрын
@@BelfastIsRed The Orthodox church is the only church that follows what Jesus Christ says. All the other "Christian" religions are heretical and that's a fact.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
Are you sure? The actual early church fathers accepted the filioque and the popes succession and authority
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
@@BelfastIsRed he's not saying that. He's saying the fullness of the faith can be found in Orthodoxy. A Christian alone is no Christian at all, after all.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
So, do you believe in the filioque? 😂
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
@@Marcel---- ... no. The pope is leading many of you to destruction. Run away from the "vicar" of Christ and turn to the Truth ☦️ Regardless, may God be with you. Peace be with you
@jasonrodgers8809 ай бұрын
Why does it have to be one or the other? Why the competition? God is present in the Church... *Capital 'C'* The East and the West are both sides of the same world!
@pejZombeanАй бұрын
Could you start linking your full videos on your shorts? I always try to find it afterward. I’m sure it would get you more views from others as well.
@chadpilled791310 ай бұрын
Kinda being dishonest about the Eastern Church not saying breaking communiom with Rome over filioque. Orthodox view schism as a great tragedy and almost a last resort. Also Pope Saint Gregory The 8th (+604) said "Whoever calls himself universal bishop, or desires this title, is, by his pride, the precursor to the Antichrist." So the pope you would claim has infallibility declared papacy antichrist, as well as disproved your claim that papal supremacy was there from the beginning. Also Saint Peter was the first bishop of Antioch. So why shouldn't Antioch be the most important bishophric?
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
No the seat of Peter is in Rome and that is historically acknowledged by very early sources, nobody disputes that the Pope is the apostolic successor of Peter. The orthodox only dispute about what that means. Pope Gregorys Quote stems from a constantinople Patriarch being bestowed a title that made it sound as if the Priesthood and Authority of the Church stems from him, which is something he condemns and does not teach. And neither does Rome teach that, since Rome acknowledges Priests out of communion with Rome to be valid Priests.
@noelphilip310 ай бұрын
@@awuriefnejqwjmnwn4960 again by this argument, the seat of Peter in Antioch (which would be the church of Antioch) ought to take a supremacy position but that is not what is being said. Antioch was the very first place a person was identified as a 'Christian'
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
@@noelphilip3 Peter died in Rome, the Church of Rome is literally built on Peters grave and there is no shortage of Patristics who mention this, which is why the mainstream Orthodox position is not to deny that Rome is the Church of Peter since this is historically attested to. To claim that it isnt is historically untenable
@noelphilip310 ай бұрын
@@awuriefnejqwjmnwn4960 I don't think I was denying that Rome is the church of Peter, but I am ascerting to you that as an example the Church of Antioch is also the Church of Peter. There's biblical evidence for this (not just historical!) I am trying to get you to see the bigger picture here
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
@@noelphilip3 Peter is the Rock upon which the church is built, to this Church the promise of indefectability is made and the Church of Rome is literally built on Peters remains, its almost Prophetic. Nobody in history considered the Church of Antioch to be Peters Church, there is no doubt about it from the sacred Tradition which we hold to, since we do not believe in Sola Scriptura. You sound like a Protestant, this is not how apostolic Believers think or argue. To call the patristic sources "just historical" is not a tenable position, one may just as well say that the Councils were "just historical". Thats protestantism.
@tonyvlavo25299 ай бұрын
Orthodoxy priests can marry, have kids, no child sexualising abuse in Orthodoxy. We believe we are just men/human serving God and as a man we sin daily but always repent. We believe only Jesus's can be pope and that All Bishops and priests are treated as equals not like Catholics with the hierarchy kingship system. Christianity Started in the Balkans for the Europeans.
@Novagergeous4 ай бұрын
the catholics has lots of hereseys For example they say they worship the same God as the Muslims do
@user-je5ib5nv8uАй бұрын
There is abuse search it up obviously not to an extreme but your bishops are single men you know that right
@OssoryOverSeas19 күн бұрын
It’s the Orthodox who hold the historical high ground.
@noelphilip310 ай бұрын
This is not fully accurate, the bishop of Rome was first among equals rather than first over equals. See the other comments below about this.
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
Thats kind of an ad hoc attempt to explain the ancient sources away, claiming that the primacy of Peter is a primacy of Honor. But we can see in real time in the EO territorial disputes with Moscow and Constantinople that having a Primacy of Authority is actually necessary, not just a primacy of honor
@noelphilip310 ай бұрын
@@awuriefnejqwjmnwn4960 you haven't explained how it is necessary? There is a reason a council of bishops can ecclesiastically take a decision just as was done in the initial councils of Nicae etc. No where is it mentioned that any one bishop of the original pentarchy of bishops (Rome, Alexandria, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch) had supremacy over others, yes the bishop of Rome was first among them but not over them. By your argument, we can say that the bishop of Constantinople has higher precedence over others (as it is the new Rome) but that's not the case as well. During the time of the initial councils, the regions were in communion with each other but each bishop had it's own jurisdiction, one didn't interfere in the matters of the others unless was needed like was done in the council's. They were all 'Christians'
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
@@noelphilip3 Well the reason I believe the Papacy is ecclesiologically necessary is because a council requires that the participants actually acknowledge the council as authoritative, which the Eastern Orthodox are utterly failing to establish for centuries at this point. There is nobody to settle the dispute and there is nobody to define what makes a council authoritative. They have no means to settle territorial disputes in ukraine, no means of settling the rebaptism Issue (which is a massive and scandalous controversy)
@noelphilip310 ай бұрын
@@awuriefnejqwjmnwn4960 Are you saying during the early ecumenical apostolic councils, the Bishop of Rome was playing a role of Supremacy? Absolutely not. Again, it was the first among equals not over equals. Let me put another example for you, an organisation has an executive board (equivalent to the bishops) who come together to decide on matters of the organisation (think vote like system for decisions etc and other such processes), only in the event of grave issues such as corruption would they take a call to bring such perpetrators to justice (i.e. the heresies from the times). The board might have an elected representative for representation matters but the representative does not have dictatorship authorities over the others. I am not too aware of the issue in the EO church you have highlighted but doesn't mean a supremacy is the solution. By that logics there's plenty of issues in the Catholic church where in a supreme ruling may have been passed but are not necessarily accepted by the relevant Catholic sect (Read issue on Syro Malabar Catholics in Kerala)
@myredeemerliveth8310 ай бұрын
@@awuriefnejqwjmnwn4960LMAO no Synod has ever failed except the false Synod of Crete in 2016. We have like three Hesychast Synods, we have the Synod of Constantinople, Tarnovo, and other Synods which are accepted as inerrant
@user-wb1ty8zv3f8 ай бұрын
I am a Greek orthodox. I want to say that it is sin to every catholic or orthodox Christian who don't support the unity of the church. We the orthodox we have to recognise that Pope is the first bishop among equal. And we have to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic brothers. No one of us have the authority to split the body of Christ . Both Catholic and orthodox people at the end of the Creed we confess our membership to the ine holly Catholic and apostolic church.
@orangecobraEU7 ай бұрын
I absolutly dont supporting is, there are a reason of catholics got kicked out, so its eretic
@nickpavlou50233 ай бұрын
Hi... What if the Pope wanted to be the Supreme religious leader over you? Not the first among equals but ruler of all... Because that is what Papal Supremacy wants.
@zlatni_orao7 күн бұрын
@@orangecobraEUThey kicked themselves out, they left all the other churches in the east
@orangecobraEU7 күн бұрын
@@zlatni_orao this made no sence, why would catholics leave another church, if catholics were according to you, first church
@zlatni_orao7 күн бұрын
@@orangecobraEU Im talking about the Roman Catholics and Latin heresy
@aristotlesghost724210 ай бұрын
Everything that just came out of your mouth is demonstrably false
@gianlucapagliuca49110 ай бұрын
Explain if you have time?
@CrusaderofGodEditz10 ай бұрын
Are you protestant???😡😡😡
@taylorrowe200210 ай бұрын
no kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rcyIaZyY262yoqs.htmlsi=0tGSuiJ4y0qIOO9q
@stefanspinu4349 ай бұрын
@@gianlucapagliuca491Pope Honorius was anathemised for the heresy of monolethism, Pope Vigilius was deposed for spreading heresy before repenting and Pope St Gregory the dialogist was against a universal bishop. How were the popes infallible if they were condemned for heresy? How is it a Pope venerated by both orthodox and catholics thought a universal bishop was a horrible thing, even though he would be one? “But I beseech your imperial Piety to consider that some frivolous things are very harmless, and others exceedingly harmful. Is it not the case that, when Antichrist comes and calls himself God, it will be very frivolous, and yet exceedingly pernicious? If we regard the quantity of the language used, there are but a few syllables; but if the weight of the wrong, there is universal disaster. Now I confidently say that whosoever calls himself, or desires to be called, Universal Priest, is in his elation the precursor of Antichrist, because he proudly puts himself above all others. Nor is it by dissimilar pride that he is led into error; for, as that perverse one wishes to appear as above all men, so whosoever this one is who covets being called sole priest, he extols himself above all other priests” This is his writings. It's clear the vatican 1 papacy was an innovation and attempt at power. Further, they used forgeries like the donation of constantinopole to gain power.
@ThirdyBxx8 ай бұрын
Orthodox is different, But they are still cathoclic
@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves9 ай бұрын
Papacy is ridiculous come on
@denaffean48059 ай бұрын
This is why the protestant exist..to correct you all
@johnsix.51-699 ай бұрын
The irony is that protestants are not in unity and "correct" each others doctrines. Which protestant denomination do you belong to?
@baniSaqer7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@baniSaqer7 ай бұрын
That was funny 😂😂😂😂😂
@bygrace7857 ай бұрын
correct us with with which interpretation of scripture that resonates with your emotions best?
@alexcarlastudillo62955 ай бұрын
Heretic pig
@Azzymantried4 ай бұрын
Bro speaks shit in upper case. 😂
@angelicamazur45302 ай бұрын
I am Orthodox❤❤❤☦
@SalvaLovesJesus049 ай бұрын
I am orthodox because i don't practice faith for the pope but for God
@spiceyroses9 ай бұрын
I wanna try the traditional Catholicism way since I'm Catholic but Orthodoxy is very interesting and yes we should pray for God not for the Pope
@ribbie53628 ай бұрын
@@spiceyroseswe don’t pray to the pope at all, he is just ridiculing himself and trying to put catholics down.
@andridefian4 ай бұрын
Pray to God, not for God. We can pray to God for our pope.
@andridefian4 ай бұрын
@@spiceyroses pray to God, not for God. We can pray to God for our pope.
@user-cf8is8zo6s10 ай бұрын
Bro this guy is preaching nonsense. It’s not about religion. Get into a relationship with JESUS and you shall be saved.
@myredeemerliveth8310 ай бұрын
Do you know the origin of the word "religion"? If not look it up and stop this Evangelical nonsense
@sharkgaming432010 ай бұрын
Are you stupid you dumb Protestant this vid is not even about you or your stupid heretic sect this is about real churches not fake shit where the pastor scams you
@OftheDay77710 ай бұрын
Theology is important
@Trillioncapo2 ай бұрын
I DONT CARE, AS AN ORTHODOX I SEE THE CATHOLICS AS MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS AMIN☦️🙏🏻
@mollyporium50868 ай бұрын
The only way to reunite is for Rome to accept the honor of papal primacy and not get drunk on pride and want papal supremacy and infallibility
@quindariousgooch888 ай бұрын
Catholic delusion is a dangerous thing
@jeffconnolly164110 ай бұрын
In the Bible there is no popes or priests to rule over the church. Jesus Christ is our High Priest (Heb. 3:1 ; 4:14-15 ; 5:5 ; 8:1 ; 9:11) and all true Christians make up a spiritual priesthood (1st Peter 2:5). Jesus Christ has sanctified all Christians who believe on Him (Heb. 10:10-11), so all priests today are unnecessary and unscriptual. Furthermore, the practice of calling a priest "Father" is forbidden by Jesus Christ in Matthew 23:9. There is only One mediator between God and men (1st Timothy 2:5).
@lukewoodard318910 ай бұрын
Amen. I would like to go further. They also give Mary unnecessary attention a.k.a. worship. I like how they say we’re not praying to Mary, we’re just talking to Mary, what do you think praying is? And why go to Mary when you can go to God himself? Catholics don’t make sense to me. And I’m pretty sure they asked to believe that Mary never sined which is a horrible belief(no offense) because the word of God is quite clear “ALL” have fallen short of the glory of God. Jesus Christ was the only one who never sined.
@MrTzarBomb10 ай бұрын
@@lukewoodard3189Since it’s been answered a million times, why not actually look up the response?
@respawncheetah10 ай бұрын
Came here to say the same.
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
The "Father" objection is bottom of the Barrel
@collinjones31110 ай бұрын
@@highestthumosi mean you amswered it yourself. I call mine dad. You can call him sir, dad, pops, pop
@OssoryOverSeas19 күн бұрын
The dude with bass voice is in trebel with his history.
@SlavicRatnik6 ай бұрын
Is there a link to the full video
@josephkush103210 ай бұрын
I just pray to god
@user-nu3sd7zb2j10 ай бұрын
So muslims and hindus . Your point ?
@OftheDay77710 ай бұрын
Let’s learn who our God is so we can pray in truth and reverence
@josephkush103210 ай бұрын
@@OftheDay777 I doubt god cares which specific sect of a church worships him,
@OftheDay77710 ай бұрын
@@josephkush1032 I’m sure God cares greatly how he is to be worshipped
@user-nu3sd7zb2j10 ай бұрын
@@josephkush1032 It takes a stupid protestant to speak for God..
@Sebastian_Borsa79 ай бұрын
It doesn’t matter ur religion what is matter is to have faith in God
@Sebastian_Borsa79 ай бұрын
Father, son, and Holy Ghost
@Kibrekidusan...8889 ай бұрын
Faith with Christian good deeds that leads to inherent God's Kingdom. only faith isn't enough
@destanichildress76899 ай бұрын
@@Kibrekidusan...888you can’t work your way to Heaven, but if you truly believe you will work. Like being a Boy Scout. How can you call yourself a Boy Scout if you don’t care about earning the Merit Badges. You don’t earn the Merit Badges because you have to but because you want to. Otherwise, don’t be a Boy Scout. BTW: I’m a BaptaPentacostaCatholic. I’m a Bible believing Christian. I have been blessed multiple times by specific direct words, spiritual guidance and visions. He is real!!!! Seek and you shall find. Knock and the door shall open.
@patrickpelletier92989 ай бұрын
faith in God, but don't listen to His words? "You are Kephas and upon this Kephas I will build my church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom" from this we see that Peter is the First among Equals, as the leader of the Church.
@Kibrekidusan...8889 ай бұрын
@@destanichildress7689If you heard from protestant Brothers , you might understand my point of view " Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone."Jacob 2:17 so as Christian we have things that we must do. If you read this version it tells a lot about good deeds. But for everything that we do God support is at the front as satan always put obstacles not to accomplish such things.
@milt2x6 ай бұрын
☦️
@biancameza41378 ай бұрын
what’s the difference between eastern catholic and roman catholic? i’m confused
@a_person7378 ай бұрын
He said it in the video, Eastern Catholics have all the beliefs of Eastern Orthodoxy, but are still united under the pope.
@meina06145 ай бұрын
@@a_person737wrong. The Byzantines accept all the beliefs of Rome but keep EO liturgy. That means they accept filioque, immaculate conception, and papal fallibility and supremacy. All catholic beliefs that EO reject
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
@@meina0614they do not recite the Filioque, fool.
@respawncheetah10 ай бұрын
It's easy to cling to tradition and dogma.... but we literally have the book to read and the spirit within us.
@EPSON-HP10 ай бұрын
And the spirit within us who help us understand the book, the bible, has led many to the catholic faith. The dogmas should not contradict that, which is in scripture. Rather, it should use the scripture to enhance, clarify and verify that, which is claimed as dogma.
@Smh10549 ай бұрын
Who canonized that book? And if the Holy Spirit helps everyone interpret the scripture properly alone why are there hundreds of Protestant denominations with different beliefs who just claim to be teaching the Bible?
@commentking159110 ай бұрын
Lies.
@wegerjominit4 ай бұрын
The best thing is following Christ
@ElDogeRenacido4 ай бұрын
Yes. And that is by being in communion with your brothers and sisters in Christ. Which is why a Church is necessary. The Truth lies in Orthodoxy, in it's full, uncorrupted form. Please, come to a service some time. Peace be with you 🙏☦️
@Marcel---the2nd2 ай бұрын
@@ElDogeRenacidoI don't agree with the orthodox church that it's compelling to me and should be to all catholics it isn't the true church and the apostolic consensus that Jesus founded. But peace to you
@caseycardenas166811 ай бұрын
Great video, I know you've mentioned before that your canonically Latin, but Eastern, specifically Byzantine, in practice. How long have you been attending the Byzantine Ruthenian Parish in Albuquerque?
@ggallosa667411 ай бұрын
Since like 2020
@taylorrowe200210 ай бұрын
a lot of people don't see the beauty in the Latin Rite I know it is pretty much just novus ordo now. @@ggallosa6674
@moranaokeoke9909 ай бұрын
Only he needs to do is to visit Byzantine museum in Athens. 😂since he belong to byzantine chatolic. And see himself
@majorjesse685111 ай бұрын
Or i should go muslim and enter jannah insha allah😊
@adirs.q.11 ай бұрын
Ehh no... see Galatians 1:8 and look at how Islam was created. Also anyone who denies the Son denies the Father. Muhammad was a p*do... But, Jesus loves you ❤️
@beatrizzepeda405210 ай бұрын
@@adirs.q.well said 👏 👌 👍
@majorjesse685110 ай бұрын
@@adirs.q. Ehh not really i m not gonna follow a conterversial bible written after à century from the birth of Jesus pbuh, also nope moral standards change with time and the average age of marriage in england in 1400 (800 years after the time of Muhammed pbuh) was 9-14 years old for females so yea the average weak Christian emotional argument about the prophet's marriage dosnt work unfortunatly 😅, allah also loves you and wants guidance for humans but at the same time he isnt in need for us nor a need to rest nor a need to pay for himself (jesus pbuh praying to god in the bible) nor saying he (jesus pbuh) is the way to god rather then saying the destiny, idk what wdym by deniying the son but i would rather follow an authentici quran rather then a bible written century after jesus pbuh
@Devoted_Catholic77710 ай бұрын
@@majorjesse6851 Muhammad married a 6 year old and raped her at 9. He is not the moral standard and that makes Islam false.
@christosanesti51810 ай бұрын
@@majorjesse6851 can you please preach your controversial "Prophet", somewhere else. This is a Catholic channel. Thank you!!
@MystikosMinistries8 ай бұрын
This is completely false, the Pope is a fallen Patriarch, and it was determined over 1500 years ago by his own hierarchy that he was not infallible. Please cite your sources next time
@ThatTradSpartan_17768 ай бұрын
“Orthodoxy or Catholicism” Byzantine Catholicism
@SoGDmitry10 ай бұрын
You are not orthodox
@jonathankuruvilla56885 ай бұрын
Religion is not the way to heaven having a relationship w Jesus christ is. Stop arguing about which denomination is right bc Jesus wouldn't and he doesn't care
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
Worship christ is not only a relationship. The reason why we're Catholic is because we have the apostolic succession
@jonathankuruvilla56884 ай бұрын
@Marcel---- ok but the only way to go to heaven is having a relationship with Jesus. Christ doesn't care about ur apostolic succession. I can be apostle Paul's son and christ wouldn't care.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
@@jonathankuruvilla5688 I agree to some extent. However, I'd say that confessing Jesus is Lord with our mouths and believing he rose on the third day will save us. It requires our faith but also our deeds to make us righteous. Jesus christ cares about us, and he makes his church and gives the keys to Peter. Whatever is bound on earth will be bound in heaven. His church is the piller of truth. The church is the body of christ
@jonathankuruvilla56884 ай бұрын
@Marcel---- yes I agree but people get so caught up whether their catholic ortho protestant ect but rather they sould say they are a follower of christ.
@Marcel----4 ай бұрын
@@jonathankuruvilla5688 Yes and no (in my opinion) you see my problem why I'm not Protestant or even a person who considers themselves only a follower of christ which disassociate with churches is with "sola scriptura" or "only scripture," like you said, had said to build a relationship with Jesus christ but some people accidentally delve into a wrong faith or "heresy" even defenders of sola scriptura say its no surprise that some wander off its because mainly what scripture teaches is what jesus said and what God intended however people get so many things wrong like "the Trinity is wrong" or "hell and heaven don't actually exist its just a state of mental" or Arianism or some Hersey even said Jesus was a demigod its unreliable for someone to read the Bible without some help that's why people who don't associate with churches look up to their pastors or even some others like Martin Luther or Calvin that's why it's not really only scripture any more its more like protestant reformed founders or like your idea that it's important for people to have a relationship with Jesus christ which I agree but that doesn't explicitly mention in the bible (it can be implied) but the reason why you even have that conclusion is because of teachers or protestant theologians who actually helped develop the importance for relationship of christ while I'm not against I'm certainly sure that sola scriptura isn't reliable. Basically, I'm going with the early church fathers like Saint ignatius of antioch, who was a disciple of apostles, John and him saying that wherever christ is, there is a Catholic church or saints who talks about the pope.... my rationality is that if people are thinking new theologians like Calvin or others, I think people should acknowledge that early church fathers are closer to christ in relationships and time being martyrs and dying for christ because of their love for him. But if I'm going to have to summarize Catholic Church in two chapters, I recommend reading James 2 and Matthew 16
@b3ar6976 ай бұрын
Sorry but what’s the point your trying to make ?
@amiibra94415 ай бұрын
☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️☦️orthodox
@trelomanga90097 ай бұрын
The Pope is allowing the blessings of same sex couples……what authority does this human have to contradict the teachings of Jesus Christ? Luke 17-3
@TheInfiniteMag3 ай бұрын
Tell me your eastern Catholic without telling me your eastern Catholic
@user-ep8xo1od9o3 ай бұрын
What eastern rite do you attend?
@Yeshua-11780Ай бұрын
Both 🇻🇦🤝☦️
@clinttrinity98626 ай бұрын
It’s funny that you say that, because it’s not true so.. maybe study history
@morvye9 ай бұрын
Muhammad Ali on the T-Shirt?
@AidenLuzano23 сағат бұрын
orthodox, catholic, at the end we are all worshipping Jesus Christ
@Dogmanofthewest2 күн бұрын
“Papal infallibility,” yet the first “Pope” Peter was wrong about the idea that new converts should become Jewish before Christian. At the time, he met all the requirements to be infallible, but he wasn’t.
@BlackMamba03094 ай бұрын
Protestant 🔛🔝
@TomPlantagenet2 ай бұрын
So you’re saying that the church always believed in papal infallibility as outline in Vatican 1?
@triggered85562 ай бұрын
They switch between saying the Pope always used it, to saying he had the authority but never exercised it, to saying it’s a doctrinal development. So they are completely inconsistent.
@TomPlantagenet2 ай бұрын
@@triggered8556 it’s almost like they’re backfilling history to fit their beliefs.
@brianguglielmin28739 ай бұрын
Julius Caesar was Hailed as Pontifex in 73 bc and Pontifex Maximus in 63 bc.
@whosavedjesus3 ай бұрын
Dear sir could you please enlighten me as to: if the relationship between god all mighty & jesus is that of a father & son may i then ask what is the relationship between holly gost & jesus christ plz and then what is the relationship between god all mighty & holly gost plz