I support China. They talk Sense. China build an Asphalt road to my house in Suriname. And build the Regional Hospital Wanica in Suriname. In Groningen Netherlands I have 50 affordable Solar Panels Heatpump made in China. Energy independent. No Gas. I produce 11.000 kWh a year. My Cellphone Xiaomi. China products changed my live for the better. In Groningen Netherlands and in Lelydorp Suriname. And President Xi says what I think. Huawei is Super. The Best. USA wants to colonise China and control China and myself.

Double standards is such a kind word. Hypocrisy is the reality. Exceptionalism is its by-product.

Pascal, I don't agree that China calls the West for practicing "Double Standard". The correct word of the Western Politicians is not being double standard - they are "HYPOCRITES". I love the Western "Democrazy" and "Freedom" - the freedom to kill, the freedom to discriminate against their own citizen, the freedom to destroy other nations and the "democrazy" that ensure that the 1% decides who their president and senators gets elected and sells weapons. The "democrazy" that is ruled by the Military Industrial Complex. We Asians wants the Chinese system because they helped and lift 800 million of their citizen from poverty. The communist government built roads and rails that are world class and which improves the traveling needs of the citizen and businessmen. Let China be China and we appreciate that the West enjoy their own type of democracy and freedom of being poor and their desire to be fooled by their own government. China is bad for the West but Asians, Africans and South Americans and Middle Eastern are having great economic activities and improving their livelihood. America and Europe can remain what they are.

The big question here is that Western powers double standard or hypocrite behavior is not just seen by China, but gradually accepted by all non-western countries. No person is born superior than the other, and inclusive is the only cure to resolve this as differentiation amongst countries located in various parts of the globe is what makes our world diversified and multifacet.

China's soft power is helping other nations to be economic viable, sustainable, not to "colonise" them. It is a win-win situation, no force or threats of sanctions like what US/Collective do!!

If you believe China is a peaceful and progressive country, raise your hand ✋🙋🏻‍♂️👍

The West are not entitled to criticize China over human rights. There are several important reasons for this (aside from the double standard)... First, the Chinese have lived by their value system for over 2,000 years. This value system persists to this day. Their society is *collectivist* and they trust their authority to take care of them (hence, the fact that China is "authoritarian"). Second, the Chinese today enjoy more freedom than at any other time in their 2,000+ years of history. Third, the Chinese fully trust their government, according to various studies (Edelman, Latana, Ash Center, etc.). Fourth, the Chinese didn't ask for our help. The Chinese don't need our help. So why are we inserting ourselves into their society? Fifth, if you bother to visit Xinjiang, or visit Tibet, and talk to the people, you will find that they are content with their quality of life. They are *happy* . If they are suffering from human rights abuses, shouldn't it be obvious in their faces? You don't see that. They accept their way of life. They are thriving. What's the problem???

Well you deserve a medal for your tireless efforts to bring together china and the West

I'm Chinese, and I can tell u the majority(more than 90% of the population) of Chinese support CPC deep down in their heart. Western people should respect Chinese people's own choices; just mind your business. We don't care about western people's options; it is our life, our choice. I would like emphases here, western people, especially Anglosaxons people, you guys are not higher or any kind of superior to us; you have no moral right to lecture us on how we should live. It is time to abandon the western superiority mentality if you guys really believe in your so-called "universal valve", all men are equal; if not, YOU have just proven that you guys are racist and double standard. period.

The Chinese give their government 95% approval. In the west, governments approval mostly about 40%. So, which is more democratic?

Well presented Pascal. Just to repeat the old saying - '"when you point a finger at someone, you have three fingers pointing back at you".

I personally don’t mind to have the same leader for decades as long as the leader is righteous, that’s what truly matters

When I was in Bangkok, one of the guy in the tour wanted to go to a market where they sell fake branded products. Soon the tour separated into 2 groups who went to different directions. One thing very interesting was most of the people who went to the ‘fake brands’ market are Westerners. On the other side, most of the people who did not are Asians. I think you are right. Asians produce cheap products because Westerners love to buy cheap products.

In China, the _"people's democratic dictatorship"_ means that the government has to bow down to the wishes of the people. In the West, it's a _"dictatorship of the bourgeoisie"_ where the government has to bow down to the wishes of the 1%.

American human rights? Ask the natives american

During the early years of 1980s when Singapore had its first North South train system built by the Japanese, all the top and middle executive management positions as well as engineering positions were filled by the Japanese. Later, when the French and German companies helped to build the railway lines that run through other parts of Singapore, these foreigners also filled the top and middle management positions. There were no condemnations from the social media from the West or India on such unfair practices from Japan, France and Germany.

The root cause of this “ double standards”’is the West do not wish to giving up the Idea of ruling the world. That leads to the hostile geopolitical rivalry. If the West particularly, US would finally treat China as equal rights country. All these double standard will go away. As we all can say and acknowledge that we are living in a very interesting and diversified world. We can then all try to approach the common goods for mankind.

I am truly puzzled. Why do the West, or how can the West, claim that their democracy is "better?" Better in what sense? *Pragmatically* better? Or *ideologically* better? Who cares about ideology? It's practical results that matter. Practical results determine whether a political system serves the people, whether it's democratic. Going by practical results, China's system serves the people extraordinarily well. The Chinese are prosperous; extreme poverty has been eradicated. They live peaceful lives. They're safe and secure, esp. from a pandemic and from invasion. They don't worry about random gun violence. They have affordable health care. They don't have homelessness. They're well-educated. The Chinese regard themselves as democratic, according to Latana's Democracy Perception Index. They fully trust their government, according to the Edelman Trust Barometer, as well as a study by Ash Center at Harvard Kennedy School. By every practical metric, China is a democracy. So they don't have multiparty elections. Who cares?

My granny used to tell her neighbour this: " stop your nonsense now! Stop telling me how to rule my household!" I was too young to understand then, now I do.

China's democracy is by the people and for the people (of China). The leaders rise from ground level up, only the strong, competent and have proved in deeds to have contributed to the people/society, can rise to the top. Democracy of the West is by the top few % and for the top few %, their leaders get elected not because they are competent but because they have more financial 'sponsors' and are popular (only by words and optics but not by deeds).

It's easy. Trust results, not empty words.

I am French, the west is double standard.

US congressmen and senators get into power with financial support of giant corporations. The voters have a choice of one stooge or another. Not really the choice of the people.

I took an American business man to some Chinese factories many years ago. He wanted the Chinese to produce copies of antique furniture to ship to the US at a very cheap price.

Actually. The US, France, and the UK all still have colonies. Of course, they don't call them colonies, but in practice, they all are.

Can we learn from each other instead of blaming each other ?

WELL. CHINA IS RIGHT...! GREETINGS TO THE NICE PEOPLE IN CHINA!!! KEEP YOUR HEADS UP!😎😎👍👍👍👍👍👍🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀💥💥

The US really needs to make clear what the rules are which make up the "Rules Based Order". For example, the US says China should abide by the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea but the US itself is one of only two countries that are not signatories to the convention. Similarly, the US says that China should abide by the ruling of the World Court directed arbitration with respect to the dispute between China and the Philippines over the SCS. But the US does not recognise the jurisdiction of the World Court. It's clear then that UNCLOS and the World Court aren't part of the "Rules Based Order". So what is ? For example, what rule allowed the US to invade Iraq based on fabricated evidence of WMD, resulting in the deaths of a million people. Or the invasion of Afghanistan resulting in a quarter of a million deaths. Someone help me: what are the rules ! Then there are the many agreements that the US has reneged on such as the nuclear agreement with Iran, the intermediate range missile agreement etc. I guess these weren't part of the "Rules Based Order" so what is ? Finally, there is the International Criminal Court which the US has blocked from investigating US forces war crimes in Afghanistan. The US issued an executive order effectively criminalizing anyone who works at the ICC. Its lawyers, judges, researchers etc could now have their U.S. bank accounts frozen, U.S. visas revoked and travel to the U.S. denied. Can I summarise what I think the "Rules Based Order" really is: It means that the US does what it likes and the rest of us do what we are told.

It's not really about standards. It's about pointing fingers. Standards can be discussed if both sides want to solve problems.

The real problem is the ‘superiority complex’ of the west. The west views everything about China as ‘inferior’ than their own called ‘standards and values’. This superiority complex is rooted in the colonialism period when the west became the ‘ruler’ of the rest of the world. However, in this age the west is confronted by the immense progress of China which even surpasses the west. To ‘compensate’ the damage on their own view of superiority, the west turns to lies and deceptions as they deny the real facts. This same phenomenon can be seen in people who suffer from superiority complex, it is a distorted truth within the person’s own psychological state of mind.

It is not just double standard, it is millions of standards.

America has been in 19 wars since World War II, but we will list the death toll from three of the bloodiest conflicts: The Korean War, The Vietnam War and wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The total death toll of people killed by American troops in all these wars put together is over 12 million. Each of these three conflicts have something in common: they were wars fought in the name of making the world "safe for democracy."

China haven't invade any county in 40 years compared to democratic nation that always in war. There is a reason that most countries polled in December 2013 by Gallup called the United States the greatest threat to peace in the world, and why Pew found that viewpoint increased in 2017. But it is a reason that eludes that strain of U.S. academia that first defines war as something that nations and groups other than the United States do, and then concludes that war has nearly vanished from the earth. Since World War II, during a supposed golden age of peace, the United States military has killed or helped kill some 20 million people, overthrown at least 36 governments, interfered in at least 85 foreign elections, attempted to assassinate over 50 foreign leaders, and dropped bombs on people in over 30 countries. The United States is responsible for the deaths of 5 million people in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, and over 1 million just since 2003 in Iraq. Since 2001, the United States has been systematically destroying a region of the globe, bombing Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and Syria, not to mention the Philippines. The United States has “special forces” operating in two-thirds of the world’s countries and non-special forces in three-quarters of them. The U.S. government provides weapons, military training, and/or military funding to almost every dictatorship and oppressive government on earth. See my 2020 book 20 Dictators Currently Supported by the U.S. U.S. weapons are used on both sides of many wars. In an attempt to quantify U.S. warmaking, I’ve copied below lists from these sources: David Vine: The United States of War William Blum: America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy Dr. Zoltan Grossman: A Century of U.S. Military Interventions James Lucas: U.S. Has Killed More Than 20 Million People From David Vine’s The United States at War: A list of wars and of military combat that for some reason isn’t called a war that does not attempt to include every war and combat against Native Americans: 1774-1883 Shawnee, Delaware 1776 Cherokee 1777-1781 Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) 1780-1794 Chickamauga 1790-1795 Miami Confederacy 1792-1793 Muskogee (Creek) 1798-1801 France 1801-1805 Tripoli 1806 Mexico 1806-1810 Spanish, French privateers 1810 Spanish West Florida 1810-1813 Shawnee Confederacy 1812 Spanish Florida 1812-1815 Canada (Great Britain) 1812-1815 Dakota Sioux 1812-1815 Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) 1813 Spanish West Florida 1813-1814 Marquesas Islands 1813-1814 Muskogee (Creek) Confederacy 1814 Spanish Florida 1814-1825 Pirates 1815 Algiers 1815 Tripoli 1816 Spanish Florida 1817 Spanish Florida 1817-1819 Seminole 1818 Oregon (Russia, Spain) 1820-1861 African Slave Trade Patrol 1822-1825 Cuba (Spain 1824 Puerto Rico (Spain) 1827 Greece 1831-1832 Falkland Islands 1832 Sauk 1832 Sumatra 1833 Argentina 1835-1836 Peru 1835-1842 Seminole 1836 Mexico 1836-1837 Muskogee (Creek) 1838-1839 Sumatra 1840 Fiji Islands 1841 Samoa 1841 Tabiteuea 1842 Mexico 1843 China 1844 Mexico 1846-1848 Mexico 1847-1850 Cayuse 1849 Turkey 1850-1886 Apache 1851 Johanna Island 1851 Turkey 1852-1853 Argentina 1853-1854 Japan 1853-1854 Nicaragua 1853-1854 Ryukyu, Ogasawara islands 1854-1856 China 1855 Fiji Islands 1855 Uruguay 1855-1856 Rogue River Indigenous Peoples 1855-1856 Yakima, Walla Walla, Cayuse 1855-1858 Seminole 1856 Panama (Colombia) 1856-1857 Cheyenne 1857 Nicaragua 1858 Coeur d’Alene Alliance 1858 Fiji Islands 1858 Uruguay 1858-1859 Turkey 1859 China 1859 Mexico 1859 Paraguay 1860 Angola 1860 Colombia 1862 Sioux 1863-1864 Japan 1864 Cheyenne 1865 Panama (Colombia) 1866 China 1866 Mexico 1866-1868 Lakota Siouw, Northern Cheyenne, Northern Arapaho 1867 Formosa (Taiwan) 1867 Nicaragua 1867-1875 Comanche 1868 Colombia 1868 Japan 1868 Uruguay 1870 Hawaii 1871 Korea 1872-1873 Modoc 1873 Colombia (Panama) 1873-1896 Mexico 1874 Hawaii 1874-1875 Comanche, Apache, Arapaho, Cheyenne, Kiowa 1876-1877 Sioux 1877 Nez Perce 1878 Bannock (Banna’kwut) 1878-1879 Cheyenne 1879-1880 Utes 1882 Egypt 1885 Panama (Colombia) 1888 Haiti 1888 Korea 1888-1889 Samoa 1889 Hawaii 1890 Argentina 1890 Lakota Sioux 1891 Bering Straight 1891 Chile 1891 Haiti 1893 Hawaii 1894 Brazil 1894 Nicaragua 1894-1895 China 1894-1896 Korea 1895 Panama (Colombia) 1896 Nicaragua 1898 Cuba (Spain) 1898 Nicaragua 1898 Philippines (Spain) 1898 Puerto Rico (Spain) 1898-1899 China 1899 Nicaragua 1899 Samoa 1899-1913 Philippines 1900 China 1901-1902 Colombia 1903 Dominican Republic 1903 Honduras 1903 Syria 1903-1904 Abyssinia (Ethiopia) 1903-1914 Panama 1904 Dominican Republic 1904 Tangier 1904-1905 Korea 1906-1909 Cuba 1907 Honduras 1909-1910 Nicaragua 1911-1912 Honduras 1911-1914 China 1912 Cuba 1912 Turkey 1912-1933 Nicaragua 1914 Dominican Republic 1914 Haiti 1914-1919 Mexico 1915-1934 Haiti 1916-1924 Dominican Republic 1917-1918 World War I (Europe) 1917-1922 Cuba 1918-1920 Russia 1918-1921 Panama 1919 Dalmatia 1919 Turkey 1919-1920 Honduras 1925 Panama 1932 El Salvador 1941-1945 World War II (Europe, North Africa, Asia/Pacific) 1946 Trieste 1947-1949 Greece 1948-1949 Berlin, Germany 1950 Formosa (Taiwan) 1950-1953 Korea 1953-1954 Formosa (Taiwan) 1955-1975 Vietnam 1956 Egypt 1958 Lebanon 1962 Cuba 1962 Thailand 1962-1975 Laos 1964 Congo (Zaire) 1965 Dominican Republic 1965-1973 Cambodia 1967 Congo (Zaire) 1976 Korea 1978 Congo (Zaire) 1980 Iran 1981 El Salvador 1981 Libya 1981-1989 Nicaragua 1982-1983 Egypt 1982-1983 Lebanon 1983 Chad 1983 Grenada 1986 Bolivia 1986 Libya 1987-1988 Iran 1988 Panama 1989 Bolivia 1989 Colombia 1989 Libya 1989 Peru 1989 Philippines 1989-1990 Panama 1990 Saudi Arabia 1991 Congo (Zaire) 1991-1992 Kuwait 1991-1993 Iraq 1992-1994 Somalia 1993-1994 Macedonia 1993-1996 Haiti 1993-2005 Bosnia 1995 Serbia 1996 Liberia 1996 Rwanda 1997-2003 Iraq 1998 Afghanistan 1998 Sudan 1999-2000 Kosovo 1999-2000 Montenegro 1999-2000 Serbia 2000 Yemen 2000-2002 East Timor 2000-2016 Colombia 2001 - Afghanistan 2001- Pakistan 2001- Somalia 2002-2015 Philippines 2002- Yemen 2003-2011 Iraq 2004 Haiti c2004- Kenya 2011 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2011-2017 Uganda 2011- Libya c2012- Central African Republic c2012- Mali c2013-2016 South Sudan c2013- Burkina Faso c2013- Chad c2013- Mauritania c2013- Niger c2013- Nigeria 2014 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2014- Iraq 2014- Syria 2015 Democratic Republic of the Congo c2015- Cameroon 2016 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2017- Saudi Arabia c2017 Tunisia 2019- Philippines The list is super long. Continues here if interested Source davidswanson warlist

American politics works for oligarch interest European interest works for American politics American success is a result of Marshall Plan (currency), geographical supremacy (military), English-speaking (media). Democracy is not much to do with its success

Excellent episode and excellent effort. I bet the book "Can We Trust China?" is excellent as well. You (as a westerner) are trying to stay neutral and less biased and "less polarized" between the west and the east, to support a friendly cooperating world instead of a fighting world. I appreciate your idealistic quest although I know you won't succeed. Also, the Chinese Socialist values and meritocratic system are actually better and higher form of society than the western individualistic "freedom from all values" and liberal lobbyist regimes. Still, you are a western at the end of the day... it's good enough you are trying to be neutral and friendly.

When some charity ads showing how poor children were forced to do labouring work in India, the world sympathies them and donates rather than accusing the politicians to sort out their social issues. Imagine if these forced junior labourers were Chinese children happening in China, the western world would definitely won’t let go of this, they would castigate and gang up against China.

Pascal, thank you for another excellent political terminology lesson. 👏👍

Perfect explaination Thanks

HOW CAN DEMOCRACY AND SANCTIONS BE IN THE SAME SENTENCE ?

Another excellent presentation with lots of pointers; please keep it up. Yep, certainly hypocritical west; they conveniently ignore the hypocrisy in their harsh criticism of China. The American politicians particularly, should look themselves in the mirror to see whether they truly honour their highly publicised values of democracy, human rights and personal freedom in the first place. Western politicians like to talk; but talk is really cheap. It is their inconsistent actions that accurately betray their double standards and hypocrisy. Basically, those who live in glass houses, should NOT throw stones at others.

Biden: _"U.S will not send long-range rocket systems to Ukraine that can reach Russia."_ (A while later) Biden: _"U.S will send long-range rocket systems to Ukraine that can reach Russia"_ U.S double standards at its finest.

You are sincere, love you

I still have an issue with the concept of 'the West'. As a French, who knows the US, who knows China, I think we have probably more in common in the way our society works with China than with the US. The American mindset is rather alien to me, and to many of other Europeans. I feel more hostage of American foreign policies and the EU lapdog attitude than a real member of 'the West', which is actually the US and its 5 eyes clique. I am saddened the World becomes so polarized, but we cannot blame developing countries for having China as a role model: we former colonizers were never able to be a role model, only a patronizing and condecending abusive ex-husband... Pascal is an expert on China, but what he explained about these double standards is also what many people feel in other parts of the World, as we could see in recent votes at the UN assembly.

make a video of china's domestically produced 28nm lithography machines please

Thanks, brilliant as always. Perhaps becoming aware that our democratic system based mainly on suffrage, and that in the concept of universal suffrage it finds its identity, is deeply in crisis in our Western societies where equality is a chimera we could look at China with curiosity instead of animosity

Whether it is autocracy, meritocracy, democracy, as long as the current government is supported by its people, then it works for the country. On the other hand if the people is not happy with the government polarization is going to tear the country apart. Under such circumstances, the government is more interested to protect their own ass instead of doing what's right for its people.

Great analysis. On the point of China making cheap unreliable things, I have this to illustrate. My entire Victorinox handle broke off after only a light tap. I bought myself a Hezhen chopper from China. It is a little more pricey than the normal Chinese product, but nothing compared to a Western chopper in price. It turned out to be the best buy you can make. Not only is it beautiful and solid, the sharpness is exceptional. I don't think any others could compete. China can definitely make outstanding things if only the buyers were not that cheapskate. I hope China goes into things of quality so that, like Japan, all products Chinese will be held in high esteem

Your are sincere, love you

Thanks Pascal, we need more balanced views on China since the western MSM will definitely not be impartial. Subscribed!

Well Mr Pascal your comments is quite fair but the term of expression favor the west. One thing we must accept is Asian thinking cannot be the same as Western.

**STARTING TO FEEL YELLOW PERIL COMING BACK AGAIN???** **IT NEVER WENT AWAY!!!!**

You are not only knowledgeable, but also just

Thank you so much for discussing human rights in the way you did, your thinking process is very intricate

What you said is simple. Every word being used to blame china, also can be used to blame opponents of china. You can do same thing standing for terrorist against police if you’d like

You know what I call freedom? The the ability to walk at 2:00AM anywhere in my city to eat street food without getting beaten, shot and mugged. Another freedom is not being confronted by drugs, graffiti and the poor homeless. I equate 'true freedom with real safety.'

Very interesting. I have subscribed

what about world terrorism of USA .

Two observations here. Firstly, system or process can not gurantee the best interest of populase. Because western political leader can be elected to run their country thru enfranchised system, but can NOT gurantee the quality governance of leader elected. Secondly, results has the final call. Chinese political system has universal suffrage in bottom political level, but upward mobolity all way to the top is only enabled thru merit system which is a practical and methodological way of proving governance.

Awesome and resonating!

This was a VERY informative video and #8 the political aspect was dead on.. Thanks

Colonialism still breathing well, except it is now disguised as part of the extended territories of its mother country, for example USA has twelve territories such as Guam, Hawaii etc. Same with France which has even more. They should return these lands to the locals and pay compensations for the damages they inflicted.

Many thanks Pascal for trying to put all the differences in one book or in the clip. I think most Chinese look at deliverables and result oriented as against talk only and no action. Individual freedom trend of neo liberalism of allowing everything in human desires is disorderly and chaotic as against set of evolved community laws for the society good is promoted in China. The community laws guaranteed safety and protecting basic human rights to the people at large. And West also fail to see that if any appointed official did not do the job properly, they get the sacked. That's accountability which in a democracy, the chap may not have to face the penalty if he belong to the 1 per cent elite group. You may have a senate hearing but do you think it is working. How many responsible culprits have actually beat the system. Why is there no action taken against Assange allegation on certain powerful persons. That's my opinion. Thanks again.

If you ask people who live in the west, they will mostly say our "leaders" have double standards...

Everytime we point our finger at others , three are pointed at ourselves . Think about this . China has very different culture and is an old civilization . Usa is barely 200++ years old .

Wow, Pascal has only less than 60k subscribers. Great job YT.

You speak slowly for this video, must be conveying something important 👍

Excelente análisis, como siempre!

It's like a couple fighting each other, each person only talks about what good I've done and what bad you've done

👍👍👍😃👌👌👌

Double standard in mind is the reflection of double-universe life in reality. Chinese live in a single-universe world, the natural world, so they only need to deal with challenges from the physical world. People, especially nowadays politicians, in the west live in double-universe world, natural and ideological overlapping, so right hand fighting against left hand is common.

"not so nice to China 200 years ago" , as a Chinese, i will never forget our history

"checks and balances" LMAO

You're too kind in your description of the West behaviors Pascal.

We lie cheat and steal - Pompeo

The one child policy was a part of the one China policy - u.s NSSM200 by Henry Kissinger explains how it works.

In this world:- One man's food to another man is poisoned. One man God to another man is Devi One man's Heaven to another man is Hell. Who is right and who is wrong?

A model of double standards：BBC

Australia has forces labour that people are doing a week work and not enough to pay the bills and food a homeless

I watched a video just few days ago. China selected a successor for president Shi when president Shi ready to retire.

Great conten.

Democracy at all cost,despite homeless ness,no health care,no education n no opportunities.ask anyone on earth what he wants? Nothing is free.Democracy comes with responsibilities as well.🙏🙏🙏pray for logical n rational n peace on earth!!

Copy? Who copied silk production, tea, porcelain, compass, paper, printing, stirup, gunpowder, etc. All invented in China.

when Russian missiles came into Cuba and become the Cuban missile crisis the same thing came up to china and against Taiwan and the United States supported Taiwan and Ukraine. why ?? I really don't understand and it's not fair.

well done

I am Chinese.... forever Chinese

Great and factual video as always Pascal 👍 From : Singapore 🇸🇬

There is no Moral equivalence .... things can be absolute

This video was brilliant and enjoyable. Thanks.!

This was well done! I loved the different perspectives

China: We strive to work hard on building infrastructure, developing our manufacturing industry for the prosperity of our country and for the improvement of the quality of people 's lives. The West: We have to steal, rob or lie to get resources from other weaker countries. We are white. We are better than them. They have to succumb to us. And there are some clear-headed people like me, who have seen through these, please read part of this article appeared on a British newspaper but not written by a British: China is the mother of all gargantuan bullet trains. Every day it manages to create something new and astonishing. And unlike the United States, unlike the British Empire, unlike the French, Dutch, Germans, Spanish, Portuguese or any other Western nation that had its turn at being a superpower in the past four centuries, China doesn’t need to run anybody over or take something from somebody else, to rise majestically. China is also standing up to the West all by herself. The West can’t believe their four-hundred-year-old global supremacy is being challenged. They hoped that the more China developed, the more it would submit to their influence, interests, and leadership. That didn’t happen. So now they will do anything possible, short of a nuclear war, to make China end.

You see the US is so freedom, Every day a lot of people enjoy shooting.. I mean one people shooting at a group of people.. if I have 2 choices to Choose between US and China I prefer living in China because I don't like shooting... Sorry..my English grammar is not good because I translated from my native language to English.. :D

good man.

The bottom line comes to results in the long term of what have you done for your people and your country no matter what words you labeled it. Everyone always protect their family right or wrong that hold true in their country. It’s really bad when you try to tell someone how to live who gives you the right to so. Good you open the minds of some people to think not sure if it is really working until something kicks them in the butt. Arrogance ignorance and lack of knowledge is the problem what you say and what you do tells who you are are you really good or bad?

when Russian missiles came into Cuba and become the Cuban missile crisis the same thing came up to china and against Taiwan and the United States supported Taiwan and Ukraine. why ?? I really don't understand and it's not feir.

Very rational talk, very impressed with the objective analysis. The speaker has a good understanding of China, which is very rare. Good job!

A very good article! An eye opener for the west particularly western politicians.

We all know that to be open minded and step out of our own comfort zone to see the world and other nations with unconscious bias is important. unfortunately in today's world with full of political, economical and cultural competition it is very hard to do so because the media with a lot of influence is directing you not to do so. and from the bottom of people's hard we all want to prove to be better than others, so competion is evitable.

So which is good and better Communist democracy or US democracy ?

Very well explained

Joey and Hunter Obiden made millions from China 🇨🇳 they can’t say nothing 20 per cent for big guy Joey