No video

CFD for Industrial Mixing: Turbulent vs Laminar Mixing

  Рет қаралды 12,304

THINK Fluid Dynamix

THINK Fluid Dynamix

Күн бұрын

These two CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) animations illustrate the contrasting characteristics of turbulent and laminar mixing, two different flow regimes that occur within fluid systems, playing critical roles in various applications. The key differences between these two types of mixing lie in their flow patterns, energy dissipation, and mixing effectiveness.
Laminar mixing, also known as streamline flow, is characterized by smooth, parallel layers of fluid that glide past one another with minimal interaction. This type of flow occurs at low Reynolds numbers, typically below 2000. Laminar mixing is highly ordered and predictable, with low levels of kinetic energy dissipation.
On the other hand, turbulent mixing is characterized by chaotic and disordered flow patterns that occur at high Reynolds numbers, typically above 4000. Turbulent flow consists of swirling eddies and vortices that generate a complex, three-dimensional mixing pattern. The chaotic nature of turbulent mixing causes a rapid increase in kinetic energy dissipation, resulting in more effective mixing.
Turbulent Modelling: Large Eddy Simulation

Пікірлер: 10
@carlovonterragon
@carlovonterragon Жыл бұрын
Very beautiful comparison ! 🙂
@joemicka5222
@joemicka5222 Жыл бұрын
The music is so intense
@heatwaveguides15
@heatwaveguides15 Жыл бұрын
How are you combating numerical diffusion in laminar passive scalar case?
@thinkfluiddynamix4834
@thinkfluiddynamix4834 Жыл бұрын
Hi! numerical (or false) diffusion happens mostly with 1-order upwind schemes. These simulations are calculated using a Lattice-Boltzmann Method solver. The explicit time-scheme, together with a very small time-step (Courant number = 0.03) and a very high resolution (50 Million lattice points) makes sure that we do not have any problems with numerical diffusion.
@jonnywilliams208
@jonnywilliams208 Жыл бұрын
Big if tru
@watmay1
@watmay1 Жыл бұрын
Thats what im sayin!!!
@skunkjobb
@skunkjobb 10 ай бұрын
I think the laminar case looked quite turbulent too, at least part of it.
@Artiick
@Artiick Жыл бұрын
So which is better? I don't understand anything about this 🤣
@rusalkin
@rusalkin Жыл бұрын
it doesnt make the slightest difference, lol
@tomaccino
@tomaccino 9 ай бұрын
​@@rusalkinThere's description that explains everything 🤦🏻
Understanding Laminar and Turbulent Flow
14:59
The Efficient Engineer
Рет қаралды 976 М.
Why Laminar Flow is AWESOME - Smarter Every Day 208
14:03
SmarterEveryDay
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
SPONGEBOB POWER-UPS IN BRAWL STARS!!!
08:35
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
Can This Bubble Save My Life? 😱
00:55
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 86 МЛН
How I Did The SELF BENDING Spoon 😱🥄 #shorts
00:19
Wian
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
The Effects Of Off Bottom Impeller Distance | Sepro Mixing
1:41
Sepro Systems
Рет қаралды 23 М.
Will this toy engine work at full size? (yes)
15:35
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
CFD for the Chemical Industry: Analysis of Rushton Turbine
1:09
THINK Fluid Dynamix
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Watch gravity pull two metal balls together
12:47
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
How do fluids actually mix?
22:26
AlphaPhoenix
Рет қаралды 175 М.
CFD Simulations for the Water & Process Industry
3:50
THINK Fluid Dynamix
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Turbulent Flow is MORE Awesome Than Laminar Flow
18:32
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Is It Possible To Completely Fill a Klein Bottle?
7:01
The Action Lab
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
SPONGEBOB POWER-UPS IN BRAWL STARS!!!
08:35
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН