Girl, this never happened. It's just a TV show. They didn't give a damn. She needed to produce an heir, that's all they cared about. This family puts misery above everything when moony and power is at stake.

But was it not worth the pain for the heir they got?

She went through it, she knew. Love this scene.

what rot are you talking. It was his ring, so it was special

She could’ve said no instead of pretending to be attracted to him 🙄

​​@@tekgid433 According to family and friends Diana wanted to be princess of Wales and eventually queen since her childhood!! So here's her big opportunity! She pretended to like Balmoral and the highlands but once she was married everything changed! Whereas Camilla was very natural with all the hunting and riding and hiking and... Camilla was more honest than Diana. Camilla didn't aim to be queen and avoided being Princess of Wales and settled nicely for Duchess. She didn't use Charles.

I think she liked the fantasy of being a princess. It's why she agreed to the marriage. She just had the wrong idea of what it entailed. In fairytales the princess is the star and the prince is an afterthought. But in real life she was a consort and was meant to be a support act for the main event, her mother in law and her heir.

@@tekgid433 But she was attracted to him, that's the point.

No one would have known Diana had she not been picked up by Prince Charles, poor guy! She married him and rode on his coattails even after their divorce! Had she not met and married Charles she would have married another rich guy and maybe Diana would have been Charles MISTRESS without giving it a second thought because there are so many perks to it. Her mother warned her about getting into the royal family but she didn't want to listen as usual. Her own family thought she was unfortunately unfit for the of princess of Wales and what did she ever do for the Welsh people? She gave up all her charities and just went on vacations!! Charles and Camilla remained with each other only - true love 💕.

Without her there would be no Prince William, Prince of Wales and his wife Princess Catherine of Wales

@@dreamsteddybearsmaster would htat be a disaster?

If only Charles had dated "lady" Di longer he would have seen how deeply disturbed Diana was and emotionally unstable and he would have dumped her! Had Charles been a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker Diana wouldn't have looked at him twice! According to family and friends Diana wanted to be princess of Wales since childhood. Diana USED Charles. She wanted her title and castles and balcony appearances and clothes and handbags and respect and admiration and press coverage and jewelry and vacations and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and should I go on? No need to... Diana was the original Megan Markle! They would have loved each other until Diana took the cameras and microphones away from Megan!

The marriage to Andrew was pushed for by the royal family to get her out of the way while Charles was abroad. Once she had given him his heirs then she had done her duty to him. He was sleeping around from the start anyway. Diana gave Charles his heirs and then started sleeping around before he returned to Camilla. She had two children and was carrying on in front of the press- not mother of the year material. She also didn't understand that she was a consort. She was there to support her husband, the heir to the throne, not take away the limelight. Camilla herself loves Charles and he loves her in return. They have been together for a very long time and are still going strong. Not every man wants young arm candy. Charles was never a playboy prince who chased after beautiful girls. He wanted an intellectual equal she share his hobbies with. Diana hadn't even finished high school and he was the first royal to get a university degree. She liked partying and shopping and he liked gardening and history.

And that will be the end of the monarchy

​@@fahimfaisalmahir567 I often thought William ( and all the other monarchies ) won't last. In the 21st century we are seeing the royals very differently. People are more keen to let go of the royals. The UK, Norway and Sweden and Denmark and Belgium and Spain etc are all on thin ice. We think differently from the generation of the 1950's when Elizabeth the II was crowned. We also want to know how the money is being spent and do the royals earn everything?

@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc Constitutional monarchy is the most successful form of Govt. in today's world. Today most people appreciate it to the fullest. Seeing the political condition of US and many other republics around the world, ppl don't want to let go of the monarchy to bring instability to the nation. Even in Australia when the republicanism was at its peak, majority still voted to keep the monarchy. Btw, RF doesn't get a single penny from taxpayers. The money they receive from Government is 25% of the profit generated by the Crown Estate (75% is given to Govt.). RF has privately owned two duchies to cover their expenses.

​​​​@@fahimfaisalmahir567 Hmmm. I thank you for the information! I appreciate it. I also apologize for thinking that the monarchies are such a threat. But to be honest with you and to tell you the truth I have been all over Europe and I heard constant hate for their king or princess or a queen and I felt some sparks of revolt. In the 20 th and 21st century royal houses have fallen. I wonder why the citizens are currently so anti monarchs? Maybe I won't ever know. LoL 🤣🤣. I'm just so very grateful that the USA doesn't have a monarchy. George Washington was asked if he wanted to be king and he responded very quickly "NO." PRESIDENT Washington was smarter...

@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc Yes, absolute monarchy is a threat, not the constitutional one..Monarchy will only be at risk if it is at loggerheads with parliament or military. It is going to stay till it is beneficial to economy. Today British RF is a billion-pound brand. Their presence contributes to the fashion, tourism and hospitality industry. On top of that, every year the RF brings around 200 million-pound worth funds to the charities they are associated with..Just see how King's Coronation was a boon to the post Covid struggling hospitality industry..

Firstly, this film is far too dark and secondly Diana once said she "felt like a lamb to the slaughter". What DRAMA from this pushy 19 year old bratty young woman! Be it a royal or a commoner BACK OUT of this artificial wedding and marriage! Princess Margaret was right when she said this has to be stopped. I think this decision had to come from Diana first and foremost and where is her father? Don't ever put yourself where you don't belong. Diana was too focused on becoming the Princess of Wales!! Both her mother and grandmother warned her to not get into the royal family! Even her own family thought Diana was unfit for the position. Diana would only listen to herself. Princess Margaret was Diana 's friend until Diana wrote a book about Charles and gave interviews about the royal family. Charles gave up Camilla when he married Diana but Diana admitted to having another man and Charles probably just gave up on this horrible "wife". He remained with his one true love Camilla and Diana had her married boyfriends coming and going to Kensington Palace! Oh, and all the marriages Diana broke up because she was "lonely". Diana also did Fergie in when Diana tipped off the photographers of Sarah's whereabouts when she was having her toes sucked!! Sarah was wrong but Diana brought this out because she was jealous of Sarah's attention from the British people. Diana was afraid of competition. Scotland Yard had to be called in to handle all the harassing phones calls Diana was making to Camilla! Diana got away with so much because both Kensington Palace and Buckingham Palace did their best to hide her revenges and her meanness until people began leaking stories even from Diana's camp.

No, he was in his 30s and he had his own income. He could've continued dating Camilla without bringing another woman into the mess.

@@cg8397Camilla was getting married to Andrew Parker Bowles, he thought his relationship with her was over.

​​​@@hera7884 Yes you are right. Charles tried to move on and he began a minor friendship with Diana's sister Sarah and when it fizzled Diana wasn't exactly "shy Di" afterall - she followed Charles around a bit - for once Diana even enjoyed going to Balmoral for a hike!? Hmmm. Odd and very pushy.

I don't think fellow commentators got it 😂

Ru Bush. All.she had to do was say no

Not wearing a seatbelt cost Diana her life.

Not when her face was on the tea towels!

​@@ambihalpe8195 No, sir. Diana was warned by her mother not to get into the royal family but Diana was not listening to anyone!! Diana was emotionally unstable but determined to get a title and castles and balcony appearances and clothes and jewelry and vacations and traveling and applause and attention and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and.... Shall I go on, sir? This was her dream since childhood according to her family and friends! Hmmm. People accuse Charles of using Diana but it makes me wonder, sir, if Diana was using Charles all the way from her imagination to her reality?

@@ambihalpe8195 No sir. Diana was emotionally unstable and treacherous at times and she was unfit for the position of princess of Wales. What did Diana ever do for the Welsh people? She was warned sir, by her mother to not get into the royal family but Diana was determined to get her recognition and title and castles and balcony appearances and clothes and jewelry and vacations and traveling and applause and attention and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and.... Should I go on, sir? People accuse Charles of using Diana but I think it's Diana who may have been using Charles from her childhood fantasies (according to her family and friends) all the way to her reality...

Yes, Diana suffered a lot with no one among the Royal family to comfort her. There must be something wrong with the Royal family. Princess Ann, Prince Andrew etc. Their marriage failed. Even Charles and Camilla no one knows for sure if they are leading a happy life. I think their marriage is a marriage of convenience and economics. I can't imagine a decent and loving mother abandoning her husband and two children just to become queen. It is disgusting

dont be stupid. Charles fell out of love with Diana as he got to know her better.

Thank you for stating that. Camille never let go, nasty piece of stuff.

Actually, that's a good point. If Charles III dies before Camilla, she wouldn't be called Queen Mother, because she isn't William's mother. The usual title would be Dowager Queen. William, out of respect for his father, will take care of her as a member of the royal family, but I imagine she'll disappear into the background, so the public can finally move on from the chaos she and Charles caused. He'll have enough to deal with, depending on if Harry is still trying to make headlines.

I think if he dies her name and titles will be the least of her concerns. She actually loves him. The biggest mistake the royal family made was to seperate Charles from Camilla - they mistook a real love for a fling. To a point I think even Charles and Camilla did not realise how serious it was and actually imagined they could get over it.

@@bvtnFutureCorpse what a load of rubbish/ How were hte public affected by Charles' marriage break up.

@@joannaplichta9677 I think past generations had dealt with it and so they thought they would do the same. But the world changed a lot in the 60s and 70s so it was a whole new ballgame that no one yet understood.