Great video again Ken, here's what I get from this: The battery is accelerating towards the null point/dielectric plane between the battery and the earth, just as we are accelerating towards the null point between us and the earth. We call it gravity. The more point source a object is , the more quickly it will accelerate towards the null point than a non point source object would. Fully charged battery is more point source than a dis-charged battery, hence it appears to have more weight.

11:29 What you're explaining is essentially the mobile principle. You can balance something light but far away from the fulcrum as long as the heavier side of the fulcrum is close to the heavy weight. So when we jump off a ladder, the fulcrum/null point we are accelerating towards is probably right at the surface of the ground (microns off the surface) but not in the ground. And since gravity is non-point specific, we are accelerating towards many null fulcrums at the same time but it's going to favor the center of mass of the earth as long as no other vector influences the trajectory (e.g. wind)

Finally 1.5 years later. Im starting to understand. YES! ty

I often walk about saying "There IS no gravity. Never was." And I mean it.

The anode of a normal alkaline manganese battery consists of zinc, which is contained in a gel. When the battery is full, this gel dampens the force of the impact. The battery simply falls over after the impact. However, when the battery is empty, the gel is solid. This is because when the battery is discharged, zinc reacts with oxygen to form zinc oxide, a rigid solid. Therefore the empty battery jumps on impact.

Interesting subject, maybe you can help explain how a lithium battery works from a field perspective, it interests me allot and this understanding might help the development of better batteries

I always KNOW when people/animals r sleeping on me, because THEY FEEL WEIGHTLESS/LIGHTER U've explained the Physics of this Perfectly ~Thank You BrilliantKenWheeler 🖤.💜.💙..💚...💛.....💖 Looking Forward 2YourNextBook.....

People are said to be electrical devices and people when the die are said to lose a small amount of weight. So they mimic batteries in this. Interesting.

So, the greater the charge, the less bounce? That would make a great myth busters style experiment, dropping 9x 9v batteries of 9,8,7v etc. charge from the same height with a high speed camera and scale ruler in shot, to graph the size/empty mass/charge/ drop distance/acceleration relationship between them. This is probably the only time I wish I had some flat batteries in the house. I suggested 9v batteries to eliminate polarity, (if at all a factor), but I guess that’s the same as dropping an AA on its side; it’s irrelevant to charge dependent static cling?

When you charge a battery you actually reduce something. Your actually reducing the entropy of the universe. A discharged battery has increased entropy. Does this mean entropy has a negative weight/mass ???

Remember the energy is stored around it not in it.

What about the internal gel solidifying into zinc oxide explanation. Seems far more of a real world impact than the tiny amount of charge in the battery. I really like your stuff Ken, although I wish you could expand on the context of the big words sometimes, for my little brain. On this one my little brain is telling me it's the gel.

22:50 gives the "answer" (polarisation). Not stating anything about the dielectric field polarisation relation to weight. no explanation...

Yes, both a charged and discharged battery are quantitatively identical. However a charged battery and discharged battery are NOT qualitatively identical. The qualitative difference is related to the fact that the battery in the charged state is of a different energy level and the effect of this energy difference from the discharged state interacts with the ether and in some way alters the way it is induced in the ether. This interaction difference results in an apparent change in weight which is actually a change in the way the battery interacts with the ether. Much like a superconducting material at critical temperature floating over (or under or to the side of) a magnet, the interaction of the material with the magnet (Meissner Effect) causes it to float. What this is demonstrating is what I would call the exclusion principle in action. The quality of the superconducting material excludes the magnetic field such that the field cannot penetrate the superconducting material and results in the levitating like effect. Let's assume for a moment that the ether is essentially a field that interacts differently with the battery when it is charged than when the battery is discharged. In a sense the rate of induction in the ether is different between the two states of the batteries charge and hence the apparent difference in weight - but that difference makes sense because the battery is actually a different 'thing" in each state. The battery interacts with the ether differently in each state. After all isn't this where our technology is going to eventually take us? All this fuss about fossil, electrical, nuclear derived energy sources is just a distraction at this point. After all isn't this exclusion principle involved in the true movement of bodies? Isn't gravity just the description of an observable effect of the exclusion principle at work in the ether? As far as the battery doing a dead cat bounce vs a livelier bounce depending upon the charge state of the battery - I suspect that the battery exhibits different elastic properties (spring coefficient k) depending upon charge. I bet that this is just a unintentional distraction related to the quality of the two battery states and has nothing to do with the weight...or does it? :) As usual great video! PS let's build a vehicle that can exclude the ether at a local point and ride it to the stars.

IOW, the different bounce characteristics between a charged battery and an uncharged battery are caused by a weight difference that is wholly associated with changes in field characteristics between the two batteries. Is that about right? "It's not the number of electrons, it is the field between the number of electrons (and elsewhere)!"

ed leedkslanin had a great experiment just like this one. he took a 3 foot metal rod and magnetized it and hung it from the middle by a string and one side dips down. what's the difference between the magnetized rod and the non magnetized rod? one can be balanced by the middle of the rod the other cant. the cg changes! very interesting batteries are similar. even more interesting is you and ed say the same thing that the position of something and the medium it is in changes

This was a good video, the last one got me researching too. One more factor that influences our perception of weight is the field strength of the Earth in general (which also varies from location to location). A stronger field would cause everything to weigh more.

ARE MAGNETS CALLED AS SUCH BC THEY WERE ONCE BELIEVED TO BE MAGIC? Is that where the "mag" in the word comes from? And, if they are no longer polarized, does that mean all polarization is gone and it's a monopole, which I think is no, or does it mean the acids in the battery no longer work or the metal they use wears out? The metal gets used up and changes mass? And if there is no charge carrying electron, what did they shoot one by one In the double slit expriment? I though it was Electrons.

Would a magnet of similar diameter added to the end of the charged and discharged battery be sufficient to alter the dielectric acceleration and thus make the bounce differential between charged and uncharged become less ?

Is it possible that the weight difference is caused by what you note but does not account for the bounce difference? Would a vibration or impact on the end of the battery if horizontal instead of vertical, be read through the Medium of the battery as same or would there be a qualitative difference between the two due to electrolyte changes? Thank you again for these wonderful thought provoking videos!!

When I check my power tool batteries I compare the weight just in my hand to tell which one has a full charge or is depleted.

ken you were talking about weight and referred to 2 objects in the universe, you said the further they are apart the less they weigh?, if there was only 2 objects in the universe, one of those would have to be moving towards the other one and come into contact with it, depending on how fast the moving object was travelling would dictate the weight of both, for me you require resistance to get a measure of weight but as i said the weight would increase if the moving object increased its speed, if i am in 3 d space i have no direction and no weight, i can only have direction and weight if something in motion comes into contact with me, the speed of it dictates my "weight", i can only have a reference of down in relation to the object in motion, be nice to have your thoughts on this, also if you could clarify, we have directionality, it is stated that objects accelerate towards the earth by way of "pulling", pulling is only a descriptor of direction, for motion to happen there must be pressure variance, something must press on something else, all motion or acceleration requires a "push", so in your view of the world is there a top down flow that presses on matter and creates density layers? if so can you elaborate on that, there must be a top down flow with the capabilities to create density layers, the only other way i can recreate this is by using motion, i can recreate direction and density by accelerating in a vehicle, a liquid filled container with an air bubble shows this, you can also use a helium balloon, as i accelerate there is a compression of air that forces the helium balloon forwards, this is what we see in reality and the only way i can recreate it is by using motion, so either the earth is in uniform motion towards us or there is a top down flow,be great to hear your thoughts

so, how can we recharge the battery?

Batteries bounce because they change state during discharge via a chemical reaction, the discharged state as a slight about of bounce which stores kenetic energy when they strike the table and spring back. Fully charged batteries don't exhibit this phenomenon. Very interesting all the same.

The charged battery has greater dielectric magnetic centerpedal acceleration towards the counter space. So how was my feeble attempt at this??🙂

Also could a particular frequency alter the magnetic divergence of an object or change the point of it? Just trying to learn from ya and use my creativity to harness something good for all. Thanks.

thinking about it I would think the charged battery would be heavier and not bounce as high due to the plain of inertia. I always thought of the plain of inertia as the zero sum return of potential energy. since the plain of inertia would have a lesser effect on a dead battery it will bounce higher.

Would a steel ball bearing gain weight after it became magnetized? If you could completely remove magnetic divergence would the object appear to be weightles?

Re universe - book out next year 2000 pages of reality consciousness - everything is wrong quantum/particles etc

Well that's worth the subscription alone.

It is the applyed electrostatic field that creates the magnet It's the "electrons" dynamics, which are perpetual electrostatic entities themself that create the magnet. Electrostatic attraction repulsion is what we understand as magnetic attraction/repulsion. Right? ;)

Thanks man that's what I get for commenting halfway through the video just broke my foot with a car battery😂 have a safe vacation

I'd be interested in how the field of a battery looks. As i've learned from you, there's no electrons, but there must be something - ok so there ist the magnetic field. Does a battery have a larger magnetic field in the negative and a larger dielectric field on the positive side, created by some kind of non-permeability? When two Magnets collide, they also instantly stick together and do not bounce much, just like the charged battery 'sticks to the earth'

Just thinking... Magnetic attraction compared to the surface of water when you barely touch it then it seems to grab and if it's say a paper towel... It will grab and pull up thru it to a point.... Yet a plastic piece will just have a drop on it.... Just pondering the effects, why, magnetism etc...

I'm in agreement with Dennis...starting to become easier to understand!

Thank you very much ken! I hope you’re having a good night!

Isn’t one of the first things we are taught is “energy cannot be created or destroyed”? Therefore, there’s no way a dead battery has less energy😂😂😂

right to the point🥳

You are an excellent teacher, Sir! Thank you for these interesting videos.

What is the difference between a solid hammer core and the core of a dead blow hammer? Which one absorbs more vibation (exhibits less recoil after contact between the two surfaces)?

I really want to see you explain magnets to Juggalos!

I was not aware that there was a difference in weight between a charges and discharged batteries.. Do you find that the bounce would be closer between a charged and discharged batteries if you added a magnet to the end of tboth the charged and discharged batteries? assuming identical magnets? Great stuff Ken. Thank you.

Love your explanation of Mother Nature.

I’m really lost thinking what is missing from this primer dielectric acceleration is understandable from what you’ve said but what’s missing hence the 7th factor ?

Do you think a nuclear blast could cause an electric discharge strong enough to magnetize the surrounding area? And if so could the magnetic field from the surrounding area interfere with the Earth's magnetic field causing long-term radiation??

I am homeschooling my 9 and 6 yr old starting back in April this year. None of us have a foundation in Latin, however, this was their pick for a secondary language. Could you suggest a solid resource for this online?. Thanks for years of knowledge and wisdom.

I pondered the other day: all movement despite medium must have a principle structure. I did the magnet lesson with a friend the other day and when they snapped together I said what happened? He says they attracted. No- what happened between them? Like space was erased (said with a silly smile) CORRECT. It can’t be hat simple right? It really is my friend, it really is. Love ya Ken

Hang in there Theoria you are one of the sane ones.

Thanks teacher

Which one of the seven parameters have changed in the charged batteries to measure more weight? Somehow the charge/polarization has created a centripetal convergence point within the battery creating a higher "vector" in reference to the Earth giving way to the measured increase in weight is my guess. Once again, thank you for your insight and content. One of the positive attributes of a man's life is leaving the earth a better place for having him lived in it. You surely have that "check box" checked off in life. I hope one day before one of us dies, we can have a meaningful conversation one on one. Not but one other person in my life I can have an intelligent and meaningful conversation with about metaphysics and/or philosophy. Let the light of righteousness help guide you forward in life my friend.

I read somewhere about a Dr who was weighing bodies at death to discover the weight of the soul,kinda the same analogy?

The charged battery has a larger intact field around it and the electrical gravity pulls more than the battery without the charged battery is actually bigger in space than the dead battery.

"To turn a Human being, into this."

what was the answer?

So what's the best rechargeable battery to get I'm thinking about I think it's Goal Pro or Goal Yeti? They sell them a lot at REI the camping place. I want to get a solar power panel help charge it with and at least one AC plug so I can run a light and the radio. Someone was talking about high ion wet versus dry I have no clue although that doesn't seem to be the premise of this video so far.

You said Leprechauns don't exist, but clearly in your other video, those green leather shorts must prove otherwise lol.

Cavendish experiment is fake it's never been replicated. Only descriptions in articles

Ken, when you say, magnetism is the dielectric field, is it comparable to a baloon rubbed on our heads hair charging up, then electrostatically attracting the hair? I think, this would be the "magnetic or better said dielectric/electrostatic" foce in action. Is this right?

BOOM! BATTERY DROP!

Fantastic video, thank you! So the difference in weight of a Tesla car charged battery pack (7104 battery cells) when fully charged vs empty is much more noticeable? Can it be measured??

It's like saying that a charged battery is a spinning top in the ether dimension. People also got mind pictures or ideas which you can't take out and put on the wall. Sometimes it's a quality and other times it makes everyone sad. With a circuit of people you can really build something and arrange food. Let's call it life, even when doing something to a battery. "Life" is still a religious concept in "science" but is also motion and physics when we study a bit longer. You can do the same test with a friend: "Ready for some bouncing?" - "No, I'm out. Going to the ether place of dreams for some spins and tricks where you can't see me. Wake my body up and return me at 8:00."

So you can depolarise a battery slowly, What about a magnet? You can get weaken an iron magnet from hitting it but can you power anything with only a magnet?

I need an audible of Ken wheeler 📙 🔉 🔊

Do the charged and discharged batteries have a different mass on a mass scale?

So energy is water and you just need to make a waterfall for it to power something? Make a hill.

Didn't you just explain how atoms work. Protons are point source (1836 positrons). I'm thinking the Electron is the low pressure vortex into Counterspace. I have a picture under my Ferrocell, of 2 magnets separated by a 1/4 plastic spacer. There's a right-hand rule vortex between the magnets. Aren't right-hand and left-hand rules, with the thumbs touching Aether? The rotation is the same, like the one direction rotation hyperboloid of Aether and thumbs onto Inertial plane/Counterspace. The Proton is point source, the Electron isn't. The Electron accelerates toward the Proton on angle, less weight. Proton and Electron have equal charge, different mass. Neutron breaks down to the Proton (+), Neutrino (~) and Electron (-). The Neutrino is an oscillating Inertial plane. (+) >~< (-) = Aether.

the body is a battery :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment

Thank you very much sir! Magnet is a ex. Of force in motion?🤔. Who applied the force! If we can strictly and discernly measure a magnetic field, would we be able to know all it's properties maybe even#of atoms? Just curious if I should get to know them better for self profit

People looking at your videos to get hints about Free Energy get nothing back !!!!! when you said you were talking about dead battries i thought you would cover john bedini's battery charger, but NO !!!!!!

Ken I have no idea why TELL ME

That is before, during and after making it’s field coherent i.e charging it simultaneously checking it’s weight amd and

Comparing to the weight difference of the battery (btw magnets are leaky to hydrogen according to hysteresis theoreticians even if you don’t believe in electrons you may consider protons moving ...

Charged vs uncharged battery have a different electrostatic interaction with the electrostatic field of earth due to polarization, which we call magnetism, that actually is the di-electric/electrostatic

No-one on earth can outsmart Jer...Val..I mean Mr. Wheeler. Respect!

The quality vs the quantity of this video is out of balance my friend.

What about the chemical reactions inside the battery?

Hahahaha....brain flatulence! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 Yes, humans love to complicate things. My dad, the logical one, always said this...warned me of it. I like your expressed perception of mother nature, though I do like to shave under my arms 😉...I like the smooth look. Thanks for the chuckles Ken! ...And your time, trying to educate us, out here! I’m getting there. (Insert muttley chuckle here)

Exactly, electrical/ electrostatic/gravity. I remember when the Chinese guy on myth busters totally overcame "gravity" with no moving parts just ions coming off the apperatis.

Hey Ken,want to try to answer some questions about planetary shit?

You need to describe how an Atom fits in to this primer, what happens when a nuclear fusion occurs as in sub-atomic level. You need to compare your theory and do tests on at least one observation that is will known in the world and prove that your theory better predicts it than the current primer. If you want ppl to benefit from it, and contribute to science. This is the way of do it, making videos will not achieve the same results.

Hello Ken so assuming the battery doesn’t leak hydrogen affecting weight Have you measured weight of a magnet

Charging a battery is moving the electrons to a higher energy level within the chemicals of the battery. When the battery is being used the excited electrons are falling to a lower state of stability giving electrical power to the draw. When the battery is used up all of the molecules have fallen into the state of stability. Weight of the battery is is of no significance in the real world. What matters is if the battery has enough umph to power a camera. This I learned in High School, something you don't think much of, education. I don't go whistling off as a cat leaving a henhouse. HA!

Is a magnet the same weight before it has been magnetized?

if you have a battery that is recently discharged you can tie a piece of string around its middle and spin it around in the air, faster and longer gives it more charge.

Explain protons and neutrons in the absence of electrons, please. Or, how does the periodic table work in the absence of electrons?

Do you write books? How can I find them.

Ken perhaps if you do not already came to the conclusion that SPACE (iow not nothing) itself can only exist where energy is because they are the same thing (think you call it aether?) then we should compare notes. I believe a black hole is simply the fulcrum through which pressures are resolved back to nothing towards counterspace, just like you explain gravity? My first law of creation is that you always need a counter creation which will resolve every pressure differentiation back to neutral or the simply Nothing? Please comment..tx...I wish I had the means to involve you in the building of my system which taps into counterspace but will most likely be called a free energy device by fools..regards.

Can you allude to it?

You’re trying to make us wait until the 4th edition I understand but still I wanna know soo bad 😅😂

I will admit I wish you'd read my comment in the last video and told me If I was right or wrong, like It was school!

The same reason that subjective and objective reality are different. Spoiler. They aren't

left a battery flat for too long, would not start or charge again.

Comment by one physics professor, “nothing really exists everything is just a hologram on the surface of a quantum universe” - no I don’t understand it either.

more charge more mass. im hugely charged.

Wow Ken this is another wonderful video. It just gets better!!!😁 Which is preferable to you,the hippy chick or the nerdy girl with the calculator. My guess would be the hippy chick!!

force acceleration potential preserved as channeled through its anti-cartesian encapsulation

So which weighs more, a dead body or a live body? 😂

I thought electricity and magnetism were one in the same, hence the electro-magnetic force? And what about the weak force then? W + Z bosons, and what about the Higgs field for that matter? ...oh you just said electrons don’t exist. I think you may have just lost me there because they have been measured, ...so ya,

So a ship floats because it weighs less...in water...

😂😂 so much for packing I guess that one comment in the chat rubbed him the wrong way but this is Garrett I've never heard of any of this stuff. Have you ever done a video on the first battery in Iran