Goal line technology wouldn't have given the goal as the ball wasn't fully in.

@kingseirios4277 You honestly think this team are legends don't you 😂😂😂😂 Interestingly Chelsea bought themselves 20 Cup finals from 2005 to 2013 with money they never earned (14 not including CShield's) and not a single one of those 20 consecutive finals did they win by more than 1 goal. They either lost, won by 1 goal or on a shootout. 1of the finals they were absolutely thrashed by AtleticoMadrid. A lot of controversy involved in many of Chelsea's final wins as well, which isn't surprising if you make a lot of finals legitimately then you're usually a dominant team and so there should be some games you win comfortably if corruption isn't heavily involved in why you were there in the first place. Especially with some of the far less expensive & mediocre teams they faced in finals if they were as great as their record of reaching all those finals could trick you into thinking, they'd win some convincingly by just law of averages. Martin Atkinson kept refereeing their cup semi-finals and other big games of theirs which was more than fishy, then he retired same year Abramovic left Chelsea 🤔 You failed to mention the goal-line decisions on Chelsea's side at Wembley but anyway...so 1 of the finals it could've been 3-1 from 1-0 down which is still quite unconvincing with Chelski's full strength team vs a depleted Everton who's stronger team had controversially beaten ManUtd's B-Team (no Ronaldo, Rooney, Carrick, Fletcher, VanDerSar etc..)when Welbeck should've had a pen and then ManUtd lost in shootout would've comfortably beaten Chelski just like they did in the last meeting at that point in Jan2009 (where Ronaldo had a wrongly disallowed goal and ManUtd still won 3-0). Ronaldo had become unplayable by this point, Chelski were far inferior to ManUtd who still hold CL unbeaten game record to this date.

@@FootkerSnookball damn some fans of mediocre team really puts effort in finding my 5 years old comment

@@kingseirios4277 More successful & bigger club than yours actually....without doing it the dirty and undeserved way Chelsea did. Chelsea were able to buy everyone for just finishing 4th and winning nothing and hadn't won anything for 3 years and very little over the course of many decades. 4th was also their highest finish for 4 years. Didn't deserve it on or off the pitch. Club was ran badly and was going into liquidation. Even then they heavily relied on 12men to achieve things so they kept getting rewarded for underperforming. It was fake and predictable...and good teams who had a chance of silverware were screwed over in that Abramovic era. The pre-Abramovic Chelsea team from 1997 to 2000 without sugar daddy clubs around were able to win a few things like a Spurs or Villa in the Abramovic era would have also (I know Spurs won LeagueCup but they were robbed several times in FAcup and in getting CL place because of sugar daddy Chelski). Also 12th is mediocre to say the least.

@@FootkerSnookball talk as much as you like. you come here to talk about another club really says everything to justify that every fans from other club hate you the most

It's funny you never said that with all the one's Lampard&Chelsea favoured from....and no one cares about the 2010 WC decision out of all the years England had decisions against them that was the most horrible England team and they were rubbish as well.