Thank you to John and everyone on the Centre Place team for tonight's fantastic Hamercopia of Knowledge. See you next week!

Missed the live. Looking forward to your presentation John. Very much respect to you.

Great channel. Very good historical presentation. One of the best I have seen.

A very interesting presentation. Even the introduction gave an excellent overview of concepts I've been trying to understand. A wonderful presentation, also a fresh perspective for me. Thanks!

keen for this one!!

The way in which John takes information and presents it so clearly is unique in the best way

Une ouverture d'esprit pour cerner la compréhension du prophète Jésus de l'Islam. Merci ❤

Bang a gong, another great Centre Place lecture.

Thank you John. Another great presentation. This one was very interesting.

Thank you for sharing these.

Thank you so much, John, for this wonderful lecture. I've learned things I didn't imagine could be out there. Can you please make a video about Islamic apocalypse as opposed to (or in relation with) Christian apocalypse (in the Revelation and other apocryphal sources)?

John is without a doubt the most intelligent interesting scholar on Earth

Thanks for this John! A very intresting take on. 4:157 with the Gnostic Jesus! Here is a summary of the different academic schools of thought when it comes to the history of early Islam: Traditionalist maximalists ( yaser qadhi and others) Traditionalist minimalists (shady nasser Emran edawi etc) Revisionist maximalists ( angelika neuwirth, sean Anthony, gabriel Said, Joshua little etc) Revisinist minimalists ( david powers, Joseph Shomaker, the Inarah School etc)

Thanks John, this was very revealing

You're a great person and intellectual. Thank you so much.

My mind is completely blown getting a hint of John's theology, 2 hours 10 minutes and 34 seconds in. (2:10:34) It came in response to a fairly blunt question: "(why) are you even a Christian?" but the answer covered life, the universe and everything. I would love to hear a mini-lecture about John's faith. (not sure if lecture is the right word; a talk or chat maybe.) "The gospels don't need to have any kind of historicity in a cosmic sense" That's Carl Sagan levels of spirituality. 💗 When Carl Sagan was asked if he believed in God, he challenged the definition of God. "If I say Yes or if I say No you have learned absolutely nothing!" "Why would we use a word, so ambiguous, that means so many different things. It makes for social lubrication, but it is not an aid to truth."

2:10:40 I like the summary of John’s/ CentrePlaces enlightened belief structure!

I don't have time to listen to all of this, but I will just correct one thing. The majority of Muslims (who are followers of the Sunnah) do not believe the Quran is "eternal" in the sense of co-equal with God, so this false parallel about it having the same logical fallacy as the trinity does not apply. According to the Hadith the first thing Allah created was Al-Kalam and Al-Lawh al-Mahfuz, the Pen and the Preserved Tablet which is where the decrees of God are recorded. I made it through the first hour and 20 minutes, I'll try to finish the rest later.

Excellent lecture on a challenging but important topic. At some later point it would be interesting to compare Jesus in Muslim eschatology vs. Christian eschatology. I think that some Muslims believe Christ will return and be part of the endgames/apocalypse...but I'm not very clear on that.

Thanks!

Thank you John! You mentioned non-christian jewish gnosticism. Could you name some sources for this?

I've changed my entire world view on Christianity thanks to these lectures. I see Jesus now as just a man with GREAT IDEAS at the right time just like George Washington and Martin Luther King Jr. The supernatural aspect seems superfluous now as it would if we made MLK Jr. the son of God. The supernatural story telling seems to be a literary device design to elevate and inspire our imaginations. You can still a BE A CHRISTIAN without making Jesus Christ into a divine being. That is a very profound perspective I had never considered.

Intriguing! This well articulated presentation debunks many Islamic claims. At this point It’s common knowledge that Mohammad took bits and peaces from earlier Christian and Jewish texts. Islam and Mormonism are in fact extremely similar in that regard. Cheers for all your in depth research!!

More videos on history of Islam please! It is really interesting how their philosophy has evolved from the early local beliefs and different local alternative christianities.

Superb lecture

Mulțumim!

John, you are one of the few that get the history of the movement called The Poor right -- very impressive. And you are very articulate when you talk about it. But people asked you a question about your faith (I have been wondering that myself; I know what you know and I can't even imagine being religious) and ... that was hard to hear ... and the first time I had to listen to what you said twice and I still have no idea what the hell that was.

I'm very surprised to see you don't couch any of your statements about Muhammed as "according to the Quran". You speak about Muhammed as if you are reciting something historical, but almost everything you say about him is simple taken - without any critical or academic analysis - straight from the pages of the Quran. You would never in a million years treat the bible as straight history. So I am puzzled why are you doing exactly that for the Quran?

Will you ever do episodes with other Bible and Theology scholars on KZfaq?

700 years later is sketchy

1:32:17 my favorite quote from Muslim Jesus

My humble request to all please read Brother of Jesus and lost teachings of Christianity by Prof. Jeffry Butz.

Which is not the true Jesus.

There's a commandment about bearing false witness but what about snitching? That's a problem too.

Interesting timeline, I wonder which other ‘peoples’ made Christianity their state religion before Rome…

a truth seeker must ask how did muhamad unlettered man in the 7th centuary gives us stories of jesus infancey that is not even mentioned in the canonical gospels but in the non canonical gospels that have been discovered just recently , the nag hamadi library ?

Thanks... Paul didn't change anything. His teaching are in line with Jesu' teaching and with all Jesus' disciples' teaching. He was led by the Holy Spirit just like the other apostles. Very good insight though. Thanks.

Fairly shallow and naive analysis as usually

I know each verse of Quran. Quran never denies nailing of Jesus on Cross but denies his Crucifixion which means: he did not die on the Cross, and same is stand of Luke and John and non-religious history

Good lecture, but I do find that Christians really struggle grasping theology outside of their own. The Quran being Uncreated doesn't make it a God. If a God is a type of person, then the Quran need no more be a God than formless matter which a Creator God may make the world from. Also, Neoplatonists would not define The One as "the real God," implying that the other Gods are fake. They were polytheists. Proclus, for example, refers to the Gods as "Henads," which means "Units/Ones." "The One" is the principle or Form of Godhood, in the same way that "Humanity" is the principle that makes humans human. There is no more "one real God" than there is "one real human" or "one real horse". The Forms have causative power, but their emanations aren't false.

I have issue with how you interpreted the following verse 19:32 19:32 He has made me dutiful toward my mother, and He has not made me arrogant or wicked 19:33 Blessed was I on the day I was born, and blessed I shall be on the day I die and on the day I am raised to life again. You claimed that when the baby Jesus said “He has made me dutiful toward my mother, and He has not made me _arrogant or wicked_” he was referring to being wicked and arrogant in his childhood. Not necessarily. He was talking about himself later on in life not when he is a baby. Just a few verses before that we read: 19:29 She pointed to the child. They said, How shall we talk to someone who is a child in the cradle 19:30 [But] he said, I am God's servant. He has given me the Book and made me a prophet 19:31 He has made me blessed wherever I may be, and has enjoined upon me prayer and almsgiving throughout my life.” He is talking about his life to come later on. How he is going to be a prophet and a messenger to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Your views are clouded by your Christian education and you try to project your distorted views on the Quran. And I believe you do it clumsily. I watched until minute 44 but I couldn’t stand it any longer.

First of all; praise the Lord Jesus. 🙏🏽 Second: THOSE MESSENGER NAMES 💀💀💀😂😂😂😂

I know each verse of Quran. Quran never supports tales of Virgin Birth and Ascension and Return of Jesus; and even these two tales never exist in ancient copies of 4 Gospels

They teach the apocryphal Jesus and not the canonical Jesus.

Love this sleeping material

i would love to hear more on johns take on plant medicine in the bible, specifically the modern take that mana was mushrooms or the vision with the burning bush was dmt x blue lotus rituals. this was such a fun and lively lecture!

Scripture shows us that before the Creation of the Heavens and all life in them and the Earth and all life in and on it, Spirit Beings existed, the אלהים ALaHaYM (Elohim), Genesis 1:1. The word ALaHaYM is in the plural, yet, when translated into English becomes the word 'God' which is singular. So here we have the beginning of Confusion. Because the word 'God' is singular, then we are to believe there can only be 'One God', but this is not what the Scriptures, the word of the Spirit, reveals to us! If no one has seen 'God' at any time or even heard His voice then we have to ask these questions: Who breathed into the nostrils of Adam the Breath of Life? who took one of Adams ribs to Create Eve? Who were Adam and Eve hiding from in the Garden? Who spoke to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden? Who did they hear speaking to them concerning what they had done wrong? The answer is, there is 'One' Spirit Being who has never been seen by Man, who we have come to know as 'Our Father' and 'One' Spirit Being who we have seen and heard, known to us as 'The Only Son of the Father', the 'One' who became flesh and dwelt among us as the 'Son of Man', John 6:46, and John 1:14. Hope this makes you think beyond what we are taught to believe?

their view is one of delighting to slight the TRUE GOD WHO is JESUS by insisting on some figment of muhammad;s vanity to do so.

Both Christians and Muslims believes in Jesus's second coming. Jesus of his desciples and early followers will be with Muslims in his second coming. Jesus of Paul, early Church fathers and Nicene Creed will be with Christians in his second coming.

I'm not a theologian but I'm pretty sure that if Christ didn't die, then Christ didn't die for your sins. Therefore, if you are a Yahweh worshiper who thinks that Christ *did* die for humanity's sins, you've got to admit that 1.9 billion fellow Yahweh worshipers (Muslims) are dead wrong. (or should that be 'alive-wrong' since Muslims believe he survived crucifixion)

read Ouran 61:6

The muslim view of Jesus is they don't like his teachings on marriage. This leads to the other Muslim teachings about Jesus.

Quran is not history book. Quran interested only the message that prophets delivered and how they worship God not their story

The Muslims have a more respectful interpretation of Mary and Ishu than the "Pharisees" (after the Eastern Europeans convert by the Babylonian Pharisee, then one can mention Judaism because it did not exist in Ishu's time). Horrible things are said about Mary within those fifty-six books!

i would also really love to hear a talk on the literary link between the gospel of luke and the bacchae and in general the similairities between dionysus and jesus in the septugent (i probably spelled that awful)

It is Quran which tells you the status of Jesus; not sectarian Mullahs and Imams. Have up learned Arabic in order to understand the Quran?

the prphet ws brn exct/y 5 centuries after fa// f Jerusa/em , Jesus be/ieved in him

This is sick (in a good way). Thanks!!!

muhamad had christian cousins ? that is new to me , no where i have heard it or read it or studied it or taught it , warqa ibn nawfal the uncle of his wife khadijah he had knowledge of the syriac peshitta bible , but he died soon after muhamad started his mission , but cousins ? check your sources friend , this is an odd ball

Muslim is praying to muhammad. Allah is created by muhammad in hadith book. There is no god but allah but allah is created by muhammad in hadith book. Is muhammad is a god alias Allah.

Does yhwh know the earth is a sphere? The Bible says no.

I know each verse of Quran. Quran tells: Jesus lived over 100 years and naturally died, and dead never come back. And same is the stand of Non-Religious history

Please learn the history of Rambam who reform jews religion which was polytheist before 800 year after he learn Quran and Islam. When islam come the christian and Jews were polytheist

Sean W. Anthony is a historian of early Islamic history and Arabic literature. This is what Sean Anthony said about the Syriac infancy gospel and Jesus speaking in the cradle: “My view is that the Qur'an influenced the Arabic Infancy Gospel. To my knowledge, there is no attestation to an episode in which the infant Jesus speaks from the cradle to defend Mary that appears in an infancy Gospel (Syriac, etc.) PRIOR to the 7th cent.” Why didn’t you mention that?

Nice job. Its just boring as crap. But that is the material

This is not the Jesus Christ of the Bible and will never, ever be.

Quran makes very Clear that Abraham used to have One Religion and that is ISLAM, and he has nothing to do with Dogmas of Pauline Christianity and Talmudists' Judaism

Few comments: 1- The story of Muhammad going to Syria and being affirmed as a prophet was a later introduction, and many Muslims don't believe that it is authentic. 2- When Mary comes to her family with baby Jesus, the Quran says, "sister of Aaron, your father was not of bad character and your mother was not a prostitute", sister of Aaron is a figure of speech to affirm her lineage to Aaron. 3- During the Middle Ages, there were various school of philosophy who had arguments about the Quran being created or eternal. However, Sunni Moslems are not required to believe that the Quran is eternal, just that it is the word of God. I am not sure what is your supporting evidence to the claim that you made. All Muslims have no issue believing that the Quran was created. As a matter of fact, most of the Quran is a response to specific incidents or statements made by pagans, Christians or Jewish figures. 4- The message that Jesus spread is called the Injeel. People translate it as the Gospels which is wrong. The canonical Gospels are stories and theologies of various writers, and the Quran says that they are mostly fake. The same applies to the Torah.

The tile of the lecture is ‘The Muslim View of Jesus’ but all we get is comparisons between the Christian tradition and the Muslim one. You are jumping around from books you call apocryphal and the accepted books in the Christian bible. Why don’t you just talk about how Jesus is viewed in the Quran without poisoning the well so to speak with your polemics.

Sister for Aaron is not means that they are real sister It is like jews say Jesus is my brother. The jews using this til know.

Quran never calls birth of Jesus a miraculous birth. Quran talks in 3:36 about *CHILDREN* of Mary and in 66:12 Quran confirms that Mary was married woman. In whole Quran, no any such Arabic word appears which can be translated as VIRGIN

Careful- don’t say these 2 words in the same sentence

You messed up how and why Jesus spoke in the cradle. When Mariam brought the baby back the people accused her of adultery. And we know from the Torah that kind of offense carries the death penalty by stoning. Jesus the baby miraculously spoke to the people in order to vindicate his mother against their accusation. But you missed such a great occasion and belittled the event and went ahead comparing the situation to some apocryphal book. What a shame. 19:16 Recount in the Book how Mary withdrew from her people to an eastern plac 19:17 and kept herself in seclusion from them. We sent her Our angel, who presented himself to her as a full-grown human being 19:18 When she saw him, she said, I seek refuge in the compassionate God from you; [do not come near] if you fear the Lord 19:19 I am only the messenger of your Lord, he replied. I shall bestow upon you the gift of a son endowed with purity 19:20 She said, How can I have a son when no man has touched me; and neither have I been unchaste 19:21 [The angel] replied, So shall it be; your Lord says, This is easy for Me; and We shall make him a sign to people and a blessing, from Us. This has been decreed 19:22 So she conceived him and withdrew with him to a distant place 19:23 The pains of labour drove her to the trunk of a date-palm. She said, Oh, if only I had died before this and passed into oblivion 19:24 But a voice called out to her from below, Do not despair. Your Lord has provided a brook that runs at your feet 19:25 and if you shake the trunk of this palm-tree, it will drop fresh ripe dates on you 19:26 Eat and drink and rejoice. And if you see any human being say, I have vowed a fast [of silence] to the Gracious God, and will not speak with any human being today 19:27 Carrying her child, she brought him to her people. They said, O Mary, you have indeed done something terrible 19:28 Sister of Aaron, your father was not an evil man, nor was your mother an unchaste woman 19:29 She pointed to the child. They said, How shall we talk to someone who is a child in the cradle 19:30 [But] he said, I am God's servant. He has given me the Book and made me a prophet 19:31 He has made me blessed wherever I may be, and has enjoined upon me prayer and almsgiving throughout my life 19:32 He has made me dutiful toward my mother, and He has not made me arrogant or wicked 19:33 Blessed was I on the day I was born, and blessed I shall be on the day I die and on the day I am raised to life again 19:34 Such was Jesus, the son of Mary. That is the whole truth, about which they still dispute 19:35 it does not befit the majesty of God that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! He is far above that: when He decrees something, He says only, Be! and it is 19:36 God is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him alone. That is the right path 19:37 Yet different groups differed among themselves. How awful it will be for those who have rejected the truth when a dreadful Day arrives.

Prophet Mohammad and his all companions left behind only written Quran; no any other manuscript. So, in order to know what Islam says about Jesus; you have to learn Arabic and then you have to read and understand whole Quran. Then you will be able to know what does Quran say about Jesus. If you will trust in what Mullahs and Imams say about Jesus then you are trading in a desert because these Imams TAMPER translation of Quran to support their some unsound beliefs. Let I tell you what does Quran say about Jesus because I understand each verse of Quran. Nowhere Quran supports stories of Virgin Birth and Ascension and Return of Jesus. Quran confirms that Jesus was indeed on the Cross but Quran says: he was *NOT CRUCIFIED=NOT DIED ON THE CROSS* And if we do not twist Gospel of John and Luke; both Gospels also show that Jesus did not die ON THE CROSS. He was alive even after the incident of Cross. Quran tells: Jesus lived over 100 years and died naturally, and dead never come back. If you have any RATIONAL QUESTION; I can answer it.

Did you know that of all the prophets in the Koran, including Mohammed, only Jesus could perform miracles and perform he did! He could talk at birth! I recall he turned stones into birds that flew away and much more! How could he do this?

Copied? Let's see; The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.” -1 Samuel 15:3 “Therefore I am full of the fury of the LORD; I am weary with holding in: I will pour it out upon the children abroad, and upon the assembly of young men together: for even the husband with the wife shall be taken, the aged with him that is full of days.” -Jeremiah 6:11 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.” -Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Deut 20:16-17) thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth - (Josh 6:21, 8:24-27, 10:, 11:11-14,21-22) And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword... And cut off their thumbs and their great toes... He left none remaining: - (Judg 18:27) And they took [the things] which Micah had made ...and came unto Laish ...and smote them with the edge of sword burnt city fire. - (1 Sam 15:1-9) Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have and spare them not but slay both man and woman infant and suckling ox and sheep camel and ass. - (1 Sam 27:9,11) And David smote the land and left neither man nor woman alive ... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite of how the crusaders were treated in return; Eyewitness-chronicler of the fifth crusade, Oliver of Paderborn writes on how the starving defeated crusaders were treated after their defeat: "Who could doubt that such goodness, friendship and charity come from God? Men whose parents, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, had died in agony at our hands, whose lands we took, whom we drove naked from their homes, revived us with their own food when we were dying of hunger and showered us with kindness even when we were in their power." This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit." This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people who take Ayat from the Quran out of their context God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Collective thinking is not good. The Crowd, Gustav Le Bon, 1895. If all continue in groups "to think" death is your shepherd. Examine yourself but not as a unit, never collectively. That would be wise but asking too much I fear.

Jesus christ is a freemason God. Jesus christ is also the arab on the hanging cross.

Good misinformation 😂

Old testament and new was made up. Jesus was a magus and part of the bacchus cults. A wicked individual.

❤️✊🏾So Jesus is looked at as a Messiah, he is truth, and we can agree on that , as it says in our holy book, the Quran. What happens when Jesus says the only way to get to God is through me? Why is it that when we pray we pray to Mohamid, he’s passed away. Are we not doing necromancy? I’ve got some questions. why is it that Jesus preaches peace and forgiveness to turn the other cheek, and yet the Quran is constantly referencing by the sword?

Sorry Islam is not Abrahamic it was created by Mohammed

The question is not whether Muslims hate Jesus, but whether Muslims obey Ten Commandments and confess sin and repent to God.

The important thing to know about the Muslim teaching on Jesus is that it is a damnable heresy. Jesus is not merely a prophet, He is God, and faith in and obedience to Him is the only way to salvation.

Jn 3: 18 Whoever believes in Him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe has already been condemned, because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. Acts 4:12 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved 2 Co 11:4 or if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

Gal 1:9 But even if we, or an angel from Heaven, preach to you any other gospel than that which we have preached, let him be accursed