We test how dirty 100 rounds of CCI Clean Subsonic and CCI Quiet Semi Auto make a suppressor.
Пікірлер: 28
@Jaemon4Eva3 жыл бұрын
Thank you , this answered many questions for me.
@danno93818 күн бұрын
I did notice with the "clean" that the deposits tend to be more mixed with the coating, which tends to fall off versus lead deposits from the CCI Quiet that I've used, which are harder to just shake free (I haven't tried the semi version). The Quiet also doesn't cycle my 10/22, which means less deposits in the action, which I think makes it a bit better, at least for me.
@KettlebellGunsmith4 жыл бұрын
Good info. Thanks. I appreciate the data collection and presentation.
@m17glock352 жыл бұрын
Great stuff brother 👏 as someone who put thousands of rounds through 22 suppressors I clean them very often . Usually around the 500 round point, usually every 2 weeks but sometimes once a week. I have been wanting to do a 500 round comparison but still haven't been able to get the cci clean to do it with . I was hoping getting the clean would extend the cleaning cycles but it doesn't look like it would .
@buddditchendorf18474 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. During the Corona doldrums, I found a 1964 Marlin 39a and Winchester 67a (no serial number) in my deceased father’s closet. I never even saw them out and forgot they existed. So this find has peaked my interest to preserve and use these beauties. At the age of 45, I am a beginner. Choosing what ammo to use would be a learning lesson. I just happened to choose CCI Quiet after reading up on how to keep the noise down and hoping it was also clean(er) than the competition. What a great resource this video is to confirm I did ok in choosing quiet. Any other suggestions for these old guns? Both are going to the gunsmith for a checkup before firing.
@LFDResearch4 жыл бұрын
Honestly the gunsmith should be able to make sure everything is mechanically sound and the cci quiet is a lower gas pressure round so it should be even more gentle on the gun than some of the hotter loads like cci stingers. Always wear hearing protection unless you are using a suppressor hearing that is lost will never return
@jb27684 жыл бұрын
Was there a reason you used one rotation (3 turns) on the CCI clean and what looked like 2 rotations (5-6 turns) on the CCI semi-auto? The different methodology negates your results and no meaningful conclusions can be drawn.
@LFDResearch4 жыл бұрын
I understand exactly what you mean and it’s one of the things I’m least happy about in this testing but considering there was far more on the clean trying to find the grime and the results came out so close it would support the possibility that the semi auto is a cleaner ammo near the far end of the suppressor
@skeet25s8 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video, but that was testing carbon fouling, not lead. The "clean" referrers to lead fouling. My .22 suppressor gets lead buildup so bad it has to scrapped off with dental tools. The carbon is easy to clean, the lead cleanup is horrible, which is why I'm looking into the CCI Clean rounds.
@MisterTengu4 жыл бұрын
I like that you're doing something different. Did you have a bulk ammo as a control?
@LFDResearch4 жыл бұрын
No we didn’t but that can easily be done is there a particular Hamni you would like to see used as a control. Like cci mini mag or rem golden bullet?
@WeerdBeard4 жыл бұрын
@@LFDResearch the golden bullets will both test the control group, but also test your vocabulary as you clear jams!
@LFDResearch4 жыл бұрын
Lol I don’t get that issue too often with them
@WeerdBeard4 жыл бұрын
@@LFDResearch good to hear, I've heard a LOT of badmouthing of them, so during the last 22 drought when I managed to secure a brick, I just fed it to revolvers....which is 99% of my .22 shooting anyway.....because .22 revolvers are THE BEST!!1!!
@LFDResearch4 жыл бұрын
Weer’d that’s just cause you don’t have a tx22 and a suppressor. Now that’s the real best 22 shooting experience
@nashvilleoutlaw2 жыл бұрын
Didn't seem ether was cleaner just a slight difference in where the deposits concentrated.
@LFDResearch2 жыл бұрын
Thats really what we were noticing and gave up on using this kind of testing as there was too much variance to get solid results
@nashvilleoutlaw2 жыл бұрын
@@LFDResearch I'm trying these out now in a 1:9 converted ar. Maybe they'll help keep from leading up the barrel with the coating and higher twist rate.
@LFDResearch2 жыл бұрын
That might help you might need to clean out the gas port from debris even with the clean
@nextoro57862 жыл бұрын
dirt from cci Quiet bro left in the rifles barrel ,therefore is why in the rear of the suppressor the dirt is more than in the front of the suppressor, look at the barrel and you will see that I am right,you are making a wrong comparison of cleanliness, in this comparison no one is not interested in the cleanliness of the suppressor but in the cleanliness of the rifle barrel.Greetings from Northern Republic of Macedonia X Republic of Yugoslavia.
@LFDResearch2 жыл бұрын
Honestly we did several of these vidoes and decided the methodology needed improved before trying to test it again. But yes you make valid points. In the states we do care how dirty the suppressor gets because of how often we have to clean them and how highly regulated they are here the one used in testing cost me about 700 usd to get and 14 months of waiting
@FeldwebelWolfenstool2 жыл бұрын
...b-roll..we used to call them "cutaways" or "viz"...