Jonathan Bohn He’s also good at “committing tournament fraud” as it says on his Wikipedia page.

Opponent could have force of will and flusterstorm. But it wouldn't have countered, since it would go like OPP FoW, LSV fluster, OPP fluster LSV's fluster, since LSV could pay for 2 flusterstorms that hit just one copy of his, and the opponent would have mana to pay only for one. I mean, I don't know if he thought all that through while playing fast and commenting. I guess the more usual and correct thing to do would have been just wastelanded and changed steps to empty their mana, even though I don't think there was a potential to a blowout there. PS: Now that I'm thinking through, opponent could have FoW + pyroblast there. It was not the best play, but he didn't get punished. Vintage seems very hard to play optimally.

Julian Dukes thank you

Thx man

also why SaffronOlive wins games with jank that in theory should not work :D

Will pass along the request!

There is more artifact disruption in the format.

There's a bunch of stuff like steel sabotage in the format, not as many disenchants and fragmentizes.

Because null rod does nothing

thanks for the answers just thought null rod is a little easier to cast and does the same thing as stony

There's a lot more artifact destruction in the format.

Yes, TGO is Bob Maher's MTGO handle.

Garrett Brandenburg yes, but he floated mana to make it after balance was done resolving

But you can Always read the card, I mean, it's right there !!! :p Don't be like, oh Mirage Mirror.. Why is that in his deck.. Obviously for a reason, so read it :p

I think he might've assumed it was Bob trying something new in the shops Phyrexian Metamorph flex slot when he first saw it, that's what I thought before seeing the Dark Depths.

I can just imagine Wizards seeing that game and banging their heads on the wall for thinking misstep was a good idea.

Im pretty sure that Black Lotus is cheaper than Force of Will and Wasteland on MTGO. Only Vintage uses Black Lotus and barely anyone plays Vintage because stereotypes.

Why?

mulder1979 theres more artifact removal in the format then enchantment removal so stony silence is better

Save Mean agreed but even then he should play more copies of Stony Silence... .

Googleplus Isterrible misharas factory snapcaster and jace are the win conditions

Welcome to Vintage? Unless you're playing combo, it's just a value war.

Mason Miller not better than I a 20 cent lightning bolt

I understand the Mishra's are the 2/2 win conditions. But the deck depends on OP not playing. Awesome deck when one is buy themselves drawing against no OP. But doesn't feel like t1 deck.

Googleplus Isterrible It's not a T1 deck. You said it sucked. There's a pretty big gap there. This is a good deck. It doesn't depend on your opponent not playing. It pressures them to not play spells. You establish a favorable boardstate, play Standstill, and then they have to exchange card advantage with you to develop their boardstate so they don't just lose.

You mean the nazi?

If you mean Twoo, he still has his own channel "Travis Wizard" but the guy has gone mental and uploads only BS now.

Twoo has his faults but that whole Nazi thing was a load of hot air

you mean that guy who only had one deck and 10000 shit ass brews which didn't work and he wasn't even able to play them correctly or read that cards cause he was probably too stoned all the time? yeah right...

i do miss the days of "let's build another shitty budget deck, play it wrong and do not listen to the people pointing out flaws and mistake and next week, we do it all over again"