Wilt would dominate in any era. Chris is a prisoner of the moment.

Chris broussard needs to have this type of conversation with a older NBA player ....coach ...or analyst such as Phil Jackson or Bill Russell.. or Rick Barry... Not someone who was a NFL player or 50 years old.....but someone with understanding what Wilt Chamberlain meant to basketball and could give an honest answer of why he should be top 10 all time

Wilt was a monster on both ends. Steph would be the only player on the top ten list without any All-Defensive team placements. Dude has zero. What's the point in scoring 40 points if the person you're guarding is scoring 50? Such a weird argument to discount defense when every player knows its hard to be a two way player. Don't leave that part out of the argument.

Chris is sad for taking Wilt out.. Wilt is by far the greatest athlete in the history of sports.... he’s top 10 off record alone.. not to mention steals and blocks weren’t even recorded back then.

Chris I've watched you for years and I think you are the best on every show you appear on but brother you are 💯 percent wrong for taking Wilt out of your top 10🤬💯😎

Wilt scored 61 percent of his points from midrange that’s facts and I have the evidence .. you dudes don’t realize you couldn’t play bully ball in that era or was offensive foul every time

I love how Broussard focuses on Wilt's low scoring in the finals without bringing up how dominant of a rebounder and shot-blocker plus playmaker he was in those finals. Like, take for instance the 1972 finals. As here are Wilt's stat lines in those finals. GAME 1 12 PTS 19 REBS 0 BLKS GAME 2 23 PTS 24 REBS 4 ASTS 8 BLKS GAME 3 26 PTS 20 REBS 9 BLKS GAME 4 12 PTS 24 REBS 12 BLKS GAME 5 24 PTS 29 REBS 4 ASTS 8 BLKS NBA FINALS AVERAGE 19.4 PTS 23.3 REBS 7.4 BLKS As for 1970, he had the only 20-20 .60.0 Finals in NBA history (a 23.2 ppg, 24.1 rpg, .62.5 seven-game series in the '70 Finals despite coming off a serious knee injury that caused him to miss over 70 games that season. While in the 1967 finals Wilt in the first two games of the 1967 Finals averaged: 13.0 PPG 35.5 RPG 10.0 APG 9.5 BPG And for the entire series he averaged 17.7 PPG (12.5 FGA) 28.5 RPG 6.8 APG 56% FG% 10 BPG Wilt’s 6.8 APG also stands as the record for highest APG by a Center in the Finals.

I heard Rob was at the Warriors championship parade in a Steph Curry jersey 😭😭

I love Bill Russell; he's one of my best friends. But, the greatest player I ever saw was Wilt Chamberlain. There's no question. -- Jerry West I scored 35 points a game for a season. You're asking me to score another 15? Nobody can do that! Look: Wilt averaged 50 points a game one year and 24 rebounds. So, to say anybody but Wilt Chamberlain is the greatest player of all time is just insane. -- Rick Barry Earl Monroe: Wilt Chamberlain would average 50 points a game today. Walt Frazier: No, 60.

How can 90's bigs like Oakley, Mason, and Ewing be physical with Steph on the 3-point line, with all those screens, fakes, relocating, and ball-handling? Skinny Reggie succeeded, and Iverson succeeded. Steph is like Reggie X Iverson, so he could succeed in any era.

from what i recall, many of wilt's low scoring finals came when he was not the team's a primary scorer. even the 68 sixers won when wilt stepped back from scoring and led the league in assists. and elgin and jerry west were at the end of their careers when wilt played with them (as was wilt). i agree that he was clearly not the kind of crazily driven winner like bill russell or mj. but i think bru is cherry picking with those critiques. i agree completely with ephraim, wilt would DOMINATE in any era. in his era when there was no shaq, he was a gentle giant, the absolute opposite of shaq who intentionally bullied everyone. wilt had much more finesse in his game than shaq ever could. not dissing shaq, he was absolutely dominant, but i think the difference in style of play needs to be considered when comparing them. if wilt wanted to run over people the way shaq did, he would do so with ease in ANY era. he was unquestionably the strongest dude to ever play in the nba. and he had skills that shaq could only dream of; the fadeaway bank shot, the sweet finger roll, the up and under, etc.folks don't give wilt his due.

For as much hate as Wilt gets to this day for only winning two rings. I'll just say that he anchored two of the greatest teams to ever play and was their leader. The 1966-1967 Philadelphia 76ers, which went an absurd 68-13 And the 1971-1972 Los Angeles Lakers, which went 69-13, famously winning 33 games in a row. Plus Wilt's teams over his career played 1045 season games + 160 playoff games. They won 672 season + 88 playoff games. Season win%: 64.3 Playoff win%: 55 Total games win%: 63.1 Plus, the only team to win more titles than his team's during his time, or have higher win%s during his time was the Celtics who were the dominant dynasty from the late 50s through the entire 60s.

I hate when analysts bring up physicality in the 90s as a factor when IT was smaller than steph and didnt struggle himself.

Everyone has a different top 10 and it’s okay. Some players will be in almost everyone’s top 10, just in different order.

Chris disqualifies his hold list leaving Wilt Chamberlain off his list. He has records that are still standing. He is only analyst on earth that has Wilt off his list. 😮

You CANNOT take Wilt out of the Top 10. That’s blasphemy. At least one person on here has some sense. Chris removed Wilt based on a hypothetical. Smh

Chris said Steph handle better than Iverson Lost all credibility

Bad comparison. An ACL tear was an career ending injury back in those days. Guys played in Cloth shoes on a wooden basketball court. They traveled by bus and didn't have all of this medicine and workout equipment to help. No 3 point line, poor nutrition, and other factors that today's players don't have to face.

Brou makes great points. Great breakdown of Wilts finals performances. Listen up Nick Wright, school is in session.

Chris Broussard is the definition of "in the moment" kind of guy

You gotta be crazy leaving wilt out of top 5 not top 10

It was very tough but I ended up taking Wilt out for Steph too. The main reason for me is, in terms of world we live in today. Just look at how Westbrook in Thunder and Harden in Houston dominated the stats for a couple of years with triple doubles and scoring respectively. Both are amazing accomplishments, but yet Westbrook averaging another triple double year and Harden averaging scoring 35 or even 50 a game doesnt have much impact anymore until they start leading and winning titles because of it. Wilt would always be one of the best players in history but he definitely wouldve been scrutinised more in today's world despite him winning those 2 championships and godly stats. In the end, its tough and subjective, so thats what makes it a good conversation for everyone.

Oh Wilt played with Jerry West huh? So are we forgetting that Steph had to get KD to beat LeBron. Interesting what holds a player back but doesn't matter with another. Oh well.

The only thing Steph can do better than Wilt is shooting from the 3pt line. Wilt could pass better, block better, rebound better, defend better, and score better. Steph would be a non-factor in Wilt's era, cause the 3-point line did not exist, so cut Steph's points in half for his career had he played in the 60s. Wilt would still be pretty much dominant in this era. Steph never played in a clear underdog team in his life. Wilt's life is defined by playing in underdog teams until he came to LA.

Steph is a great player and he's my favorite of this generation. He's not in my top 10 though. And he's DEFINITELY not over Wilt. >You can argue offense. Wilt's a better scorer who can shoot. Steph's a better shooter who can score. But there's a giant gap on defense in favor of Wilt. >Here is Curry's career stats. 24.3 points, 6.5 assists, 1.7 steals, 0.2 blocks, and 4.6 rebounds. Those numbers are not impressive to me. Maybe the assists are good for an off ball player. But that's it. >Wilt is a 4x MVP-3 times consecutively. Curry is a 2x MVP-and the 2016 MVP is incredibly controversial. People heavily disagreed with him being the first ever unanomous MVPs when so many other seasons were more suited for it. >Curry is a 4x all nba first team member. Meaning the league thought he was a 1st rate player 4 seasons in a 13 year span and counting. Wilt is a 7x all NBA first team member in a 14 year span. >While Wilt only won 2 chips-both wins were legit. Curry's recent victory was the most legit chip he won. In 2015, he was losing until Kyrie got injured. In 2016, he blew a 3-1 lead. Then he added KD to help him win in 17 and 18. This is a guy who's first 3 chips came from freak circumstances which is why he didn't win the finals MVP for any of them. Him proving himself this year doesn't change that. I can't ignore all of that because "today's players are under more scrutiny" and because Wilt's a playoff choker (as Chris used). His overally resume would need improvement.

Hey, Chris, you left something out: In 1967, Wilt Chamberlain led Philadelphia to an NBA record 68 wins and to the NBA championship. You are correct that he averaged 17.7 points per game in the finals that year. Here's what you neglected to mention: How many rebounds did Wilt average in those Finals? Answer: 28.5. Wilt was the clear MVP, but, as is pointed out below, the formal award was only awarded beginning in 1969. In 1972, Wilt Chamberlain led the Lakers to an NBA record 69 wins and to the NBA championship. Wilt averaged 19 points per game. Again, how many rebounds did Wilt average in those Finals? Answer: 19.2. Who was the NBA Finals MVP that year, when Wilt was "coming up short?" Answer: Wilt Chamberlain. Examples could be multiplied, but I'll leave it at that.

Let me say this, anybody who has Wilt Chamberlain out of the top 3, much less the top 10, has no idea what they're talking about. Wilt was the Babe Ruth of basketball. Ask any baseball writer today who were the top 10 players ever, and almost all of them would have Ruth, Mays, and Henry Aaron in the top 5. Most of the writers never saw Aaron and Mays play and none of them saw Ruth play. They picked them because they understand history and they're not blinded by the shiny new toys of today. The lack of respect given to Wilt by guys who call themselves basketball experts is stunning. There's not enough double talk that this clown Broussard can provide that can explain how a man who STILL owns 72 NBA records, many of which will never be broken, is not in the top 10. He can't explain how you keep a man who is the only player in the history of the sport that had the league change its rules to specifically stop HIM, is not worthy of a top 10. They didn't change the rules for Jordan, LeBron, or Curry.

Saying that Iverson is not a top 5 ball handler is perfect to me. Ppl confuse crossover with handles. You could steal balls from AI, something you couldn't do from players like Kyrie, Nash, Jamal Crawford and Pistol. There are different levels to it

Steph would took atleast 10 ankles per game in 80's and 90's

WILT definitely the GOAT wit da LADEEZ.....20,000+

Wilt will always be on my top 5 list for a couple reasons. The only player to ever lead the league at one time or another in scoring, rebounding and assist. The only player to average 48 min a game in one season. Never fouled out in his career. The night he set the NBA record for grabbing 55 boards, Russell was on the court, and known for his rebounding. One of only two players to have a 20-20-20 game. Rest my case!

The year he averaged 50 the next best players avg was 31

The only real reason Wilt ain’t have more rings is because he played during the most dominant run for a team in pro sports history but everyone is entitled to their list.

After leaving Wilt off his top ten list, Chris should have his sports journalists card revoked.

You can’t argue ‘if he played today’ to support keeping him on the top 10 list. He doesn’t play today.

A generation from now, Steph will undoubtedly be considered a top 10 player, and this debate will be irrelevant. Steph won’t get his due respect until the next generation.

Chris you are normally on your game to drop wilt Chamberlain off is a damn disgrace....you cannot drop wilt out of top 10 the guy has average 50 points and 25 rebs ..55 rebs in a game and a 100 point game

I believe Chris has Wilt #4 in his top 10 list a couple years ago. How can you drop #4 out of the top 10? I disagree with Chris. Curry was top 20 before winning his 4th and he's top 15 after winning his 4th

It's because in the finals teams would triple team Wilt, and Wilt's team was so ridiculously weak they couldn't make shots. When he had decent talent he won, and was on 2 of the greatest teams in history. His scoring average did come down, because his coach told him to focus on defense and rebounding...Those low averages that Chris pointed out in playoff games came after Wilt had a career ruining knee injury. His playoff averages before the injury was just fine.

Curry over Chamberlain is just down right DELUSIONAL!!!! 🤦🏼‍♂️

I ain’t listening without Rob.

I like how people say he wouldn’t be able to thrive in the 90s but Reggie Miller who weighs the same as Steph but is like 3-5 inches taller skinny ass took MJ to a game 7….

Chris is right stephs impact on winning is better than wilts clearly being he has more rings and he has been the best at his position for years now also he changed the way the game is played. Yes wilt has his own stat book but we gotta nitpick and you play to win the game not create your own stat book even tho both have done so therefore steph had won more so he has to go in and wilt is out for steph. Hell just for context i know y'all dont like it but Steph has 4 rings in 11 years played bcuz he missed 2 from injury and bron has 4 rings in 19 yrs and no missed seasons. Steph is an more efficient winner than bron these are facts man's is neck and neck with em go argue with a wall about these facts

Steph ain't top 10... Stop it.... Top 15

The guy’s argument about that Wilt would dominate today’s NBA is ridiculous. The reason why we don’t see traditional big centers in NBA any more is because based on the current rules, traditional Centers will not survive on both ends. Therefore the GM don’t draft them and the young kids are not trained to be them

We have got to stop slighting Curry. I get it. He’s not a physically imposing type of player that we’re use to but he has too many accolades at this point to keep him out of the top ten. Period! We have to face it the fact that some of the old players are being surpassed at this point by current players and that’s okay. With that said Wilt has to go. Stop refuting with a bunch of nonsensical hypotheticals to keep him out. Welcome to the top ten Steph. Well deserved.

It's so frustrating in Basketball when discussing a player's career ranking we leave out the biggest factor, which is the other 9 players on the court. Argue all you want about Wilt's stats vs wins, but look at his teammates/competition each time. Same goes for every damn player. Teamwork makes the dreamwork and will always beat individual excellence, the ball moves faster than the player. It's pretty peculiar to Ball too, most other team sports talk about teams.

This was Asinine, AsiTEN, AsiEleven, AsiTwelve ! Stop disrespecting Wilt... There are not 5 players better than the big dipper The real top 10 are as follows: 1. Kareem 2. MJ 3. Wilt 4. Kobe 5. Magic 6. Shaq 7. Duncan 8. Russell 9. LeBron 10. Steph

Steph ain't in my top ten and Wilt not being in the top ten renders any list a joke.

This is GREAT!!! Keep Rob off the Show!!!

Playoff series: 7-1: Russell's Celtics vs. Wilt's teams 20-1: Russell's Celtics vs. non-Wilt teams 17-4: Wilt's teams vs. non-Celtics Wilt had more championships from 1960 to 1972 than any non-Celtics player. People can say what they want about Wilt but "loser" is not a logically appropriate label for him. As if not for facing the most stacked team ever he would have at minimum 6 to 7 rings.

Javale McGee is a freak athlete and he’s a role player. Chill about the 90’s. It wasn’t mad max and the thunder dome. More importantly you had illegal defense in the 90’s. Steph is going to have single coverage north of the foul line. He would destroy that league.

Still holds untouchable records 50 years later…Rebound all time leader, 100 point game, only center to ever lead the league in assists, less teams back in the day so he played against Bill Russell numerous times and one game had 55 rebounds on Russell, and the list goes on…He’ll always remain in the top 10!

These conversations crack me up. "Not top 10"???? Wilt is the GOAT, and it Isn't Even Close.

Wilt and Russell dominated when they were only 8 and 9 teams and the league still had part time NBA players. No disrespect to their accomplishments but they are the next 2 to move out

Thank you Chris for being in the media

You're the best analyst my bro was telling me about kawhi leanord and lebron agreement years ago I think he mentioned your name idk but I just found out where he got the information from typing in LeBron kawhi and lighting to your video realizing you'd be someone who had that insight and it's real

I know Wilt had monster numbers, despite scoring low, during the Finals. But, this is why I see it as a mistake when you try to compare the greats' numbers against each other. As they explicit always said with Andrew Wiggins, "he's an empty calories guy". All stats, no winning. And I know the greats are obviously winning, that's why they're in that discussion. It isn't a comparison with Wiggins, but a comparison of how effective were you against your competition. The thing with Wilt is, he wasn't as much during the important times. Wilt competed against the Celtics, and yes they were monstrous, but he had a lot of opportunities post-Bill Russell as well. And from all that time, he only got two. And was the best on only one. I also hate it when they say, "He's the Shaq of that era.". Because it's a little unfair to Shaq. Why? Shaq was a three-time Finals MVP during a threepeat. Yeah, he had Kobe, but then that dismisses the fact that Wilt had Jerry West (plus Goodrich and Baylor). This is why I think the case for Steph over Wilt is a little compelling and convincing. Steph actually steps up in the big games. He's performing at the same level or better during the playoffs and the Finals. Despite that bad 2016 stat, which people forget was him coming in early from an injury, he's been relatively good. During the KD years as well, he was going toe to toe with KD in performance stat-wise, and then the eye test, which is seeing Steph's abnormal gravity, is a testament to his greatness. Aside from that, Steph dominated his era in his position. People would say you're coked up if you say anyone else was better at the point (unless you say it's LeBron, but that's a different argument for now). There are only a few people you can say that with. Wilt wasn't. Bill and Kareem have outperformed him (and several other centers as well). Anyways, that's just my two cents on the Wilt v Steph. I say that but I actually have both in the Top 10. And I actually still have Wilt over Steph (the regular season stats are just astronomical to overlook), but that being said, one more championship jumps Steph over a lot of people. And I think the Top 11 are now the different class. It's just a matter of rankings. The 11 are: MJ, LeBron, Kareem, Magic, Bill, Wilt, Larry, Kobe, Steph, Shaq, Tim. I placed Tim outside the Top 10 because no matter how good his stats and performance was, he wasn't a game-changer. He wasn't perceived as someone who changed the game. All the ones in the Top 10, you can't tell a summarized story of the NBA without mentioning their names. That is the impact that I'm looking at. Then there are two barely outside of this class but are literally just a hair below: KD & Hakeem. If Steph gets another ring, we can say he won more without KD than with KD. And if that's another Finals MVP for Steph (5 rings, 2 FMVPs, 2 MVPs), which I expect, he's easily jumping Larry (3 rings, 2 FMVPs, 3 MVPs) & Kobe (5 rings, 2 FMVPs, 1MVP), and in my eyes, even Wilt. Sidenote: If Draymond hadn't gotten injured, the Warriors would retain their #1 spot in the West. And if they perform as well as they've done during the start of the season, Steph would still be ranked #1 in the MVP rankings. Steph could've had four MVPs in one season.

Wilt told Jordan he would average 60 points a year if he played in his era.

All these box score fans defending Wilt whiel forgetting that stats are inflated back then due to the fast pace they play. 50 pts before is like 35 points today... but sure lets assume Wilt beats Steph in terms of box score stats. Steph beats him in terms of winning impact, rings, +/- which is more important. High numbers means nothing when it doesn't contribute to winning.

I ain't taken Wilt out of the top 10 over Steph, man please.

Chris what are you smoking to disrespect hakeem like this

So u mean to tell me Wilt only averaged 18 ppg in the finals and y’all call Steph a finals chocker imagine if Steph averaged that in the finals. Steph>Wilt all time.

What doesn’t make sense is Chris gave a perfect reason why Wilt would be out. Y’all talk about what happens in the playoffs and he didn’t perform in the playoff. Steph has perform in every level.

If you're valuing impact on winning, look at the stat of % wins added to their team when a player plays vs doesn't play: Steph is #1 all time with ~32%, Lebron #2 with ~30.6%, MJ #3 with ~26% (I think JimmyHighRoller did vid on this). He won before and after KD. Plus Steph completely changed the game. He broke the meta of basketball. Gamers know that anything that causes a meta change is overpowered. Steph is literally overpowered. Steph will eventually go down in the Top 3 to GOAT debate. People will realize this over time.

Guys Wilt ran a 10.9 100 meter dash, shot putted 56 feet. And won the high jump championships straight years in college. We are literally talking about an elite athlete of in Era. Put some respect on this man's name. Also he was 7'1 doing all this stuff. He was a freak of nature.

Let's use Salaam's logic in reverse and put prime Steph in wilt's era....with no 3s he would average 50!

Chris really needs a new partner. This podcast would take off if they got rid of rob.

Chris B. said he cared about winning. How about this, then? Wilt has the 3rd highest win share total in NBA history. Only Kareem and LeBron are above him, and they had four and three more seasons to surpass him, respectively. LeBron barely edges him out, 249 to 247. Steph is in 46th place, with less than half of Wilt's total (120.23 for Steph, 247.26 for Wilt). Ok, but that's the regular season. What about in the playoffs? Wilt is 6th, and Steph is 24th.

EPHRAIM physically is describing James Wiseman when describing Wilt.

Gosh I don't understand why Hakeem isn't the top 10 discussions. Talk about doing it at both end of the floor and transcending the game. Hakeem footwork was impeccable and he could shoot the J. So skilled that the great players of this era seek him out to work on their game.

IF DRAYMOND GREEN DID HAD THESE NUMBERS AVERAGE IN FINALS SERIES, Broussard would pass out! Wilt Chamberlain 1965 Finals Points avg 29.4 Rebounds 27.6 Assists 2.4 Wilt Chamberlain 1967 Finals Points 17.7 Rebounds 28.5 Assists 6.8 MVP Wilt Chamberlain 1969 Finals Points 11.7 Rebounds 25.0 Assists 3.0 Wilt Chamberlain 1970 Finals Points 23.3 Rebounds 24.1 Assists 4.0 Wilt Chamberlain 1972 Finals Points 19.4 Rebounds 23.2 Assists 2.6 MVP (Game 5 1972 24 points 29 rebounds 8 assists 8 blocks - A game LeBron is incapable of doing)

Shooting can thrive in any era.

Chris this is your worst take Wilt has been the most dominant center of all time not to mention player period it's like a human playing against a gorilla stop it with this prisoner of the moment

WILT chamberlain legacy is unquestioned you can't fault a guy who was so dominant nobody was on his level Chris is smoking something.

wilt was playing 5 on 1 in the finals

If its all about impact on winning than the greatest player all time is Bill Russell by a long shot.

How can shaq not be on the list? Most dominant player I’ve seen . Longevity is the only reason he only won 4 championships

Wilt and/or Bill can be replaced. Bill averaged under 20 ppg, shot under 50% from the field as a center, played with 5+ hofers every year, and won championships in a league when there were only 9 teams. Is he an all time great? Yes!!! Is he undeniably in the top 10? No so fast my friend!

Chris is showing BS , he knows damn well that in Wilt & Russell era the best players WEREN'T ALLOWED to play in the league... Wilt would've dominated in ANY ERA , that's why he holds records ( that means you're the only one to have accomplished that feat)... the lack of championships are because the Celtics had stacked squads & ownership that was willing to INCLUDE players that other teams wouldn't allow to play...Steph only had one finals that he lead his team to a title , he was sort of a role player or disappointment in all other finals... Chris stop trying to start a weak narrative for Steph to exclude Wilt on your list. You do the same thing for Lebron to try to make him leapfrog Kareem, Kareem's basketball resume far exceeds ANYONE on any of your list (it's written & etched in stone , it's HIStory 😆). Stop reaching (preaching) , you're starting to taint your reputation bro 👎🏾

Bill Russel is not a top 10 player I’m sorry to break the news. He’s a legend a hall of Famer and important to the history of the game. But there were 10 teams in the league, he’s was the tallest player at 6/9 and the talent was not there all around. He averaged like 15 points at the height of his career I mean come on.

Wilt Chamberlain is a monster

For context about Wilt's finals average. 1964 is Wilt's only NBA Finals series that his team had him looking to score when they fed him in the post. He attempted 24 shots per game during that series as opposed to only 11.7 shots per game average for the rest of his NBA finals career (30 additional games). This has led many to see his 18.6 finals ppg and conclude he must have not been as capable as his regular-season career number indicates. But it’s actually because his role changed so much and he played far more finals (relative to his regular-season career) in a fewer shot attempt role. This is weighted as such because he had more Finals appearances late in his career vs those early years where he was blowing up PPG records.

Wilt is the best athlete ever in the NBA....These clowns are a disgrace

Wilt probably was triple teamed in those finals. Need footage. Not just numbers. Sorry.

He top 11-15

I hate to do it, because I have so much respect for what he went through and he's the definition of a winner. I would take out Mr. Russell and replace him/w Steph. My top ten is based on numbers, talent, the it factor, winning and who would I draft number #1.

The desperation puttin steph in the top10🤮

Let’s be real the issue is some players have to be top 10 just bc,wilt and bill have spots no matter what,there’s a few players better then them but won’t get tht nod Bc of the respect those two got

Why would he take out Wilt? Shouldn't he take out whoever he has a number 10, Steph wouldn't move up that much just from winning another Championship. He has him at 8 now. Before he had him between 12-15. Doesn't make sense.

Listening to this makes me realize these guys are no longer talking about true basketball they’re just using their love of certain players and their hatred for certain players and talking about it. When Chris is asking them why couldn’t he do this in different areas and they don’t have one thing to say you realize they already made up their mind.

And Steph would have cook the sh*t out of Wilt's eras guards (and I'm definitely not a Steph fan). Everybody always "would be dominant in X era" 😂

Time for a vacation mr Broussard PRISONER OF THE MOMENT lmao

Some people have and always will hate Steph.

Why are they acting like 1v1 doesn't matter? Its very important to be able to guard your man and stay in front of him, thats just a useful skill in general and team defense is important but iso defense is just as important to stop drives. And also, 1v1 scoring is important too. I love team basketball when the ball is moving and it creates open shots. But when you're facing a team with a strong defense, that doesn't always work.. if your offense fails, it's very valuable to have a great 1v1 player to bail you out with a go to move.

I like Steph and what he's done so far in his NBA career, but to replace who many consider to be the greatest big man of all time does'nt make any sense. You don't replace a big man with a guard. If you choose a first and second team with point guards and shooting guards. You got Oscar and Magic on the first and second team. MJ and Kobe shooting guards. Wilt and Kareem the centers, The Mail Man and Tim Duncan my two power forwards, and LaBron along with John Havlicek small forwards. These are my picks and I know someone will even question these, but Steph could possibly fit into the top thirty or maybe even twenty but not the top ten.

IF YOU GOT STEPHEN CURRY IN YOUR NBA TOP 10(HE SHOULDN'T BE) .. AND DON'T HAVE OL'🐐👑 WILT CHAMBERLAIN IN YOUR TOP 3 .. YOU NEED YOUR 🏀 TALKING PRIVILEGES REVOKED ..

Steph is a better playoff performer than Kobe especially in the finals check the numbers. Kobe shouldn’t be in the top 10. Wilt and Shaq severely underachieved when it comes to what they should have been.

I’d place those two teams where Wilt Chamberlain won the championship to beat any era’s champions the NBA has ever produced. Only Michael Jordan can claim to be a greater player. And I’m talking about players in their prime. Lou Al cinder prime versus chamberlains prime, I’m picking Chamberlain

And y'all say Rob Parker is a fool...listen to Chris when it's a Steph topic... he goes completely brainless